On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Ramasubramanian Ramesh wrote:
> >I think you ran into this problem:
> >http://blog.ronnyegner-consulting.de/2011/08/18/ext4-and-the-16-tb-limit-now-solved/
> >
> >I know of no way to get resize2fs to work with partitions larger than
> >16 TB, however in the blog post it's expla
> Hi,
>
> I have kernel 3.13 and e2fsprog 1.42.9 (as part of mybuntu 14.04.5 LTS).
> With this, is it possible to resize2fs my ext4 RAID6 /dev/md0 to 24TB (ie
> >16TB)? If so, please help me get there. If not, please recommend the
> upgrades needed to the setup before this
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Ram Ramesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have kernel 3.13 and e2fsprog 1.42.9 (as part of mybuntu 14.04.5 LTS).
> With this, is it possible to resize2fs my ext4 RAID6 /dev/md0 to 24TB (ie
> >16TB)? If so, please help me get there. If not, pl
Hi,
I have kernel 3.13 and e2fsprog 1.42.9 (as part of mybuntu 14.04.5
LTS). With this, is it possible to resize2fs my ext4 RAID6 /dev/md0 to
24TB (ie >16TB)? If so, please help me get there. If not, please
recommend the upgrades needed to the setup before this can be done. So,
far,
On Sonntag, 11. September 2016 11:43:17 PYT Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On 09/11/2016 08:59 AM, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
> > On Sonntag, 11. September 2016 08:12:24 PYT Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2016 06:37 AM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On 09/10/2016 07:57 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> On 09
On 09/11/2016 08:59 AM, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
On Sonntag, 11. September 2016 08:12:24 PYT Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/11/2016 06:37 AM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 07:57 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 03:34 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 03:28 PM, Tony Baldwin wro
On Sonntag, 11. September 2016 09:17:41 PYT Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> On 09/11/2016 08:54 AM, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
> > On Sonntag, 11. September 2016 08:12:24 PYT Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2016 06:37 AM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On 09/10/2016 07:57 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> On
On 09/11/2016 08:54 AM, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
On Sonntag, 11. September 2016 08:12:24 PYT Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/11/2016 06:37 AM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 07:57 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 03:34 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 03:28 PM, Tony Baldwin wro
On Sonntag, 11. September 2016 08:12:24 PYT Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> On 09/11/2016 06:37 AM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> > On 09/10/2016 07:57 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> >> On 09/10/2016 03:34 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On 09/10/2016 03:28 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On 09/10/2016 03:07 PM,
On Sonntag, 11. September 2016 08:12:24 PYT Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> On 09/11/2016 06:37 AM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> > On 09/10/2016 07:57 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> >> On 09/10/2016 03:34 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On 09/10/2016 03:28 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On 09/10/2016 03:07 PM,
On 09/11/2016 06:37 AM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 07:57 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 03:34 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 03:28 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 03:07 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
Le quintidi 25 fructidor, an CCXXIV, Anthony Baldwin a écrit
On 09/10/2016 07:57 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 03:34 PM, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 03:28 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote:
On 09/10/2016 03:07 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
Le quintidi 25 fructidor, an CCXXIV, Anthony Baldwin a écrit :
I apologize, but, I've never quite figured o
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:16:11 +0200
Nicolas George wrote:
> Le nonidi 29 thermidor, an CCXXIV, Yousif AL-Torki a écrit :
> > 1) caps lock key has no LED & no option to make indicator to be
> > seen on screen to indicate caps lock key whether on or off. There
> > is "Caps Lock Indicator" on Ubuntu
Le nonidi 29 thermidor, an CCXXIV, Yousif AL-Torki a écrit :
> 1) caps lock key has no LED & no option to make indicator to be seen on
> screen to indicate caps lock key whether on or off. There is "Caps Lock
> Indicator" on Ubuntu but it is not available on Debian repositories. Only
> Debian with
a. I prefer Debian also because it has much more applications package
than Fedora. It seem that Debian by default will never support my laptop as
Fedora untill Strech version (version 9) released as stable & this may take 2
years ! Please help me to run Debian on this laptop without these problems.
Best.
On 06/28/2015 10:49 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Nick Metz writes:
Ah.. sorry you have the Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG right?
did you modprobe ipw2200 ?? I cant ' t find it on your output of lsmod
Then, after installing firmware-ipw2x00, I did:
# modprobe ipw2200
, but still nothing
On Monday 29 June 2015 18:43:20 Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Brad Rogers writes:
> > On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:50:28 +0100
> > Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >
> > Hello Rodolfo,
> >
> >>, that can be shifted on the left or right position. So the device
> >>*should* be there, but it gives no sign to be alive..
Brad Rogers writes:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:50:28 +0100
> Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> Hello Rodolfo,
>
>>, that can be shifted on the left or right position. So the device
>>*should* be there, but it gives no sign to be alive...
>
> With much electronic equipment, /especially/ computers, existen
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:50:28 +0100
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Hello Rodolfo,
>, that can be shifted on the left or right position. So the device
>*should* be there, but it gives no sign to be alive...
With much electronic equipment, /especially/ computers, existence of a
switch, port or other exter
Lisi Reisz writes:
> On Monday 29 June 2015 17:26:59 Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> Optional: Wlan Switch/TV-in Port.
>
> But you say that you have got the switch??
Sure, it's something small, 2.5cm all together, like this:
OFF-- ON
|Wireless|
--
, that can b
Lisi Reisz writes:
> On Monday 29 June 2015 16:53:22 Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> David Wright writes:
>> > Glad to hear you've got it working.
>>
>> Thanks, it was thanks to you listers' help.
>>
>> > For cases where the linux drivers *don't* work, the windows driver can be
>> > used with ndiswrapp
On Monday 29 June 2015 17:26:59 Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Optional: Wlan Switch/TV-in Port.
But you say that you have got the switch??
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: htt
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> David Wright writes:
>
>> I don't know what hardware you have, but some older laptops came with
>> *optional* wireless, so that might explain it "not working". Do the FCC/CE
>> stickers give any clues?
>
> The fabricant specifications say that my old Hyundai laptop has
On Monday 29 June 2015 16:53:22 Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> David Wright writes:
> > Glad to hear you've got it working.
>
> Thanks, it was thanks to you listers' help.
>
> > For cases where the linux drivers *don't* work, the windows driver can be
> > used with ndiswrapper.
> >
> > In the case of my
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:53:22PM +0100, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> The fabricant specifications say that my old Hyundai laptop has an Intel
> PRO/Wireless 2200BG, whose driver, according to https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi,
> should be in the firmware-ipw2x00 Debian package which I installed via
> apti
David Wright writes:
> Glad to hear you've got it working.
Thanks, it was thanks to you listers' help.
> For cases where the linux drivers *don't* work, the windows driver can be
> used with ndiswrapper.
>
> In the case of my Zyxel G302v3, I blacklist the rtl8180 module (which thinks
> it can
Glad to hear you've got it working.
Quoting Rodolfo Medina (rodolfo.med...@gmail.com):
> David Wright writes:
>
> > Quoting Rodolfo Medina (rodolfo.med...@gmail.com):
> >> The WiFi hardware on my machine should be Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG, but it
> >> is probably dead, because installing firmwa
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> But now it seems to work. I tried what suggested by some listers, to use the
> Debian installation CD to see if my WiFi usb device was detected and could
> reach the net, but the network configuration failed, maybe also because I
> didn't know what DHCP hostname to put t
David Wright writes:
> Quoting Rodolfo Medina (rodolfo.med...@gmail.com):
>> The WiFi hardware on my machine should be Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG, but it
>> is probably dead, because installing firmware-ipw2x00 had no effect. But I
>> have some other WiFi hardware, that I bought yesterday and tha
Quoting Rodolfo Medina (rodolfo.med...@gmail.com):
> Brian writes:
>
> > On Sun 28 Jun 2015 at 17:16:19 +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 15:54 +0100, Brian wrote:
> >> > BTW, 70-persistent-net.rules does not show what hardware is on the
> >> > system. However, it does s
On Sunday 28 June 2015 22:05:39 Ric Moore wrote:
> On 06/28/2015 04:26 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> > The WiFi hardware on my machine should be Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG, but
> > it is probably dead, because installing firmware-ipw2x00 had no effect.
> > But I have some other WiFi hardware, that I
On 06/28/2015 04:26 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
The WiFi hardware on my machine should be Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG, but it is
probably dead, because installing firmware-ipw2x00 had no effect. But I have
some other WiFi hardware, that I bought yesterday and that's detected - so it
seems - on wlan
Brian writes:
> On Sun 28 Jun 2015 at 17:16:19 +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 15:54 +0100, Brian wrote:
>> > BTW, 70-persistent-net.rules does not show what hardware is on the
>> > system. However, it does show that at some time in the past wlan0
>> > used a USB wireless
On Sun 28 Jun 2015 at 17:16:19 +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 15:54 +0100, Brian wrote:
> > BTW, 70-persistent-net.rules does not show what hardware is on the
> > system. However, it does show that at some time in the past wlan0
> > used a USB wireless device.
>
> I know, bu
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 14:49:00 +
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> it still won't connect in WiFi
> mode. But maybe the solution is coming. What should I do now?
>
If you're feeling desperate, and I do know the feeling, you might
invest some download time in a recent Knoppix. It's not guaranteed to
On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 15:54 +0100, Brian wrote:
> BTW, 70-persistent-net.rules does not show what hardware is on the
>
> system. However, it does show that at some time in the past wlan0
> used a USB wireless device.
I know, but at the time it was posted it was the best clue to the wifi
hardware
On Sun 28 Jun 2015 at 13:40:36 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Nick Metz writes:
>
> > Can you please send the output of lspci and lsmod? So we can see if the
> > hardware is their and driver is loaded.
>
> I read the pc's technical paper and its wireless device should be Intel
> PRO/Wireless 22
Nick Metz writes:
> Ah.. sorry you have the Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG right?
>
> did you modprobe ipw2200 ?? I cant ' t find it on your output of lsmod
Then, after installing firmware-ipw2x00, I did:
# modprobe ipw2200
, but still nothing seemed to be changed in all the outputs of the various
Ah.. sorry you have the Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG right?
did you modprobe ipw2200 ?? I cant ' t find it on your output of lsmod
best regards
Nick
Am 28.06.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Nick Metz:
Hi Rodolfo,
sorry i think i missed a reply, is the wirelss card inside or external
via usb?
Anyway if
Hi Rodolfo,
sorry i think i missed a reply, is the wirelss card inside or external
via usb?
Anyway if it is an intel card you have to install and modrobe iwlwifi
https://wiki.debian.org/iwlwifi
after modprobe iwlwifi the interface should be their.
best regards
Nick
Am 28.06.2015 um 15:4
On Sunday 28 June 2015 14:30:12 Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 13:39 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 June 2015 13:22:13 Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 13:16 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >
> > No, Rodolpho Medino wrote:
>
> Sorry, I replied to the wrong mail
writes:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 02:20:32PM +0200, Nick Metz wrote:
>>
>> Can you please send the output of lspci and lsmod? So we can see if
>> the hardware is their and driver is loaded.
>
> Perhaps the output of "sudo rfkill list" might be interesting too
> (rfkill manages the enable/disable
Nick Metz writes:
> Can you please send the output of lspci and lsmod? So we can see if the
> hardware is their and driver is loaded.
I read the pc's technical paper and its wireless device should be Intel
PRO/Wireless 2200BG, whose driver, according to https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi,
should be i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 02:20:32PM +0200, Nick Metz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you please send the output of lspci and lsmod? So we can see if
> the hardware is their and driver is loaded.
Perhaps the output of "sudo rfkill list" might be interesting too
(
On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 13:39 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 28 June 2015 13:22:13 Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 13:16 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> No, Rodolpho Medino wrote:
Sorry, I replied to the wrong mail. But he did post that, so if that is
his wifi it should be a real
On Sunday 28 June 2015 13:22:13 Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 13:16 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
No, Rodolpho Medino wrote:
> > > # USB device 0x:0x (r8188eu)
> > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> > > ATTR{address}=="14:cc:20:11:82:ec", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0",
> >
> > A
y:dffc-dffd
shows up - as far as I understand - nothing about WiFi.
Please help abilitate WiFi connection on that PC. With google I couldn't
work it out.
Have you got the driver for your wifi card? and is it installed?
Lisi
--
Nick Metz
FHE3 GmbH, Leopoldstr. 5, 76133 Karlsr
On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 13:16 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > # USB device 0x:0x (r8188eu)
> > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> > ATTR{address}=="14:cc:20:11:82:ec", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0",
> ATTR{type}=="1",
> > KERNEL=="wlan*", NAME="wlan0"
>
Is this your wifi? If so it needs the firm
t; >>capabilities: pm bus_master cap_list rom ethernet physical tp mii
> >> 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd autonegotiation configuration:
> >> autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=sis900 driverversion=v1.08.10
> >> Apr. 2 2006 duplex=full ip=192.168.1.4 late
t; >>capabilities: pm bus_master cap_list rom ethernet physical tp mii
> >> 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd autonegotiation configuration:
> >> autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=sis900 driverversion=v1.08.10
> >> Apr. 2 2006 duplex=full ip=192.168.1.4 late
2006 duplex=full ip=192.168.1.4 latency=64 link=yes maxlatency=11
>> mingnt=52 multicast=yes port=MII speed=100Mbit/s resources: irq:19
>> ioport:d800(size=256) memory:dfffc000-dfffcfff memory:dffc-dffd
>>
>> shows up - as far as I understand - nothing about WiFi.
&
t-fd autonegotiation configuration:
> autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=sis900 driverversion=v1.08.10 Apr.
> 2 2006 duplex=full ip=192.168.1.4 latency=64 link=yes maxlatency=11
> mingnt=52 multicast=yes port=MII speed=100Mbit/s resources: irq:19
> ioport:d800(size=256) memory:dfffc000-dfffc
on=on broadcast=yes driver=sis900
> driverversion=v1.08.10 Apr. 2 2006 duplex=full ip=192.168.1.4 latency=64
> link=yes maxlatency=11 mingnt=52 multicast=yes port=MII speed=100Mbit/s
> resources: irq:19 ioport:d800(size=256) memory:dfffc000-dfffcfff
> memory:dffc-dffd
&g
resources: irq:19 ioport:d800(size=256) memory:dfffc000-dfffcfff
> memory:dffc-dffd
>
> shows up - as far as I understand - nothing about WiFi.
>
> Please help abilitate WiFi connection on that PC. With google I couldn't
> work
> it out.
>
> Thanks,
urces: irq:19 ioport:d800(size=256) memory:dfffc000-dfffcfff
memory:dffc-dffd
shows up - as far as I understand - nothing about WiFi.
Please help abilitate WiFi connection on that PC. With google I couldn't work
it out.
Thanks,
Rodolfo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> Yesterday I received a Modem-Router for my brand new ADSL connection, which
> I've never used before (first old analogic modem, then usb stick with sim
> card in it), and it works fine in wifi mode but from Gnome Network Manager it
> seems I can't succesfully make work in
On 06/27/2015 08:17 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Yesterday I received a Modem-Router for my brand new ADSL connection,
We need more information to help you.
What distribution of Debian are you running?
What is the make and model of the Modem-Router?
Who is your ADSL provider?
Do they provi
Hi all.
Yesterday I received a Modem-Router for my brand new ADSL connection, which
I've never used before (first old analogic modem, then usb stick with sim card
in it), and it works fine in wifi mode but from Gnome Network Manager it seems
I can't succesfully make work in `Wired' mode: in fact,
In regards to issue #2:
I created an identical VM and performed an identical install, except for
one difference, I used ext4 instead of btrfs (for all of /, /boot and
/home). This install works fine.
I noticed that in the broken install, initramfs is missing cryptsetup.
I'm not sure if there is a
Issue #1 seems to just be virtualbox not being able to remember efi
entries across reboots, so let's ignore that.
Can anyone offer any help with regards to issues #2 & #3 please?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
I'm playing around with creating some example configurations in a VM,
and I'm having some issues.
I have a Debian sid amd64 installation in a VM, which uses a combination
of GPT, EFI, btrfs, and LUKS, with two HDDs.
I laid out the partitioning during installation as follows (forgetting
to create
Hi Paul,
Paul E Condon wrote:
> I have been cleaning up old email files and in the process created a
> mess I have several mail directories containing emails from different
> times and collected under slightly different operating condition. I
> want to merge them into a single directory with the e
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:36:01 -0600
Paul E Condon wrote:
> I have been cleaning up old email files and in the process created a
> mess I have several mail directories containing emails from different
> times and collected under slightly different operating condition. I
> want to merge them into a
I have been cleaning up old email files and in the process created a
mess I have several mail directories containing emails from different
times and collected under slightly different operating condition. I
want to merge them into a single directory with the emails arranged in
threads by topic and
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 15:23:06 -0400
Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 10:26 AM, The Wanderer
> wrote:
> > On 08/10/2014 10:15 AM, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, The Wanderer
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 08/10/2014 09:26 AM, Tom H wrote:
>
> halt/poweroff/reboot have ca
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 10:26 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 08/10/2014 10:15 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, The Wanderer
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/10/2014 09:26 AM, Tom H wrote:
halt/poweroff/reboot have called shutdown at least since
6/squeeze.
>>>
>>> Ah, so that m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/10/2014 10:15 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, The Wanderer
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/10/2014 09:26 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>> halt/poweroff/reboot have called shutdown at least since
>>> 6/squeeze.
>>
>> Ah, so that may be a Debian
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 08/10/2014 09:26 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 8:46 AM, The Wanderer
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/10/2014 02:45 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
If halt or reboot is called when the system is not in runlevel
0 or 6, in other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/10/2014 09:26 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 8:46 AM, The Wanderer
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/10/2014 02:45 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
>>> If halt or reboot is called when the system is not in runlevel
>>> 0 or 6, in other words when
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 06:45:04 + Bonno Bloksma sent:
> Charlie: According to the man pages all 3, halt, poweroff and reboot,
> use the shutdown command to perform the necessary steps when not
> starting in runlevel 0 or 6, which is pretty much always. So it is
> really weird that in your case po
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 8:46 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 08/10/2014 02:45 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
>>
>> Charlie: According to the man pages all 3, halt, poweroff and reboot,
>> use the shutdown command to perform the necessary steps when not
>> starting in runlevel 0 or 6, which is pretty much a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/10/2014 09:12 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2014-08-10 14:46 +0200, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 08/10/2014 02:45 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
>>
>>> -
>>> If halt or reboot is called when the system is not in runlevel
>>> 0 or 6, in oth
On 2014-08-10 14:46 +0200, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 08/10/2014 02:45 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
>
>> -
>> If halt or reboot is called when the system is not in runlevel 0
>> or 6, in other words when it's running normally, shutdown will be
>> invoked instead (with the -h or -r flag). For
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/10/2014 02:45 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Wanderer: While using Wheezy starting to use poweroff is the proper
> way to migrate from halt. But I do agree, it might have been a good
> idea to communicate this in a better way.
That's Debian-speci
Hi,
> On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:46:51 + Rodolfo Medina sent:
>
>
>
>> I've always used `halt' to shutdown the machine. Is `poweroff'
>> proper to do that?
>>
>> Rodolfo
>
> poweroff doesn't work for me, but I tried it as root, next time I use it I
> will try it as user and see if it works th
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:46:51 + Rodolfo Medina sent:
> I've always used `halt' to shutdown the machine. Is `poweroff'
> proper to do that?
>
> Rodolfo
poweroff doesn't work for me, but I tried it as root, next time I use
it I will try it as user and see if it works then. shutdown now does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/08/2014 03:51 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Hi Rodolfo,
>
>> Two days ago, after full-upgrade, as explained, it was impossible
>> to boot neither to reboot and I had to unplug the machine. Thanks
>> to lister's help, the above commands through
Brian writes:
> On Fri 08 Aug 2014 at 13:20:40 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
>> Brian writes:
>>
>> > Boot into the OS on sda6. Read the documentation for the version of grub
>> > on it, Try 'grub-install /dev/sda'.
>>
>> Thanks. The last command (grub-install /dev/sda) succeded in putting s
Bonno Bloksma writes:
> Hi Rodolfo,
>
>> Two days ago, after full-upgrade, as explained, it was impossible to boot
>> neither to reboot and I had to unplug the machine. Thanks to lister's help,
>> the above commands through debian-installer in rescue mode managed to repair
>> the system. But no
On Fri 08 Aug 2014 at 13:20:40 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Brian writes:
>
> > Boot into the OS on sda6. Read the documentation for the version of grub
> > on it, Try 'grub-install /dev/sda'.
>
> Thanks. The last command (grub-install /dev/sda) succeded in putting sda6 in
> master boot reco
Brian writes:
> On Fri 08 Aug 2014 at 07:25:19 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
>> 2) I don't manage to move boot partition from sda7 (Sid) to sda6
>> (oldstable): the commands
>>
>> # grub
>> grub > root (hd0,5)
>> grub > setup (hd0)
>> grub > quit
>
> Your prompt is for GRUB. T
On Fri 08 Aug 2014 at 07:25:19 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> 2) I don't manage to move boot partition from sda7 (Sid) to sda6 (oldstable):
> the commands
>
> # grub
> grub > root (hd0,5)
> grub > setup (hd0)
> grub > quit
Your prompt is for GRUB. The commands seem to be GRU
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 07:51:04 + Bonno Bloksma sent:
> Don't shutdown with the halt(8) command, it is not supposed to power
> off the machine, and the systemd maintainers consider it a bug[1]
> that the sysvinit implementation does it anyway. Use the poweroff
> command instead.
I found that, th
Hi Rodolfo,
> Two days ago, after full-upgrade, as explained, it was impossible to boot
> neither to reboot and I had to
> unplug the machine. Thanks to lister's help, the above commands through
> debian-installer in rescue mode
> managed to repair the system. But now two problems still remain
On 06/08/14 09:33 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> My Debian Sid box won't restart after today's full-upgrade.
Brian writes:
> On Thu 07 Aug 2014 at 12:39:59 +0100, Brian wrote:
>
>> At the prompt issue the commands
>>
>grub-install /dev/sda
>
>update-grub
>
>exit
>
> Then re
Brian writes:
> On Thu 07 Aug 2014 at 12:39:59 +0100, Brian wrote:
>
>> At the prompt issue the commands
>>
>> grub-install /dev/sda
>>
>> update-grub
>>
>> reboot
>
> Forget the last line.
>
>grub-install /dev/sda
>
>update-grub
>
>exit
>
> Then reboot.
All right, it worke
On Thu 07 Aug 2014 at 13:14:35 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Brian writes:
>
> > On Thu 07 Aug 2014 at 12:39:59 +0100, Brian wrote:
> >
> >> At the prompt issue the commands
> >>
> >> grub-install /dev/sda
> >>
> >> update-grub
> >>
> >> reboot
> >
> > Forget the last line.
> >
> >
Brian writes:
> On Thu 07 Aug 2014 at 12:39:59 +0100, Brian wrote:
>
>> At the prompt issue the commands
>>
>> grub-install /dev/sda
>>
>> update-grub
>>
>> reboot
>
> Forget the last line.
>
>grub-install /dev/sda
>
>update-grub
>
>exit
>
> Then reboot.
When I do `grub-ins
On Thu 07 Aug 2014 at 12:39:59 +0100, Brian wrote:
> At the prompt issue the commands
>
> grub-install /dev/sda
>
> update-grub
>
> reboot
Forget the last line.
grub-install /dev/sda
update-grub
exit
Then reboot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debia
Bob Proulx writes:
> Gary Dale wrote:
>> Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> >My Debian Sid box won't restart after today's full-upgrade. At booting, I
>> >read
>
> Sid is the unstable child...
>
>> To get back into your system, you can try booting from a Linux CD (system
>> rescue CD, for example) and try
On 6 Aug 2014 20:10 +, from rodolfo.med...@gmail.com (Rodolfo Medina):
`After this message, you will be given a shell with /dfev/sda7 mounted on
"/"...'
I press enter, and it gets back to the previous: `Execute a shell in
/dev/sda7'. I press enter, and again to `Aft
On Wed 06 Aug 2014 at 20:10:24 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Rodolfo Medina writes:
>
> > Brian writes:
> >
> >> Never seen that behaviour. Is /dev/sda7 where you have your root file
> >> system? Are you using the Wheezy installer?
> >
> > Well, no, I'm using Lenny installer.
> >
> > Rodolfo
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> Brian writes:
>
> N> On Wed 06 Aug 2014 at 17:04:55 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Proulx writes:
>>>
>>> > Then eventually it will get to a menu "Enter rescue mode" that will
>>> > ask what device to use as a root file system. It will list the
>>> > partitio
Brian writes:
N> On Wed 06 Aug 2014 at 17:04:55 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
>> Bob Proulx writes:
>>
>> > Then eventually it will get to a menu "Enter rescue mode" that will
>> > ask what device to use as a root file system. It will list the
>> > partitions that it has automatically detecte
On Wed 06 Aug 2014 at 17:04:55 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Bob Proulx writes:
>
> > Then eventually it will get to a menu "Enter rescue mode" that will
> > ask what device to use as a root file system. It will list the
> > partitions that it has automatically detected. (If you have raid or
Bob Proulx writes:
> Gary Dale wrote:
>> Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> >My Debian Sid box won't restart after today's full-upgrade. At booting, I
>> >read
>
> Sid is the unstable child...
>
>> To get back into your system, you can try booting from a Linux CD (system
>> rescue CD, for example) and try
Gary Dale wrote:
> Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >My Debian Sid box won't restart after today's full-upgrade. At booting, I
> >read
Sid is the unstable child...
> To get back into your system, you can try booting from a Linux CD (system
> rescue CD, for example) and trying to debug from there. For ex
On 06/08/14 09:33 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Hi all.
My Debian Sid box won't restart after today's full-upgrade. At booting, I read
Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
Could that message provide any suggestion for what has happened and how to fix
it? I have no idea what to do.
T
Hi all.
My Debian Sid box won't restart after today's full-upgrade. At booting, I read
Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
Could that message provide any suggestion for what has happened and how to fix
it? I have no idea what to do.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Rodolfo
--
T
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 05:31:37PM +0400, Reco wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:34:13 +1200
> Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:13:01PM +0400, Reco wrote:
> > >
> > > Correct. In fact [1] can mislead people into thinking that subscribing
> > > to the maillist to receive an a
201 - 300 of 1666 matches
Mail list logo
