David Wright composed on 2021-06-22 11:00 (UTC-0500):
> On Sat 19 Jun 2021 at 14:51:53 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>> As already mentioned, you needn't have paid. Two unrelated things were
>> likely to
>> have caused this to happen. Vista and or Win10 could have been installed in
>> MBR
>>
On Sat 19 Jun 2021 at 14:51:53 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> William Lee Valentine composed on 2021-06-19 10:19 (UTC-0600):
>
> > I had installed a back version of Debian in a partition on a
> > 500-megahertz computer that was otherwise running Windows 2000 and
> > MS-DOS.
>
> > When I had
On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 10:19:57 -0600
William Lee Valentine wrote:
>
> I later installed Debian 10.2 in a partition on a 64-bit computer that
> was otherwise running Windows 10.
>
> When I had finished installing Linux, Grub wanted to know whether I
> wanted it installed on the master boot
William Lee Valentine composed on 2021-06-19 10:19 (UTC-0600):
> I had installed a back version of Debian in a partition on a
> 500-megahertz computer that was otherwise running Windows 2000 and
> MS-DOS.
> When I had finished installing Linux, on that machine, Grub wanted to
> know whether I
On 6/19/21 12:19 PM, William Lee Valentine wrote:
I had installed a back version of Debian in a partition on a
500-megahertz computer that was otherwise running Windows 2000 and
MS-DOS.
When I had finished installing Linux, on that machine, Grub wanted to
know whether I wanted it installed
On 19/06/2021 13:19, William Lee Valentine wrote:
I have now another 64-bit computer, running Windows 10, whose BIOS
provides the option of booting from a USB device. If I install Debian
10.2 in a partition on this computer, would I tell Grub to make the
partition bootable? Would Grub instead
Hello.
You do not need to reinstall Windows to fix boot problems. Download Windows
iso from the Microsoft website along with a special tool to burn it to the
flash drive, boot from it and Windows will repair most booting issues.
Motherboard firmware may act in Legacy/BIOS mode or UEFI mode.
I had installed a back version of Debian in a partition on a
500-megahertz computer that was otherwise running Windows 2000 and
MS-DOS.
When I had finished installing Linux, on that machine, Grub wanted to
know whether I wanted it installed in the master boot record. It
reported seeing Windows
Many thanks to Christian, David, and Pascal!
With your hints I was able to solve the problems.
Lessons learned:
1. d-i needs to be in "low" questions mode (expert) to allow
manual selection of partition type (e.g. DOS/MBR or GPT).
2. d-i seems to call grub-install on /dev/md0, even if
Christian Seiler a écrit :
> On 01/08/2016 02:51 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>> Current tools won't align for compatibility purpose any more. The
>> default 1-MiB alignment is only for performance purpose, not compatibility.
>
> This is new to me - I always thought that this was entirely for
>
W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
>
> I try to install Jessie with a soft RAID6 of four disks, 1 TB each.
> The idea is to use the complete disk for RAID and then only on top
> separate swap and root.
>
> The installation worked fine on one machine, but for some reason,
> grub does not install on the
On 01/08/2016 02:03 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Christian Seiler a écrit :
>> Problem is that GPT doesn't have such a gap.
>
> GPT usually also has such a gap for partition alignment purpose.
Well sure, but MBR also has all the CHS baggage - and while it isn't
used anymore on modern systems,
Hi,
I try to install Jessie with a soft RAID6 of four disks, 1 TB each.
The idea is to use the complete disk for RAID and then only on top
separate swap and root.
The installation worked fine on one machine, but for some reason,
grub does not install on the fourth disk. It turns out, that the
On 01/08/2016 01:22 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> I try to install Jessie with a soft RAID6 of four disks, 1 TB each.
> The idea is to use the complete disk for RAID and then only on top
> separate swap and root.
>
> The installation worked fine on one machine, but for some reason,
> grub does
Christian Seiler a écrit :
>
> Ok, if you use MBR, only the first 512 bytes are used for the MBR
> partition table, so that the gap between those bytes and the first
> partition (and there is *always* a gap, the size depends on the
> details of the logical geometry of the disk) has traditionally
On 01/08/2016 02:51 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Christian Seiler a écrit :
>> for compatibility reasons every tool that manipulates MBR
>> partitions will therefore want to leave a gap after the MBR.
>
> Current tools won't align for compatibility purpose any more. The
> default 1-MiB alignment
On 01/07/2016 04:22 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
I try to install Jessie with a soft RAID6 of four disks, 1 TB each.
The idea is to use the complete disk for RAID and then only on top
separate swap and root. ...
grub does not install on the fourth disk. It turns out, that the
fourth disk is
Christian Seiler a écrit :
>
> Well sure, but MBR also has all the CHS baggage - and while it isn't
> used anymore on modern systems, there still is the de-factor standard
> of aligning the first partition with the first CHS-sector that is so
> ingrained historically that the gap between MBR and
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 05:25:34AM +, T o n g wrote:
hi,
Long story, I don't want Grub2/Grub-PC, etc, but get upgraded to it. Now
I can't go back, because grub-common is listed as a dependency of grub-
legacy. But the grub-common package has been upgraded for use with
version 2 only.
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:57:04 -0700, Freeman wrote:
I don't want Grub2/Grub-PC, etc, but get upgraded to it. Now
I can't go back, because grub-common is listed as a dependency of grub-
legacy. But the grub-common package has been upgraded for use with
version 2 only.
I posted this past week
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:12:58PM +, T o n g wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:57:04 -0700, Freeman wrote:
I don't want Grub2/Grub-PC, etc, but get upgraded to it. Now
I can't go back, because grub-common is listed as a dependency of grub-
legacy. But the grub-common package has been
Stephen Powell wrote:
Aren't you glad you use Dial? Don't you wish everybody did?
s/Dial/lilo/
Given that I have in the past spent up to 2 days remotely walking family
members through fixing machines that booted to LI or LIL .. no.
I only wish lilo on enemies -- but still prefer enemies
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:46:28 -0400 (EDT), Joey Hess wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote:
Aren't you glad you use Dial? Don't you wish everybody did?
s/Dial/lilo/
Given that I have in the past spent up to 2 days remotely walking family
members through fixing machines that booted to LI or LIL
T o n g wrote:
hi,
Long story, I don't want Grub2/Grub-PC, etc, but get upgraded to it. Now
I can't go back, because grub-common is listed as a dependency of grub-
legacy. But the grub-common package has been upgraded for use with
version 2 only.
Comment?
Thanks
I have such
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:25:34 -0400 (EDT), Tong wrote:
Long story, I don't want Grub2/Grub-PC, etc, but get upgraded to it. Now
I can't go back, because grub-common is listed as a dependency of grub-
legacy. But the grub-common package has been upgraded for use with
version 2 only.
I don't
hi,
Long story, I don't want Grub2/Grub-PC, etc, but get upgraded to it. Now
I can't go back, because grub-common is listed as a dependency of grub-
legacy. But the grub-common package has been upgraded for use with
version 2 only.
Comment?
Thanks
--
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
Dear all,
I've just upgrade my sarge system to lenny. We now encountered a problem.
Our original kernel is 2.4.27 and our present kernel is 2.6.26.
Our main SATA disk is recognized as hdd at the time of installation.
But in lenny, it is recoginzed as sda.
I find that each time I install a kernel
On Friday 02 October 2009 15:41:11 Niu Kun wrote:
I've just upgrade my sarge system to lenny. We now encountered a problem.
Our original kernel is 2.4.27 and our present kernel is 2.6.26.
Our main SATA disk is recognized as hdd at the time of installation.
But in lenny, it is recoginzed as
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. 写道:
On Friday 02 October 2009 15:41:11 Niu Kun wrote:
I've just upgrade my sarge system to lenny. We now encountered a problem.
Our original kernel is 2.4.27 and our present kernel is 2.6.26.
Our main SATA disk is recognized as hdd at the time of installation.
But in
during debian installation from a new r4 cd that i downloaded from
debian.org, i got the following error
grub fatal error
during installation and then i installed the lilo loader instead of debian.
now i can access debian though i still dont know how to configure lilo to
access windows. this
On Thursday 04 December 2008, raman narasimhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'problem with grub loader and screen resolution in gnome':
A. How do i revert back to grub loader??
From within the running system install grub to the mbr. For more
information, see the grub documentation.
B. Or how
Hello all,
I'm a newbie to Linux. I have a Dell server with two raid arrays (sda
and sdb), both raid 1. I created and LVM on sdb. After having copied
the filesystem from sda onto sdb, I want to configure grub so that it
boots on sdb. when i type grub root (sdb,0) , i get the message :
Am 2008-05-15 um 11:14 schrieb Gilles Guiot:
Hello all,
I'm a newbie to Linux. I have a Dell server with two raid arrays
(sda and
sdb), both raid 1. I created and LVM on sdb. After having copied the
filesystem from sda onto sdb, I want to configure grub so that it
boots on
sdb.
Could
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Am 2008-05-15 um 11:14 schrieb Gilles Guiot:
Hello all,
I'm a newbie to Linux. I have a Dell server with two raid arrays (sda
and
sdb), both raid 1. I created and LVM on sdb. After having copied the
filesystem from sda onto sdb, I want to configure grub so that
2008-05-15 17:02+0200 Gilles Guiot:
my server has two raid1 arrays, each with two disks, for a total of
four hd. sda1 relates to the biggest partion on the first array
(sda) and sdb1 relates to the only partition on the second raid
array. point is this sdb1 is in lvm so to speak, ie there
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008-05-15 17:02+0200 Gilles Guiot:
my server has two raid1 arrays, each with two disks, for a total of
four hd. sda1 relates to the biggest partion on the first array (sda)
and sdb1 relates to the only partition on the second raid array. point
is this sdb1 is in
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 12:13 -0600, Justin Guerin wrote:
Hi,
I've had to move my install to a new physical disk. I made an image of my
two partitions (/boot and /), and they restored properly. Now, I only need
to run grub-install to install the boot loader.
When I boot from Knoppix,
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:21:44 +0200
Philippe De Ryck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 12:13 -0600, Justin Guerin wrote:
Hi,
I've had to move my install to a new physical disk. I made an image of my
two partitions (/boot and /), and they restored properly. Now, I only
Hi,
I've had to move my install to a new physical disk. I made an image of my
two partitions (/boot and /), and they restored properly. Now, I only need
to run grub-install to install the boot loader.
When I boot from Knoppix, I can mount the / to /mnt/target, then mount /boot
to
On Thursday 13 April 2006 13:21, Philippe De Ryck wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 12:13 -0600, Justin Guerin wrote:
Hi,
[snip problem]
Justin,
I don't think it is necessary to chroot at all. The knoppix disk has
grub on board, so you can use that command. The command also has a
command
Hallo Andreas Krummrich, hallo auch an alle anderen
Am Freitag, 3. Februar 2006 22:43 schrieb Andreas Krummrich:
[...]
Hat aber auch nicht geklappt. Ein update-grup mach die Änderung
wieder rückgängig?!?
Was mache ich hier falsch?
Schreib deine Zeilen außerhalb des automatisch generierten
Hallo zusammen,
ich habe ein Problem mit Grub. Ich habe das OpenBSD auf meiner Soekris
NET4801 in Rente geschickt und Debian Sarge installiert.
Nun habe ich ein Problem beim booten bzw. mit den Ausgaben über die
serielle Konsole. Also der Grub und später das login prompt werden auf
der Konsole
42 matches
Mail list logo
