Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Richard Owlett writes:
Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:42:32AM -0700, sting wing wrote:
Question: how does a person know if their /dev is a static or dynamic /dev
% findmnt /dev
TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE OPTIONS
/dev devtmpfs devtmpfs rw,size=249844k,nr
Richard Owlett writes:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:42:32AM -0700, sting wing wrote:
>>> Question: how does a person know if their /dev is a static or dynamic /dev
>
>>
>> % findmnt /dev
>> TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE OPTIONS
>> /dev devtmpfs devtmpfs rw,size=249844k,nr_inode
> What does it mean when /dev is said to be static? dynamic?
> What should I be reading about?
On Linux, static tends to be used on embedded systems for speed and
sanity when you know about all the hardware that will be connected and
don't want anything interfering. OpenBSD has a Makedev script wh
2012/10/11 houkensjtu
> Thanks Joe, Brian, Murphy
>
> As I post above, I forgot to say all these experiments were done in my
> home on my laptop...
> Now I am in my office and re-do all this experiment.
> To be short, now all experiment which is done with ip address works well,
> while if I do ss
Thanks Joe, Brian, Murphy
As I post above, I forgot to say all these experiments were done in my home on
my laptop...
Now I am in my office and re-do all this experiment.
To be short, now all experiment which is done with ip address works well, while
if I do ssh USER@DEBIAN, it will say:
ssh: C
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 08:19:25 PM houkensjtu wrote:
> Thanks for great reply!!
> I have to apologize for sth... I forgot to say that all these experiments
> were done in home on my laptop...omg So, now I solved the problem with
> echo "1">/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
> What is this fil
Brian於 2012年10月11日星期四UTC+9上午8時00分04秒寫道：
> On Wed 10 Oct 2012 at 08:35:13 -0700, houkensjtu wrote:
>
>
>
> > I am a newbie both of debian and networking... Recently I am trying
>
> > to connect my home laptop(I have a router in my home) from office. I
>
> > read several articles on port forwar
Hi Joe!
Thank you for detailed reply!
Actually I found a switch which solved my problem and now all my experiments
works perfectly. The command is:
echo "1">/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
but...What is it?! Is there any other way to check and configure my laptop's
status without writing directly
On Wed 10 Oct 2012 at 19:44:27 +0100, Joe wrote:
[Some good advice snipped]
> However you resolve the initial problem, the ssh server is very heavily
> targeted by the bad guys, using password checking bots. A quick and
> dirty security measure is to forward a non-standard high numbered
> externa
On Wed 10 Oct 2012 at 08:35:13 -0700, houkensjtu wrote:
> I am a newbie both of debian and networking... Recently I am trying
> to connect my home laptop(I have a router in my home) from office. I
> read several articles on port forwarding. And I succeeded in opening
> an 22 port on my router, al
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
houkensjtu wrote:
> Hi debianer!
> I am a newbie both of debian and networking...
> Recently I am trying to connect my home laptop(I have a router in my
> home) from office. I read several articles on port forwarding. And I
> succeeded in opening an 22 por
http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
A bit of searching the net on port-forwarding oughta give you the answer.
You probably forgot to forward port 22 on the router to whichever ip
adress your DEBIAN has.
Search around for stuff on your router/ISP combo as they're almost
always blocked
On Sunday 08 April 2007 03:06, Michael M. wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 16:47 -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> > Thanks for taking to time to post all that information. I have installed
> > Gnome, just haven't figured out how to get it going yet! After reading
> > your post one of the things that I
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 16:47 -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> Thanks for taking to time to post all that information. I have installed
> Gnome, just haven't figured out how to get it going yet! After reading your
> post one of the things that I think I need to do first is read some good
> article
On Saturday 07 April 2007 10:49, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > > > The Gnome option doesn't appear under the "Session Type" option. I
> > > > assume that I haven't installed all the packages needed for Gnome.
> > > > What additional packages do I need?
> > >
> > > Maybe the gnome-session package? Try t
On Saturday 07 April 2007 14:41, Michael M. wrote:
> --
> Michael M. ++ Portland, OR ++ USA
> "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions
> of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to
> dream." --S. Jackson
Thanks for taking to time to pos
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 07:29 -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
> > > Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
> > > RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
On Saturday 07 April 2007 09:11, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > As I had stated previously I installed from the
> > debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso image. If I take your suggestion,
> > which sounds like a good one, when I boot will I be given a choice
> > of which system to start or will I have to man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:40:57AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> On Saturday 07 April 2007 09:11, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > > As I had stated previously I installed from the
> > > debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso image. If I take your suggestion,
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:33:09PM +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 11:19 -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:40:57AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> > > Yes, I did find that and used it now. But, I did an in
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 11:19 -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:40:57AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> > Yes, I did find that and used it now. But, I did an install of the Gnome
> > core;
> >
> > aptitude install gnome-core
> >
> > The Gnome option doesn't appear under the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:26:53PM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 10:46, John L Fjellstad wrote:
> > Randy Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had
> > > Sarge i
Randy Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You're better off just installing all three and test them out. I
> > think they are pretty feature-equivalent these days.
>
> As I had stated previously I installed from the
> debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso image. If I take your suggestion,
> whi
Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just because distributions default to something doesn't mean that
> other things don't work on them. The beauty of Debian is that almost
> everything is available in the repositories. You can use whatever you
> feel most comfortable with. The only way you w
> Keep the following packages at their current version:
> fam [Not Installed]
> Leave the following dependencies unresolved:
> libgnomevfs2-0 recommends fam
> nautilus recommends fam
> Score is -341
> Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
>
> I chose not to accept this right now. Do I need to add th
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:05:52 -0400
Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 07:53:01AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 April 2007 08:14, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:33:28AM -0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 07:53:01AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 08:14, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:33:28AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> > > On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
> >
On Thursday 05 April 2007 08:14, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:33:28AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
> > > > Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Dist
Randy Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I had stated previously I installed from the
> debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso image. If I take your suggestion,
> which sounds like a good one, when I boot will I be given a choice of
> which system to start or will I have to manually close KDE an
On Thursday 05 April 2007 10:46, John L Fjellstad wrote:
> Randy Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge
> > installed but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean
> > install of Etch. Works great!! Since I am a new
Randy Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge
> installed but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean
> install of Etch. Works great!! Since I am a new user I don't have a
> favorite windowing system that I prefer an
Doug writes:
> Minimal command line interface:
> no monitor, no graphics card, no terminal, just a
> dot matrix printer and a keyboard.
> Yup, did that once when I _really_ needed to fix
> something.
You really don't want to get into that competition here.
Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 19:09 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>> . gconf spews all sorts of errors into log files.
>
> Not true as of 2.18.0.1-2.
>
Too bad that this is not in Etch. But good to know.
thanks
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 19:09 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> . gconf spews all sorts of errors into log files.
Not true as of 2.18.0.1-2.
--
Cheers,
Sven Arvidsson
http://www.whiz.se
PGP Key ID 760BDD22
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:38:13PM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
> >> Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
> >> RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
> >
> > Because Gnome is superior, of course. :-)
> >
> Flamebait! Oh now, now we're going to get a flamewar over which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Mark wrote:
[snip]
>> As stated previously I am a newbie in the Linux world, but one that seen
>> enough to know that there is no going back now! So currently I don't really
>> have a loyalty to any of the higher level window systems. I would b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:33:28AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
> > > Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:33:28AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
> > > Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like U
Oops! Sorry about that! Kmail gave me an error on the first send so I didn't
think it was sent out.
On Thursday 05 April 2007 07:33, Randy Patterson wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
> > > Why Gnome i
On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
> > Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
> > RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
>
> Because Gnome is superior, of course. :-)
As stated previou
On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
> > Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
> > RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
>
> Because Gnome is superior, of course. :-)
As stated previou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael M. wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
>
>> Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
>> RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
>
>
> Because Gnome is superior, of course. :-
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
> Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
> RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
Because Gnome is superior, of course. :-)
--
Michael M. ++ Portland, OR ++ USA
"No live organism can continue for
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:12:58PM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
>
> So would you say in general that the debian-testing-xxx-kde-CD-1.iso image is
> for higher end system installs and the debian-testing-xxx-xfce-CD-1.iso image
> is for lower end and debian-testing-xxx-netinst.iso image is to all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge installed
> but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean install of Etch.
> Works great!! Since I am a
Randy Patterson wrote:
> So would you say in general that the debian-testing-xxx-kde-CD-1.iso image
> is for higher end system installs and the debian-testing-xxx-xfce-CD-1.iso
> image is for lower end and debian-testing-xxx-netinst.iso image is to
> allow for all options?
>
I do not think debia
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 18:09, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Randy Patterson wrote:
> > I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge
> > installed but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean
> > install of Etch. Works great!! Since I am a new user I don't hav
El Miércoles, 4 de Abril de 2007 19:09, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi escribió:
> Randy Patterson wrote:
> > I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge
> > installed but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean
> > install of Etch. Works great!! Since I am a new user I
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
> I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge installed
> but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean install of Etch.
> Works great!! Since I am a new user I don't have a favorite windowing syst
Randy Patterson wrote:
> I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge
> installed but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean
> install of Etch. Works great!! Since I am a new user I don't have a
> favorite windowing system that I prefer and was wondering if som
Michael Pobega wrote:
On 02/17/2007 08:52:31 AM, Jan Sneep wrote:
[...]
If you use iTunes to download music you're out of luck, because there
are almost no Linux equivalents. If your kids only use iTunes to
update their iPods, then there is always gtkpod, which is what I
personally use to upda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 08:52:31AM -0500, Jan Sneep wrote:
>> Well two weeks ago I successfully installed Debian for the first time (first
>> time for any Linux OS for that matter)
>
> congrats!! welcome to freedom...
>
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 08:52:31AM -0500, Jan Sneep wrote:
> Well two weeks ago I successfully installed Debian for the first time (first
> time for any Linux OS for that matter)
congrats!! welcome to freedom...
> Inspired with my recent success installing Debian on one machine I was
> thinking
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 16:30 +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 08:52 -0500, Jan Sneep wrote:
> > How about iTunes for loading songs onto their iPods? At the moment they use
> > my Windows Xp machine to fill up their iPods, because of course iTunes
> > doesn't run on ME. I have to
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 08:52 -0500, Jan Sneep wrote:
> How about iTunes for loading songs onto their iPods? At the moment they use
> my Windows Xp machine to fill up their iPods, because of course iTunes
> doesn't run on ME. I have to re-boot my machine after they're done because
> some iTunes servi
On 17-feb-2007, at 14:52, Jan Sneep wrote:
How about iTunes for loading songs onto their iPods? At the moment
they use
my Windows Xp machine to fill up their iPods, because of course iTunes
doesn't run on ME. I have to re-boot my machine after they're done
because
some iTunes service ju
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 08:52:31 -0500
"Jan Sneep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and for the second part to my question ...
>
> How about iTunes for loading songs onto their iPods? At the moment they use
> my Windows Xp machine to fill up their iPods, because of course iTunes
> doesn't run on ME. I h
On 02/17/2007 08:52:31 AM, Jan Sneep wrote:
Well two weeks ago I successfully installed Debian for the first time
(first
time for any Linux OS for that matter) and thanks to the replies to my
last
question I've got Samba up and working beautifully and this week-end
I'm
going to get CUPS configur
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Sackville-West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
No I was just asking. I'm just trying to figure out why I can send ema
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:21:09AM +1100, Duncan McDonald wrote:
> From: "Andrei Popescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:00:10 +1100
> >"Duncan McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>From: "Andrew Sackville-West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> so you can get to the machine, i.e. the po
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:00:10AM +1100, Duncan McDonald wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Sackville-West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming
- Original Message -
From: "Andrei Popescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:00:10 +1100
"Duncan McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:00:10 +1100
"Duncan McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Sackville-West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exi
On Wed January 10 2007 11:00, Duncan McDonald wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Sackville-West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
>
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Sackville-West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
so you can get to the machine, i.e. the port is not blocked. can you
manu
On Wed January 10 2007 10:19, Duncan McDonald wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alan Ianson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
>
>
>
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:19:46AM +1100, Duncan McDonald wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alan Ianson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:37:55AM +1100, Duncan McDonald wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Sackville-West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 3:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Ianson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:49 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
...
It was a common practice in my area that ISP's would block ports like 25
On Wed January 10 2007 09:37, Duncan McDonald wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Sackville-West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 3:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
>
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Sackville-West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 3:33 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
okay, so I had to try this to learn and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig +short b
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:33:04 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[ snip: Jon Dowland's nice mini-tutorial about dig and MX records ]
> okay, so I had to try this to learn and
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig +short bigpond.com mx
> 10 extmail.bigpond.com.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping www.big
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:06:20PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:52:01AM +1100, Duncan McDonald
> wrote:
> > As I said I'm fairly new to system administration so I'm
> > not sure what an MX record is.
>
> Domains are mapped to IP addresses via DNS records. DNS
> records co
On Wed January 10 2007 05:54, Duncan McDonald wrote:
> From: "Alan Ianson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 12:26 AM
> Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
>
>
> ...
>
> > Just a shot in th
A useful function is
# dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config
Regards
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:52:01AM +1100, Duncan McDonald
wrote:
> As I said I'm fairly new to system administration so I'm
> not sure what an MX record is.
Domains are mapped to IP addresses via DNS records. DNS
records come in a variety of types: the most common being
the 'A' record, which speci
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:47:15PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> "no server error", and the fact that you later say you
> see nothing in your exim4 logs make me wonder if you've
> setup MX records for your domain to point to the IP
> address of your server?
In the absence of MX records, maile
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:54:44AM +1100, Duncan McDonald
wrote:
> I actually set the 'listening' addresses option to blank.
> I believe this means that my server should be listening on
> all available network addresses shouldn't it?
Yes, and you can verify this using "lsof -ni:25 | grep
LISTEN",
From: "Alan Ianson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
...
Just a shot in the dark. If exim4 is set to listen to 127.0.0.1 it will
only
accept connections from localhost, n
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Kemp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian list"
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
...
"no server error", and the fact that you later sa
On Wed January 10 2007 04:41, Duncan McDonald wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm relatively new to Debian administration and I've recently encountered a
> problem with Exim which has me stumped. While I can send email directly
> from the server to external recipients and also from other computers within
> th
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:41:29PM +1100, Duncan McDonald wrote:
> "The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected
> by the server. The rejected email-mail address was '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
> Subject 'test', Account: 'blah', Server: 'mail.bigpond.com', Protocol:
> SMTP,
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Ooops. I guess I wasn't as clear as I could have been.
>
> Editing /etc/default/bootlod to set
> BOOTLOGD_ENABLE=yes
>
> Works like a charm.
>
> Miles
Thanks for clarifying that for me ;-)
Regards
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tire
Ooops. I guess I wasn't as clear as I could have been.
Editing /etc/default/bootlod to set
BOOTLOGD_ENABLE=yes
Works like a charm.
Miles
Willie Wonka wrote:
[ apologies for the long time since replying ]
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Willie Wonka wrote:
Mumia W. wrote:
AFAIK, that's not the way
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > I'll echo the question about where to find that out other than a helpful
> > reply on this list.
>
> A manpage does not always include specific info about how things are set
> up in Debian, unfortunately. (You can file a wishlist bug asking the
> package maintainer to i
[ apologies for the long time since replying ]
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Willie Wonka wrote:
> > Mumia W. wrote:
> >> AFAIK, that's not the way you enable boot-logging. Just edit
> >> /etc/default/bootlogd.
> >>
> >
> > It did not take affect after a warm (re)boot -- so I'll try your suggestion
-
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 15:15:40 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Willie Wonka wrote:
> >Mumia W. wrote:
> >>AFAIK, that's not the way you enable boot-logging. Just edit
> >>/etc/default/bootlogd.
> >>
> >
> >It did not take affect after a warm (re)boot -- so I'll try your
> >suggestion -
> >but why
Willie Wonka wrote:
Mumia W. wrote:
AFAIK, that's not the way you enable boot-logging. Just edit
/etc/default/bootlogd.
It did not take affect after a warm (re)boot -- so I'll try your suggestion -
but why wouldn't the man page say how to enable it? Or where should I look for
that kind of inf
Mumia W. wrote:
> AFAIK, that's not the way you enable boot-logging. Just edit
> /etc/default/bootlogd.
>
It did not take affect after a warm (re)boot -- so I'll try your suggestion -
but why wouldn't the man page say how to enable it? Or where should I look for
that kind of info instead?
I'm _
On 07/21/2006 09:31 AM, Willie Wonka wrote:
[...]
So I drop to a VT/VC (ctrl-alt-f2) and login as root;
then rerun above command '/sbin/bootlogd -lps'
and it *seems* to have taken affect -- but i guess i won't know for sure until
I reboot...well here goes ;-)
Regards
AFAIK, that's not the wa
Wulfy wrote:
> man bootlogd it's part of the sysvinit package... :)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S bootlogd
> sysvinit: /sbin/bootlogd
> initscripts: /etc/init.d/bootlogd
> initscripts: /etc/init.d/stop-bootlogd
> initscripts: /etc/default/bootlogd
> sysvinit: /usr/share/man/man8/bootlogd.8.g
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Wulfy wrote:
> > Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >> Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> >>> El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
> and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
> capture are generated too early in the startup process
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
> > and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
> > capture are generated too early in the startup process to hit the log
> > files - guess I have to connect my laptop to the serial p
Wulfy wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
capture are generated too early in the startup process to hit the
log files - guess I have to connect m
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
capture are generated too early in the startup process to hit the
log files - guess I have to connect my laptop to th
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
capture are generated too early in the startup process to hit the log
files - guess I have to connect my laptop to the serial port and
captu
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
> and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
> capture are generated too early in the startup process to hit the log
> files - guess I have to connect my laptop to the serial port and
> capture the console tra
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 17:01 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
Are there some settings that control what's logged at boot time?
Hope this helps:
man syslog.conf
man sysklogd
Cheers.
PS: next time it would be better that you read the documentation and
"google" for a w
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 17:01 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
> Are there some settings that control what's logged at boot time?
Hope this helps:
man syslog.conf
man sysklogd
Cheers.
PS: next time it would be better that you read the documentation and
"google" for a while before you ask. So
Marco Prandini wrote:
Hello,
I'm switching to Debian after a long time on RedHat, and I haven't
been able to find a couple of functions of the package manager I'd
like to use... hoping they exist at all!
1) I'd like to find which files of a package have been altered with
respect to the ori
1 - 100 of 319 matches
Mail list logo
