"Young, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanx for the fast replies.
>
> I'd like to have two emacsen if possible or one that will fit the bill for
> both purposes. The machine I'm working on upgrading is going to be an
> experimental Amateur radio packet machine and is somewhat minimalist. (48
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Young, Ed wrote:
>
>
> Ok, I'm still confused...
>
> Emacs? Not part of the current distribution? This is alarming.
No, that's not what I meant. IIRC, there was once emacs and now
there are emacs19 and emacs20 and no plain "emacs". If you have a bo
"emacs" package, you
e to try it as long as it will coexist with GNU Emacs.
Any comments or caveats or experiences here?
My priorities:
Emacs (of some variety)
X
AX25Utils.
I also need to be able to compile and do some code development.
Thanx,
Ed
> Subject: Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs
>
>
"Young, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, I'm still confused...
>
> Emacs? Not part of the current distribution? This is alarming.
There are now *four* emacsen in hamm: emacs-19.34, emacs-20.2,
xemacs-19.16, and xemacs-20.4, and you need to choose which you want.
The "emacs" package is obso
ob Nielsen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 9:01 AM
> To: Edward J. Young
> Cc: debian list
> Subject: Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs
>
> On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I should mention tha
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote:
>
>
> I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for
> packages that are headed as "obsolete", one being emacs. Does this mean
> what I think: that emacs 19.34.? is now obsolete because I've upgraded
> around it and now it needs up
i had the same thing happen and i had selected to upgrade emacs to
20.xx...made a mess. it was the only really broken package.
had been wanting to check out xemacs so ended up purging emacs and
installing xemacs-20.whatever and like it. anyway, suspect you will need
to purge emacs and do a clean
I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for
packages that are headed as "obsolete", one being emacs. Does this mean
what I think: that emacs 19.34.? is now obsolete because I've upgraded
around it and now it needs upgrading too? Probobly.
There are some other packages l
8 matches
Mail list logo
