Re: Bug étrange NTP (la suite)

Le samedi 5 septembre 2015, 17:11:48 François Boisson a écrit : >[… CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC …] > > Sauf que cette option a été ajoutée au noyau 3.10 et > > n’existe pas dans le 2.6… > > Mince je pensais que cela existait déjà sur le 2.6. C'était > mon explication... Vérifie quand même sur ton

Re: Bug étrange NTP (la suite)

Le Sat, 05 Sep 2015 11:31:29 +0200 "Sylvain L. Sauvage" a écrit: > Et aussi : Pourquoi le serveur NTP voit le décalage quand il > apparaît mais pas quand il disparaît ? dans le deuxième cas le décalage est trop grand et ans ce cas, NTP ne rattrape pas l'heure. Ce

Re: Bug étrange NTP

Le Sun, 26 Jul 2015 14:38:08 +0200 Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net a écrit: On 2015-07-20 22:10:52 +0200, François Boisson wrote: Autre chose qui m'incite à penser à des interruptions non traitées: Mais pourquoi toutes les 2^22 secondes, et pourquoi pendant 89,06 secondes? Si je le

Re: Bug #745697 - dm-raid45

El día 19 de agosto de 2015, 10:28, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:31:54 -0300, Javier ArgentinaBBAR escribió: El día 18 de agosto de 2015, 14:24, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: (...) Pero veo que por fin (!) lo han arreglado, pero vamos, que no son

Re: Bug #745697 - dm-raid45

El Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:31:54 -0300, Javier ArgentinaBBAR escribió: El día 18 de agosto de 2015, 14:24, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: (...) Pero veo que por fin (!) lo han arreglado, pero vamos, que no son errores graves sino simplemente mensajes molestos. Paciencia. Es lo que nos

Re: Bug #745697 - dm-raid45

El Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:04:48 -0300, Javier ArgentinaBBAR escribió: Buenas tardes. Pregunta a la lista: ¿alguno pudo solucionare el inconveniente? Pues como no edites el script de configuración para que no se cargue ese módulo y regeneres la imagen initrd no veo otra forma de hacer... salvo

Re: Bug #745697 - dm-raid45

El día 18 de agosto de 2015, 14:24, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:04:48 -0300, Javier ArgentinaBBAR escribió: Buenas tardes. Pregunta a la lista: ¿alguno pudo solucionare el inconveniente? Pues como no edites el script de configuración para que no se cargue

Re: Bug Reporting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 04:16:33AM +0800, Nafiez wrote: Hi, I wanted to ask on what is the process to submit bug via e-mail. Can you help? I assume you are talking about reporting a bug against a Debian package: there's a comand for that called

Re: Bug Reporting

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 04:16:33AM +0800, Nafiez wrote: Hi, I wanted to ask on what is the process to submit bug via e-mail. Can you help? Thank you, Nafiez Hello Nafiez, you usually report bugs via reportbug (open a terminal, type `reportbug enter` and follow the instructions).

Re: Bug étrange NTP

On 2015-07-20 22:10:52 +0200, François Boisson wrote: Autre chose qui m'incite à penser à des interruptions non traitées: Mais pourquoi toutes les 2^22 secondes, et pourquoi pendant 89,06 secondes? En clair donc, il y eu pour la machine 314s d'interruption horloge entre chaque ligne,

Re: Bug étrange NTP

Le Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:54:21 +0200 Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net a écrit: Il y a un autre bug: c'était 89,06s dans ton premier message, et c'est maintenant 86,06s! Celui là je le connais bien, c'est l'interface clavier chaise. Lire 89,06s. [...] Pour le 2^22, je ne vois pas, à part

Re: Bug étrange NTP

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 07:27:35AM +0200, François Boisson wrote: * Je vais regarder si il y a une dérive de l'horloge RTC, je me demande si ces 89,06s ne viendrait pas de là (mais théoriquement l'horloge RTC est mise à jour toutes les 11 minutes) Pour autant qu'il m'en souvienne, l'horloge

Re: Bug étrange NTP

Bonsoir, Et en te fiant à ta première impression du souci matériel, ne serait-ce pas une interférence horloge rtc pile du bios ? Cordialement, Christophe De Natale Le 20 juil. 2015 à 22:10, François Boisson user.anti-s...@maison.homelinux.net a écrit : Le Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:08:07

Re: Bug étrange NTP

Le Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:08:07 +0200 François Boisson user.anti-s...@maison.homelinux.net a écrit: L'heure matérielle est censée se mettre à jour toutes les 11 minutes. En fait tout ce passe comme si la machine s'était gelée pendant ces 89,06s. On pourrait peut être imaginer que pour une raison

Re: Bug étrange NTP

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 02:28:46PM +0200, François Boisson wrote: Cette période de 2^22 et le délai de 86,06s disent ils quelque chose à quelqu'un? Pas spécifiquement, mais la description me rappelle un très vieux bug que j'avais eu, où l'on ne masquait pas les interruptions dans le traitement

Re: Bug étrange NTP

Le 19 juil. 2015 à 17:54, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net a écrit : On 2015-07-18 14:28:46 +0200, François Boisson wrote: Essaie de faire une recherche sur Google avec ces valeurs sous diverses écritures. Mais j'ai l'impression que tu est le seul à avoir ce problème, sinon il aurait été

Re: Bug étrange NTP

On 2015-07-18 14:28:46 +0200, François Boisson wrote: [precisions] Toutes les 2^22 secondes soit en gros 1 mois 20 jours, le serveur, prend 89,06s d'avance (et est ejecté du pool donc). Les bugs se sont produit à ces dates (et peut être avant): 12/08/2014 13:44:02 30/09/2014 02:56:06

Re: Bug étrange NTP

Le Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:50:16 +0200 Yves Rutschle debian.anti-s...@rutschle.net a écrit: On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 02:28:46PM +0200, François Boisson wrote: Cette période de 2^22 et le délai de 86,06s disent ils quelque chose à quelqu'un? Pas spécifiquement, mais la description me rappelle

Re: Bug étrange NTP

[precisions] Toutes les 2^22 secondes soit en gros 1 mois 20 jours, le serveur, prend 89,06s d'avance (et est ejecté du pool donc). Les bugs se sont produit à ces dates (et peut être avant): 12/08/2014 13:44:02 30/09/2014 02:56:06 17/11/2014 15:02:38 05/01/2015 04:14:12 22/02/2015 17:21:55

Re: Bug étrange NTP

Le Sat, 18 Jul 2015 14:37:54 +0200 Bernard Schoenacker bernard.schoenac...@free.fr a écrit: bonjour, serait il possible de voir du côté de adjtimex ? Plus précisemment? Voilà ce que donne un dump de adjtimex: francois@cerbere:~$ ./adjtimex code retour: 0 modes : 0 offset (time offset ns ou

Re: Bug étrange NTP

Le Sat, 18 Jul 2015 14:28:46 +0200, François Boisson user.anti-s...@maison.homelinux.net a écrit : [precisions] Toutes les 2^22 secondes soit en gros 1 mois 20 jours, le serveur, prend 89,06s d'avance (et est ejecté du pool donc). Les bugs se sont produit à ces dates (et peut être avant):

[SOLVED] Re: bug? laptop-mode-tools - mouse turns off after 3s of inactivity after last update

Sounds like usb-autosuspend, at a glance. I noticed that the commented line listing usb-autosuspend as a valid option for one of the settings in /etc/laptop-mode/laptop-mode.conf disappeared with the most recent update to that package, but I didn't notice anything in the changelogs that would

Re: bug? laptop-mode-tools - mouse turns off after 3s of inactivity after last update

On 07/11/2015 at 09:04 AM, Hans wrote: Dear list, I accidently had to reinstall laptop-mode-tools. I had to purge and reinstall the package. After this, I noticed, that my usb-mouse (cable), turns off after 3s of inactivity. This behaviour was already deccribed here in older forums:

Re: Bug with xdg-utils / xdg-open / gvfs-open

On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 20:43 +0200, Christoph Martens wrote: Hey guys, I wanted to report a bug, but reportbug is completely broken on Ubuntu. So, I have the following issue with xdg-open, which is not the fault of xdg-utils, but an issue with gvfs:

Re: Bug in Mailman version 2.1.18

El Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:33:21 -0400, Ariel escribió: (...) Bug in Mailman version 2.1.18 We're sorry, we hit a bug! Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of traceback and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, but the webmaster can find this

Re: Bug in Mailman version 2.1.18

El Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:04:08 -0400, Ariel escribió: (mando de nuevo porque el otro mensaje se coló dentro de otro hilo) (...) Bug in Mailman version 2.1.18 We're sorry, we hit a bug! Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of traceback and other system

Re: Bug Report: QMMP issue - [Jessie with MATE] when caja opened, qmmp launches instead

On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 18:16 +0200, jake.pers...@riseup.net wrote: Hi Guys Very odd bug this. Caja opens fine without qmmp installed. But when qmmp is installed and you want to browse with caja, the qmmp player launches instead. Where do I post this? Hi, I poked around the qmmp

Re: bug report

Nader wrote: hi, I need to report a bug in the debian installation system. I do not know the name of the package that reportbug needs. Please let me know how to proceed. Browse the bugs in installation-reports and see if it has been reported already.

Re: bug report

could be debian-installer package? 2015-05-06 11:13 GMT+08:00 Nader nad...@gmail.com: hi, I need to report a bug in the debian installation system. I do not know the name of the package that reportbug needs. Please let me know how to proceed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Bug lubuntu

Traduzindo, o usuário operador adicionado ao grupo www-data nao consegue criar subdiretorios de um diretorio do grupo www-data com permissão rwx. Em 26 de março de 2015 10:54, Rodrigo Cunha rodrigo.root...@gmail.com escreveu: Fala pessoal, olha o que eu peguei no lubuntu.

Re: Bug lubuntu

http://ubuntuforum-br.org/ Em 26/03/15, Rodrigo Cunharodrigo.root...@gmail.com escreveu: Fala pessoal, olha o que eu peguei no lubuntu. operador@lab:/var/www/www.loja.meudominio.intranet$ pwd /var/www/www.loja.meudominio.intranet operador@lab:/var/www/www.loja.meudominio.intranet$ ls -l ../

Re: [BUG]Shellshock

quem tem servidor web com cgi-bin publico precisa atualizar o seu sistema . tem esse script que você pode usa-lo https://shellshocker.net/ On 22-03-2015 13:28, Rodrigo Cunha wrote: Solução, adicione os repositorios : deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main deb-src

Re: [BUG]Shellshock

O bash 4.1 Tinha essa vulnerabilidade, fiz o upgrade para o 4.2.37 e agora não tem mais a vulnerabilidade. Fiquei curioso de como eu poderia explorar esta vulnerabilidade em meu ambiente de laboratorio para fins academicos, isso poderia render um bom artigo para a comunidade de SLivre,

Re: [BUG]Shellshock

Olha isso # bash --version GNU bash, version 4.1.5(1)-release (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software; you are free to

Re: [BUG]Shellshock

Obrigado ao Antonio Terceiro por lembrar que o Debian LTS existe. Estou com gNewSense e com algumas dúvidas Coloquei no terminal: root@root# env x='() { :;}; echo vulneravel' bash -c 'true' vulneravel root@root# env x='() { :;}; echo unvulneravel' bash -c 'false' unvulneravel root@root# env x='()

Re: [BUG]Shellshock

Que mistureba... Mas com relação ao bug veja qual versão do bash é a vulnerável e qual está instalada na sua máquina... assimo como os pacotes do referentes ao SSL... procure no google, sites com CVE's por exemplo, ou na parte de segurança do debian no seu site... [ ] 's Em 22/03/15, Thiago

Re: [BUG]Shellshock

Solução, adicione os repositorios : deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main deb-src http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main Executei: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install --only-upgrade bash gcc-4.4 Em 22 de março de 2015 13:26, P. J. pjotam...@gmail.com escreveu: Que

[SOLVED] Re: [BUG]Shellshock

* Retirei linhas duplicadas que acabei colocando no sources.list quando copiei o que estava nas páginas do Debian-LTS; * Apliquei # apt-get update apt-get install bash (gcc-4.4 já estava instalado) * Agora o comando que o Rodrigo Cunha apresentou não retorna mais a resposta de 'vulneravel' nem

Re: [SOLVED] Re: [BUG]Shellshock

Valeu por mais esta dica do site shelshocker.net Se não tiver o curl instalado, como foi aqui, é só instalar # apt-get install curl Teste: # curl https://shellshocker.net/shellshock_test.sh | bash % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current

Re: [BUG]Shellshock

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 01:04:40PM -0300, Thiago Zoroastro wrote: Obrigado ao Antonio Terceiro por lembrar que o Debian LTS existe. Estou com gNewSense e com algumas dúvidas Coloquei no terminal: root@root# env x='() { :;}; echo vulneravel' bash -c 'true' vulneravel root@root# env x='() {

Re: [BUG]Shellshock

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sir, É claro que bugaria. Às vezes coloco algumas linhas diferentes da família Debian e coloco # apt-get upgrade para ver quais pacotes precisariam ser atualizados. Na maioria das vezes nem é possível ou não faço. Como neste que uso é gNewSense,

Re: [BUG]Shellshock

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:23:34PM -0300, Thiago Zoroastro wrote: Sir, É claro que bugaria. Às vezes coloco algumas linhas diferentes da família Debian e coloco # apt-get upgrade para ver quais pacotes precisariam ser atualizados. Na maioria das vezes nem é possível ou não faço. Como

Re: [BUG]Shellshock

Aviso: (...) "The mail server responded:  4.7.1 deb... Não foi possível enviar pelo Icedove.   Em meus computadores eu faço testes. No momento estou usando um Kaiana beta em dois notebooks (pessoal e um somente de testes). Já tive experiências falhas com pacotes, estou habituado a instalar o que

Re: [BUG?] Re: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

Bonjour à tous les utilisateurs et développeurs de Debian : Le jeudi 12 mars 2015 à 13:27, Philippe Gras ph.g...@worldonline.fr a écrit : Listmaster me remonte les bretelles parce que mon fournisseur a rejeté 1 de ses messages sur un total de 199, sur une période de 7 jours (voir plus bas

Re: [BUG?] Re: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

Le 12/03/2015 14:27, Philippe Gras a écrit : Listmaster me remonte les bretelles parce que mon fournisseur C'est un envoi automatique, donc pas la peine de trop paniquer. Ce qui est desolant c'est de voir tant de projets libres(ou pas) ne pas utiliser Sympa, qui ecrase tous les autres

Re: Bug#780201: new codename needed for oldstable (due to squeeze-lts) when stable becomes oldstable

On 3/10/15, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 22:54:42 +0800 Subject: Re: Bug#780201: new codename needed for oldstable (due to squeeze-lts) when stable becomes oldstable To: debian

Re: BUG REPORT (CRITICAL) - JESSIE: System Barely Running ... right after lightdm starts

*Hello* *Kindly acknowledge that the problem is partially resolved.* *I managed to run top for a while and found that mount and systemd were consuming the cpu, so tried to delete some packages like lightdm and schroot.* *After removal of schroot the system has now become usable.* *I have not

Re: Bug or problem with ssd disk

On 02/03/2015 06:32 AM, Ian Scheehan wrote: Sometimes (random moment), my debian freeze, stop working. I don't know which package or kernel part cause that debian jessie freeze. How can get data/info of my computer and error which happen and send report bug to you? Can you help? best

Re: Bug or problem with ssd disk

On 02/03/2015 06:32 AM, Ian Scheehan wrote: Sometimes (random moment), my debian freeze, stop working. I don't know which package or kernel part cause that debian jessie freeze. How can get data/info of my computer and error which happen and send report bug to you? Can you help? best

Re: Bug i GUfw

Den 30 januari 2015 17:47 skrev Sven Arvidsson s...@whiz.se: Bug: #681315 Det är tyvärr inte så ovanligt, men du kan ju göra ändringen själv, så funkar det åtminstone på ditt system. Hmmm.. du menar alltså att det är vanligt att kända buggar kan finnas kvar i flera år i Debian ? Ok.

Re: Bug i GUfw

Den 30 januari 2015 17:41 skrev Anders Jackson anders.jack...@gmail.com: Det är tyvärr inte så ovanligt, men du kan ju göra ändringen själv, så funkar det åtminstone på ditt system. Eller så skickar man in en patch själv, om det inte redan finns någon. Det brukar göra att det går lite fortare

Re: Bug i GUfw

Hej Den 30 januari 2015 16:00 skrev Sven Arvidsson s...@whiz.se: On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 05:59 +0100, Rolf Edlund wrote: Tydligen finns buggen fortfarande kvar i GUfw, som gör att programmet enbart visas i menyn under Unity. Fast den varit känd i många år. Bug: #681315 Det är tyvärr inte så

Re: Bug i GUfw

Den 30 januari 2015 16:00 skrev Sven Arvidsson s...@whiz.se: Bug: #681315 Det är tyvärr inte så ovanligt, men du kan ju göra ändringen själv, så funkar det åtminstone på ditt system. Hmmm.. du menar alltså att det är vanligt att kända buggar kan finnas kvar i flera år i Debian ? Ok. --

Re: Bug i GUfw

On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 17:35 +0100, Rolf Edlund wrote: Den 30 januari 2015 16:00 skrev Sven Arvidsson s...@whiz.se: Bug: #681315 Det är tyvärr inte så ovanligt, men du kan ju göra ändringen själv, så funkar det åtminstone på ditt system. Hmmm.. du menar alltså att det är vanligt att

Re: Bug i GUfw

On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 05:59 +0100, Rolf Edlund wrote: Tydligen finns buggen fortfarande kvar i GUfw, som gör att programmet enbart visas i menyn under Unity. Fast den varit känd i många år. Bug: #681315 Det är tyvärr inte så ovanligt, men du kan ju göra ändringen själv, så funkar det

Re: Bug#770098: Request for a debian-nordic mailing list

Yes, why not? flemming On 18-11-2014 22:32, Per Andersson wrote: Package: lists.debian.org Severity: normal Hi! Please create a debian-nordic mailing list, for the Nordic Debian Community. At FSCONS 2014 in Göteborg, Sweden, almost a dozen Debian people attended the Debian room. During a

Re: Bug#770098: Request for a debian-nordic mailing list

Hi Flemming, Quoting Flemming Bjerke (2014-11-21 10:35:46) Yes, why not? Bedre hvis du sender din kommentar til 770...@bugs.debian.org. Helt fint at kommentere på denne liste (på dansk, endda), men processen med at oprette nye lister i Debian kræver at der påvises et behov, som bl.a. kan ske

Re: Bug#770098: Request for a debian-nordic mailing list

2014-11-21 12:19 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Hi Flemming, Quoting Flemming Bjerke (2014-11-21 10:35:46) Yes, why not? Bedre hvis du sender din kommentar til 770...@bugs.debian.org. Helt fint at kommentere på denne liste (på dansk, endda), men processen med at oprette nye

Re: Bug#770098: Request for a debian-nordic mailing list

2014-11-21 13:37 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Per Andersson (2014-11-21 12:49:14) 2014-11-21 12:19 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Flemming Bjerke (2014-11-21 10:35:46) Yes, why not? Bedre hvis du sender din kommentar til 770...@bugs.debian.org. Helt

Re: bug report

Hi Georges, On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 08:53:19PM -0600, Georges Jamieson wrote: I was trying to install jasper on a Raspbery Pi. The installation failed and requested that I send in a bug report thus my email. I can not understand the instructions for doing so but I did see this email

Re: Bug en debian 7 con interfaz de red, rename

El día 1 de septiembre de 2014, 16:03, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Mon, 01 Sep 2014 10:09:40 +0200, Maykel Franco escribió: El día 19 de agosto de 2014, 16:12, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: (...) Voy a probar a reiniciar haber si con el cambio que he realizado en grub

Re: Bug en debian 7 con interfaz de red, rename

El día 2 de septiembre de 2014, 10:09, Maykel Franco maykeldeb...@gmail.com escribió: El día 1 de septiembre de 2014, 16:03, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Mon, 01 Sep 2014 10:09:40 +0200, Maykel Franco escribió: El día 19 de agosto de 2014, 16:12, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com

Re: Bug en debian 7 con interfaz de red, rename

El Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:09:13 +0200, Maykel Franco escribió: El día 1 de septiembre de 2014, 16:03, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: (...) Ejecuta ifconfig -a cuando el equipo haya iniciado a ver qué interfaces detecta. Otra cosa que podrías probar es a renombrar el archivo /etc/

Re: Bug en debian 7 con interfaz de red, rename

El día 19 de agosto de 2014, 16:12, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:46:52 +0200, Maykel Franco escribió: El día 18 de agosto de 2014, 16:22, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: (...) ¿Has pensado en abrir un informe de fallo contra udev? Sí lo he pensado,

Re: Bug en debian 7 con interfaz de red, rename

El Mon, 01 Sep 2014 10:09:40 +0200, Maykel Franco escribió: El día 19 de agosto de 2014, 16:12, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: (...) Voy a probar a reiniciar haber si con el cambio que he realizado en grub se solventa. ¿Y qué pasó tras el reinicio? Lo que me extraña es que sin

Re: Bug en debian 7 con interfaz de red, rename

El día 18 de agosto de 2014, 16:22, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:04:50 +0200, Maykel Franco escribió: Hola buenas, tenía configurado un bonding con 2 tarjetas de red, eth0 y eth1. He reiniciado varias veces esa máquina y nunca he tenido problema. Hará unos 2

Re: Bug en debian 7 con interfaz de red, rename

El Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:46:52 +0200, Maykel Franco escribió: El día 18 de agosto de 2014, 16:22, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: (...) ¿Has pensado en abrir un informe de fallo contra udev? Sí lo he pensado, pero si te soy sincero he pensado solucionarlo antes de reportarlo. Voy

Re: Bug en debian 7 con interfaz de red, rename

El Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:04:50 +0200, Maykel Franco escribió: Hola buenas, tenía configurado un bonding con 2 tarjetas de red, eth0 y eth1. He reiniciado varias veces esa máquina y nunca he tenido problema. Hará unos 2 meses, actualicé el sistema y hoy que he reiniciado me encuentro con que

Re: Bug#736258: acpid won't stop, won't upgrade (systemd) - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736258

Sorry about the delay in responding. Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes: Large time outs can cause bad side-efects on surprising ways. If the socket is down, you get an immediate connection refused reply, which short-circuits the time out. As this is a generic feature, we

Re: Bug#736258: acpid won't stop, won't upgrade (systemd) - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736258

On Sun, 10 Aug 2014, Russ Allbery wrote: To take a step back, I think this is a fair summary of the discussion. Please let me know if you disagree: ... I agree to all points. It is a fair summary. I think you've convinced me that the approach of stopping a socket by the same name when

Re: Bug#736258: acpid won't stop, won't upgrade (systemd) - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736258

On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: [snip] Is there a reason debian-user is subscribed to this bug report? Please don't top-post. Probably because it's a debian-user@ thread that resulted in the the bug report and we were added to the cc as a

Re: Bug#736258: acpid won't stop, won't upgrade (systemd) - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736258

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard j.deboynepollard-newsgro...@ntlworld.com writes: And bugs #734766 and #734848 tell one the answer, which is that in order to preserve its existing conceptual model that there is just the one thing (named simply acpid) invoke-rc.d should pull out the socket from the

Re: Bug#736258: acpid won't stop, won't upgrade (systemd) - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736258

On Sat, 02 Aug 2014, Russ Allbery wrote: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard j.deboynepollard-newsgro...@ntlworld.com writes: And bugs #734766 and #734848 tell one the answer, which is that in order to preserve its existing conceptual model that there is just the one thing (named simply acpid)

Re: Bug#736258: acpid won't stop, won't upgrade (systemd) - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736258

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes: Services being subject to a package update can be down for extended amounts of time (think package update that requires manual intervention, or even a full manual reconfiguration, etc), or may actually involve an ABI break. In both cases,

Re: Bug#736258: acpid won't stop, won't upgrade (systemd) - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736258

On Sat, 02 Aug 2014, Russ Allbery wrote: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes: Services being subject to a package update can be down for extended amounts of time (think package update that requires manual intervention, or even a full manual reconfiguration, etc), or may

Re: Bug#736258: acpid won't stop, won't upgrade (systemd) - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736258

Is there a reason debian-user is subscribed to this bug report? On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 10:42:38AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard j.deboynepollard-newsgro...@ntlworld.com writes: [snip] -- If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are

Re: Bug in mediathekview?

On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:29:35PM +0200, Hans wrote: strace -f dpkg --print-architecture execve(/usr/bin/dpkg, [dpkg, --print-architecture], [/* 46 vars */]) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) Ouch. This means that user cannot execute dpkg itself. ls -la /usr/bin/dpkg -rwxr-x--- 1 root root

[SOLVED] Re: Bug in mediathekview?

Hi Reo! And this proves it. This is definitely wrong, anyone should be able to execute dpkg. Yeah, I already that this was the problem. I downloaded the package dpkg again and looked into. So I saw the wrong permissions. BTW, to check 'stock' file permissions that should be set on a

Re: Bug in mediathekview?

Hi. On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:06:05 +0200 Hans hans.ullr...@loop.de wrote: LANG=C mediathekview /usr/lib/java-wrappers/jvm-list.sh: line 25: /usr/bin/dpkg: Permission denied And the line 25 of this script reads: __arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) Can you run 'dpkg --print-architecture' as

Re: Bug in mediathekview?

Hi Reco! And the line 25 of this script reads: __arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) Can you run 'dpkg --print-architecture' as non-root? No. Are there any files at /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d that aren't readable by non- root? No. What are the permissions to /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg (should be 644)?

Re: Bug in mediathekview?

On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:44:29 +0200 Hans hans.ullr...@loop.de wrote: Hi Reco! And the line 25 of this script reads: __arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) Can you run 'dpkg --print-architecture' as non-root? No. Aha. What about: strace -f dpkg --print-architecture Are there any

Re: Bug in mediathekview?

On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:44:29 +0200 Hans hans.ullr...@loop.de wrote: Hi Reco! And the line 25 of this script reads: __arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) Can you run 'dpkg --print-architecture' as non-root? No. Aha. What about: strace -f dpkg --print-architecture Are there any

Re: Bug in mediathekview?

Aha. What about: strace -f dpkg --print-architecture Reco See: strace -f dpkg --print-architecture execve(/usr/bin/dpkg, [dpkg, --print-architecture], [/* 46 vars */]) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) dup(2) = 3 fcntl(3, F_GETFL) =

Re: Bug #693630: Dconf unknown method 'Change'

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:18 PM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 25.04.2014 14:01, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit : Le 24.04.2014 11:53, James Collier a écrit : Hi Berenger (and all), Thanks very much for the replies. My installed dconf packages and versions:

Re: Bug corrigeren (was Re: LDAP TLS probleem)

On Monday 09 June 2014 14:05:01 Paul van der Vlis wrote: Is een e-mail sturen naar cont...@bugs.debian.org met als inhoud: 'reassign 751002 libldap-2.4-2' de correct manier? Ja, maar altijd netjes afsluiten na de control commando's met 'thanks' (zonder aanhalingstekens). -- GPG:

Re: Bug corrigeren (was Re: LDAP TLS probleem)

op 09-06-14 14:27, Diederik de Haas schreef: On Monday 09 June 2014 14:05:01 Paul van der Vlis wrote: Is een e-mail sturen naar cont...@bugs.debian.org met als inhoud: 'reassign 751002 libldap-2.4-2' de correct manier? Ja, maar altijd netjes afsluiten na de control commando's met 'thanks'

Re: Bug en libgnutls

El día 4 de junio de 2014, 10:39, Mauro Antivero mauro.antiv...@gmail.com escribió: Estimados, estoy buscando información sobre el bug reciente en libgnutls (detallo el mismo más abajo), más precisamente que versiones son las afectadas y a partir de que versión está resuelto el problema.

Re: Bug en libgnutls

El Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:39:11 -0300, Mauro Antivero escribió: Estimados, estoy buscando información sobre el bug reciente en libgnutls (detallo el mismo más abajo), más precisamente que versiones son las afectadas y a partir de que versión está resuelto el problema. (...) Mi pregunta en

Re: Bug en libgnutls

El 04/06/14 11:11, Camaleón escribió: El Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:39:11 -0300, Mauro Antivero escribió: Estimados, estoy buscando información sobre el bug reciente en libgnutls (detallo el mismo más abajo), más precisamente que versiones son las afectadas y a partir de que versión está resuelto el

Re: Bug en libgnutls

El 04/06/14 11:09, Guido Ignacio escribió: El día 4 de junio de 2014, 10:39, Mauro Antivero mauro.antiv...@gmail.com escribió: Estimados, estoy buscando información sobre el bug reciente en libgnutls (detallo el mismo más abajo), más precisamente que versiones son las afectadas y a partir de

Re: Bug en libgnutls

El Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:10:49 -0300, Mauro Antivero escribió: El 04/06/14 11:11, Camaleón escribió: El Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:39:11 -0300, Mauro Antivero escribió: Estimados, estoy buscando información sobre el bug reciente en libgnutls (detallo el mismo más abajo), más precisamente que

Re: Bug en libgnutls

El 04/06/14 13:25, Mauro Antivero escribió: El 04/06/14 11:09, Guido Ignacio escribió: El día 4 de junio de 2014, 10:39, Mauro Antivero mauro.antiv...@gmail.com escribió: Estimados, estoy buscando información sobre el bug reciente en libgnutls (detallo el mismo más abajo), más precisamente

Re: Bug en libgnutls

El Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:33:46 -0300, Mauro Antivero escribió: El 04/06/14 13:25, Mauro Antivero escribió: El 04/06/14 11:09, Guido Ignacio escribió: (...) Mauro el cve es el CVE-2014-3466 y la info y solución la tenés acá [1] Más info [2] Pido mis disculpas, el mail que acabo de mandar

Re: Bug #693630: Dconf unknown method 'Change'

Le 24.04.2014 11:53, James Collier a écrit : Hi Berenger (and all), Thanks very much for the replies. My installed dconf packages and versions: james@james-turing:~$ apt-cache search dconf | grep dconf dconf-cli - simple configuration storage system - utilities dconf-editor - simple

Re: Bug #693630: Dconf unknown method 'Change'

Le 25.04.2014 14:01, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit : Le 24.04.2014 11:53, James Collier a écrit : Hi Berenger (and all), Thanks very much for the replies. My installed dconf packages and versions: james@james-turing:~$ apt-cache search dconf | grep dconf dconf-cli - simple

Re: Bug #693630: Dconf unknown method 'Change'

Hi Berenger (and all), Thanks very much for the replies. My installed dconf packages and versions: james@james-turing:~$ apt-cache search dconf | grep dconf dconf-cli - simple configuration storage system - utilities dconf-editor - simple configuration storage system - utilities

Re: Bug #693630: Dconf unknown method 'Change'

Le 23.04.2014 09:00, James Collier a écrit : Hello everyone, first time posting here. Yay! I've been having trouble with this dconf bug for some time now. And no solution on google seems to help. To get this error all I need to do is try to change a setting. e.g. open terminal: $

Re: Bug #693630: Dconf unknown method 'Change'

The idea of make a configuration file a binary file is the most serious bug of dconf. It's bad by design and when ever possible, we should avoid using software that needs dconf. As user use an editor that is dependent to dconf, to edit a file with root privileges and than try to use a MUA that's

Re: Bug #693630: Dconf unknown method 'Change'

Le 23.04.2014 15:33, Ralf Mardorf a écrit : The idea of make a configuration file a binary file is the most serious bug of dconf. It's bad by design and when ever possible, we should avoid using software that needs dconf. As user use an editor that is dependent to dconf, to edit a file with

Re: Bug #693630: Dconf unknown method 'Change'

On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 16:38 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: You know, I think exactly the same [snip] the mailing-list's discussions about bloat-wares, gnome, systemd, etc... :D I was thinking to send it to the off-topic list instead, but decided to mention that dconf is less

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >