On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:08:52PM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:21:04 +0100
> wrote:
>
> > If that's a genuine question, and if that interests others, I'd be glad to
> > post my upgrade notes. There are many resources out there, of which I'd
> > recommend (at least):
> >
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:21:04 +0100
wrote:
> If that's a genuine question, and if that interests others, I'd be glad to
> post my upgrade notes. There are many resources out there, of which I'd
> recommend (at least):
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/systemd#Installing_without_systemd
> http://noo
On Tuesday 16 February 2016 14:20:19 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 02:08:53PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 February 2016 13:21:04 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > if that interests others, I'd be glad to
> > > post m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 02:08:53PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 February 2016 13:21:04 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > if that interests others, I'd be glad to
> > post my upgrade notes
>
> Yes, please.
OK. It might take me a couple of days,
On Tuesday 16 February 2016 13:21:04 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> if that interests others, I'd be glad to
> post my upgrade notes
Yes, please.
Lisi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:59:55AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:53:41 +
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > > Want to stay with GNU-Linux, not ready to switch to Systemd-Linux.
> >
> > Jessie without systemd?
>
> How do you ins
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:53:41 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > Want to stay with GNU-Linux, not ready to switch to Systemd-Linux.
>
> Jessie without systemd?
How do you install that ?
Cheers,
Ron.
--
Ninety percent of everything is crud.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 08:35:16AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:36:33 +0100
arian wrote:
you might want to use aptitude (synaptics probably works too), as it makes
figuring out why it does what much easier, among other things. For a start, it
lists things one item per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:53:41AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 February 2016 11:35:16 Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:36:33 +0100
> >
> > arian wrote:
> > > you might want to use aptitude (synaptics probably works too),
On Tuesday 16 February 2016 11:35:16 Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:36:33 +0100
>
> arian wrote:
> > you might want to use aptitude (synaptics probably works too), as it
> > makes figuring out why it does what much easier, among other things. For
> > a start, it lists things one i
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:36:33 +0100
arian wrote:
> you might want to use aptitude (synaptics probably works too), as it makes
> figuring out why it does what much easier, among other things. For a start,
> it lists things one item per line by default. If you decide to do so, you
> probably want
> When I execute apt-get update && apt-get upgrade, [...]
Let me quote `man apt-get`:
upgrade
upgrade is used to install the newest versions of all packages
currently installed
on the system from the sources enumerated in /etc/apt/sources.list.
Packages
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 08:24:24PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:31:15PM -0400, "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:03:59PM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 02:40:45AM -0400, Kevin Mark wro
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 02:48:29PM -0400, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
>
> I have a debian system installed and want to dist
> upgrade it, BUT I want apt--get dist-upgrade to upgrade
> only the installed debs and not to download everything
> under the sun!
dist-upgrade will only upgrade those packages tha
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:31:15PM -0400, "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:03:59PM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 02:40:45AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > If you want less stuff installed, then you can tell aptitude n
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:03:59PM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 02:40:45AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > If you want less stuff installed, then you can tell aptitude not to
> > install 'recommends',
>
> If a package is listed as a recommends and you consider it should onl
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 02:40:45AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> If you want less stuff installed, then you can tell aptitude not to
> install 'recommends',
If a package is listed as a recommends and you consider it should only
be a suggests it is considered a bug.
--
Chris.
==
"One, with God,
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 04:10:38PM -0400, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 12 May 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 05/12/08 13:48, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a debian system installed and want to dist
>>> upgrade it, BUT I want apt--
ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
I have a debian system installed and want to dist
upgrade it, BUT I want apt--get dist-upgrade to upgrade
only the installed debs and not to download everything
under the sun!
'apt-get dist-upgrade' does exactly that. It tries to update as many of
the installed packages a
ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
>
> I have a debian system installed and want to dist
> upgrade it, BUT I want apt--get dist-upgrade to upgrade
> only the installed debs and not to download everything
> under the sun!
>
> Is such a thing possible?
You might be looking for
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/08 13:48, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
I have a debian system installed and want to dist
upgrade it, BUT I want apt--get dist-upgrade to upgrade
only the installed debs and not to download everything
unde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/08 13:48, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
>
> I have a debian system installed and want to dist
> upgrade it, BUT I want apt--get dist-upgrade to upgrade
> only the installed debs and not to download everything
> under the sun!
>
> Is such a thing poss
Rodolfo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
>> ; but then, when I tried to install libopensync-plugin-syncml with:
>>
>> # apt-get install libopensync-plugin-syncml
>>
>> , I got error:
>>
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies.
>> libopensync-plugin-syncml: Depends: libs
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:48:37PM +0200, Rodolfo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Rodolfo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ; but then, when I tried to install libopensync-plugin-syncml with:
>
> # apt-get install libopensync-plugin-syncml
>
> , I got error:
>
> The following
Rodolfo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In order to catch the newer version of opensync, I added to sources.list the
> following lines:
>
> #opensync
> deb http://opensync.gforge.punktart.de/repo/opensync-0.21/ etch main
> deb-src http://opensync.gforge.punktart.de/repo/opensync-0.21/ etch
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:34:59PM +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> In order to catch the newer version of opensync, I added to sources.list the
> following lines:
>
> #opensync
> deb http://opensync.gforge.punktart.de/repo/opensync-0.21/ etch main
> deb-src http://opensync.gforge.punktart.de/rep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:05:02AM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 05:27:57PM +0200, Albert Dengg wrote:
> > and afterwards you should probably clear the cache using 'apt-get clean'
>
> Why?
unless you want to use them again for so
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 05:27:57PM +0200, Albert Dengg wrote:
> and afterwards you should probably clear the cache using 'apt-get clean'
Why?
--
Marc Wilson | Remember, God could only create the world in 6 days
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | because he didn't have an established user base.
sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 11:15:35AM -0400, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
>
> How does one install the upgrade that was downloaded as:
>
>apt-get upgrade -d
>
> -ishwar
just run apt-get upgrade
everything that is already downloaded won't be downloaded aga
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:08:44 -0400 (EDT)
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How can one install a package downloaded as:
>
>apt-get install -d gcc-3.4
hopefully it is either in your present directory or in the archive directory -
probably /var/cache/apt/archives ...
do #dpkg -i .
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
How can one install a package downloaded as:
apt-get install -d gcc-3.4
If you download it first, then a simple `apt-get install gcc-4.3` later
will install it. This is because apt looks in the local package cache
before going to the network.
-Roberto
--
Roberto
George Borisov wrote:
> Eric Wong wrote:
>
>>3) dpkg -P apache2
>>And then I remove apache2
>
>
> Try using "apt-get remove --purge apache2" instead?
>
>
> Hope this helps,
>
That will not help as apache2 is just a meta-package. There are other
packages with file in /etc/apache2.
-Roberto
Andrew Sackville-West writes:
> apt probably doesn't realise that you previously removed apache2 and so
> doesn't know to reinstall the confs. just a guess there.
'apt-get remove apache2' removes the package but not the configuration
files. Thus when he later did 'apt-get install apache2' apt ass
Eric Wong wrote:
>
> 3) dpkg -P apache2
> And then I remove apache2
Try using "apt-get remove --purge apache2" instead?
Hope this helps,
--
George Borisov
DXSolutions Ltd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Roberto,
Really thanks a lot!
I tried to search it in google, but couldn't find out the solution. Your information is extremely helpful !! Thanks a lot!
:)
KC Eric
On 5/24/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Wong wrote:> Hi,>> I am newbie to Debian, and have a question
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:16:42PM +0800, Eric Wong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am newbie to Debian, and have a question about apt-get.
>
> Conside the following steps:
>
> 1) apt-get install apache2
>
> Now apache2 is installed and working fine
>
> 2) rm -rf /etc/apache2
> I try to remove all configur
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:16:42PM +0800, Eric Wong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am newbie to Debian, and have a question about apt-get.
>
> Conside the following steps:
>
> 1) apt-get install apache2
>
> Now apache2 is installed and working fine
great
>
> 2) rm -rf /etc/apache2
> I try to remove all
try 'dpkg-reconfigure apache2'
Henrique
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Wong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am newbie to Debian, and have a question about apt-get.
>
> Conside the following steps:
>
> 1) apt-get install apache2
>
> Now apache2 is installed and working fine
>
> 2) rm -rf /etc/apache2
> I try to remove all configurations
>
> 3) dpkg -P apache2
> And
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:47:27 -0500 (EST)
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have installed debian-archive-keyring and apt-get install still
> complains like:
>
> WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
> tex-common tetex-base libkpathsea4 libpoppler0c2 libt1-5 tete
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:11:51PM +0200, Dominik Epple wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have an empty /var/cache/apt/archives directory. For building
> a custom CD, I want to have all packages that are installed on the
> machine as a file on my computer, e.g. in the /var/cache/apt/archives
> directory. Ca
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:39:22PM +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> > I have an empty /var/cache/apt/archives directory. For building
> > a custom CD, I want to have all packages that are installed on the
> > machine as a file on my computer, e.g. in the /var/cache/apt/archives
> > directory. Can I
Hello
Dominik Epple (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have an empty /var/cache/apt/archives directory. For building
> a custom CD, I want to have all packages that are installed on the
> machine as a file on my computer, e.g. in the /var/cache/apt/archives
> directory. Can I make apt-get download
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 at 19:00 GMT, Alfredo Valles penned:
> On Tuesday 04 November 2003 5:26 pm, JG wrote:
>>
>> No. We base the stability of our system by using "stable" (and,
>> possibly, backports: www.apt-get.org).
>
>
> But it would be a good idea to add to apt the capability of undo the
> mo
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 5:26 pm, JG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:26:15PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> > > The general answer is "downgrades are not supported". It is often
> > > possible to just install the previous versions of packages with
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 at 08:23 GMT, Rob Weir penned:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:40:02PM -0800, Joe Rhett said
>> With no way to go back? Right...
>
> Notice that I said "general", by the way. It is often possible to
> trivially downgrade packages with dpkg, but sometimes it is extremely
> diffic
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:40:02PM -0800, Joe Rhett said
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:26:15PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> > The general answer is "downgrades are not supported". It is often
> > possible to just install the previous versions of packages with "dpkg"
> > (look in /var/cache/apt/archives
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:40:02PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
> You've got to be kidding me. Hm, let's base the stability of our system on
> whether or not someone bothered to report a bug? With no way to go back?
> Right...
You mean let's NOT, as potentially useful input, evaluate whether or not
a
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:26:15PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> The general answer is "downgrades are not supported". It is often
> possible to just install the previous versions of packages with "dpkg"
> (look in /var/cache/apt/archives/ for old .debs), but there are no
> guarantees. Installing "apt
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:14:51PM -0700, Robert Soricone said
> Is it possible to "undo" an upgrade performed by apt-get, i.e. revert to
> your previous state?
The general answer is "downgrades are not supported". It is often
possible to just install the previous versions of packages with "dpkg"
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:20:37AM -0700, James LeClair wrote:
> Hello all. Could someone suggest, or better yet provide an example, a way
> to edit a sources.list file so as to have the most up to date debian
> desktop system possible. Suppose I could just install Knoppix but that
> would be to
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:20:37AM -0700, James LeClair wrote:
> would be to easy. I have done some experimenting, but every time I appear
> to have done the dist-upgrade successfully, KDE completely breaks down.
James, see the new book in progress at
http://www.togaware.com/linux/survivor/Upda
Hi,
* James LeClair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030710 12:53]:
> Hello all. Could someone suggest, or better yet provide an example, a way
> to edit a sources.list file so as to have the most up to date debian
> desktop system possible.
Well it depends on whether you are running stable, testing or uns
Ferenc Engard wrote:
Hi all,
Can I (permanently) overdrive the dependency settings of a package?
I.e., I want to disable a 'conflicts' dependency which is not a conflict
to me, anyway, I have installed the package in question with "dpkg -i
--force-conflicts", and works great.
But, in this state a
on Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 07:33:21AM +0530, Jijo Jose A ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> hi all
>
> i am trying to download packages from
> http://pandora.debian.org/debian-non-US/,
> using apt-setup, it update the packages lists and after it don't work with
> apt-get , the error occured like
>
> apt-
> BTW Is there a way to build debian pakages manually, I
> mean I rather download the files (diff, dsc
> orig.tar.gz ...using any ftp client into local and
> build it.
>
sure, how do you think we do it?
dpkg-source -x foo.dsc
cd foo-version
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc # make sure you in
Vishal Soni wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how I can specify a destination with
> apt-get? i.e. apt-get installs everything in /usr, but
> I want to get it to install in /usr/local/...
>
> Thanks in advance,
> v
Also, where files get installed to is determined by the package, not by
apt-get.
Tom
Why would you want to do this? The whole point of having /usr/local is to
keep what you add to your system seperate from the main distribution. This
is at least Debian's implementation of what /usr/local should
represent. Is there a specific reason that you would want to prefer
/usr/local over /usr
Jorge Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, I want apt-get to get some packages from unstable (using
> something like apt-get install postgresql/unstable), but for all the
> other packages I want the versions in testing (so that doing an
> 'apt-get install postgresql install the version from
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 10:00:22AM -0500, Jorge Santos wrote:
> Hello, I want apt-get to get some packages from unstable (using
> something like apt-get install postgresql/unstable), but for all the
> other packages I want the versions in testing (so that doing an
> 'apt-get install postgresql inst
Jorge Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello, I want apt-get to get some packages from unstable (using
>something like apt-get install postgresql/unstable), but for all the
>other packages I want the versions in testing (so that doing an
>'apt-get install postgresql install the version from testi
Eric Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any comments on the proposed-updates? It's not testing but it is not
> approved stable either.
proposed-updates (which is a link to potato-proposed-updates/)
contains updates to stable.
moritz
--
Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www
Eric Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Here are the questions.
Thanks for all the help. I'll put what I'm thinking to do as a result of
all the responses.
>
> 1. Does the order matter? Will it look to cd first if the cd entry is
> first in the file and then online second?
I'll put the CD's first in the
b3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:45:06PM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> > 1. Does the order matter? Will it look to cd first if the cd entry is
> > first in the file and then online second?
>
> I'm not entirely sure if order matters or not...
It does. If you keep the
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Keith Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 10:16:35AM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
>
> > Now, we all use `apt-get update; apt-get upgrade' on a regular
> > basis. But you're supposed to use `apt-get dist-upgrade' when moving
> > between distributions. What happens if
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 10:16:35AM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
> Now, we all use `apt-get update; apt-get upgrade' on a regular
> basis. But you're supposed to use `apt-get dist-upgrade' when moving
> between distributions. What happens if stable changes without your
> knowledge and you run
b3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> they switch. (IE: if you use "potato" you'll always get "potato"
> packages, but if you use "stable", then when woody becomes stable,
> you'll get upgraded to woody.)
Now, we all use `apt-get update; apt-get upgrade' on a regular
basis. But you're supposed to u
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:45:06PM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> 1. Does the order matter? Will it look to cd first if the cd entry is
> first in the file and then online second?
I'm not entirely sure if order matters or not - I generally only keep
the cdrom entries in there until I have the net
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Ameurlain Antoine wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I recently installed a package (aterm) from its debian package file
> with dpkg -i. Since I have a compiled version of Xfree864.0, I had
> to force the installation (aterm required "xlibs" which I haven't got).
> Fine.
> But now, apt-ge
Subject: apt-get question
Date: Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 01:39:59PM -0700
In reply to:Wayde C Gutman
Quoting Wayde C Gutman([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> This what I have gone through so far,
>
> First tried to apt-get dist-update with the following in
> /ect/apt/sources.list,
>
> ftp://ft
Wayde C Gutman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This what I have gone through so far,
>
>First tried to apt-get dist-update
That should be dist-upgrade, I hope ...
>with the following in /ect/apt/sources.list,
>
>ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/upgrade-i386/apt 0.3.19
>i386.deb
>also
Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How can I lists the available packages on my Debian CDs with apt-get?
>Supose I need to install XWindow, how should I know which packages I
>have to install?
apt-cache search whatever
I found that the investment of time in learning dselect was well w
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:41:53PM +0200, Moritz Schulte wrote:
>
> the debs are in /var/cache/apt/archives/
> from time to time you get asked, wether you want to delete these
> files.
One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet, these are packages containing
binaries, not source. If you want to down
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:49:08PM -0400, Christopher W. Aiken wrote:
> Does "apt-get" also save the downloaded software?
yes.
> If so where would I look for it to save to a floppy or zip?
the debs are in /var/cache/apt/archives/
from time to time you get asked, wether you want to delete these
"michael d. ivey" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:25:28PM -0700, Nate Amsden wrote:
> > still can't do(although i still see people reference it sometimes i
> > never got it workin) is the 'search' function to search thru things, i
> > keep seeing from time-to-time people say 'apt-get search
Hello
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:25:28 -0700, Nate Amsden said:
[snip]
:
: you can 'clear' the cache if you want by running apt-get clean. you can
: also specify another location to download to, you can also tell it to
: download *only* and not install(see manpage for apt-get), one thing apt
:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:25:28PM -0700, Nate Amsden wrote:
> still can't do(although i still see people reference it sometimes i
> never got it workin) is the 'search' function to search thru things, i
> keep seeing from time-to-time people say 'apt-get search '
> but none of my machines with apt
yes; and /var/cache/apt/archives
hth.
bentley taylor
(potato on 2.2.16)
//
"Christopher W. Aiken" wrote:
>
[snip
> Does "apt-get" also save the downloaded software?
> If so where would I look for it to save to a floppy or zip?
>
> ---
> Christopher W. Aiken, Scenery Hill, Pa, USA
> chris
"Christopher W. Aiken" wrote:
>
> In FreeBSD there exists a "ports" tree with hundreds of
> software titles that have been "ported" to FreeBSD. One only
> has to connect to Internet and do a "make; make install; make clean"
> for FreeBSD to go to the proper FTP site(s) to download the
> software
>Where does apt-get download the files from?
/etc/apt-get/sources.list
man apt-get would have told you.
TomG
>
>Tom
>
>
>--
>Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
pgpPFJ4OK0vuH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
From: Will Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I think what he means is that when you install from CD, it rolls through
>the CD and checks every packages against the list of selections, like:
>Skipping deselected package: bash
>Skipping deselected package: bang
>Skipping deselected package: beat
I rememb
Hi Shawn,
you wrote on Sat, Mar 20 1999:
>In hamm, it was such a task to install a package in dselect because
>it rolls through every single package on the dist. Does slink
>resolve this problem and more specifically, is apt-get the
>resolution?
You may have overlooked it: there was an apt in t
On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Sarel Botha wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 1999 at 03:38:07PM -0500, Will Lowe wrote:
> > > What exactly do you mean "it rolls through every single package
> > > on the dist"? If you mean what it sounds like, you only have to
> >
> > I think what he means is that when you install
Yes, I mean that after selecting install, it check every single
packages.
David Gaudine wrote:
>
> > I've heard a lot about apt-get in slink but I have a question about
> >it. In hamm, it was such a task to install a package in dselect because
> >it rolls through every single package on the dis
On Sat, Mar 20, 1999 at 03:38:07PM -0500, Will Lowe wrote:
> > What exactly do you mean "it rolls through every single package
> > on the dist"? If you mean what it sounds like, you only have to
>
> I think what he means is that when you install from CD, it rolls through
> the CD and checks ever
> What exactly do you mean "it rolls through every single package
> on the dist"? If you mean what it sounds like, you only have to
I think what he means is that when you install from CD, it rolls through
the CD and checks every packages against the list of selections, like:
Skipping deselected
> I've heard a lot about apt-get in slink but I have a question about
>it. In hamm, it was such a task to install a package in dselect because
>it rolls through every single package on the dist. Does slink resolve
>this problem and more specifically, is apt-get the resolution?
What exactly do y
87 matches
Mail list logo
