On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:26:21 -0700
dmacdoug wrote:
>
> Assuming your sshd server is on a computer attached
> to a router which is your gateway to the internet, and
> the router is set to forward port 22 to that computer
> some ISP's don't route port 22 traffic. I know that
> AT&T blocks por
On Sb, 23 oct 21, 09:33:44, Joe wrote:
>
> The ssh protocol by default works on TCP port 22, but the sshd (server)
> configuration file allows different ports to be specified. If you have
> port 22 open to the Internet, you will get many firewall logs for
> people trying brute-force password attac
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 08:42:09 +0300
Semih Ozlem wrote:
> Are there specific tutorials websites that you can recommend, how
> about port forwarding. From where which sites in particular can I
> learn about these topics?
Here's a good practical guide:
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutoria
Are there specific tutorials websites that you can recommend, how about
port forwarding. From where which sites in particular can I learn about
these topics?
Joe , 22 Eki 2021 Cum, 00:08 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 23:48:38 +0300
> Semih Ozlem wrote:
>
> > I think it was somethin
On Friday, 22 Oct 2021 at 09:46, David Wright wrote:
> I'm guessing it was a BT Home Hub.
EE *before* bought by BT but maybe same supplier even then.
> One might suspect that 100 lies at the lower boundary of its DHCP
> range, leaving 99 static addresses free. But no guess at a product.
I canno
On Fri 22 Oct 2021 at 11:59:40 (+0100), Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Friday, 22 Oct 2021 at 13:40, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Typically modems and home routers use the .1 address for themselves.
>
> Interesting. My last 2 routers have had *.254 (!)
I'm guessing it was a BT Home Hub. It's idiosyncrati
On Friday, 22 Oct 2021 at 13:40, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Typically modems and home routers use the .1 address for themselves.
Interesting. My last 2 routers have had *.254 (!) and *.100 as their
address.
--
Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.60 & org 9.5 on Debian 11.1
On Jo, 21 oct 21, 22:52:37, Semih Ozlem wrote:
> I am unable to access my modem settings page when writing 192.168.1.100 to
> check if there is a firewall.
Are you sure this is the correct address? How did you establish that?
Typically modems and home routers use the .1 address for themselves.
E
That's 'systemctl status ssh' without the 1) of course.I meant to put more
steps but decided not to
--
James B
portoteache...@fastmail.com
Em Sex, 22 Out ʼ21, às 00:18, James B escreveu:
> Hi Semih,
>
> In my opinion, I would go back to basics first.You may have installed
> openssh but it
Hi Semih,
In my opinion, I would go back to basics first.You may have installed openssh
but it doesn't necessarily run by default (for reasons that will make sense
when you look at it further).Do you know how to start systemd services? It
looks to me like your ssh server isnt' running.So, run (
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 09:53, Semih Ozlem wrote:
> From:Semih Ozlem
> To:Debian Users , ubuntu-us...@lists.ubuntu.com
Please, do not send individual messages to more than one
mailing list.
It is rather unfriendly to everyone else that reads each list, because
we do not see any conversation tha
I am unable to access my modem settings page when writing 192.168.1.100 to
check if there is a firewall.
Below is the web page that I get
Unable to connect
Firefox can’t establish a connection to the server at 192.168.1.100.
The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:41:43PM +0300, Semih Ozlem wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I set up an openssh server and I am trying to access that machine remotely
> (not from the local network. but from another ip address). I get an error
> (something about port 22). What setting needs to be checked and w
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 09:07:02PM +, Semih Ozlem wrote:
> Yes the error message is
>
> ssh: connect to host (ip address of remote host) port 22: Connection refused
This message means one of these things:
1) The sshd process is not running, or is not listening on the default port.
2) A fire
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 23:48:38 +0300
Semih Ozlem wrote:
> I think it was something like "ssh: connect to host port 22:
> Connection refused" It will take me a little while to get the same
> error message again.
>
>
Ideally you need to do more than open the ssh port, particularly if you
inten
Yes the error message is
ssh: connect to host (ip address of remote host) port 22: Connection refused
Semih Ozlem , 21 Eki 2021 Per, 20:48
tarihinde şunu yazdı:
> I think it was something like "ssh: connect to host port 22:
> Connection refused" It will take me a little while to get the s
I think it was something like "ssh: connect to host port 22:
Connection refused" It will take me a little while to get the same error
message again.
James B , 21 Eki 2021 Per, 23:45 tarihinde
şunu yazdı:
> Hi Semih,
>
> Could you post the exact wording of the error message please?
>
> Best
>
Hi Semih,
Could you post the exact wording of the error message please?
Best
JB
--
James B
portoteache...@fastmail.com
Em Qui, 21 Out ʼ21, às 21:41, Semih Ozlem escreveu:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I set up an openssh server and I am trying to access that machine remotely
> (not from the loca
Hi everyone,
I set up an openssh server and I am trying to access that machine remotely
(not from the local network. but from another ip address). I get an error
(something about port 22). What setting needs to be checked and what needs
to be done on the machine that openssh server is running and
gt; the have real IPs, and others are behind firewalls and NATs, which render a
> > regular direct connection impossible.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Francisco
> >
> If your aim is to get one, completely free of charge, software for remote
> access to yo
t; and therefore we do not have control over their networking environment; some
> of
> the have real IPs, and others are behind firewalls and NATs, which render a
> regular direct connection impossible.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Francisco
>
If your aim is to get one, completely free o
Francisco M Neto wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> At work, we have several computers that are located at different
> locations throughout the country. Some of them are highly inaccessible by
> usual
> means, and it requires a certain planning to reach them to have direct access.
> Therefore, we hav
Le 17/04/2019 à 15:35, Francisco M Neto a écrit :
Greetings!
At work, we have several computers that are located at different
locations throughout the country. Some of them are highly inaccessible by usual
means, and it requires a certain planning to reach them to have direct access.
Th
Greetings!
At work, we have several computers that are located at different
locations throughout the country. Some of them are highly inaccessible by usual
means, and it requires a certain planning to reach them to have direct access.
Therefore, we have been using TeamViewer software to ac
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 04:51:59PM -0400, John Cunningham wrote:
I'm trying to set up a laptop that users can use for remote access to a
Windows Active Directory Domain, and would appreciate some guidance in the
right direction. It looks pretty straightforward to get a Debian comput
I'm trying to set up a laptop that users can use for remote access to a
Windows Active Directory Domain, and would appreciate some guidance in the
right direction. It looks pretty straightforward to get a Debian computer
to authenticate with AD. But I can't get my head around the rem
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:40:10 -0700
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> Can Debian support this telnet SRA login to another system?
May be this could help you:
http://helpdesk.princeton.edu/kb/display.plx?ID=1157
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
In a NetBSD system,
$ telnet localhost
...
Trying SRA secure login:
User (me):
Password:
[ SRA accepts you ]
$
Helpful documentation about SRA hasn't turned up.
In a Debian system on the local network this happens.
$ telnet netbsdsystem
Trying 172.25.2.2...
Connected to netbsdsystem.invalid
On 2010-03-16 07:06, Mitchell Laks wrote:
[snip]
i will look to see what comes up at work this morning and at Dad and Mom's
tonight
Configure their firewall (open port 23 and, if the fw is an external
device, forward the port to your Dad's PC) and then ssh into his box
and configure his pr
Thanks for answer
I know that , but I used debian list and the list is more read firstly,
secondly ubuntu is based on debian so. thirdly I remmember I had this
problem on debian a couple of years ago.
by the way the problem is for vsftp and ssh too, so it is a security
problem ( on openssl
Hi,
abdelkader belahcene writes:
> I install vsftp as sererver on ubuntu 9.10
Please refer to the Ubuntu user technical support mailing list [1] for
problems with Ubuntu.
Regards,
Ansgar
[1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-req
Hi,
I install vsftp as sererver on ubuntu 9.10
It runs for a time then stops answer for remote access, but not for local
access ???
I mean If i use the commandftp 192.168.10.10 from the localhost
it responds
but ftp 192.168.10.10 from a remote machine it doesn&#
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 06:17:37PM +0100, Paul Csanyi wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I will to set up my home network so so I can to
> connect from LAN to postgresql server on DMZ.
>
> I can to connect to the postgresql server when I
> set up pg_hba.conf with 'trust' method, but can't
> to connect to it wit
Hello!
I will to set up my home network so so I can to
connect from LAN to postgresql server on DMZ.
I can to connect to the postgresql server when I
set up pg_hba.conf with 'trust' method, but can't
to connect to it with 'md5' method.
What is the solution?
Any advices will be appreciated!
--
On 12/29/2007 01:39 PM, Paul Csanyi wrote:
> How can I give someone remote access through ssh login only to my
> /home/user/some/ directory?
Depending on what you might wish them to be able to do, such as log into
a chroot or just upload files, I have used rssh or scponly under v
Hello!
How can I give someone remote access through ssh login only to my
/home/user/some/ directory?
Any advices will be appreciated!
--
Regards, Paul Csanyi
http://www.freewebs.com/csanyi-pal/index.htm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:10:34AM -0700, Bill wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> What's the best way to provide secure and remote access to a
> Windows user. I want to give my friend access to Apache so
> he can work on our website.
>
As Andrei and the anonymous poster from Arizona
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:10:34AM -0700, Bill wrote:
> What's the best way to provide secure and remote access to a
> Windows user. I want to give my friend access to Apache so
> he can work on our website.
putty
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you
Bill wrote:
Hi folks,
What's the best way to provide secure and remote access to a
Windows user. I want to give my friend access to Apache so
he can work on our website.
tia,
b.
The best way would be to use SSH.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Hi folks,
What's the best way to provide secure and remote access to a
Windows user. I want to give my friend access to Apache so
he can work on our website.
tia,
b.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:50:13 +0100
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:18:43PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> > The only existing solution that seemed to do what I wanted was grunt
> > [1], by our own John Goerzen [2], but it has virtually no documentation
> > [3], so
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:18:43PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> The only existing solution that seemed to do what I wanted was grunt
> [1], by our own John Goerzen [2], but it has virtually no documentation
> [3], so in the time-honored *nix tradition, I decided to roll my own.
Too late for you pe
Hi everyone,
A little over a year ago I asked (on this list) [0] about a solution
for secure, remote access via email. The only existing solution that
seemed to do what I wanted was grunt [1], by our own John Goerzen [2],
but it has virtually no documentation [3], so in the time-honored *nix
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:21:33 -0500
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 01:20:06PM -0800, Peter Easthope wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:48:09PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
[snip]
> > fetchmail sends messages to port 25 via SMTP whereas
> > mutt wa
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 01:20:06PM -0800, Peter Easthope wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:48:09PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > You can setup mutt on machine M and have it just pull messages directly
> > from machine P via POP.
>
> Two factors against that.
> - P belongs to an ISP whic
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:48:09PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> You can setup mutt on machine M and have it just pull messages directly
> from machine P via POP.
Two factors against that.
- P belongs to an ISP which refuses POP access from
a machine not on his WAN.
- M is inside a firew
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:01:43PM -0800, Easthope wrote:
> Roberto Sanchez & others,
>
> At Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:45:38 -050, Roberto Sanchez said,
> "Setup mutt on the machine and ssh in when
> you are travelling."
>
> It works as you outline.
> POP3 server, is on machine P.
> fetchmail, exim, mu
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:01:43PM -0800, Easthope wrote:
> Roberto Sanchez & others,
>
> At Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:45:38 -050, Roberto Sanchez said,
> "Setup mutt on the machine and ssh in when
> you are travelling."
>
> It works as you outline.
> POP3 server, is on machine P.
> fetchmail, exim, mu
Roberto Sanchez & others,
At Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:45:38 -050, Roberto Sanchez said,
"Setup mutt on the machine and ssh in when
you are travelling."
It works as you outline.
POP3 server, is on machine P.
fetchmail, exim, mutt and ssh are on home machine, H.
ssh is on mobile machine M.
Also, thanks
On Thursday 24 August 2006 09:06, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
> Remote system is debian derivative. When I access this system
> using ssh, the connection does not execute $HOME/.bashrc
> on remote system.
I usually link .bashrc to .bash_profile or vice versa to avoid this problem.
--
Paul Johnson
Email
Other login shell, wrong permissions, ...
What does ssh -V show?
A workaround: ~/.ssh/environment
On 8/24/06, Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Remote system is debian derivative. When I access this system
using ssh, the connection does not execute $HOME/.bashrc
on remote system.
Rega
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:06:35PM -0400, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
> Remote system is debian derivative. When I access this system
> using ssh, the connection does not execute $HOME/.bashrc
> on remote system.
My .bash_profile starts with
if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then
source ~/.bashrc
fi
According to
Remote system is debian derivative. When I access this system
using ssh, the connection does not execute $HOME/.bashrc
on remote system.
Any ideas?
-ishwar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:38:22AM -0300, Cristian Gutierrez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> >>
> You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
> >> And make already sloth
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:41:44PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Pigeon wrote:
> >I say this because I've just broken a remote box doing an apt-get
> >upgrade - security upgrades to woody - which Isn't Supposed To Happen.
> >Don't know exactly how, because ssh is one of the things that broke...
>
>
Pigeon wrote:
I say this because I've just broken a remote box doing an apt-get
upgrade - security upgrades to woody - which Isn't Supposed To Happen.
Don't know exactly how, because ssh is one of the things that broke...
If you can get access to the box or walk someone through access on the b
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:32:40PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
> > know if I could provide support for there small network of PC'
Lionel VICTOR wrote:
Now I'm speaking theoretically 'cos I've never needed to try this out
but...
SSH can compress data. So, as the CPU is not the problem (i.e.:
[SNIP]
Well given that, the difference between theory and practice is that
practice works... theoretically.
As any gamer knows tho
Steve Lamb a écrit :
Paul Johnson wrote:
Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH is
all you need (and it's X11 forwarding option is your friend). If not,
you'll have to go with the much slower, much more insecure VNC.
Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to u
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:46:38PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I've worked with VNC and several other technologies (radmin, WTS, and
> another which fails to come to mind...). For intermittent support work,
> they are acceptable. Wouldn't want to work on 'em full time though.
I'm working on
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
>>
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
>> And make already sloth VNC more like sitting through all 3 hours of
>> Titanic: Slow and painful with lots of high-pitche
> Could you expand on how exactly you set that up? I rarely use windows
> but sometimes I am forced to (like on campus computers). Also, is there
> an easy way to acomplish the same thing on a linux box?
>
> Joshua
Sorry for missing a few details- I use Linux almost exclusive at home- The su
on Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:10:58PM -0800, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Running applications.
>
> That shouldn't make it slow, X is window-oriented, instead of
> just-take-a-jpeg-of-the-screen-and-cram-it-over-the-netw
Joshua Ferraro wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH. It's what
I do for those unfortunate times I stuck on a windows machine
(since the VNC viewer and PuTTY are monolithic executables that
don't require administrative privileges to install).
Could you expand on how exactly y
> -Original Message-
> From: Roberto Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 February 2004 1:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Remote access PC support
>
>
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Robert
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
And make already sloth VNC more like sitting through all 3 hours of
Titanic: Slow and painful with lots of high-pitched shrieking in the
middle. Be sure to
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Running applications.
That shouldn't make it slow, X is window-oriented, instead of
just-take-a-jpeg-of-the-screen-and-cram-it-over-the-network-oriented.
Unfortunately as of a few months ago anything built on G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Running applications.
That shouldn't make it slow, X is window-oriented, instead of
just-take-a-jpeg-of-the-screen-and-cram-it-over-the-network-oriented.
> What are you doing that is m
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:46:34PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to using VNC for access to
my X desktop because X was slower than VNC. I can't imagine SSH+X would be
faster than VNC. :P
What are you doing to it that X is slower
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:46:34PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH is
> >all you need (and it's X11 forwarding option is your friend). If
> >not, you'll have to go with the much slower, much more insecure VNC.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:46:34PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to using VNC for access to
> my X desktop because X was slower than VNC. I can't imagine SSH+X would be
> faster than VNC. :P
What are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
And make already sloth VNC more like sitting through all 3 hours of
Titanic: Slow and painful with lots of high-pitched shrieking
Paul Johnson wrote:
Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH is
all you need (and it's X11 forwarding option is your friend). If not,
you'll have to go with the much slower, much more insecure VNC.
Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to using VNC for access to my
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
> >>>kn
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
home.
Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
> know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
> home.
Yup. If every other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
> know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
> home. I have been reading about VNC and wondered about its security
> and speed. I went to tightvnc and see inf
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to know if I could
provide support for there small network of PC's at home. I have been reading about
VNC and wondered about its security and speed. I went to tightvnc and see info about
using SSH as well. Anyone using a
"Morbo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to log in through telnet and ideally also through X into the
> Linux machine, start an ftp client or irc client etc. then close the
> connection again with the started applications continueing to run?
>
> Also if I could do that, could I then l
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 01:40:31PM -0700, MRZ wrote:
> Do these types of solutions work bothways a-la pcAnyWhere? I'm thinking of
> looking into
> that VNC option but want to be able to control the Win box from Linux and
> not necessarily the other way around.
VNC will let you control the window
>Morbo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have two computers at home. On one I'm running Linux, and
> > machine if I want to use it. I'm also want to try some free X servers for
> > Win32 (any suggestions?) so that I could actually log in through X.
> > Balazs
> Luke Reeves replied:
> For an X-server f
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:30:34PM +0200, Morbo wrote:
> Unfortunatly I have only space for one screen and keyboard. I could use some
> switch, but they usually degrade image quality at high resolution (or cost a
> fortune), so I found it's much more convenient to telnet/ssh into the linux
> machin
For an X-server for Windows, the two I use are:
WeirdX - http://www.jcraft.com/weirdx/ - This is an open-source 100%
Java server, works fairly well (but you need a hefty system to run it)
NetSarang X Manager - http://www.netsarang.com/download/download.html
- A really good fast and stable
There's an adequate X server for windows that used to be free but is now
$25 shareware:
http://www.microimages.com/mix/
it will probably do what you need. I haven't played with the cygwin one.
--
Andrew J Perrin - [EMAIL PROTECT
* Morbo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> Hi,
>
> I have two computers at home. On one I'm running Linux, and it is turned on
> non-stop. On the other I'm running W$ndows (mainly for games). This one is
> only running if I'm doing something on it.
> Unfortunatly I have only space for one screen
Hi,
I have two computers at home. On one I'm running Linux, and it is turned on
non-stop. On the other I'm running W$ndows (mainly for games). This one is
only running if I'm doing something on it.
Unfortunatly I have only space for one screen and keyboard. I could use some
switch, but they usuall
Hi!
At work I´m using exmh (and mh therefore) to read my mail, if I have to access
it from home (much too often :-/ ) currently I either open exmh on the remote
machine via ssh´s port-forwarding (mainly because of the compression facility)
or mh´s built-in tools scan, show, repl etc.
Either opti
Ron Rademaker wrote:
>
> Hardware:
>
> ISDN Teles 16.3 card
>
> Goal:
>
> I want to be able to let other computers log in on my server, by calling
> the server with a modem or isdn card. The server isn't always connected to
> the internet and runs a 2.2.13 kernel with debian 2.1
> Can anybody t
Not sure about the ISDN card, but I do this with an external modem using the
mgetty package.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 02:20:11PM +0100, Ron Rademaker wrote:
>
> Hardware:
>
> ISDN Teles 16.3 card
>
> Goal:
>
> I want to be able to let other computers log in on my server, by calling
> the serve
Hardware:
ISDN Teles 16.3 card
Goal:
I want to be able to let other computers log in on my server, by calling
the server with a modem or isdn card. The server isn't always connected to
the internet and runs a 2.2.13 kernel with debian 2.1
Can anybody tell me how I could do that.
The other comp
[ you should post to debian-isp i think ]
On 28-Dec-98, ivan took time to write :
> So as to gain as much experience and knowledge as I can I want to set up
> the home system so that it emulates a major ISP as closely as possible. I
> have 3 486 machines and 1 pentium 133 and 1 pentium 200.
i'm
s fairly expensive, I am trying to find a way around
that. Also, the information on the telco's page implied that a remote
access server was used in place of 'x' number of modems and was cheaper and
easier than that many modems as well. Have you any knowledge on this ?
If more com
Hello again !
Am I right in thinking that a remote access server simply takes the place
of a million modems for a dial-in setup ?
When I was browsing the web recently I saw an advertisement for a RAS that
is powered by a Pentium 166. That being so, I assume it is a specially
configured PC.
Is
Cheers - that worked great
Rich
On Thu, 29 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> *- Richard Harran. wrote about "setting up display for remote access"
> | I want to be able to use my X-display on my computer at home to be run
> | from a remote server.
> |
> | Ie, I wan
*- Richard Harran. wrote about "setting up display for remote access"
| I want to be able to use my X-display on my computer at home to be run
| from a remote server.
|
| Ie, I want to be able to telnet or rlogin to a remote system, then try
| something like:
|
| xterm -display
I want to be able to use my X-display on my computer at home to be run
from a remote server.
Ie, I want to be able to telnet or rlogin to a remote system, then try
something like:
xterm -display :
but when I have tried this, I have got the error message:
can't open display :.
Do I need
96 matches
Mail list logo
