On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:26:21 -0700
dmacdoug wrote:
>
> Assuming your sshd server is on a computer attached
> to a router which is your gateway to the internet, and
> the router is set to forward port 22 to that computer
> some ISP's don't route port 22 traffic. I know that
> AT blocks port
On Sb, 23 oct 21, 09:33:44, Joe wrote:
>
> The ssh protocol by default works on TCP port 22, but the sshd (server)
> configuration file allows different ports to be specified. If you have
> port 22 open to the Internet, you will get many firewall logs for
> people trying brute-force password
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 08:42:09 +0300
Semih Ozlem wrote:
> Are there specific tutorials websites that you can recommend, how
> about port forwarding. From where which sites in particular can I
> learn about these topics?
Here's a good practical guide:
Are there specific tutorials websites that you can recommend, how about
port forwarding. From where which sites in particular can I learn about
these topics?
Joe , 22 Eki 2021 Cum, 00:08 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 23:48:38 +0300
> Semih Ozlem wrote:
>
> > I think it was
On Friday, 22 Oct 2021 at 09:46, David Wright wrote:
> I'm guessing it was a BT Home Hub.
EE *before* bought by BT but maybe same supplier even then.
> One might suspect that 100 lies at the lower boundary of its DHCP
> range, leaving 99 static addresses free. But no guess at a product.
I
On Fri 22 Oct 2021 at 11:59:40 (+0100), Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Friday, 22 Oct 2021 at 13:40, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Typically modems and home routers use the .1 address for themselves.
>
> Interesting. My last 2 routers have had *.254 (!)
I'm guessing it was a BT Home Hub. It's
On Friday, 22 Oct 2021 at 13:40, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Typically modems and home routers use the .1 address for themselves.
Interesting. My last 2 routers have had *.254 (!) and *.100 as their
address.
--
Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.60 & org 9.5 on Debian 11.1
On Jo, 21 oct 21, 22:52:37, Semih Ozlem wrote:
> I am unable to access my modem settings page when writing 192.168.1.100 to
> check if there is a firewall.
Are you sure this is the correct address? How did you establish that?
Typically modems and home routers use the .1 address for themselves.
That's 'systemctl status ssh' without the 1) of course.I meant to put more
steps but decided not to
--
James B
portoteache...@fastmail.com
Em Sex, 22 Out ʼ21, às 00:18, James B escreveu:
> Hi Semih,
>
> In my opinion, I would go back to basics first.You may have installed
> openssh but it
Hi Semih,
In my opinion, I would go back to basics first.You may have installed openssh
but it doesn't necessarily run by default (for reasons that will make sense
when you look at it further).Do you know how to start systemd services? It
looks to me like your ssh server isnt' running.So, run
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 09:53, Semih Ozlem wrote:
> From:Semih Ozlem
> To:Debian Users , ubuntu-us...@lists.ubuntu.com
Please, do not send individual messages to more than one
mailing list.
It is rather unfriendly to everyone else that reads each list, because
we do not see any conversation
I am unable to access my modem settings page when writing 192.168.1.100 to
check if there is a firewall.
Below is the web page that I get
Unable to connect
Firefox can’t establish a connection to the server at 192.168.1.100.
The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:41:43PM +0300, Semih Ozlem wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I set up an openssh server and I am trying to access that machine remotely
> (not from the local network. but from another ip address). I get an error
> (something about port 22). What setting needs to be checked and
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 09:07:02PM +, Semih Ozlem wrote:
> Yes the error message is
>
> ssh: connect to host (ip address of remote host) port 22: Connection refused
This message means one of these things:
1) The sshd process is not running, or is not listening on the default port.
2) A
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 23:48:38 +0300
Semih Ozlem wrote:
> I think it was something like "ssh: connect to host port 22:
> Connection refused" It will take me a little while to get the same
> error message again.
>
>
Ideally you need to do more than open the ssh port, particularly if you
Yes the error message is
ssh: connect to host (ip address of remote host) port 22: Connection refused
Semih Ozlem , 21 Eki 2021 Per, 20:48
tarihinde şunu yazdı:
> I think it was something like "ssh: connect to host port 22:
> Connection refused" It will take me a little while to get the
I think it was something like "ssh: connect to host port 22:
Connection refused" It will take me a little while to get the same error
message again.
James B , 21 Eki 2021 Per, 23:45 tarihinde
şunu yazdı:
> Hi Semih,
>
> Could you post the exact wording of the error message please?
>
> Best
Hi Semih,
Could you post the exact wording of the error message please?
Best
JB
--
James B
portoteache...@fastmail.com
Em Qui, 21 Out ʼ21, às 21:41, Semih Ozlem escreveu:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I set up an openssh server and I am trying to access that machine remotely
> (not from the
Hi everyone,
I set up an openssh server and I am trying to access that machine remotely
(not from the local network. but from another ip address). I get an error
(something about port 22). What setting needs to be checked and what needs
to be done on the machine that openssh server is running and
ve real IPs, and others are behind firewalls and NATs, which render a
> > regular direct connection impossible.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Francisco
> >
> If your aim is to get one, completely free of charge, software for remote
> access to your "m
t; and therefore we do not have control over their networking environment; some
> of
> the have real IPs, and others are behind firewalls and NATs, which render a
> regular direct connection impossible.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Francisco
>
If your aim is to get one, completely free o
Francisco M Neto wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> At work, we have several computers that are located at different
> locations throughout the country. Some of them are highly inaccessible by
> usual
> means, and it requires a certain planning to reach them to have direct access.
> Therefore, we
Le 17/04/2019 à 15:35, Francisco M Neto a écrit :
Greetings!
At work, we have several computers that are located at different
locations throughout the country. Some of them are highly inaccessible by usual
means, and it requires a certain planning to reach them to have direct access.
Greetings!
At work, we have several computers that are located at different
locations throughout the country. Some of them are highly inaccessible by usual
means, and it requires a certain planning to reach them to have direct access.
Therefore, we have been using TeamViewer software to
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 04:51:59PM -0400, John Cunningham wrote:
I'm trying to set up a laptop that users can use for remote access to a
Windows Active Directory Domain, and would appreciate some guidance in the
right direction. It looks pretty straightforward to get a Debian computer
I'm trying to set up a laptop that users can use for remote access to a
Windows Active Directory Domain, and would appreciate some guidance in the
right direction. It looks pretty straightforward to get a Debian computer
to authenticate with AD. But I can't get my head around the remote access
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:40:43PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> * Verder zoeken naar een mariadb met SSL, ook meteen naar clients zoeken.
> * Zelf compileren en als je toch bezig bent, ook clients.
> * Tunnel technieken als VPN
* een échte database gebruiken, in plaats van speelgoed.
Package:
Hoi Paul,
Wij doen dit als volgt:: mysql tunnelen over ssh. Kan met elke ssh
client (putty, onder windows) maar wij gebruiken navicat:
https://www.navicat.com/download/
Dit is een mysql client met ingebouwde ssh functionaliteit. Maakt eerst
een ssh naar je mysql server, en van daaruit
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:40:43PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:48:53PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> > Hoi,
> >
> > Ik vraag me af hoe veilig remote access toestaan is naar een MariaDB
> > server op Debian stable.
> >
> >
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:48:53PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> Ik vraag me af hoe veilig remote access toestaan is naar een MariaDB
> server op Debian stable.
>
> Als ik onderstaande doe, dan krijg ik geen output:
> ldd `which mysqld` | grep tls
> ldd `
Hoi,
Ik vraag me af hoe veilig remote access toestaan is naar een MariaDB
server op Debian stable.
Als ik onderstaande doe, dan krijg ik geen output:
ldd `which mysqld` | grep tls
ldd `which mysqld` | grep ssl
Dit betekent toch dat MariaDB zonder TLS en SSL gecompileerd is, of
vergis ik me nu
In a NetBSD system,
$ telnet localhost
...
Trying SRA secure login:
User (me):
Password:
[ SRA accepts you ]
$
Helpful documentation about SRA hasn't turned up.
In a Debian system on the local network this happens.
$ telnet netbsdsystem
Trying 172.25.2.2...
Connected to
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:40:10 -0700
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
Can Debian support this telnet SRA login to another system?
May be this could help you:
http://helpdesk.princeton.edu/kb/display.plx?ID=1157
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 2010-03-16 07:06, Mitchell Laks wrote:
[snip]
i will look to see what comes up at work this morning and at Dad and Mom's
tonight
Configure their firewall (open port 23 and, if the fw is an external
device, forward the port to your Dad's PC) and then ssh into his box
and configure his
Thanks for answer
I know that , but I used debian list and the list is more read firstly,
secondly ubuntu is based on debian so. thirdly I remmember I had this
problem on debian a couple of years ago.
by the way the problem is for vsftp and ssh too, so it is a security
problem ( on
Hi,
I install vsftp as sererver on ubuntu 9.10
It runs for a time then stops answer for remote access, but not for local
access ???
I mean If i use the commandftp 192.168.10.10 from the localhost
it responds
but ftp 192.168.10.10 from a remote machine it doesn't
Hi,
abdelkader belahcene abelahc...@gmail.com writes:
I install vsftp as sererver on ubuntu 9.10
Please refer to the Ubuntu user technical support mailing list [1] for
problems with Ubuntu.
Regards,
Ansgar
[1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Per Eric Rosén wrote:
Ett bra paket att ha till en server är watchdog som startar om
systemet i fall att det låser sig. Sen finns heartbeat, ldirectord mm
för HA (hög tillgänglighet), men de förutsätter flera datorer (och är
nog overkill).
En HTPC med HA-lösning vore inte helt dumt; jag
Ett bra paket att ha till en server är watchdog som startar om systemet
i fall att det låser sig. Sen finns heartbeat, ldirectord mm för HA (hög
tillgänglighet), men de förutsätter flera datorer (och är nog overkill).
/Per Eric
--
^): Per Eric Rosén http://rosnix.net/~per/
/ p...@rosnix.net
maillist.pe...@home.se wrote:
Hej!
Sitter med ett problem som kanske inte är världens mest viktiga
men det känns ändå väldigt frustrerande att inte kunna lösa det.
Min HTPC har tuffat och gått åtminstone sedan i somras utan att
behöva starta om den eller haft några problem. Just nu är jag
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 03:42:16PM +0100, Kim Christensen wrote:
maillist.pe...@home.se wrote:
Hej!
Sitter med ett problem som kanske inte är världens mest viktiga
men det känns ändå väldigt frustrerande att inte kunna lösa det.
Min HTPC har tuffat och gått åtminstone sedan i somras utan
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:32:44 +0100
maillist.pe...@home.se wrote:
Jag tvivlar, men finns det något sätt att komma åt den förutom
ssh? Telnet är avstängt så det funkar inte. Port 80 verkar inte
heller svara på tilltal längre.
Köra script via en ftp-server kan man ibland, men då får det ju vara
Hej!
Sitter med ett problem som kanske inte är världens mest viktiga
men det känns ändå väldigt frustrerande att inte kunna lösa det.
Min HTPC har tuffat och gått åtminstone sedan i somras utan att
behöva starta om den eller haft några problem. Just nu är jag
bortrest över julen och naturligtvis
Den den 23 december 2008 23:32 skrev maillist.pe...@home.se:
Hej!
Hej. Gud Jul.
Sitter med ett problem som kanske inte är världens mest viktiga
men det känns ändå väldigt frustrerande att inte kunna lösa det.
Min HTPC har tuffat och gått åtminstone sedan i somras utan att
behöva starta om
não com esse nome. ;)
Mas a resposta é sim.
2008/7/30 Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alguem por aqui, já configurou um RAS no Linux?
Abraços,
--
Denis Anjos.
Cisco Certified Network Associate.
Universidade Federal do ABC
Santo André - SP - BR
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Opa, e aí Guilherme! Beleza?
Cara, que programa vc usou para o redirecionamento das seriais?
Alguem havia me falado sobre o tty redirector, mas este é pago.
Tentei o ttyd, mas o man é bem curto, e quase não achei nada a
respeito na internet.
No windows uso um programa chamado netserial, e com
Pacote: freeradius
Estado: não instalado
Versão: 1.1.7-1build4
Prioridade: opcional
Seção: net
Mantenedor: Ubuntu Core Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tamanho Descompactado: 2892k
Depende de: adduser, libc6 (= 2.7-1), libgdbm3, libltdl3 (= 1.5.2-2),
libpam0g (= 0.99.7.1), libperl5.8 (= 5.8.8),
Olá, Flamarion!
Eu acredito que não seja bem isso.
Vou detalhar.
Tenho um equipamento chamado RAS ( Remote Access Server ) este cara,
tem nele, centenas de portas seriais, e modems, além de conexões
ethernet.
ele funciona da seguinte forma: é ligado na LAN, e da máquina que irá
controlar, vc
Ta certo o que enviei faria o papel do ras.
E qual a dificuldade de criar as pseudo portas seriais?
Não entendi a questão.
Att
Flamarion Jorge
Denis escreveu:
Olá, Flamarion!
Eu acredito que não seja bem isso.
Vou detalhar.
Tenho um equipamento chamado RAS ( Remote Access Server ) este
Olá,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:09:00AM -0300, Denis wrote:
Tenho um equipamento chamado RAS ( Remote Access Server ) este cara,
tem nele, centenas de portas seriais, e modems, além de conexões
ethernet.
nunca utilizei um RAS, mas encontrei algo que talvez possa te ajudar:
http
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:25:50AM -0300, Ricardo Ichizo wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:09:00AM -0300, Denis wrote:
Tenho um equipamento chamado RAS ( Remote Access Server ) este cara,
tem nele, centenas de portas seriais, e modems, além de conexões
ethernet.
nunca utilizei um
autenticacao, não?
Este meu servidor não irá receber chamadas, apenas discar, acho que
não preciso de radius então...
Certo?
Att
Flamarion Jorge
Denis escreveu:
Olá, Flamarion!
Eu acredito que não seja bem isso.
Vou detalhar.
Tenho um equipamento chamado RAS ( Remote Access Server
estão normais, pois pelo windows, na mesma
máquina, usando um programa chamado net serial, eu consigo mandar os
modems discarem.
Att
Flamarion Jorge
Denis escreveu:
Olá, Flamarion!
Eu acredito que não seja bem isso.
Vou detalhar.
Tenho um equipamento chamado RAS ( Remote Access
Alguem por aqui, já configurou um RAS no Linux?
Abraços,
--
Denis Anjos.
Cisco Certified Network Associate.
Universidade Federal do ABC
Santo André - SP - BR
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 06:17:37PM +0100, Paul Csanyi wrote:
Hello!
I will to set up my home network so so I can to
connect from LAN to postgresql server on DMZ.
I can to connect to the postgresql server when I
set up pg_hba.conf with 'trust' method, but can't
to connect to it with 'md5'
Hello!
I will to set up my home network so so I can to
connect from LAN to postgresql server on DMZ.
I can to connect to the postgresql server when I
set up pg_hba.conf with 'trust' method, but can't
to connect to it with 'md5' method.
What is the solution?
Any advices will be appreciated!
--
Hello!
How can I give someone remote access through ssh login only to my
/home/user/some/ directory?
Any advices will be appreciated!
--
Regards, Paul Csanyi
http://www.freewebs.com/csanyi-pal/index.htm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On 12/29/2007 01:39 PM, Paul Csanyi wrote:
How can I give someone remote access through ssh login only to my
/home/user/some/ directory?
Depending on what you might wish them to be able to do, such as log into
a chroot or just upload files, I have used rssh or scponly under various
Hi folks,
What's the best way to provide secure and remote access to a
Windows user. I want to give my friend access to Apache so
he can work on our website.
tia,
b.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Bill wrote:
Hi folks,
What's the best way to provide secure and remote access to a
Windows user. I want to give my friend access to Apache so
he can work on our website.
tia,
b.
The best way would be to use SSH.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:10:34AM -0700, Bill wrote:
What's the best way to provide secure and remote access to a
Windows user. I want to give my friend access to Apache so
he can work on our website.
putty
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:10:34AM -0700, Bill wrote:
Hi folks,
What's the best way to provide secure and remote access to a
Windows user. I want to give my friend access to Apache so
he can work on our website.
As Andrei and the anonymous poster from Arizona noted, ssh is the best
way
Hi everyone,
A little over a year ago I asked (on this list) [0] about a solution
for secure, remote access via email. The only existing solution that
seemed to do what I wanted was grunt [1], by our own John Goerzen [2],
but it has virtually no documentation [3], so in the time-honored *nix
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:18:43PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
The only existing solution that seemed to do what I wanted was grunt
[1], by our own John Goerzen [2], but it has virtually no documentation
[3], so in the time-honored *nix tradition, I decided to roll my own.
Too late for you
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:50:13 +0100
Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:18:43PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
The only existing solution that seemed to do what I wanted was grunt
[1], by our own John Goerzen [2], but it has virtually no documentation
[3], so in the
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:21:33 -0500
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 01:20:06PM -0800, Peter Easthope wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:48:09PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
[snip]
fetchmail sends messages to port 25 via SMTP whereas
mutt wants to
Roberto Sanchez others,
At Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:45:38 -050, Roberto Sanchez said,
Setup mutt on the machine and ssh in when
you are travelling.
It works as you outline.
POP3 server, is on machine P.
fetchmail, exim, mutt and ssh are on home machine, H.
ssh is on mobile machine M.
Also, thanks
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:01:43PM -0800, Easthope wrote:
Roberto Sanchez others,
At Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:45:38 -050, Roberto Sanchez said,
Setup mutt on the machine and ssh in when
you are travelling.
It works as you outline.
POP3 server, is on machine P.
fetchmail, exim, mutt and ssh
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:01:43PM -0800, Easthope wrote:
Roberto Sanchez others,
At Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:45:38 -050, Roberto Sanchez said,
Setup mutt on the machine and ssh in when
you are travelling.
It works as you outline.
POP3 server, is on machine P.
fetchmail, exim, mutt and ssh
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:48:09PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
You can setup mutt on machine M and have it just pull messages directly
from machine P via POP.
Two factors against that.
- P belongs to an ISP which refuses POP access from
a machine not on his WAN.
- M is inside a
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 01:20:06PM -0800, Peter Easthope wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:48:09PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
You can setup mutt on machine M and have it just pull messages directly
from machine P via POP.
Two factors against that.
- P belongs to an ISP which
Remote system is debian derivative. When I access this system
using ssh, the connection does not execute $HOME/.bashrc
on remote system.
Any ideas?
-ishwar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:06:35PM -0400, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Remote system is debian derivative. When I access this system
using ssh, the connection does not execute $HOME/.bashrc
on remote system.
My .bash_profile starts with
if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then
source ~/.bashrc
fi
According to
Other login shell, wrong permissions, ...
What does ssh -V show?
A workaround: ~/.ssh/environment
On 8/24/06, Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remote system is debian derivative. When I access this system
using ssh, the connection does not execute $HOME/.bashrc
on remote system.
On Thursday 24 August 2006 09:06, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Remote system is debian derivative. When I access this system
using ssh, the connection does not execute $HOME/.bashrc
on remote system.
I usually link .bashrc to .bash_profile or vice versa to avoid this problem.
--
Paul Johnson
Email
access the internet outside of the corporate
network? Track and monitor remote access easily and unobtrusively to make sure
that your intellectual assets are secure. Download the free whitepaper and find
out more today!
http://list.windowsitpro.com/t?ctl=3486E:7F5CF7
-- More Windows IT Pro
Steve Lamb a écrit :
Paul Johnson wrote:
Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH is
all you need (and it's X11 forwarding option is your friend). If not,
you'll have to go with the much slower, much more insecure VNC.
Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to
Lionel VICTOR wrote:
Now I'm speaking theoretically 'cos I've never needed to try this out
but...
SSH can compress data. So, as the CPU is not the problem (i.e.:
[SNIP]
Well given that, the difference between theory and practice is that
practice works... theoretically.
As any gamer knows
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:32:40PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
home.
Yup. If every
Pigeon wrote:
I say this because I've just broken a remote box doing an apt-get
upgrade - security upgrades to woody - which Isn't Supposed To Happen.
Don't know exactly how, because ssh is one of the things that broke...
If you can get access to the box or walk someone through access on the
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:41:44PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Pigeon wrote:
I say this because I've just broken a remote box doing an apt-get
upgrade - security upgrades to woody - which Isn't Supposed To Happen.
Don't know exactly how, because ssh is one of the things that broke...
If
on Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:38:22AM -0300, Cristian Gutierrez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
And make already sloth VNC more like
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to know if I could
provide support for there small network of PC's at home. I have been reading about
VNC and wondered about its security and speed. I went to tightvnc and see info about
using SSH as well. Anyone using a setup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
home. I have been reading about VNC and wondered about its security
and speed. I went to tightvnc and see info about using SSH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
home.
Yup. If every other system you're
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
home.
Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's
Paul Johnson wrote:
Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH is
all you need (and it's X11 forwarding option is your friend). If not,
you'll have to go with the much slower, much more insecure VNC.
Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to using VNC for access to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
And make already sloth VNC more like sitting through all 3 hours of
Titanic: Slow and painful with lots of high-pitched shrieking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:46:34PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to using VNC for access to
my X desktop because X was slower than VNC. I can't imagine SSH+X would be
faster than VNC. :P
What are
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:46:34PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH is
all you need (and it's X11 forwarding option is your friend). If
not, you'll have to go with the much slower, much more insecure VNC.
Much
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:46:34PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to using VNC for access to
my X desktop because X was slower than VNC. I can't imagine SSH+X would be
faster than VNC. :P
What are you doing to it that X is slower
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Running applications.
That shouldn't make it slow, X is window-oriented, instead of
just-take-a-jpeg-of-the-screen-and-cram-it-over-the-network-oriented.
What are you doing that is
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Running applications.
That shouldn't make it slow, X is window-oriented, instead of
just-take-a-jpeg-of-the-screen-and-cram-it-over-the-network-oriented.
Unfortunately as of a few months ago anything built on
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
And make already sloth VNC more like sitting through all 3 hours of
Titanic: Slow and painful with lots of high-pitched shrieking in the
middle. Be sure
-Original Message-
From: Roberto Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 February 2004 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Remote access PC support
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You can always
Joshua Ferraro wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH. It's what
I do for those unfortunate times I stuck on a windows machine
(since the VNC viewer and PuTTY are monolithic executables that
don't require administrative privileges to install).
Could you expand on how exactly
on Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:10:58PM -0800, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Running applications.
That shouldn't make it slow, X is window-oriented, instead of
Could you expand on how exactly you set that up? I rarely use windows
but sometimes I am forced to (like on campus computers). Also, is there
an easy way to acomplish the same thing on a linux box?
Joshua
Sorry for missing a few details- I use Linux almost exclusive at home- The
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
And make already sloth VNC more like sitting through all 3 hours of
Titanic: Slow and painful with lots of high-pitched shrieking
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
