Hi. I am having problems compiling the current linux-source4.19. I
am using the same config file -- just copied to .config, except that I
had to get rid of the gpg key in the cryptographic api section. I get
the following error when trying to compile:
CC arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.o
arch/
On Apr 05, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 07:18:04 -0400
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>> On Apr 05, 2020, Celejar wrote:
>>> Well, you don't name your ISPs, but I'm pretty sure the big ones
>>> generally forbid running servers (for anything beyond "personal" use) on
>>> residential connections.
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 07:18:04 -0400
Dan Purgert wrote:
> On Apr 05, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 21:11:33 -0400
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >
> > > On Apr 03, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:46:00 -0400
> > > > Dan Purgert wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Apr 03, 2020,
On Apr 05, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 21:11:33 -0400
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>
> > On Apr 03, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:46:00 -0400
> > > Dan Purgert wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Apr 03, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > Fair enough - but has anyone l
Hi all,
The links below contain many suggestions (of which a percentage has
already been mentioned in this thread). However I am putting the links
here because there are a few more options inside. I guess there are many
recent similar threads in many FLOSS lists/forums/other discussion
platforms a
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 21:11:33 -0400
Dan Purgert wrote:
> On Apr 03, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:46:00 -0400
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >
> > > On Apr 03, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > Fair enough - but has anyone looked into, say, Jitsi Meet's default
> > > > settin
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 09:33:48AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> tomas writes:
> > Besides gitlab, which was mentioned elsewhere in this thread, there is
> > Savannah [1] (recommended if you prefer the "Free" spelling of "Open
> > Source" ;-)
>
> Back
tomas writes:
> Besides gitlab, which was mentioned elsewhere in this thread, there is
> Savannah [1] (recommended if you prefer the "Free" spelling of "Open
> Source" ;-)
Back when I was looking for a new home for Chrony I looked into
Savannah. They required "
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 02:39:18AM +0200, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Would like to publish some open source software.
> In the past I used sourceforge but I don't like their policies anymore.
>
> Is git the way to go nowadays?
Besides gitlab, which was mentioned e
ree for 30 days - This is something I don't like
> Get free trial - This I also don't like
They are providing free hosting for Open Source and Education:
https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2018/06/05/gitlab-ultimate-and-gold-free-for-education-and-open-source/
> When I have to pay to c
On 4/4/2020 3:09 AM, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> I see a lot of Free Software development migrating to
>> Gitlab:
>>
>> https://about.gitlab.com/
>>
>> It is also a product that can be self hosted as some projects are
>> doing.
>>
>> - Nate
>>
> free for 30 days - This is something I don't like
> Get
On 2/4/20 3:27 am, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
It could be a manpower issue and/or upstream wants more flexibility than
allowed by Debian policies.
I use autokey. Until earlier this year the latest version available in
debian was 0.90.odd. Version 0.95.10 is now available in testing thanks
to some
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 19:52:24 -0500
Nate Bargmann wrote:
> - Nate
>It is also a product that can be self hosted as some projects are
> doing.
I will look into that, thanks Nate
On Apr 03, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:46:00 -0400
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>
> > On Apr 03, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Fair enough - but has anyone looked into, say, Jitsi Meet's default
> > > settings? Do they block non-hosts from screen sharing?
> >
> > IIRC, jit.si
I see a lot of Free Software development migrating to
> Gitlab:
>
> https://about.gitlab.com/
>
> It is also a product that can be self hosted as some projects are
> doing.
>
> - Nate
>
free for 30 days - This is something I don't like
Get free trial - This I also don't like
Thanks for the hin
* On 2020 03 Apr 19:47 -0500, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Would like to publish some open source software.
> In the past I used sourceforge but I don't like their policies anymore.
>
> Is git the way to go nowadays?
>
> But then again I do not like MS `|` git
Hi.
Would like to publish some open source software.
In the past I used sourceforge but I don't like their policies anymore.
Is git the way to go nowadays?
But then again I do not like MS `|` github.
Any recommendations please...
On 4/2/20 02:56, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-03-31, n...@dismail.de wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:17:56PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
>>> […] Recently I was looking at zoom.us - seems to be in
>>> hype now - can be installed in debian and can be used as video conferencing
>>> tool.
>>
>> Based on z
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:46:00 -0400
Dan Purgert wrote:
> On Apr 03, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> > [...]
> > Fair enough - but has anyone looked into, say, Jitsi Meet's default
> > settings? Do they block non-hosts from screen sharing?
>
> IIRC, jit.si (their web-client) defaults to needing a passphras
On Apr 03, 2020, Celejar wrote:
> [...]
> Fair enough - but has anyone looked into, say, Jitsi Meet's default
> settings? Do they block non-hosts from screen sharing?
IIRC, jit.si (their web-client) defaults to needing a passphrase to even
get in. But I only ever took a cursory glance before "ev
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 16:14:26 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
> On 2020-04-02, Celejar wrote:
> >>
> >> I was just reading this little item about zoom from the G-men (actually,
> >> Kristen is a Boston G-woman, apparently):
> >>
> >> https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/boston/news/press-release
On 2020-04-02, Celejar wrote:
>>
>> I was just reading this little item about zoom from the G-men (actually,
>> Kristen is a Boston G-woman, apparently):
>>
>> https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/boston/news/press-releases/fbi-warns-of-teleconferencing-and-online-classroom-hijacking-dur
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:16:43 +0200
Erwan David wrote:
> Le 31/03/2020 à 22:27, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 03:09:47PM -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> I second Zoom. You can install it via flatpak, which might make you feel
> >> better. I tri
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:56:26 +0200
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 12:13:24PM -, Curt wrote:
> > On 2020-04-01, Celejar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > This thread isn't too encouraging (though I'm uncertain about the exact
> > nature of the participants):
> >
> > https://github.com/bigbluebutton/
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:13:24 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
> On 2020-04-01, Celejar wrote:
> >
> > How easy is it in practice to install on Debian? The following statement
> > in the FAQ scared me off:
> >
> > *
> >
> > BigBlueButton requires Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit. See Install BigBlueButton.
> >
> >
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:56:18 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
> On 2020-03-31, n...@dismail.de wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:17:56PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> >> […] Recently I was looking at zoom.us - seems to be in
> >> hype now - can be installed in debian and can be used as video conferencing
>
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:50:40 +
"Russell L. Harris" wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 08:58:16AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> >I am indeed strongly tempted to try that. I suppose I'm just spoiled by
> >Debian - I almost always install stuff from the repos, and I tend to
> >assume (probably somewhat u
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 12:13:24PM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-04-01, Celejar wrote:
[...]
> This thread isn't too encouraging (though I'm uncertain about the exact
> nature of the participants):
>
> https://github.com/bigbluebutton/bigbluebutton/issues/8861
LWN has a currently a topic on tha
On 2020-04-01, Celejar wrote:
>
> How easy is it in practice to install on Debian? The following statement
> in the FAQ scared me off:
>
> *
>
> BigBlueButton requires Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit. See Install BigBlueButton.
>
> We (the core developers) have not installed BigBlueButton on any other
> v
On 2020-03-31, n...@dismail.de wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:17:56PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
>> […] Recently I was looking at zoom.us - seems to be in
>> hype now - can be installed in debian and can be used as video conferencing
>> tool.
>
> Based on zoom's "privacy" policy and everything I'
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 19:27:37 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 01 apr 20, 08:58:16, Celejar wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 03:57:17 +
> > "Russell L. Harris" wrote:
> >
> > > server. And Jitsi is open source. What more could you ask?
> >
&
suggestion of an open-source program easy-to-configure and
easy-to-use for this?
Preferably a Debian package?
Thank you,
Markos
Hi Friends,
I didn't know Jitsi and BigBlueButton.
Really enjoyed Jitsi.
I will start using Jitsi, and test the server installation later.
And also know more
On Mi, 01 apr 20, 08:58:16, Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 03:57:17 +
> "Russell L. Harris" wrote:
>
> > server. And Jitsi is open source. What more could you ask?
>
> I am indeed strongly tempted to try that. I suppose I'm just spoiled by
>
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 08:58:16AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
I am indeed strongly tempted to try that. I suppose I'm just spoiled by
Debian - I almost always install stuff from the repos, and I tend to
assume (probably somewhat unreasonably) that if something isn't there,
there's a good reason for it
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:11:55 +0200
juh wrote:
> Am 01.04.20 um 01:09 schrieb Celejar:
> > I spend some time today trying to find a libre alternative to Zoom,
> > preferably one in the Debian repos, but came up empty. The closest I
> > found were indeed Jitsi Meet (a part of the much larger Jitsi p
dwith? Log in
> and give it a try; it is free. Or you can install Jitsi and run your own
I did try the hosted instance (meet.jit.si) ;) It worked perfectly,
although I have no idea how well it would scale to dozens of users, and
how reliable / usable it would be in production use.
> se
On 2020-03-31 21:30, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:27:28PM +0200, n...@dismail.de wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:17:56PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> […] Recently I was looking at zoom.us - seems to be in
> hype now - can be installed in debian and can be used as video confer
Am 01.04.20 um 13:14 schrieb deloptes:
> juh wrote:
>
>> My hosting cooperative Hostsharing runs BigBlueButton on Debian
>> machines. We recently made a stress test with 47 participants to see
>> what requirements are needed in reality.
>
> very good - as far as I see theoretically it should be p
juh wrote:
> My hosting cooperative Hostsharing runs BigBlueButton on Debian
> machines. We recently made a stress test with 47 participants to see
> what requirements are needed in reality.
very good - as far as I see theoretically it should be possible to run it on
windows, but no one tried ...
On 1/04/20 8:11 pm, juh wrote:
> Use a translation server if you want to read it all but the figures
> should be clear enough.
Commas are useful :-)
> Use a translation server if you want to read it all, but the figures
> should be clear enough.
> Use a translation server if you want to read it,
juh wrote:
> We wrote a report about our test in German.
>
> https://www.hostsharing.net/blog/2020/03/30/bigbluebutton-im-lasttest/
>
> Use a translation server if you want to read it all but the figures
> should be clear enough.
What is the ratio for the bandwidth - up/down?
For example I hav
ght make you
> >>feel better. I tried jitsi some time ago, I think that will require
> >>a bit more setup for sure.
>
> >It's proprietary, right?
>
> According to the jitsi.org web site, Jitsi provides "Multi-platform
> open-source video conferencing"
Am 01.04.20 um 01:09 schrieb Celejar:
> I spend some time today trying to find a libre alternative to Zoom,
> preferably one in the Debian repos, but came up empty. The closest I
> found were indeed Jitsi Meet (a part of the much larger Jitsi project),
> and BigBlueButton, libre but designed to be
Le 31/03/2020 à 22:27, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 03:09:47PM -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I second Zoom. You can install it via flatpak, which might make you feel
>> better. I tried jitsi some time ago, I think that will require a bit more
>> setu
it is free. Or you can install Jitsi and run your own
server. And Jitsi is open source. What more could you ask?
I'm actually puzzled by why there doesn't seem to be any easy, solid
libre alternative to Zoom.
Jitsi is easy. Do you have reason to say that the current release of
Jits
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:05:47 -0400
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 March 2020 18:24:30 deloptes wrote:
>
> > Russell L. Harris wrote:
> > > You can conference through a server at jitsi.org, or you can
> > > download a jitsi package (a Debian package is available) which you
> > > can install
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:14:00 +
"Russell L. Harris" wrote:
> At the moment, the Debian STABLE repository contains no Jitsi package.
Actually, *no* official Debian repository currently contains Jitsi. It
was removed in 2017, apparently due to QA issues, although I don't know
the whole story:
On Tuesday 31 March 2020 18:24:30 deloptes wrote:
> Russell L. Harris wrote:
> > You can conference through a server at jitsi.org, or you can
> > download a jitsi package (a Debian package is available) which you
> > can install on your own server and run with complete independence
> > from jitsi.
Russell L. Harris wrote:
> You can conference through a server at jitsi.org, or you can download
> a jitsi package (a Debian package is available) which you can install
> on your own server and run with complete independence from jitsi.org.
well, if you had the bandwidth.
1:1 works @home, but con
n...@dismail.de wrote:
> Based on zoom's "privacy" policy and everything I've herad so far about
> it, I would not recommend using zoom. Some examples:
> - Just a week or so ago it was exposed that zoom was sharing data with
> facebook without informing the user about it or giving any choice on th
sure.
It's proprietary, right?
According to the jitsi.org web site, Jitsi provides "Multi-platform
open-source video conferencing".
You can conference through a server at jitsi.org, or you can download
a jitsi package (a Debian package is available) which you can install
on
maximum.
Any suggestion of an open-source program easy-to-configure and easy-to-use for
this?
https://openmeetings.apache.org/
Not in Debian, but relatively easy to install and use.
Requires 100Mbps symmetric connection, about 4Gb of RAM.
Reco
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:27:28PM +0200, n...@dismail.de wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:17:56PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> > […] Recently I was looking at zoom.us - seems to be in
> > hype now - can be installed in debian and can be used as video conferencing
> > tool.
>
> Based on zoom's "pri
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:17:56PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> […] Recently I was looking at zoom.us - seems to be in
> hype now - can be installed in debian and can be used as video conferencing
> tool.
Based on zoom's "privacy" policy and everything I've herad so far about it,
I would not recommend
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 03:09:47PM -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
[...]
> I second Zoom. You can install it via flatpak, which might make you feel
> better. I tried jitsi some time ago, I think that will require a bit more
> setup for sure.
It's proprietary, right?
-- t
signature.asc
ional level. Since then I have not looked into
> what is available, but I am sure there are plenty of open source free web
> tools that can be used. Recently I was looking at zoom.us - seems to be in
> hype now - can be installed in debian and can be used as video conferencing
> tool
ual classes for small groups, 5 or 6 students maximum.
>
> Any suggestion of an open-source program easy-to-configure and easy-to-use
> for this?
https://openmeetings.apache.org/
Not in Debian, but relatively easy to install and use.
Requires 100Mbps symmetric connection, about 4Gb of RAM.
Reco
t;To help her I am looking for a package in the Debian repository to
>organize virtual classes for small groups, 5 or 6 students maximum.
>
>Any suggestion of an open-source program easy-to-configure and
>easy-to-use for this?
>
>Preferably a Debian package?
>
>Thank you,
&
barnard for command line users and mumble for graphical users can
connect to the same channel and the interface will be video not just
text.
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020, Markos wrote:
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:44:14
> From: Markos
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Small
at is available, but I am sure there are plenty of open source free web
tools that can be used. Recently I was looking at zoom.us - seems to be in
hype now - can be installed in debian and can be used as video conferencing
tool.
Don't waste time on VNC - what a BS idea! If I were the teache
of an open-source program easy-to-configure and easy-to-use for
this?
Preferably a Debian package?
Thank you,
Markos
Have you seen Debian education? Start here and see if there are any programs
that your wife could use. They probably would need the students to have Debian
on their
Hi Friends,
My wife is a teacher and is trying to teach remote lessons using only
WhatsApp video calls.
To help her I am looking for a package in the Debian repository to
organize virtual classes for small groups, 5 or 6 students maximum.
Any suggestion of an open-source program easy-to
essful: people have
> internalized the fact that Libre Software is good. But the education
> efforts have been unsuccessful: people have not learned why Libre
> Software is good.
It is kinda difficult to explain, isn't it?
> As a result, we see many actors who try to reap the bene
people have not learned why Libre
Software is good.
As a result, we see many actors who try to reap the benefits without
sowing the seeds: to get the PR boost of “doing Open Source” without
actually giving their code. To do that, they give the raw code itself,
but make it immensely complicated, and
Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Anyone have any advice what I should check to find what's missing?
most likely you need to connect with the appropriate profile.
I forgot already how the gnome gui looked like for it, but there was a pop
up menu where you can select sink or source for the audio.
doesn't seem to recognise the phone as an audio
source. Once paired and connected, my GNOME seems ready to use a network
through the phone's bluetooth, but if I start to play audio on the
phone, I get silence -- which tells me the phone expects it to work as
it isn't using i
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 14:29 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 02:26:26PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> > Tixy, thanks. I did check the latest Deb 10 version but not the change
> log.
> > I was fooled by the Debian version number which looks like the BSD number
> > which I guess never
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 02:26:26PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> Tixy, thanks. I did check the latest Deb 10 version but not the change log.
> I was fooled by the Debian version number which looks like the BSD number
> which I guess never changes.
https://www.debian.org/security/faq#version
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:13 Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 11:53 -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> > I started looking in to use of OpenSMPTD for a mail server and have
> > installed it from Debian packages.
> >
> > In the process of reading a blog article by the current developer I
> > discover
ould like to install from source but I wonder if that is such a
> smart move,
No, it does not. Specifically, if you're aiming at version 6.6.2p1 -
install opensmtpd from the backports.
> especially when we now use systemd and the source is set
> up with the traditional GNU automake sys
curity issues were discovered by SSL Labs (Qualys). Note that Debian
> 10 is only at version 6.0.3p1! See the source at:
>
> https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD
>
> I would like to install from source but I wonder if that is such a
> smart move, especially when we now use sys
er some serious
> security issues were discovered by SSL Labs (Qualys). Note that Debian
> 10 is only at version 6.0.3p1! See the source at:
>
> https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD
>
> I would like to install from source but I wonder if that is such a
> smart move, es
issues were discovered by SSL Labs (Qualys). Note that Debian
10 is only at version 6.0.3p1! See the source at:
https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD
I would like to install from source but I wonder if that is such a
smart move, especially when we now use systemd and the source is set
up with the
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 11:53 -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> I started looking in to use of OpenSMPTD for a mail server and have
> installed it from Debian packages.
>
> In the process of reading a blog article by the current developer I
> discovered the upstream is now at version 6.6.2p1+ after some s
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:53:09AM -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD
>
> I would like to install from source but I wonder if that is such a
> smart move, especially when we now use systemd and the source is set
> up with the traditional GNU automa
). Note that Debian
10 is only at version 6.0.3p1! See the source at:
https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD
I would like to install from source but I wonder if that is such a
smart move, especially when we now use systemd and the source is set
up with the traditional GNU automake system and I don&#
et up Elmer
> with Trilinos. In short, a setup for some heavy duty computer
> modeling. Because of several factors, I chose to download the latest
> source code from GitHub. The CMake file (without MPI support) worked
> fine and the make file ran fine. But when I included MPI into the
>
modeling.
Because of several factors, I chose to download the latest source code
from GitHub. The CMake file (without MPI support) worked fine and the
make file ran fine. But when I included MPI into the CMake file, (see
below) the CMake still ran fine
On 8/25/19, Daniel Rossi wrote:
> I've tried to figure out this myself, but have been forced here. I need
> to enable a feature which was added in git but not packaged for buster
> yet, I have exactly the same problem with Ubuntu Bionic. I would like to
> make unstable packages of this for releasi
11.0) bison (>= 1:2.4) flex (>= 2.5.34)
perl-doc libgirepository1.0-dev (>= 0.9.12-4~) gobject-introspection (>=
0.9.12-4~) libcap-dev
W: Unmet build-dependency in source
debian/rules:7: /usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/clean-la.mk: No such
file or directory
Im assuming I need some
Hi,
Knut Hengstenberg wrote:
> > we want to have the information, which binary packages belong to a
> > certain source package. So for example the source package 0ad has two
> > binary packages:
> >
> > https://packages.debian.org/source/jessie/0ad
Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 22 aug 19, 09:03:59, Knut Hengstenberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for a project, I would like to have the relationship "Debian source
> package <-> Debian binary packages". So all the existing source
> packages can be found for each distributio
Great, this seems to be the right place, thanks for the link. Unfortunately I
do not see a possibility to get the information of the assignment between
source package and binary packages.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 09:03:59AM +0200, Knut Hengstenberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for a project, I would like to have the relationship "Debian source package
> <-> Debian binary packages". So all the existing source packages can be found
> for each distributio
Hi all,
for a project, I would like to have the relationship "Debian source package <->
Debian binary packages". So all the existing source packages can be found for
each distribution here (for jessie):
https://packages.debian.org/source/jessie/allpackages
Now we want to have
...@lists.debian.org
Subject: Accepted systemd 242-4 (source) into unstable
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:09:13 +0200
Source: systemd
Architecture: source
Version: 242-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian systemd Maintainers
Changed-By: Michael Biebl
Changes:
systemd
Hi.
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 11:17:08AM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> But what about a bug in a package packaged in Debian and which you
> manage the sources knowing Debian packaged one has surely a bug and
> you want to report?
reportbug --src
> What if this is a security bug?
It's
Hi,
I would like to report a bug for a package which is in Debian. The page
at https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting says mainly install reportbug and
use it or other weird mail way involving some manual field to add. But what
about a bug in a package packaged in Debian and which you manage the
s
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 8:17 AM Kent West wrote:
> Oops; when to Thomas instead of list; sorry. (Gmail, ugh!)
>
"went", not 'when". (Kent's typing skills, ugh!)
-- Forwarded message -
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:23 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> It depends on where you plan to
m just one or two steps ahead of you.
>
>
> Kent West wrote:
> > Should I consider the Debian download as the official source, of the Git
> > version?
>
> s/of/or/ ?
>
>
Oops, my bad. Yes, "or".
It depends on where you plan to submit your changes.
>
>
Oops, went to Stefan instead of list; sorry. (Google Mail is so ... broken,
in some ways.)
-- Forwarded message -
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:50 PM Stefan Monnier
wrote:
> > When I use "apt source sl" (from sid, into its own directory) and compare
> > t
Hi,
Disclaimer: I am not a Debian member and only prepare the Debian packages
of my own upstream project. So i'm just one or two steps ahead of you.
Kent West wrote:
> Should I consider the Debian download as the official source, of the Git
> version?
s/of/or/ ?
It depends on whe
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:49:15PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > When I use "apt source sl" (from sid, into its own directory) and compare
> > that tree (?) with what I get if I download via what that suggests (git
> > clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sl.git)
> When I use "apt source sl" (from sid, into its own directory) and compare
> that tree (?) with what I get if I download via what that suggests (git
> clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sl.git) (into its own directory), I
> notice that the Makefile in the Debian vers
Hi!
I'm trying to dip my toe in the waters of editing the source code of Debian
packages, and I've started with the simplest, most innocuous program I
could think of - sl (the ASCII train that goes by on the screen when you
mistype "ls" as "sl).
When I use "apt sour
Hi,
I don’t know if this is the right place to ask, if my problem is not too
specific or something.
Is source-specific routing possible under debian? I think this is what
I need in my case ("multihoming" I think): on my laptop I'm generally
connected too zero up to two differents
hi Debian users,
I figured some of you might be interested in participating in the
GTypist project, a simple console typing tutor, by translating or
testing the upcoming 2.10 release (of course lesson authors and
programmers are also welcome!).
Here is the announcement:
http://lists.gnu.org/archi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 02:53:26PM +, Curt wrote:
[...]
> You start by telling him not to call it open source [...]
A very daring interpretation of my e-mail (and there were other
bits in there, mind you).
> Nothing gets past yo
an accounting application, aka ledger (surprise!)
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LedgerSMB
>
> I think the "usual" meaning of e-commerce (or ecommerce, as the OP
> put it) is different from that.
Righto.
Now, listen up, Tom, here's what we got so far:
A guy from Singap
(GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlurleYACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZfBACfQjmG0CpG7L6NLtOYBI8DYQeb
w60AnRBQHxGdMHMNUSUdmQ0F1nYStO+G
=kCP5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
One of these might interest you.
https://www.cmscritic.com/top-10-open-source-ecommerce-platforms/
301 - 400 of 4656 matches
Mail list logo
