Re: Debian unstable ce matin

2012-05-01 Thread Sylvain L. Sauvage
Le mardi 1 mai 2012 à 10:28:14, Valentin Surrel a écrit : Le mardi 01 mai 2012 à 09:55 +0200, valen...@surrel.org a écrit : Bonjour la liste, ’jour, J'ai mis ça : Package: xserver-xorg* Pin: release a=testing Pin-Priority: 991 et réinstallé mon serveur X. Ca a marché, mais je sais

Re: Nvidia module makes system unstable

2012-04-16 Thread Indulekha
Sean Whalen whalens...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, I recently made the switch from Kubuntu 11.10 to Debain stable. Everything was running very well until I installed the Nvidia module the Debian way. Then, the system became highly unstable. I noticed that the system would become very

Nvidia module makes system unstable

2012-04-15 Thread Sean Whalen
Hello All, I recently made the switch from Kubuntu 11.10 to Debain stable. Everything was running very well until I installed the Nvidia module the Debian way. Then, the system became highly unstable. I noticed that the system would become very sluggish during simple tasks The most repeatable

Re: Nvidia module makes system unstable

2012-04-15 Thread Eduardo Bearzoti
Hi Sean, For the past few days, I've been trying to install Squueze on my PC and have experienced very similar troubles. My card is a GeForce 8400 GS. The screen and the whole system freeze as soon as gdm3 starts. I installed the Nvidia module the Debian Way, and also (after some reluctance)

Re: Unstable: Gimp requires dbus and gconf2 now? fail.

2012-04-11 Thread Kelly Clowers
am sick and tired of having to see his bullshit daemons... :( Again, seems unnecessarily rude Luckily I am using unstable can warn everyone who cares about this shitstorm. Actually I do not see anywhere where gimp even depends on gconf. And I haven't seen any shitstorms about gconf or dbus

Re: Unstable: Gimp requires dbus and gconf2 now? fail.

2012-04-11 Thread Miles Bader
Jon Dowland j...@debian.org writes: I grudgingly use GIMP but wish I didn't have to. Dependencies on DBUS and gconf2 are the least of its problems (if you consider those problems at all). MyPaint, which has been packaged, looks like a possibly replacement. Hmm, if having almost no

Unstable: Gimp requires dbus and gconf2 now? fail.

2012-04-10 Thread Dirk
Hello, can we please stay clear of all cancers Havoc Pennington has done? HAL was shit and got replaced. dbus and gconf2 are just as shit and will be replaced too. ...if necessary with gentoo. I am sick and tired of having to see his bullshit daemons... :( Luckily I am using unstable can

Re: Unstable: Gimp requires dbus and gconf2 now? fail.

2012-04-10 Thread Jon Dowland
On 10/04/12 10:58, Dirk wrote: dbus and gconf2 are just as shit and will be replaced too. Last I heard dbus was going strong - even looking at offloading work to the kernel (harnessing existing kernel messaging systems e.g. netlink) to improve performance. I grudgingly use GIMP but wish I

Re: Unstable: Gimp requires dbus and gconf2 now? fail.

2012-04-10 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:58:17 +, Dirk wrote: (...) I am sick and tired of having to see his bullshit daemons... :( All of the above sounded a bit rude :-/ Luckily I am using unstable can warn everyone who cares about this shitstorm. Can you point to that hard requirement? Just curious

Re: [MUST WATCH YOUTUBE VIDEO] [SUCCESS REPORT] Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 and Linux Kernel 3.3.0 in Ubuntu 11.10 amd64

2012-03-26 Thread Arnt Karlsen
23:29:46 +0800, Teo wrote in message 4f6b456a.8040...@gmail.com: Dear Xen Users and David Techer, It is only in the last few days that I have had great success with Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 and Linux

Re: [MUST WATCH YOUTUBE VIDEO] [SUCCESS REPORT] Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 and Linux Kernel 3.3.0 in Ubuntu 11.10 amd64

2012-03-24 Thread Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:29:46 +0800, Teo wrote in message 4f6b456a.8040...@gmail.com: Dear Xen Users and David Techer, It is only in the last few days that I have had great success with Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset

Re: [MUST WATCH YOUTUBE VIDEO] [SUCCESS REPORT] Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 and Linux Kernel 3.3.0 in Ubuntu 11.10 amd64

2012-03-24 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Donnerstag, 22. März 2012 schrieb Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming): Dear Xen Users and David Techer, Hi Teo, It is only in the last few days that I have had great success with Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 and Linux

[MUST WATCH YOUTUBE VIDEO] [SUCCESS REPORT] Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 and Linux Kernel 3.3.0 in Ubuntu 11.10 amd64 dom

2012-03-22 Thread Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
Dear Xen Users and David Techer, It is only in the last few days that I have had great success with Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 and Linux Kernel 3.3.0 in Ubuntu 11.10 amd64 dom0. Please do watch my Youtube video

[MUST WATCH YOUTUBE VIDEO] [SUCCESS REPORT] Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 and Linux Kernel 3.3.0 in Ubuntu 11.10 amd64 dom

2012-03-22 Thread Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
Dear Xen Users and David Techer, It is only in the last few days that I have had great success with Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 and Linux Kernel 3.3.0 in Ubuntu 11.10 amd64 dom0. Please do watch my Youtube video

Re: [MUST WATCH YOUTUBE VIDEO] [SUCCESS REPORT] Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 and Linux Kernel 3.3.0 in Ubuntu 11.10 amd64

2012-03-22 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:29:46 +0800, Teo wrote in message 4f6b456a.8040...@gmail.com: Dear Xen Users and David Techer, It is only in the last few days that I have had great success with Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM Virtual Machine with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset

[SUCCESS REPORT] Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM domU and Windows XP Home Edition HVM domU with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 in Ubuntu 11.10 amd64 Dom0

2012-03-21 Thread Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
Subject: Xen VGA Passthrough to Windows 8 Consumer Preview HVM domU and Windows XP Home Edition HVM domU with Xen 4.2-unstable Changeset 25070 in Ubuntu 11.10 amd64 Dom0 Dear All, For more information, please read the following threads: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2012-03

[YOUTUBE] Installing Windows 8 in Ubuntu 11.10 dom0 with Xen 4.2-unstable and Linux Kernel 3.3.0-rc7

2012-03-18 Thread Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpibG1dqOq8hd=1 Yours sincerely, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f65e177.3040...@gmail.com

[andreimpope...@gmail.com: Re: General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository)]

2012-03-07 Thread Chris Bannister
I think he wanted to CC'd so ... - Forwarded message from Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com - Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 01:28:15 +0200 From: Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository) On Lu

Re: [andreimpope...@gmail.com: Re: General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository)]

2012-03-07 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Subject: Re: General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository) On Lu, 05 mar 12, 10:36:45, Abou Al Montacir wrote: I'm speaking about testing not unstable. It used to be quite stable and works well for the last 5 years. Now, it is unstable in the sense that there are many critical bugs

Re: KDE SC 4.7.4 being uploaded to unstable

2012-03-05 Thread PS
Mar 2012 01:13:22 +0100 Subject: KDE SC 4.7.4 being uploaded to unstable Hello, the upload of KDE SC 4.7.4 started today and will continue tomorrow. I recommend you to not upgrade at least until all the packages are uploaded. When done I'll send another mail to this mailing list. Good night

Re: General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository)

2012-03-05 Thread Abou Al Montacir
and good compromise between stability and new features for a desktop usage. Please don't confuse unstable with buggy. In the Debian sense it means constantly changing, moving state. Whereas stable means not changing, known state. I'm speaking about testing not unstable. It used to be quite stable

Re: General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository)

2012-03-05 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 05 mar 12, 10:36:45, Abou Al Montacir wrote: I'm speaking about testing not unstable. It used to be quite stable and works well for the last 5 years. Now, it is unstable in the sense that there are many critical bugs that were introduced recently. For me such regressions should

Fwd: KDE SC 4.7.4 being uploaded to unstable

2012-03-04 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema
Pues eso: ---BeginMessage--- Hello, the upload of KDE SC 4.7.4 started today and will continue tomorrow. I recommend you to not upgrade at least until all the packages are uploaded. When done I'll send another mail to this mailing list. Good night from UTC+1. signature.asc Description: This

Re: General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository)

2012-03-04 Thread Chris Bannister
usage. Please don't confuse unstable with buggy. In the Debian sense it means constantly changing, moving state. Whereas stable means not changing, known state. -- Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet. -- Napoleon Bonaparte -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ

Re: bzr-hg gone missing from unstable?

2012-03-04 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:08:27 -0500, Max Hyre wrote: On 03/01/12 17:18, Brian wrote: http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bzr-hg.html Thanks. It's obvious I didn't read the bug reports closely enough. I saw that http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659888 was resolved, and

bzr-hg gone missing from unstable?

2012-03-01 Thread Max Hyre
Dear Debian: Starting to play with Bazaar, I figured I'd practice on a Mercurial repository I have lying around. My box follows unstable, and when I did ``apt-get install bzr-hg'' I was told E: Unable to locate package bzr-hg But it's right there: http

Re: bzr-hg gone missing from unstable?

2012-03-01 Thread Brian
On Thu 01 Mar 2012 at 16:49:47 -0500, Max Hyre wrote: bzr-hg's bug list has nothing relevant, and I could find no mention of the lack in the last couple of months of debian-user, so here it is: where'd it go, and should it come back? http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bzr-hg.html -- To

Re: bzr-hg gone missing from unstable?

2012-03-01 Thread Max Hyre
On 03/01/12 17:18, Brian wrote: http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bzr-hg.html Thanks. It's obvious I didn't read the bug reports closely enough. I saw that http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659888 was resolved, and didn't look inside to see that the resolution was

General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository)

2012-02-29 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Hi All, During the last few months I've been experiencing an increasing instability on my systems running wheezy. This used to be a good quality repository and good compromise between stability and new features for a desktop usage. However, with the gnome3 transition I started to experience more

Re: General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository)

2012-02-29 Thread Walter Hurry
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:59:03 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN HTML HEAD META HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8 META NAME=GENERATOR CONTENT=GtkHTML/4.2.2 /HEAD BODY Hi All,BR BR During the last few months

Fwd: Mr. Geissert Need Some Help Debian GNU/Linux unstable Sid - Official Snapshot amd64 LIVE/NETINST Binary 20090704-21:29

2012-01-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Mr. Geissert Need Some Help Debian GNU/Linux unstable Sid - Official Snapshot amd64 LIVE/NETINST Binary 20090704-21:29 Date: Wednesday 25 January 2012, 17:08:36 From: maujhsn 1037302...@gmail.com To: geiss...@debian.org I downloaded

[Un peu HS.. ou pas !] connaitre les paquets provenant de testing ou unstable ?

2012-01-22 Thread Mourad Jaber
Bonjour, Je cherche le moyen de déterminer d'où proviennent les paquetages installés sur ma machine (testing, unstable ou experimental !)... Google n'étant pas mon ami ce soir, je n'ai pas trouvé de réponse concluante... Y-a-t'il une possibilité de le faire simplement ? ++ Mourad -- Lisez

Re: [Un peu HS.. ou pas !] connaitre les paquets provenant de testing ou unstable ?

2012-01-22 Thread Jean-Yves F. Barbier
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:16:47 +0100 Mourad Jaber m...@nativobject.net wrote: Je cherche le moyen de déterminer d'où proviennent les paquetages installés sur ma machine (testing, unstable ou experimental !)... Google n'étant pas mon ami ce soir, Gogol n'a jamais été ton ami, il te le dit

Re: [Un peu HS.. ou pas !] connaitre les paquets provenant de testing ou unstable ?

2012-01-22 Thread Yves Rutschle
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 06:16:47PM +0100, Mourad Jaber wrote: Y-a-t'il une possibilité de le faire simplement ? apt-cache policy package Y. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme

Re: [Un peu HS.. ou pas !] connaitre les paquets provenant de testing ou unstable ?

2012-01-22 Thread Amanda Hinault
Le 22 janvier 2012 17:32, Jean-Yves F. Barbier 12u...@gmail.com a écrit : Y-a-t'il une possibilité de le faire simplement ? Pas que je saches, tu va devoir te taper le listing dans une main, le café dans la deuxième, la pizza dans la troisième et les yeux rivés sur packages.debian.org.

Re: [Un peu HS.. ou pas !] connaitre les paquets provenant de testing ou unstable ?

2012-01-22 Thread Yannick Palanque
Bonjour, À 2012-01-22T17:38:46+0100, Amanda Hinault hina...@gmail.com écrivit : Je te trouve bien catégorique pour une fois, effectivement je ne vois pas de logiciel qui le fasse Si j'ai bien compris la demande, Synaptic le fait (mais évidemment, ça n'est pas du mode texte). -- Yannick

Re: [Un peu HS.. ou pas !] connaitre les paquets provenant de testing ou unstable ?

2012-01-22 Thread Jean-Yves F. Barbier
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:38:46 +0100 Amanda Hinault hina...@gmail.com wrote: Pas que je saches, tu va devoir te taper le listing dans une main, le café dans la deuxième, la pizza dans la troisième et les yeux rivés sur packages.debian.org. Je te trouve bien catégorique pour une fois,

Re: [Un peu HS.. ou pas !] connaitre les paquets provenant de testing ou unstable ?

2012-01-22 Thread angus . frinc
Bonsoir, Le 22/janv. - 18:16, Mourad Jaber a écrit : Je cherche le moyen de déterminer d'où proviennent les paquetages installés sur ma machine (testing, unstable ou experimental !)... Y-a-t'il une possibilité de le faire simplement ? Avec aptitude, voici quelques recettes pour lister les

Re: [Un peu HS.. ou pas !] connaitre les paquets provenant de testing ou unstable ?

2012-01-22 Thread Bernard Schoenacker
Le Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:16:47 +0100, Mourad Jaber m...@nativobject.net a écrit : Bonjour, Je cherche le moyen de déterminer d'où proviennent les paquetages installés sur ma machine (testing, unstable ou experimental !)... Google n'étant pas mon ami ce soir, je n'ai pas trouvé de réponse

Re: [Un peu HS.. ou pas !] connaitre les paquets provenant de testing ou unstable ?

2012-01-22 Thread Mourad Jaber
Effectivement, ça ressemble bien à ce que je cherche :) ++ Mourad Le 22/01/2012 18:19, angus.fr...@free.fr a écrit : Bonsoir, Le 22/janv. - 18:16, Mourad Jaber a écrit : Je cherche le moyen de déterminer d'où proviennent les paquetages installés sur ma machine (testing, unstable ou

Re: [Un peu HS.. ou pas !] connaitre les paquets provenant de testing ou unstable ?

2012-01-22 Thread Jérôme
Le dimanche 22 janvier 2012 à 18:16 +0100, Mourad Jaber a écrit : Bonjour, Je cherche le moyen de déterminer d'où proviennent les paquetages installés sur ma machine (testing, unstable ou experimental !)... Google n'étant pas mon ami ce soir, je n'ai pas trouvé de réponse concluante

ATI proprietary driver unstable on kernel 3.0.0.2

2011-11-21 Thread Richard
Hi, I'm pretty sure this isn't a gnome problem as it effects xfce as well. The display with the fglrx module is unstable when changing desktops it breaks up, starting and video causes it to crash and you get returned to the login pane DKMS will not build the fglrx modules downloaded from

Re: ATI proprietary driver unstable on kernel 3.0.0.2

2011-11-21 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Lu, 21 nov 11, 12:33:42, Richard wrote: Hi, I'm pretty sure this isn't a gnome problem as it effects xfce as well. The display with the fglrx module is unstable when changing desktops it breaks up, starting and video causes it to crash and you get returned to the login pane DKMS

Re: Gnome 3 : rôle de unstable/testing

2011-11-15 Thread Vincent Danjean
). -- Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87 Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main -- Lisez la FAQ de

Re: Gnome 3 : rôle de unstable/testing

2011-11-14 Thread Rémi Vanicat
y a experimental pour ça. Experimental n'est pas toujours suffisant. En particulier elle n'est pas assez utilisée et donc testée à mon goût. Un des gros intérêt de unstable/testing reste quand même le fait de trouver des bugs, et pour ça il faut que des gens utilise les paquets. De plus le fait

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-14 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:34:15 +0100, Arno Schuring wrote: Camaleón (noela...@gmail.com on 2011-11-13 17:59 +): and how many people are whining because GNOME 2 is gone? We all miss the good job that GNOME2 did. IMO, there is nothing wrong about users whining or complaining because of

Re: Gnome 3 : rôle de unstable/testing

2011-11-13 Thread Vincent Danjean
peu le délire ici. Unstable et testing, c'est pour préparer la prochaine stable de Debian. Ça signifie que les *logiciels* de unstable (et donc de testing) doivent avoir une qualité suffisante pour être dans une Debian stable. Si on veut tester un *logiciel* dans Debian, c'est experimental. Ce

Re: Gnome 3 : rôle de unstable/testing

2011-11-13 Thread Rémi Vanicat
), ça signifie qu'ils ont abusé du système de développement de Debian. Unstable et testing ne devraient recevoir que des versions considérées comme correctes pour une stable. Pas sur, l'intégration d'un gros truc comme gnome 3 prend du temps. Attendre que tout soit finie du coté upstream avant de

Re: Gnome 3 : rôle de unstable/testing

2011-11-13 Thread Vincent Danjean
oui vu une de leur réponse à un de mes bugs), ça signifie qu'ils ont abusé du système de développement de Debian. Unstable et testing ne devraient recevoir que des versions considérées comme correctes pour une stable. Pas sur, l'intégration d'un gros truc comme gnome 3 prend du temps. Attendre que

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 13:10 +, Camaleón wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:26:31 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Hi Camaleón, hi everybody else :) at the moment the fallback mode looks promising. Don't put your expectations on it :-) Is there already a GNOME 3 version without fallback

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 12:41 +, Camaleón wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:47 +, Richard wrote: How do you switch DM to LXDE etc, there is nothing on the login pane as there used to be. I have TWM in the dropdown menu so other desktops should be also present. While the Login-Manager

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:04:15 +, Cam Hutchison wrote: Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes: On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:15:42 +, Cam Hutchison wrote: I'd like to keep using the panel from GNOME 2. I like its world clock, the menu and a couple of applets. Is this still in unstable at all

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:13:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 13:10 +, Camaleón wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:26:31 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Hi Camaleón, hi everybody else :) at the moment the fallback mode looks promising. Don't put your expectations on it :-)

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Erwan David
On 13/11/11 12:16, Camaleón wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:13:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 13:10 +, Camaleón wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:26:31 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Hi Camaleón, hi everybody else :) at the moment the fallback mode looks promising. Don't

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:20:40 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 12:41 +, Camaleón wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:47 +, Richard wrote: How do you switch DM to LXDE etc, there is nothing on the login pane as there used to be. I have TWM in the dropdown menu so other

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Richard
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:46:37 + (UTC) Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:20:40 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 12:41 +, Camaleón wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:47 +, Richard wrote: How do you switch DM to LXDE etc, there is nothing on

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:18:52 +0100, Erwan David wrote: On 13/11/11 12:16, Camaleón wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:13:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 13:10 +, Camaleón wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:26:31 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Hi Camaleón, hi everybody else :)

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:56:17 +, Richard wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:46:37 + (UTC) Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: For those who can't see any other login sessions other than gnome/gnome fallback/default they should run: ls -l /usr/share/xsessions To check what's there.

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Richard
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:07:10 + (UTC) Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:56:17 +, Richard wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:46:37 + (UTC) Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: For those who can't see any other login sessions other than gnome/gnome

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:54:43 +, Richard wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:07:10 + (UTC) Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: (...) But no pulldown on the login menu, any ideas how to get this added Let's see... at the login greeter window you have to click on your user name (richard)

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Walter Hurry
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:18:13 +, Camaleón wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:54:43 +, Richard wrote: Sorry printscreen doesn't function until logged in. You can use a digital still camera or your cell phone's one :-) Or xnest -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 11:16 +, Camaleón wrote: Hm? Around 10 o'clock in the morning I wasn't able to receive emails. It's Sunday, people is sleeping after a long journey of gnome-shell tweaking :-P It was an issue by my provider, I got timeouts. Anyway, I need to do additional

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 11:57 +, Camaleón wrote: I hope I can turn off all of the mutter effects (window shadows and moving windows), they're really annoying. Fallback mode :p. - Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Erwan David
Le Sun 13/11/2011, Ralf Mardorf said On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 11:16 +, Camaleón wrote: Hm? Around 10 o'clock in the morning I wasn't able to receive emails. It's Sunday, people is sleeping after a long journey of gnome-shell tweaking :-P It was an issue by my provider, I got

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:06:59 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 11:57 +, Camaleón wrote: I hope I can turn off all of the mutter effects (window shadows and moving windows), they're really annoying. Fallback mode :p. And when it's not available anymore, what? :-) No

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Richard
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:35:04 + (UTC) Walter Hurry walterhu...@lavabit.com wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:18:13 +, Camaleón wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:54:43 +, Richard wrote: Sorry printscreen doesn't function until logged in. You can use a digital still camera or your

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:29 +0100, Erwan David wrote: Le Sun 13/11/2011, Ralf Mardorf said On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 11:16 +, Camalen wrote: Hm? Around 10 o'clock in the morning I wasn't able to receive emails. It's Sunday, people is sleeping after a long journey of gnome-shell

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:44:05 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:29 +0100, Erwan David wrote: (...) But I understand that fallback mode will disapear, sooner or later. Really? Really. How many people like GNOME 3 I like GNOME3. And I hope gnome-shell fits my needs,

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Arno Schuring
Camaleón (noela...@gmail.com on 2011-11-13 17:59 +): and how many people are whining because GNOME 2 is gone? We all miss the good job that GNOME2 did. IMO, there is nothing wrong about users whining or complaining because of the change, that's a normal reaction that express the

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-13 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 01:34 +0100, Arno Schuring wrote: However, you can argue whether effectively discontinuing the most-used DE on Linux is a wise move. I can understand some of the reasoning behind it, but in my mind, abandoning your old product in favor of some fad of the day feels like a

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-12 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:15:42 +, Cam Hutchison wrote: I'd like to keep using the panel from GNOME 2. I like its world clock, the menu and a couple of applets. Is this still in unstable at all? The replacement seems to be less functional (at the moment). Yes, you can still launch

AW: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Cam Hutchison [mailto:c...@xdna.net] Gesendet: Sa 11/12/2011 06:15 An: debian-user@lists.debian.org Betreff: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable? I'd like to keep using the panel from GNOME 2. I like its world clock, the menu and a couple of applets

Re: AW: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-12 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:38 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: (...) OT: Are there any users who like GNOME 3 or Unity? I already don't like KDE 4. I was a KDE 3 user, resp. since years i'm a GNOME 2 user, anyway, until now KDE 4 might be not that worth as GNOME 3 already is. Hopefully XFCE, LXDE,

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-12 Thread Richard
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:38 +0100 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Cam Hutchison [mailto:c...@xdna.net] Gesendet: Sa 11/12/2011 06:15 An: debian-user@lists.debian.org Betreff: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable? I'd like to keep using

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-12 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:47 +, Richard wrote: If gnome3 was more user configurable it would be OK, I'm still using it on my laptop with FC15. My problems are: no automatic login~ yes I've set the user options and they get ignored This already has to be working. It does for me. Look at

AW: AW: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Camaleón [mailto:noela...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Sa 11/12/2011 12:51 An: debian-user@lists.debian.org Betreff: Re: AW: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable? On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:38 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: (...) OT: Are there any users who like

Re: AW: AW: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-12 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:26:31 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Hi Camaleón, hi everybody else :) at the moment the fallback mode looks promising. Don't put your expectations on it :-) This weekend might become a weekend of snapshot-backups and restores. I still haven't installed gnome-core for

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-12 Thread Richard
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 12:41:32 + (UTC) Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:47 +, Richard wrote: If gnome3 was more user configurable it would be OK, I'm still using it on my laptop with FC15. My problems are: no automatic login~ yes I've set the user

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-12 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:14:23 +, Richard wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 12:41:32 + (UTC) Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: Look at your /etc/gdm3/daemon.conf and check if these values are set: [daemon] AutomaticLoginEnable = true AutomaticLogin = your_username It looks like the

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-12 Thread Walter Hurry
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:17:01 +, Camaleón wrote: I think Fedora 15 shipped gnome-shell 3.0, the same we have right now in Debian. But again, this 3.0 release provides little to nothing customization options unless you manually go and edit the required files. Upcoming versions of the shell

Re: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-12 Thread Cam Hutchison
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes: On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:15:42 +, Cam Hutchison wrote: I'd like to keep using the panel from GNOME 2. I like its world clock, the menu and a couple of applets. Is this still in unstable at all? The replacement seems to be less functional (at the moment

Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?

2011-11-11 Thread Cam Hutchison
I'd like to keep using the panel from GNOME 2. I like its world clock, the menu and a couple of applets. Is this still in unstable at all? The replacement seems to be less functional (at the moment). Otherwise is there a compatible panel available that can use the GNOME 2 world clock

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable - Running Password-gorilla

2011-10-02 Thread Csanyi Pal
Hi, After upgrade to unstable whenever I start Password Gorilla I get message: The Password Gorilla requires the pwsafe package. This seems to be an installation problem, as the pwsafe package ought to be part of the Password Gorilla distribution. aptitude search pwsafe gives me nothing. My

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable - Running Password-gorilla

2011-10-02 Thread Bob Proulx
Csanyi Pal wrote: After upgrade to unstable whenever I start Password Gorilla I get message: Since you are changing to a new topic it is best to post a new message to the mailing list and not reply to the older thread. People who have decided that they were not interested in the older thread

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable - Installing gnash

2011-09-27 Thread Csanyi Pal
Hi, After resolving sudo issue I want to install gnash but get these output: sudo aptitude install gnash The following NEW packages will be installed: gnash gnash-common{ab} The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT be installed: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3 0

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable - Installing gnash

2011-09-27 Thread Bob Proulx
Csanyi Pal wrote: sudo aptitude install gnash The following NEW packages will be installed: gnash gnash-common{ab} ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: gnash-common: Depends: libavcodec52 (= 4:0.6-1~) which is a virtual But Squeeze's gnash-common is version 0.8.8-5 and

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable - Installing gnash

2011-09-27 Thread Bob Proulx
://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20110730T152949Z/pool/main/liba/libav/libavformat52_0.6.2-5_i386.deb dpkg -i libavformat52_0.6.2-5_i386.deb Note that if you are working with Sid Unstable you will need to become proficient in dealing with breakages such as this. Using 'snapshot

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable - NVIDIA

2011-09-26 Thread Csanyi Pal
Hi, I had installed the NVIDIA driver downloaded from nvidia.com when run Squeeze. Now when I'm running unstable I have uninstalled every nvidia package and have installed nvidia-installer-cleanup. I'm running kernel 3.0.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Sep 20 07:03:13 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux and have

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable - NVIDIA

2011-09-26 Thread Brad Alexander
nvidia-kernel-dkms nvidia-settings nvidia-support nvidia-vdpau-driver xserver-xorg-video-nvidia --b On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Csanyi Pal csanyi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I had installed the NVIDIA driver downloaded from nvidia.com when run Squeeze. Now when I'm running unstable I

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable - NVIDIA

2011-09-26 Thread Csanyi Pal
Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com writes: I believe to install the nvidia driver the Debian way, you need to enable the non-free repositories then install glx-alternative-nvidia libgl1-nvidia-alternatives libgl1-nvidia-glx libglx-nvidia-alternatives nvidia-alternative Already installed.

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable - NVIDIA

2011-09-26 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Montag, 26. September 2011 schrieb Csanyi Pal: Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com writes: I believe to install the nvidia driver the Debian way, you need to enable the non-free repositories then install glx-alternative-nvidia libgl1-nvidia-alternatives libgl1-nvidia-glx

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable - NVIDIA

2011-09-26 Thread Csanyi Pal
Hans-J. Ullrich hans.ullr...@loop.de writes: Am Montag, 26. September 2011 schrieb Csanyi Pal: Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com writes: I believe to install the nvidia driver the Debian way, you need to enable the non-free repositories then install glx-alternative-nvidia

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable - NVIDIA

2011-09-26 Thread Csanyi Pal
Csanyi Pal csanyi...@gmail.com writes: Hans-J. Ullrich hans.ullr...@loop.de writes: Am Montag, 26. September 2011 schrieb Csanyi Pal: Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com writes: I believe to install the nvidia driver the Debian way, you need to enable the non-free repositories then install

Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable

2011-09-25 Thread Csanyi Pal
Hi, I have upgraded my Desktop system Debian Squeeze to Debian unstable. Now when I try to upgrade or install some package I get output and error messages: Reading changelogs... Done dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig' not found in PATH or not executable. dpkg: warning: 'start-stop-daemon' not found

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable

2011-09-25 Thread Weaver
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:15:57 +0200 Csanyi Pal csanyi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have upgraded my Desktop system Debian Squeeze to Debian unstable. Now when I try to upgrade or install some package I get output and error messages: Reading changelogs... Done dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable

2011-09-25 Thread Weaver
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:15:57 +0200 Csanyi Pal csanyi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have upgraded my Desktop system Debian Squeeze to Debian unstable. Now when I try to upgrade or install some package I get output and error messages: Reading changelogs... Done dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable

2011-09-25 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-09-25 22:15 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote: I have upgraded my Desktop system Debian Squeeze to Debian unstable. Now when I try to upgrade or install some package I get output and error messages: Reading changelogs... Done dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig' not found in PATH or not executable

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable

2011-09-25 Thread Csanyi Pal
Weaver wea...@riseup.net writes: On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:15:57 +0200 Csanyi Pal csanyi...@gmail.com wrote: I have upgraded my Desktop system Debian Squeeze to Debian unstable. I was followed these steps: http://www.kdenlive.org/user-manual/downloading-and-installing-kdenlive/pre-compiled

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable

2011-09-25 Thread Csanyi Pal
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes: On 2011-09-25 22:15 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote: I have upgraded my Desktop system Debian Squeeze to Debian unstable. Now when I try to upgrade or install some package I get output and error messages: Reading changelogs... Done dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig

Re: Upgraded from Squeeze to unstable

2011-09-25 Thread Bob Proulx
Csanyi Pal wrote: I have upgraded my Desktop system Debian Squeeze to Debian unstable. Now when I try to upgrade or install some package I get output and error messages: Reading changelogs... Done dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig' not found in PATH or not executable. You have hit this bug

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >