I need to know more about the state of perl on your machine; please
post the output of the following commands:
dpkg -l perl\* | awk '/^i/{print $1,$2,$3}'
stat /usr/share/perl/5.8.8/Pod/Usage.pm
ls -l /usr/share/perl/
muse:~# dpkg -l perl\* | awk '/^i/{print $1,$2,$3}'
iU perl 5.10.0-13
ii
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 16:32:35 -0400, dlc AT radix DOT net wrote:
I need to know more about the state of perl on your machine; please
post the output of the following commands:
dpkg -l perl\* | awk '/^i/{print $1,$2,$3}'
stat /usr/share/perl/5.8.8/Pod/Usage.pm
ls -l /usr/share/perl/
I tried to upgrade my Sid system after having had it shutdown for
months. Apt-Get downloaded over a thousand packages! I had some
trouble which resulted in finally using the -f and --fix-missing options
and now I get the following results:
Setting up base-passwd (3.5.18) ...
Can't locate
i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.16.4
so i did the distr-upgrade again. following is the session output. '31 not
fully installed or removed.' is where it gets interesting:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package
tom arnall wrote:
i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.16.4
so i did the distr-upgrade again. following is the session output. '31 not
fully installed or removed.' is where it gets interesting:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get
On Sunday 20 January 2008 11:46, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.16.4
so i did the distr-upgrade again. following is the session output. '31
not fully installed or removed.' is where it gets
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:20:03 -0800, tom arnall wrote:
i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.16.4
I think you should follow the Sarge-Etch upgrade notes, adapting them
to your somewhat different situation. There are a couple of issues to
tom arnall wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 11:46, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.16.4
so i did the distr-upgrade again. following is the session output. '31
not fully installed or removed.' is
On Sunday 20 January 2008 12:17, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 11:46, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.16.4
so i did the distr-upgrade again. following is the
On Sunday 20 January 2008 12:37, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
Marty,
should i be concerned about the following. i did this without pointing
sources.list to the new repository.
Well, fix that. :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
It's a typical cascade of errors
tom arnall wrote:
Marty,
should i be concerned about the following. i did this without pointing
sources.list to the new repository.
Well, fix that. :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
It's a typical cascade of errors caused by the first few individual package
On Sunday 20 January 2008 12:03, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:20:03 -0800, tom arnall wrote:
i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.16.4
I think you should follow the Sarge-Etch upgrade notes, adapting them
to your
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:46:31PM -0500, Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard
to say:
tom arnall wrote:
i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.16.4
so i did the distr-upgrade again. following is the session output. '31
not fully installed
tom arnall wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 12:37, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
Marty,
should i be concerned about the following. i did this without pointing
sources.list to the new repository.
Well, fix that. :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
It's a typical cascade
When installing a new system (etch), is there any trick I need to know for
getting my home directory right? I have the one from old system backed up.
When I go to restore it on the new system, I assume the installer will have
put some kind of home directory on the new system under my username.
tom arnall wrote:
When installing a new system (etch), is there any trick I need to know for
getting my home directory right? I have the one from old system backed up.
When I go to restore it on the new system, I assume the installer will have
put some kind of home directory on the new system
On Sunday 20 January 2008 14:32, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
When installing a new system (etch), is there any trick I need to know
for getting my home directory right? I have the one from old system
backed up. When I go to restore it on the new system, I assume the
installer will
tom arnall wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 14:32, Marty wrote:
The simplest solution is to start with a new drive. Unplug and remove your
current drive if it contains anything valuable, put it in a safe place. As
the saying goes, when you're stuck in the hole, stop digging.
don't have
On Sunday 20 January 2008 15:36, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 14:32, Marty wrote:
The simplest solution is to start with a new drive. Unplug and remove
your current drive if it contains anything valuable, put it in a safe
place. As the saying goes, when
On Sunday 20 January 2008 17:49, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
besides my home directory, what else should i think about backing up?
I would back up etc as well.
what would be the advantage of 'rsync'?
It makes perfect copies of directory trees.
is there a problem with 'cp -R' in this
tom arnall wrote:
besides my home directory, what else should i think about backing up?
I would back up etc as well.
what would be the advantage of 'rsync'?
It makes perfect copies of directory trees.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
tom arnall wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 17:49, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
besides my home directory, what else should i think about backing up?
I would back up etc as well.
Come to think of it, I might also grab var, and maybe run dpkg-query and save
the output, to make
I was able to fix it. Apparently if the error occurs, it doesn't
install the package at all. So I put the necessary dirs in root's path
and ran 'aptitude install' again for the failed packages and it was
ok.
Thanks.
Nick
--
Nick's Auditorium: http://users.pandora.be/nicks_auditorium
History of
I was able to fix it. Apparently if the error occurs, it doesn't
install the package at all. So I put the necessary dirs in root's path
and ran 'aptitude install' again for the failed packages and it was
ok.
Thanks.
Nick
--
Nick's Auditorium: http://users.pandora.be/nicks_auditorium
History of
I was able to fix it. Apparently if the error occurs, it doesn't
install the package at all. So I put the necessary dirs in root's path
and ran 'aptitude install' again for the failed packages and it was
ok.
Thanks.
Nick
--
Nick's Auditorium: http://users.pandora.be/nicks_auditorium
History of
I was able to fix it. Apparently if the error occurs, it doesn't
install the package at all. So I put the necessary dirs in root's path
and ran 'aptitude install' again for the failed packages and it was
ok.
Thanks.
Nick
--
Nick's Auditorium: http://users.pandora.be/nicks_auditorium
History of
I'm trying to upgrade a Sarge box to Etch and several dpkg: `x' not
found on PATH-errors occured.
I followed the instructions in the release notes
(http://www.nl.debian.org/releases/etch/i386/release-notes/ch-
upgrading.en.html):
I ran
# aptitude upgrade
# aptitude install initrd-tools
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 01:44:09PM +0200, Nick De Graeve wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade a Sarge box to Etch and several dpkg: `x' not
found on PATH-errors occured.
I followed the instructions in the release notes
(http://www.nl.debian.org/releases/etch/i386/release-notes/ch-
Bill Wohler wrote:
Bob Proulx writes:
Correct. Linux 2.4 support has been dropped post Etch.
Since the kernel for this particular system (a vserver) is not under
my control and I don't expect it to be upgraded anytime soon if ever
this would be bad.
That could be a problem. The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
Bill Wohler wrote:
Robert Jerrard writes:
WARNING: POSIX threads library NPTL requires kernel version
2.6.8 or later. If you use a kernel 2.4, please upgrade it
before installing glibc.
Does this imply that lenny will not support 2.4 at all?
[Robert, please do not take this off-list. Thanks.]
Robert Jerrard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 23:05 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
You should install a 2.6.18 kernel from etch, after that is done you
can upgrade libc6 and the kernel to break the loop.
BTW, it is not
Robert Jerrard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
WARNING: POSIX threads library NPTL requires kernel version
2.6.8 or later. If you use a kernel 2.4, please upgrade it
before installing glibc.
Does this imply that lenny will not support 2.4 at all? I know that
2.4 isn't recommended under etch, but
Bill Wohler wrote:
Robert Jerrard writes:
WARNING: POSIX threads library NPTL requires kernel version
2.6.8 or later. If you use a kernel 2.4, please upgrade it
before installing glibc.
Does this imply that lenny will not support 2.4 at all?
Correct. Linux 2.4 support has been dropped
I am running debian unstable with kernel 2.6.5-1-k7 on an AMD Athlon
processor. When I try to upgrade the kernel it tells me:
penrose:~# apt-get install -t etch linux-image-2.6.22-1-k7
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:45:43PM -0600, Robert Jerrard wrote:
I am running debian unstable with kernel 2.6.5-1-k7 on an AMD Athlon
processor. When I try to upgrade the kernel it tells me:
penrose:~# apt-get install -t etch linux-image-2.6.22-1-k7
Your reason for the -t etch may prove
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 17:06 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:45:43PM -0600, Robert Jerrard wrote:
I am running debian unstable with kernel 2.6.5-1-k7 on an AMD Athlon
processor. When I try to upgrade the kernel it tells me:
penrose:~# apt-get install -t etch
Robert Jerrard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, when I try 'apt-get -f install' I get:
penrose:~# apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libc6
The following packages
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 23:05 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
Robert Jerrard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, when I try 'apt-get -f install' I get:
penrose:~# apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 03:14:32PM -0600, Robert Jerrard wrote:
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 17:06 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:45:43PM -0600, Robert Jerrard wrote:
I am running debian unstable with kernel 2.6.5-1-k7 on an AMD Athlon
processor. When I try to upgrade
I routinely run apt-get upgrade and apt-get dist-upgrade to keep my
packages up to date,
well when I went to do a dist-upgrade today it wants to install many
texlive-* packages, yet i don't have texlive installed and i don't
want it installed ! i use tetex for my tex/latex needs and don't want
to
Zach wrote:
I routinely run apt-get upgrade and apt-get dist-upgrade to keep my
packages up to date,
well when I went to do a dist-upgrade today it wants to install many
texlive-* packages, yet i don't have texlive installed and i don't
want it installed ! i use tetex for my tex/latex needs
On 7/8/07, Jonathan Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Zach,
It might be a better idea to run aptitude (or apt-get) upgrade rather than
dist-upgrade as a matter of routine. I think you will avoid these kinds of
problems this way.
Cheers,
Jonathan
Hi Jonathan,
Ok, I'm curious though 1) why it
Zach wrote:
On 7/8/07, Jonathan Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Zach,
It might be a better idea to run aptitude (or apt-get) upgrade rather
than dist-upgrade as a matter of routine. I think you will avoid these
kinds of problems this way.
Cheers,
Jonathan
Hi Jonathan,
Ok, I'm
Received Sun 08 Jul 2007 7:23pm +1000 from Jonathan Kaye:
Zach wrote:
On 7/8/07, Jonathan Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Zach,
It might be a better idea to run aptitude (or apt-get) upgrade rather
than dist-upgrade as a matter of routine. I think you will avoid these
kinds of
On 7/8/07, Graham Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tetex no longer exists (except historically) and to automatically and seamlessly
Hi Graham,
Wow, this is news to me. What happened the project was going strong
just 1-2 years ago. Did all the developers suddenly abandon it? How
strange.
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 11:21:39AM +0200, Jonathan Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Zach wrote:
I think you can mark them as hold as in aptitude hold texlive.
I still don't know why you want to do a dist-upgrade rather than a simple
upgrade as a matter of routine. Have you tried doing
On 7/8/07, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
upgrade is extremely conservative and will bail if it encounters
even something as trivial as a new dependency that needs to be
installed. dist-upgrade is a much better alternative if you're
tracking unstable or testing; with upgrade, many
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 11:21:39AM +0200, Jonathan Kaye
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
Zach wrote:
I think you can mark them as hold as in aptitude hold texlive.
I still don't know why you want to do a dist-upgrade rather than a simple
upgrade as a matter of
On 7/8/07, Jonathan Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just today I
wanted to upgrade amarok to 1.4.6 and as a result installed newer versions
of a couple of other packages. That certainly unblocked things because when
I did my normal upgrade I had 193 upgrades to make. I take this to be
normal. If
Zach wrote:
On 7/8/07, Jonathan Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just today I
wanted to upgrade amarok to 1.4.6 and as a result installed newer
versions of a couple of other packages. That certainly unblocked things
because when I did my normal upgrade I had 193 upgrades to make. I take
this
On 7/8/07, Jonathan Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. In your /etc/apt folder create a file called preferences which looks
something like this
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 600
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=testing
Pin-Priority: 650
What do the numbers
If I wish to upgrade a package would I do upgrade instead of
install in your example?
Should I delete this file if I wish to not do pinning?
Zach
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On 7/8/07, Graham Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|tetex no longer exists (except historically) and to automatically
|and seamlessly
|
| Hi Graham,
|
| Wow, this is news to me. What happened the project was going strong
| just 1-2 years ago. Did all
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 14:16:53 -0400, Zach wrote:
On 7/8/07, Graham Williams wrote:
[...]
Unless you have a specific reason to stay with tetex, might be best to
just go with the flow. My observation is that the transition, left to
apt-get, works just fine.
Ok and will all my commands
Zach wrote:
On 7/8/07, Jonathan Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. In your /etc/apt folder create a file called preferences which looks
something like this
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 600
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=testing
Pin-Priority: 650
What do
Zach wrote:
If I wish to upgrade a package would I do upgrade instead of
install in your example?
Should I delete this file if I wish to not do pinning?
Zach
upgrade and install are two different things. upgrade looks for a later
version for all the packages that you have already installed.
Hi,
Just to share a problem - and its solution - that I'm surprised doesn't happen
more often with Testing:
Did a dist-upgrade yesterday using adept (frontend for aptitude), previewing
the changes first to check for breakages. After the upgrade libc6 (and three
other related packages) were
On 6/3/07, John O'Hagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just to share a problem - and its solution - that I'm surprised doesn't
happen
more often with Testing:
Did a dist-upgrade yesterday using adept (frontend for aptitude),
previewing
the changes first to check for breakages. After the upgrade
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 07:38:49PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 06:21:34PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
Andrei Popescu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, April
10, 2007 10:35 AM -0500:
I am curious whether some debconf action, or dependencies in the deb
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:23:27PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 07:38:49PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 06:21:34PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
Andrei Popescu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, April
10, 2007 10:35 AM -0500:
will probably happen to other casual
users. I also suspect it's avoidable.
The setup that led to this upgrade problem was:
- Debian stable installed as desktop system plus server
- all package management done through Synaptic
- repositories pointed to stable, not Sarge
- Gnome screen saver active
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 06:21:34PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
Andrei Popescu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, April
10, 2007 10:35 AM -0500:
I am curious whether some debconf action, or dependencies in the deb
files, could have warned the user?
Prior to a new release, I wonder if
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fatal server error:
failed to initialize core devices
^^^
X cannot find your mouse. Try another device instead of /dev/psaux.
I have /dev/input/mice
Same result.
Have a look for errors in dmesg. I have this:
~#
Andrei Popescu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, April
10, 2007 2:54 AM -0500:
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fatal server error:
failed to initialize core devices
^^^
X cannot find your mouse. Try another device instead of
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrei Popescu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday,
April 10, 2007 2:54 AM -0500:
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fatal server error:
failed to initialize core devices
^^^
X cannot find
Andrei Popescu wrote on Tuesday, April 10, 2007 9:05 AM -0500:
Are you using gpm? IIRC the xorg.conf must be setup differently if you
use gpm.
gpm package is not installed.
--
Seth Goodman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In another thread, someone suggested dpkg-reconfigure udev for other
hardware detection problems, so I tried it. That refuses to run
because it wants a more recent kernel.
Missed this the first time. What kernel are you running and what
version of udev?
Andrei Popescu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, April
10, 2007 10:35 AM -0500:
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In another thread, someone suggested dpkg-reconfigure udev for
other hardware detection problems, so I tried it. That refuses to
run because it wants a more
I've started an upgrade from Sarge to Etch through the Synaptic Package
manager under Gnome. The package repositories all look for stable. I
selected the normal level of questions from the terminal interface.
It was going well, but now XScreenSaver activated and it does not accept
my password,
Seth Goodman ha scritto:
I've started an upgrade from Sarge to Etch through the Synaptic Package
all on the terminal display behind the screensaver :)
Have you tried to kill xscreensaver after remotely loggin in?
gc :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:41:06 -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
I've started an upgrade from Sarge to Etch through the Synaptic Package
manager under Gnome. The package repositories all look for stable. I
selected the normal level of questions from the terminal interface.
It was going well,
gianca wrote on Monday, April 09, 2007 10:04 AM -0500:
Have you tried to kill xscreensaver after remotely loggin in?
Florian Kulzer wrote on Monday, April 09, 2007 10:41 AM -0500:
You can try to kill the screen saver and/or the screen lock.
However, if I kill the screen lock process on my
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:41:06AM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
I've started an upgrade from Sarge to Etch through the Synaptic Package
manager under Gnome. The package repositories all look for stable. I
selected the normal level of questions from the terminal interface.
Please note that the
On Monday 09 April 2007 19:04, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:41:06AM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
I've started an upgrade from Sarge to Etch through the Synaptic Package
manager under Gnome. The package repositories all look for stable. I
selected the normal level of
On Monday, 09.04.2007 at 19:55 +0200, Nigel Henry wrote:
Perhaps it's not a good idea upgrading while X is running, but the
only problems I've ever had were when upgrading from Woody to Sarge. I
seem to remember X being shutdown, and having to continue the upgrade
from the command line.
I
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:24:19 -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
[...]
Now on to the PERL locale variable warnings. These warnings are all
similar to:
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = en_US:en_GB:en,
Well, a bit premature on solved status. The upgrade from Sarge to Etch
did complete after killing the screensaver process, but it did not leave
the system in a good state. Minor problems include Postgre failing on
boot, as well as a mini-DNS server that I don't believe was in Sarge
failing to
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:46:21PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
Well, a bit premature on solved status. The upgrade from Sarge to Etch
did complete after killing the screensaver process, but it did not leave
the system in a good state. Minor problems include Postgre failing on
boot, as well as
Matt Richardson wrote on Monday, April 09, 2007 4:39 PM -0500:
I had the same problem when I upgraded sarge to etch some time ago.
The solution was to add psmouse to /etc/modules. Check out lsmod and
see if it's listed already, but I'd guess not.
cray4:~# lsmod
Module Size
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
packages, /usr/X11R6/bin contains only a lib directory with a few
^
I guess you mean /usr/X11R6/
Section InputDevice
Identifier Configured Mouse
Driver mouse
Option
Andrei Popescu wrote on Monday, April 09, 2007 5:28 PM -0500:
Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
packages, /usr/X11R6/bin contains only a lib directory with a few
^
I guess you mean /usr/X11R6/
Yes, sorry. /usr/X11R6/bin is a symlink to /usr/bin
Section
On 4/9/07, Seth Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Richardson wrote on Monday, April 09, 2007 4:39 PM -0500:
I had the same problem when I upgraded sarge to etch some time ago.
The solution was to add psmouse to /etc/modules. Check out lsmod and
see if it's listed already, but I'd guess
Seth Goodman wrote:
I think your problem is in this section, see below.
(EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/psaux
No such device.
(EE) Configured Mouse: cannot open input device
(EE) PreInit failed for input device Configured Mouse (II)
UnloadModule: mouse (WW) No
Yesterday, I took the leap and upgraded from Sarge to Etch by following
the Etch release notes as best I could. The upgrade appeared to work
very well, but for some font problems. I'm very new to debian and
linux, so may have made some poor decisions during the upgrade.
The xfs font server
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:39 -0700, Terrence Branscombe wrote:
Yesterday, I took the leap and upgraded from Sarge to Etch by following
the Etch release notes as best I could. The upgrade appeared to work
very well, but for some font problems. I'm very new to debian and
linux, so may have
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 13:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Folkert wrote::
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:39 -0700, Terrence Branscombe wrote:
Yesterday, I took the leap and upgraded from Sarge to Etch by following
the Etch release notes as best I could. The upgrade appeared to work
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 17:39 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 13:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Folkert wrote::
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:39 -0700, Terrence Branscombe wrote:
Yesterday, I took the leap and upgraded from Sarge to Etch by following
the Etch
Took me a few days but finally got the 100+Meg update completed and
now find I don't have a working X anymore. Actually it 'might' be
working but I can't see it working because the screen is black but
the log shows..
Hi,
A few suggestions, apologies in advance if you already have tried
all
Sven Arvidsson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Took me a few days but finally got the 100+Meg update completed and
now find I don't have a working X anymore. Actually it 'might' be
working but I can't see it working because the screen is black but
the log shows..
Hi,
A
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 14:04 -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so: undefined symbol:
_glapi_Dispatch
(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so
(EE) Failed to load module GLcore (loader failed, 7)
That doesn't look good, but if
On 11/22/06, Arvind Marathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/etc/modprobe.d/sound but lspci doesn't. Is there anything else i need to
do to get sound working?
Try updating the pciutils on your system.
Another point: alsa shows me two cards:
hda-intelIntel Corporation
On 11/21/06, Arvind Marathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debian got installed without a hitch...and kernel upgrade also worked
Great. Congrats!
Now to some other issues:
1 auto mounting cd, floppy etc...
I created a file /etc/auto.media with the lines:
Here is my /etc/fstab
# /etc/fstab:
On 11/21/06, Arvind Marathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debian got installed without a hitch...and kernel upgrade also worked
Great. Congrats!
Now to some other issues:
1 auto mounting cd, floppy etc...
I created a file /etc/auto.media with the lines:
Here is my /etc/fstab
# /etc/fstab:
W Paul Mills([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Fluxbox
Warning: Failed to open file(/usr/share/fluxbox/nls/en_US/fluxbox.cat)
for translation, using default messages.
Looks like something in your config is looking for fluxbox, and it is
not installed.
See note below.
Wayne Topa([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
_
X Window System Version 7.1.1
Release Date: 12 May 2006
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.1.1
Build Operating System: UNKNOWN
Current Operating System: Linux buddy 2.6.15y #7 Wed Sep 27
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wayne Topa wrote:
Wayne Topa([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
_
X Window System Version 7.1.1
Release Date: 12 May 2006
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.1.1
Build Operating System: UNKNOWN
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:05:07 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I 'wgot' the link mentioned in a d-u post about AIGLX
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_AIGLX but my video card, a
Tseng Labs Inc ET6000, isn't listed as supported. I tried commenting
out the 'Load dri' but get the
Liam O'Toole([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:05:07 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I 'wgot' the link mentioned in a d-u post about AIGLX
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_AIGLX but my video card, a
Tseng Labs Inc ET6000, isn't listed
Hi all. Has anyone else upgraded Etch in the last few days and had a
problem with X?
Took me a few days but finally got the 100+Meg update completed and
now find I don't have a working X anymore. Actually it 'might' be
working but I can't see it working because the screen is black but
the log
Commend in /etc/X11/xorg.conf the following line out:
Load dri
As the output shows an error concerning dri.
If it still doesn't work, look at the lines with (EE) in front, look if
you can find something matching in /etc/X11/xorg.conf and comment it
out. That should do it.
Good luck!
301 - 400 of 632 matches
Mail list logo
