On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 23:37 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
> On 9/28/2012 1:39 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 20:27 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
> >> Try:
> >>
> >> $clive -f best "http://vimeo.com/24972836";
> >
> > Does it download and convert long YouTube videos on the fly or does it
On 9/28/2012 1:39 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 20:27 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Try:
$clive -f best "http://vimeo.com/24972836";
Does it download and convert long YouTube videos on the fly or does it
take hours?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KufCS2ad0eE
Regards,
Ralf
On
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:24:12 +0200
Siard wrote:
> Celejar:
> > lee:
> > > Celejar:
> > > > If the website gives you a mms:// url, can wget download the
> > > > content from that (I don't know, I've never tried it)?
> > >
> > > You'd have to try, the manpage of wget doesn't say and I don't have
>
Celejar:
> lee:
> > Celejar:
> > > If the website gives you a mms:// url, can wget download the
> > > content from that (I don't know, I've never tried it)?
> >
> > You'd have to try, the manpage of wget doesn't say and I don't have
> > an URL to try it with.
>
> I'm pretty sure wget doesn't hand
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 20:27 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
> Try:
>
> $clive -f best "http://vimeo.com/24972836";
Does it download and convert long YouTube videos on the fly or does it
take hours?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KufCS2ad0eE
Regards,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-req
On 9/25/2012 4:42 PM, lee wrote:
Celejar writes:
http://www.iba.org.il/gimmel/?entity=869508&type=269&page=248
Clicking the little red headphone-with-emanating-sound-waves brings up
this message:
"You must install the Windows Media Player Firefox Plugin.
Click here to download and install t
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:42:22 +0200
lee wrote:
> Celejar writes:
>
> > http://www.iba.org.il/gimmel/?entity=869508&type=269&page=248
> >
> > Clicking the little red headphone-with-emanating-sound-waves brings up
> > this message:
> >
> > "You must install the Windows Media Player Firefox Plugin.
Celejar writes:
> http://www.iba.org.il/gimmel/?entity=869508&type=269&page=248
>
> Clicking the little red headphone-with-emanating-sound-waves brings up
> this message:
>
> "You must install the Windows Media Player Firefox Plugin.
>
> Click here to download and install the plugin.
>
> Or click
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:11:22 +0200
lee wrote:
> Celejar writes:
>
> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:22:28 +0200
> > lee wrote:
> >
> >> Celejar writes:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
> >> > lee wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Celejar writes:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> >> like someone else would a
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:52:10 -0400
Rob Owens wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 02:22:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
> > lee wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've used it many times to watch / download media that I
> > > > couldn't access any other way.
> > >
> > > How did
Camaleón writes:
>>> Then install Adobe Flash Player and problem solved.
>>
>> It doesn't solve the problem.
>
> It will solve the problem of displaying Flash Player videos in the
> browser, what makes you think it won't?
That isn't the problem.
I removed the flashplayer library from ado
Celejar writes:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:22:28 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Celejar writes:
>>
>> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
>> > lee wrote:
>> >
>> >> Celejar writes:
>
> ...
>
>> >> like someone else would and it doesn't work, so I have no reason to
>> >> believe that it would work fo
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 02:22:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
> lee wrote:
> >
> > > I've used it many times to watch / download media that I
> > > couldn't access any other way.
> >
> > How did you do that?
>
The above was referencing gecko-mediaplayer and mozil
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:22:28 +0200
lee wrote:
> Celejar writes:
>
> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
> > lee wrote:
> >
> >> Celejar writes:
...
> >> like someone else would and it doesn't work, so I have no reason to
> >> believe that it would work for someone else. And there was some
On 2012-09-20, lee wrote:
>>
>> Hanlon's razor applies here as well.
>
> Huh?
>
I wish Gillette's razor could be applied to some of these threads.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:16:03 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>>> Like I said, nothing to worry about. Do you have a plan B?
>>
>> Yes, of course; the same approach that I've used for DMCA-friendly
>> services: avoiding those that require from me a component which is not
>> available for my
Celejar writes:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Celejar writes:
>> >
>> > Perhaps because they don't want people grabbing the videos and watching
>> > them without browsing to their site, or reposting them elsewhere?
>>
>> People have to go to their website to get it eit
Camaleón writes:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:20:20 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>
>>> Sadly, we can't be sure on what the future will provide, so worrying
>>> know is useless and wasteful. The only we can do is having a "Plan B",
>>> that's all.
>>
>> Like I said, nothing to worry about
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
lee wrote:
> Celejar writes:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:11:59 +0200
> > lee wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> isn't something I would want to do, and I don't understand why websites
> >> which are there to let people watch videos attempt to make watching them
> >
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:20:20 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
Should that happens, you will have to choose: looking for a proper
replacement of the plugin or simply avoid sites that make use of an
unsupported feature in your system.
>>>
>>> And that isn't a good situation.
>>
Celejar writes:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:11:59 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> isn't something I would want to do, and I don't understand why websites
>> which are there to let people watch videos attempt to make watching them
>> so difficult for people that they can't watch the videos in the fi
Martin Steigerwald writes:
> Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 schrieb lee:
>>
>> Adobe says on their website: "Flash Player 11.2 is the last supported
>> Flash Player version for Linux. Adobe will continue to provide security
>> updates."[1]
>>
>> What's that supposed to mean? Will we soon have
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Jo, 20 sep 12, 03:11:59, lee wrote:
>>
>> Thank you! It doesn't seem to reasonably lead to anywhere. Maintaining
>> a library of scripts that deal with particular websites which even
>> continue to change how they present the videos to break such scripts
>> isn't so
Camaleón writes:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:27:35 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>>>
>>> Should that happens, you will have to choose: looking for a proper
>>> replacement of the plugin or simply avoid sites that make use of an
>>> unsupported feature in your system.
>>
>> And that isn't
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:11:59 +0200
lee wrote:
...
> isn't something I would want to do, and I don't understand why websites
> which are there to let people watch videos attempt to make watching them
> so difficult for people that they can't watch the videos in the first
> place.
Perhaps because
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 schrieb lee:
> > Frank McCormick writes:
> > > On 15/09/12 06:30 PM, lee wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium
> > >> are able to play arbitrary
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 schrieb lee:
> Frank McCormick writes:
> > On 15/09/12 06:30 PM, lee wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium
> >> are able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
> >>
> > Chrome has built-in
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:27:35 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>>> There is also the possibility that they come up with a new version for
>>> other OSs. They could add features in the new version that make it
>>> impossible to play videos which are compatible with the new version
>>> with th
On Jo, 20 sep 12, 03:11:59, lee wrote:
>
> Thank you! It doesn't seem to reasonably lead to anywhere. Maintaining
> a library of scripts that deal with particular websites which even
> continue to change how they present the videos to break such scripts
> isn't something I would want to do, and
Rob Owens writes:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 05:30:29PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> Rob Owens writes:
>>
>> > Looks like gecko-mediaplayer is the replacement for mozilla-mplayer.
>> > Testing it now...
>>
>> Let me guess: It doesn't work.
>>
> I couldn't get it to work, but I may have gotten a lead.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 05:30:29PM +0200, lee wrote:
> Rob Owens writes:
>
> > Looks like gecko-mediaplayer is the replacement for mozilla-mplayer.
> > Testing it now...
>
> Let me guess: It doesn't work.
>
I couldn't get it to work, but I may have gotten a lead. Several
web articles talk abou
Camaleón writes:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:28:30 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>
> (...)
>
>> There is also the possibility that they come up with a new version for
>> other OSs. They could add features in the new version that make it
>> impossible to play videos which are compatible w
Rob Owens writes:
> Looks like gecko-mediaplayer is the replacement for mozilla-mplayer.
> Testing it now...
Let me guess: It doesn't work.
--
Debian testing amd64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:28:30 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
(...)
>> OTOH, html5 is now at the corner, my hope is that Flash Player for the
>> web dies in a very near future...
>
> There is also the possibility that they come up with a new version for
> other OSs. They could add feature
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:26:13PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> >
> > Thx, I looked at that and there weren't any. Meanwhile, I tried gnash
> > and found that it doesn't work at all. Lightspark depends on
> > pulseaudio, and I don't want to install that. Are there any
> > alternatives --- preferab
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 20:15 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
> Fiddling around by semi-random clicking on stuff and reloading the
> page six or eight times sometimes works. In other words, patience is
> what's required.
Deleting the cache, closing and opening the browser and last but not
least rebooting
--- On Tue, 9/18/12, Mark Allums wrote:
> From: Mark Allums
> Subject: Re: What is playing videos in web browsers?
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2012, 8:15 PM
>
>
> Some computers don't resume all the hardware properly.
> If
On 9/18/2012 7:53 PM, Go Linux wrote:
--- On Sat, 9/15/12, lee wrote:
From: lee
Subject: Re: What is playing videos in web browsers?
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Saturday, September 15, 2012, 11:08 PM
Adobe says on their website: "Flash Player 11.2 is the last
supported
--- On Sat, 9/15/12, lee wrote:
> From: lee
> Subject: Re: What is playing videos in web browsers?
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Saturday, September 15, 2012, 11:08 PM
>
>
> Adobe says on their website: "Flash Player 11.2 is the last
> supported
>
Camaleón writes:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:42:57 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> There might be the problem that, in a while, you can't play videos with
>> it anymore since Adobe says there aren't going to be any further
>> releases. I don't know what their plans are, perhaps it just becomes
>> obsolete
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:42:57 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:09:43 +0200, lee wrote:
>>
>> interactive applications. Anyway, what trouble are you having with
>> Adobe Flash Player?
>
> Besides that I hate it, if you use it, you don't have key bindings like
> you
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 23:42 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:09:43 +0200, lee wrote:
> >
> > what trouble are you having with Adobe Flash Player?
>
> Besides that I hate it, if you use it, you don't have key bindings like
> you do in mplayer. It probably doesn't
Rob Owens writes:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:26:13PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
>> >
>> There used to be mozilla-mplayer, but it looks like it's not in the
>> Squeeze repos. There is mozilla-plugin-vlc. Maybe give that a shot.
>>
> Hmm, I just tried it and many of the videos on youtube and vim
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:26:13PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:09:43PM +0200, lee wrote:
> > Camaleón writes:
> >
> > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:30:23 +0200, lee wrote:
> > >
> > >> trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
> > >> able to play a
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:09:43PM +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:30:23 +0200, lee wrote:
> >
> >> trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
> >> able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
> >> libflashplayer.so
Camaleón writes:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:09:43 +0200, lee wrote:
>
> interactive applications. Anyway, what trouble are you having with Adobe
> Flash Player?
Besides that I hate it, if you use it, you don't have key bindings like
you do in mplayer. It probably doesn't use VDPAU, either.
Ther
Chris Bannister writes:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 04:58:35PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 14:37 +0200, lee wrote:
>> > flashgot
>>
>> I installed something called DownloadHelper, but never used it.
>
> apt-get show clive
Sounds good, I'll try it, thank you :)
--
Debian
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 04:58:35PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 14:37 +0200, lee wrote:
> > flashgot
>
> I installed something called DownloadHelper, but never used it.
apt-get show clive
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are bei
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:09:43 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
(...)
>>> What might they be using to play these videos? Where is configured
>>> what they use?
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> "about:plugins" will tell what other flash plugins are installed and
>> available for your browser.
>
> Thx, I l
Camaleón writes:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:30:23 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
>> able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
>> libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
>> such vide
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 14:37 +0200, lee wrote:
> flashgot
I installed something called DownloadHelper, but never used it.
$ pacman -Qi firefox
Name : firefox
Version: 15.0.1-1
Architecture : x86_64
$ pacman -Qi flashplugin
Name : flashplugin
Version: 11.2.202.
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:30:23 +0200, lee wrote:
> trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
> able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
> libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
> such videos. I have removed it for
Bob Proulx writes:
> Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> Chrome is the nonfree version. It is nonfree because it includes
> Flash and probably other nonfree things. Chromium is the free version
> and does not have Flash nor any other nonfree thing embedded. That is
> the specific difference between Ch
On 9/16/2012 2:22 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/15/2012 11:48 PM, lee wrote:
Hmmm. They are saying I'm participating in a test and seamonkey
supports Video-Tag and WebM (whatever that is) and doesn't support
h.264. They are saying chromium supports all of it.
How do I get h.264 support in seamo
On 9/15/2012 11:48 PM, lee wrote:
How do I get h.264 support in seamonkey?
It will probably happen eventually, but h.264 has patents, so it may not
happen soon. You can always add it yourself through a plugin. But you
may have to *write* the plugin yourself, and it may not be legal in some
On 9/15/2012 11:48 PM, lee wrote:
Peter Viskup writes:
there is something like HTML5 already out.
Try to have a look on http://www.youtube.com/html5 and then search for
HTML5 support for your favorite browser and you will get an answer.
Hmmm. They are saying I'm participating in a test and
Frank McCormick writes:
> On 15/09/12 06:30 PM, lee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
>> able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
>
> Chrome has built-in Flash - it's called PepperFlash so it does not
> depend on ex
Peter Viskup writes:
> there is something like HTML5 already out.
> Try to have a look on http://www.youtube.com/html5 and then search for
> HTML5 support for your favorite browser and you will get an answer.
Hmmm. They are saying I'm participating in a test and seamonkey
supports Video-Tag and
Frank McCormick wrote:
> lee wrote:
> >trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
> >able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
> >libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
> >such videos. I have removed it for testing
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 01:15 +0200, Peter Viskup wrote:
> there is something like HTML5 already out.
> Try to have a look on http://www.youtube.com/html5 and then search for
> HTML5 support for your favorite browser and you will get an answer.
AFAIK HTML5 draft doesn't replace flash completely. It
On 09/16/2012 12:30 AM, lee wrote:
Hi,
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
such videos. I have removed it for testing and b
On 15/09/12 06:30 PM, lee wrote:
Hi,
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
such videos. I have removed it for testing and bot
Hi,
trying out chromium, I have found that both seamonkey and chromium are
able to play arbitrary videos found on youtube. I used to have
libflashplayer.so in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory which used to play
such videos. I have removed it for testing and both browsers still play
videos. In t
63 matches
Mail list logo
