Re: apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r) downloads incorrect version

David Wittman wrote: >> 3.16.0-4 is *not* the kernel version but the ABI name used. > I feel dumb for asking, but the output of uname is not the exact > kernel version I'm running? That seems contradictory to everything > I've learned and read... including what I just read

Re: apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r) downloads incorrect version

Hi. On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:43:17 -0600 David Wittman wrote: > Danke, Sven. > > > 3.16.0-4 is *not* the kernel version but the ABI name used. > > I feel dumb for asking, but the output of uname is not the exact kernel > version I'm running? That seems contradictory

Re: Re: apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r) downloads incorrect version

Danke, Sven. > 3.16.0-4 is *not* the kernel version but the ABI name used. I feel dumb for asking, but the output of uname is not the exact kernel version I'm running? That seems contradictory to everything I've learned and read... including what I just read here[1]: > Kernel version > This is

Re: apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r) downloads incorrect version

4-amd64 > vagrant@debian-jessie:~$ dpkg-query --show linux-image-$(uname -r) > linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 3.16.39-1 > ``` > So what ends up happening is `apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r)` > pulls the source for the kernel at 3.16.39-1 instead of 3.16.0-4 and > my module bu

apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r) downloads incorrect version

) linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 3.16.39-1 ``` So what ends up happening is `apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r)` pulls the source for the kernel at 3.16.39-1 instead of 3.16.0-4 and my module builds with the incorrect magicver. I know I can do things to work around the magicver, but I'm just curious

Re: apt-get source download has files not in git repository

Hallo, * Joel Roth [Thu, Nov 20 2014, 10:05:08PM]: pkgcache.apt pkgcache.bin restore sources.list sources.list.destdir srcpkgcache.bin Hi Andrei, Are you sure these files are from dbus? I'd rather guess they are from the 'apt' source package. Anyway:

Re: apt-get source download has files not in git repository

On Jo, 20 nov 14, 22:05:08, Joel Roth wrote: Are you sure these files are from dbus? I'd rather guess they are from the 'apt' source package. Anyway: Yes, they are. I'm curious at which step they get generated. Me too. Care to explain step by step what you did? Kind regards, Andrei --

Re: apt-get source download has files not in git repository

: $ apt-get source dbus All files in .pc directories are generated when the source package is unpacked. Please read the dpkg-source manpage. You are unpacking the most common source format 3.0 (quilt). I found the files listed above also need to be present to build the package. If you unapply

Re: apt-get source download has files not in git repository

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 08:03:58AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Jo, 20 nov 14, 12:29:32, Joel Roth wrote: However, there are files that apt-get source downloads that are not in the repository. Can someone tell me where they come from? They appear necessary for the package to build

apt-get source download has files not in git repository

Hi list, I'm trying to build the dbus package from source. I can do it the usual way: apt-get source cd dbus-1.18.10 debuild -uc -us -b However, I would like to use the git repository. apt-get source helpfully announces: NOTICE: 'dbus' packaging is maintained in the 'Git' version control

Re: apt-get source download has files not in git repository

On Jo, 20 nov 14, 12:29:32, Joel Roth wrote: However, there are files that apt-get source downloads that are not in the repository. Can someone tell me where they come from? They appear necessary for the package to build. .pc/ Packages Packages.gz apt.conf

apt-get install linux-source vs apt-get source linux

'make deb-pkg'. Or I can install the source of the linux-package (apt-get source linux), and run 'fakeroot debian/rules source', apply my patch, and run 'fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_amd64'. Can someone explain to me which method I should use in which situation? I have randomly

Re: apt-get install linux-source vs apt-get source linux

-source), unzip the .tar.bz, apply my patch and run 'make deb-pkg'. Or I can install the source of the linux-package (apt-get source linux), and run 'fakeroot debian/rules source', apply my patch, and run 'fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_amd64'. Can someone explain to me which

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 05:46:18 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 03:23:04PM +, Camaleón wrote: I don't recall Hugo has said what he tried (exactly) and what was the result. Really? http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/08/msg00310.html Really. The post you

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

/bugreport.cgi?bug=683768 is present. I want to do the installs with apt-get source. How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say? Does this help? http://snapshot.debian.org/ Hint: Usage section :-) I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries they give

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

to install consecutively to see if bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683768 is present. I want to do the installs with apt-get source. How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say? Does this help? http://snapshot.debian.org/ Hint: Usage section

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:09:20AM +, Camaleón wrote: On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 10:31:48 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 04:38:29PM -0500, hvw59601 wrote: I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries they give are nothing like where the linux source files are.

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:47:18 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:09:20AM +, Camaleón wrote: On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 10:31:48 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 04:38:29PM -0500, hvw59601 wrote: I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 01:29:10PM +, Camaleón wrote: Sorry, but I don't get what kind of documentation issue do you find here. There's a small Usage section in the front page. Sources and binary files are there, so...? Not me, The OP found an issue, ... so ... why can't he bring it up

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 02:06:19 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 01:29:10PM +, Camaleón wrote: Sorry, but I don't get what kind of documentation issue do you find here. There's a small Usage section in the front page. Sources and binary files are there, so...? Not

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 02:32:49PM +, Camaleón wrote: On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 02:06:19 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: Not me, The OP found an issue, ... so ... why can't he bring it up there? Entirely appropriate, IMNSVHO. But you seemed to dissect the issue and found a documentation

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 03:06:25 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 02:32:49PM +, Camaleón wrote: On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 02:06:19 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: Not me, The OP found an issue, ... so ... why can't he bring it up there? Entirely appropriate, IMNSVHO. But

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683768 is present. I want to do the installs with apt-get source. How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say? Does this help? http://snapshot.debian.org/ Hint: Usage section :-) I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 03:23:04PM +, Camaleón wrote: I don't recall Hugo has said what he tried (exactly) and what was the result. Really? http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/08/msg00310.html Seems like problem solved? -- If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating

installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

Hi, http://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux/ has in it 8 debian kernel source packages that I want to install consecutively to see if bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683768 is present. I want to do the installs with apt-get source. How does one do this? Specifically

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

-get source. How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say? Does this help? http://snapshot.debian.org/ Hint: Usage section :-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

the installs with apt-get source. How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say? Does this help? http://snapshot.debian.org/ Hint: Usage section :-) I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries they give are nothing like where the linux source files are. Hugo

Re: installing source packages from snapshot.debian.org with apt-get source

/bugreport.cgi?bug=683768 is present. I want to do the installs with apt-get source. How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say? Does this help? http://snapshot.debian.org/ Hint: Usage section :-) I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries

Re: does apt-get source verify signature?

Rob Owens wrote: When I apt-get source somepackage as a regular user, does the system do a signature check on the source that is downloaded? Where does the signature reside? Yes; in the .dsc file. A failure to verify the signature will only result in a warning message. -- see shy jo

Re: does apt-get source verify signature?

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 09:04:58AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Rob Owens wrote: When I apt-get source somepackage as a regular user, does the system do a signature check on the source that is downloaded? Where does the signature reside? Yes; in the .dsc file. A failure

does apt-get source verify signature?

When I apt-get source somepackage as a regular user, does the system do a signature check on the source that is downloaded? Where does the signature reside? Thanks. I can't find this info in any of the man pages. -Rob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org

apt-get source produces gpg error. Can't check signature: public key not found

I am trying to get the source code for a Debian package with apt-get source xxx where xxx is the name of the package. The retrieval of the source package appears to have been successful, but I get error messages along the way: gpg: new configuration file `/root/.gnupg/gpg.conf' created gpg

Re: apt-get source produces gpg error. Can't check signature: public key not found

On 2010-01-07 16:37 +0100, Stephen Powell wrote: I am trying to get the source code for a Debian package with apt-get source xxx where xxx is the name of the package. The retrieval of the source package appears to have been successful, but I get error messages along the way: gpg: new

Re: apt-get source produces gpg error. Can't check signature: public key not found

On 2010-01-07 at 11:04:18 -0500, Sven Joachim wrote: Why do you run apt-get source as root? I am used to being root when I run apt-get because this is required when installing a binary package. I assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that installing a source package also required root privileges

Re: apt-get source produces gpg error. Can't check signature: public key not found

? Are there THAT MANY Debian developers? About thousand. On 2010-01-07 at 11:04:18 -0500, Sven Joachim wrote: Because it is not necessary if you don't work with source packages. Well, I guess that makes sense. But apt does not recommend or even suggest debian-keyring. It seems to me that if one runs apt-get

apt-get source ne fonctionne pas pas en non root ?

Bonjour, J'ai l'impression que apt-get source ne fonctionne pas si on n'est pas root. Pourtant dans un howto (un peu vieux) sur APT (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/apt-howto.fr.txt), il est indiqué que cela doit fonctionner en non root [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sources$ apt-get

Re: apt-get source ne fonctionne pas pas en non root ?

Le Mer 29 octobre 2008 09:20, ludo a écrit : [...] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sources$ apt-get source hello Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Nécessité de prendre 388ko dans les sources. Err http

kernel backporting on etch with apt-get source

Hi, I have found a way to re-create the official linux-image*.deb packages using the apt-get source command [1]: #!/bin/bash apt-get source -t unstable linux-image-2.6.24-1-686-bigmem cd linux-2.6-2.6.24 fakeroot debian/rules debian/build debian/stamps fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen

Re: en apt-get source

Estas en la maquina por ssh ??, si es así tienes un proceso de aptitude corriendo, paralo o mira a ver q está haciendo (puede que no te hayas dado cuenta) y listo. El día 31/10/07, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:58:48PM +0100, Rene Lopez

Re: en apt-get source

El 30/10/07, rene lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Les explico en un momento, el caso es que quiero usar la fuuente de un paquete y uso para eso el comando apt..., bien resulata a la ahora de descarga dicho paquete me sale el siguinte error: apt-get source pam-mysql Leyendo lista de

Re: en apt-get source

: apt-get source pam-mysql Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando árbol de dependencias... Hecho E: No pude abrir el fichero /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.pl.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_contrin_source_Sources - open (2 No existe el fichero o el directorio) En mi lista de sources.list es

Re: en apt-get source

ahora de descarga dicho paquete me sale el siguinte error: apt-get source pam-mysql Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando árbol de dependencias... Hecho E: No pude abrir el fichero /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.pl.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_contrin_source_Sources - open (2

Re: en apt-get source

en un momento, el caso es que quiero usar la fuuente de un paquete y uso para eso el comando apt..., bien resulata a la ahora de descarga dicho paquete me sale el siguinte error: apt-get source pam-mysql Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando árbol de dependencias

Re: en apt-get source

El 31/10/07, Rene Lopez Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Ok gracias el problema es que estoy con ambiente de textos solamente y el comando no funciona, no lo reconoce. Y el error que me da con con el comando: apt-get install libssl-dev el cual me devuel el siguiente error: como puedo

en apt-get source

Les explico en un momento, el caso es que quiero usar la fuuente de un paquete y uso para eso el comando apt..., bien resulata a la ahora de descarga dicho paquete me sale el siguinte error: apt-get source pam-mysql Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando árbol de dependencias... Hecho E

Re: en apt-get source

El mar, 30-10-2007 a las 15:13 +, rene lopez escribió: Les explico en un momento, el caso es que quiero usar la fuuente de un paquete y uso para eso el comando apt..., bien resulata a la ahora de descarga dicho paquete me sale el siguinte error: apt-get source pam-mysql Leyendo lista

Re: en apt-get source

On 10/30/07, rene lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib deb-src http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib deb http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free Solo tienes repositorio de fuentes para las actualizaciones

Re: en apt-get source

Gracias por la recomendacion que me has dado, pero al parecer sigue la misma dificultad a la hora de actulizar me dice: No se pudo bloquear /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Recurso no disponible temporalmente) Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/), is another process using it?

Re: en apt-get source

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:20:17PM +0100, Rene Lopez Carrera wrote: Gracias por la recomendacion que me has dado, pero al parecer sigue la misma dificultad a la hora de actulizar me dice: No se pudo bloquear /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Recurso no disponible temporalmente) Unable to lock

Re: en apt-get source

[Por lo que más quieras, contesta a la lista, no al privado.] On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:53:42PM +0100, Rene Lopez Carrera wrote: El día 30/10/07, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:20:17PM +0100, Rene Lopez Carrera wrote: Gracias por la

Re: en apt-get source

Bien perdona tata lata es que por mucho que leo y pregunto no se aclara la duda, ni encuentro respuesta revise los proceso que estaban corriendo y todo normal no se que otra cosa de puede hacer. PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 1 ?S 0:00 init [2] 2 ?S 0:00

Re: en apt-get source

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:58:48PM +0100, Rene Lopez Carrera wrote: El día 30/10/07, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:53:42PM +0100, Rene Lopez Carrera wrote: No eres root, o tienes otro administrador de paquetes ejecutandose al mismo

apt-get source question

I looked in the APT tutorial and also in a book but I could not find an answer to this problem. I want to get a source package from the testing release, not from stable, so I did this: apt-get -t testing source packagename It does not seem to work. Is there a way to do this without

Re: apt-get source question

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 05:10:38PM +, Pollywog wrote: I looked in the APT tutorial and also in a book but I could not find an answer to this problem. I want to get a source package from the testing release, not from stable, so I did this: apt-get -t testing source packagename

Re: apt-get source question

to work. Is there a way to do this without temporarily modifying the sources.list in order to get the desired sources? Try apt-get source packagename=1.2.3-4 use whatever the version number is for testing. Stephen -- GPG Pubic Key: http://users.eastlink.ca/~stephencormier/publickey.asc

Re: apt-get source question

On Tuesday 01 August 2006 03:10, Pollywog wrote: [...] I want to get a source package from the testing release, not from stable, so I did this: apt-get -t testing source packagename It does not seem to work. Is there a way to do this without temporarily modifying the sources.list in order

Re: apt-get source question

this: apt-get -t testing source packagename It does not seem to work. Is there a way to do this without temporarily modifying the sources.list in order to get the desired sources? Try apt-get source packagename=1.2.3-4 use whatever the version number is for testing. I didn't think

Re: apt-get source stable

Vendredi 28 juillet 2006, 07:43:06 CEST, fred a écrit : Bonjour, 'jour, Je voudrais recompiler les sources de la libc6 2.3.2 de la sarge. Seulement, par défaut, apt-get source me récupère les sources de la testing. De même si je fais un apt-get source -t stable. Où me goure-je

Re: apt-get source stable

Selon Sylvain Sauvage [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Vendredi 28 juillet 2006, 07:43:06 CEST, fred a écrit : Bonjour, 'jour, Je voudrais recompiler les sources de la libc6 2.3.2 de la sarge. Seulement, par défaut, apt-get source me récupère les sources de la testing. De même si je fais

Re: apt-get source questions

. These are the steps I follow: 1. `apt-get source pkg_name` in an empty directory. 2. Move into the package's build directory. 3. Change the build version (`dch` + editing debian/changelog, I usually add 'mt' rather than bump the build version). 4. Make any changes I want to the build steps and the source

Re: apt-get source questions

On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 09:13:48AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote: 1. How do I do the equivalent of the usual gnu ./configure when I install from source..? This is all done from inside the debian/rules file. I'd suggest reading the New Maintainer's Guide for a gentle introduction to Debian packaging.

Re: apt-get source questions

Magnus Therning wrote: On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 09:13:48AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote: 1. How do I do the equivalent of the usual gnu ./configure when I install from source..? This is all done from inside the debian/rules file. I'd suggest reading the New Maintainer's Guide for a gentle

apt-get source questions

1. How do I do the equivalent of the usual gnu ./configure when I install from source..? 2. Can I just remove the source tree after having installed the binary .deb without breaking anything? Or is there a recommended 'debian way' to clean up? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: apt-get source

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:05:43 +0200 David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Having failed to get apt-build to work, I tried this. I can easily compile and install stuff that the kde packages will not due to dependency problems (around qt3 and kde) and I get the Debian version (versions posted

apt-get source

Having failed to get apt-build to work, I tried this. I can easily compile and install stuff that the kde packages will not due to dependency problems (around qt3 and kde) and I get the Debian version (versions posted on kde-apps, sourceforge had unrelated compilation problems!). A few kudos

Re: apt-get source picks the wrong repository

Hi On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:43, Daniel Webb wrote: I've been using Debian for 5 years, so I thought I understood how package priorities work, but apparently I don't. Why is it pulling the packages from unstable instead of stable? $ apt-get source -b fakeroot If you have deb-src lines

Re: apt-get source picks the wrong repository

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:38:57PM +1100, Andrew Vaughan wrote: If you have deb-src lines pointing at stable and unstable apt-get source will get the latest (ie, unstable) version. Use apt-get source pkg=version to get other versions. From the apt-get manpage source source

Re: apt-get source picks the wrong repository

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:41, Daniel Webb wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:38:57PM +1100, Andrew Vaughan wrote: If you have deb-src lines pointing at stable and unstable apt-get source will get the latest (ie, unstable) version. Use apt-get source pkg=version to get other versions. From

Re: apt-get source picks the wrong repository

package priorities work, but apparently I don't. Why is it pulling the packages from unstable instead of stable? $ apt-get source -b fakeroot Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Need to get 981kB of source archives. Get:1 http://ftp3.nrc.ca unstable/main fakeroot 1.5.6 (dsc

Re: apt-get source picks the wrong repository

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 10:20:19PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: I can't believe that it would be a problem, as I imagine your /etc/apt/preferences would cause an error, but do you have a stable line in your /etc/apt/sources.list? all i can say is that's weird Yes, I regularly get

apt-get source picks the wrong repository

I've been using Debian for 5 years, so I thought I understood how package priorities work, but apparently I don't. Why is it pulling the packages from unstable instead of stable? $ apt-get source -b fakeroot Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Need to get 981kB

apt-get source + pentium-builder = i386?

Hello, I installed the pentium-builder package and I made the export DEBIAN_BUILDARCH=i686. However, after a apt-get build-dep and apt-get source -b, the result was a i386 package. Why the result wasn't a i686 package? I tested with IPTraf and Postgresql-8.0. Thanks, Eriberto

Re: apt-get source + pentium-builder = i386?

On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 10:37:08AM -0300, Eriberto wrote: Hello, I installed the pentium-builder package and I made the export DEBIAN_BUILDARCH=i686. However, after a apt-get build-dep and apt-get source -b, the result was a i386 package. Why the result wasn't a i686 package? I tested

Re: apt-get source + pentium-builder = i386?

Ok. Thanks! New doubt: how to see i686 in the package? The dpkg -I command don't show this information. Regards, Eriberto Roberto C. Sanchez escreveu: Are you saying this because filename ends in _i386.deb? If so, that is normal. Even the i686 kernel image packages end in that suffix:

apt-get source + pentium-builder = i386?

Pessoal, Instalei o pentium-builder e exportei a variável DEBIAN_BUILDARCH=i686. No entanto, depois de fazer apt-get build-dep e apt-get source, o resultado foi um pacote i386. Não tinha que ser i686? Testei com o IPTraf e com o Postgresql-8.0. Alguém pode me explicar o que houve? Grato

'apt-get source' ignores pinning?

'apt-get source' for me seems to ignore my pinning setup and downloads newer source than it should. apt-get install/build-dep does not, however. Is there something I'm doing wrong, or not understanding? More detail below. For example, apt-cache policy swf-player shows, as it should (I'm

Re: APT-GET SOURCE

Saudaes Todos, Aqui voc pode obter a lista dos mirror oficiais primrios e secundrios... http://www.debian.org/mirror/list Eu utilizo: http://ftp.br.debian.org (US) http://non-us.debian.org (NON-US) Voc pode tambm procurar por pacotes como apt-spy e netselect-apt, que verificam a

Re: APT-GET SOURCE

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:44:17 -0300, Rafael Ferreira wrote: Olá... Eu sempre usei no source list os endereços da USP: deb http://linorg.usp.br/debian unstable main contrib non-free mas estou tendo problemas esses dias.. Alguem me indica mais algum

Re: APT-GET SOURCE

você pode usar esses: deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free Rafael Ferreira wrote: Olá... Eu sempre usei no source list os endereços da USP: deb http://linorg.usp.br/debian

Re: APT-GET SOURCE

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:44:17 -0300 Rafael Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alguem me indica mais algum source list?? Que tal o oficial? deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free --

APT-GET SOURCE

Olá... Eu sempre usei no source list os endereços da USP: deb http://linorg.usp.br/debian unstable main contrib non-free mas estou tendo problemas esses dias.. Alguem me indica mais algum source list?? Obrigado Rafael Ferreira / Ceará ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by

'apt-get source kernel-source-2.4.26'

Hallo Leute, nachdem ich mittlerweile gemerkt habe, das ich in der .config SIS5513 aktivieren muß, um einen SiS746 zum laufen zu bringen, gibt es jetzt beim kompilieren probleme: make-kpkg --append-to-version -server --revision 4 configure kernel_image Ich habe: (

apt-get source and /etc/apt/apt.conf

I was perplexed by getting older source version(s) of file with apt-get source gkrellm. I asked a friend and went through: I didn't have any pinning, didn't even know how to pin. However: zen8100a:/etc/apt# cat apt.conf APT::Default-Release woody; It appears there's some configuration for apt

Eigenartiger Fehler bei 'apt-get source'

) ___ / | apt-get source fileutils=4.1-10 | Reading Package Lists... | Building Dependency Tree... | Failed to fetch file:/home/ftp/debian/dists/woody/main/source/f/fileutils/fileutils_4.1-10.dsc Link to fileutils_4.1-10.dsc failure | Failed to fetch file:/home

Baixando fonte e instalando.. apt-get source

Amigos, estou com um problema: baixei o fonte do postgresql pelo apt-get source postgresql certo? até aí tudo bem, porém gostaria de saber o que faço para poder alterar um dos arquivos .h que tenho que alterar e nao estou vendo a possibilidade.. como instalo o pacote mecho nesse arquivo e

Re: Baixando fonte e instalando.. apt-get source

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 02:33:06PM -0300, Vitor Acioli wrote: Amigos, estou com um problema: baixei o fonte do postgresql pelo apt-get source postgresql certo? até aí tudo bem, porém gostaria de saber o que faço para poder alterar um dos arquivos .h que tenho que alterar e nao estou vendo

apt-get source

Bonjour, j'aimerais savoir si quelqu'un sait comment préciser la distribution pour laquelle on désire charger les sources : dans mon fichier sources.list, il y a une ligne deb-src pour la woody et une pour la testing. Apparemment l'option -t stable ou -t woody ne fonctionne pas : il me

Re: apt-get source

tu fais: apt-get install tonpackage/tadistribution ou apt-get -t testing tonpackage si testing est la distrib. voilà bonne journée Le Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:11:48 +0100 , Cédric , prit sa plume pour écrire: Bonjour, j'aimerais savoir si quelqu'un sait comment préciser la distribution

Re: apt-get source

Et bien justement, ça ne marche pas. Il ne prend pas en compte le paramètre -t que je lui donne. ex: apt-get source samba/woody - E: Unable to find a source package for samba/woody et apt-get source -t woody samba - Get:1 ftp://ftp.oleane.net testing/main samba 3.0.1-2 (dsc

Re: apt-get source

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 16:00:32 +0100, Cédric Devillers wrote: Et bien justement, ça ne marche pas. Quel est donc le problème ? Ça ne marche pas avec les sources ? Nan, ça marche pas avec les sources ... Perso, je commente et décommente les lignes en fonction du besoin, c'est radical et

Re: mit apt-get source eignene Pakete erzeugen

Am 2004-01-07 02:57:44, schrieb Thorsten Gowik: On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:48:34PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: apt-get install fuckroot Michelle bist du dir sicher :) Sch... , Hatte probleme mich als root einzuloggen... Jede mänge Erger !!! Gruß Thorsten Grüße

Re: mit apt-get source eignene Pakete erzeugen

# dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -tfakeroot -b ^ -t Versuchs mal mit '-r' ;-) danke, jetzt gibts dennoch einen Fehler: #dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot -b dpkg-buildpackage: source package is samba dpkg-buildpackage: source version is

dselect fuer Debian upgrades (Re: mit apt-get source eignene Pakete erzeugen])

Hallo Heino. On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:03:33AM +0100, Heino Tiedemann wrote: In diesem Buch http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3936759006/qid=1073268062/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_3_1/028-0399334-4664536 steht allerdings, dass bei einem Sprung auf die eine neue debian version (erwänt ist da der

Re: mit apt-get source eignene Pakete erzeugen]

* Heino Tiedemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040105 03:03]: In diesem Buch http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3936759006/qid=1073268062/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_3_1/028-0399334-4664536 steht allerdings, dass bei einem Sprung auf die eine neue debian version (erwänt ist da der Sprung von Potato auf woody)

Re: mit apt-get source eignene Pakete erzeugen

Moin, On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:56:52AM +0100, Roland Schmid wrote: [...] /usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage: fakeroot: command not found ist fakeroot denn auch installiert? Gruss -- hgb -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum

Re: mit apt-get source eignene Pakete erzeugen

* Roland Schmid wrote: /usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage: fakeroot: command not found Na, was koennte da wohl fehlen...? Norbert -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem

Re: mit apt-get source eignene Pakete erzeugen

Am 2004-01-06 11:56:52, schrieb Roland Schmid: danke, jetzt gibts dennoch einen Fehler: #dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot -b dpkg-buildpackage: source package is samba dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 2.2.3a-12.3 dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mit apt-get source eignene Pakete erzeugen

Hallo! On 06 Jan 2004 at 01:14 +0100, Roland Schmid wrote: Hallo, - Changelog und Revisionsnummer des Pakets anpassen. Das ist bei einem Backport Pflicht und auch bei Modifikationen am stable-Paket empfehlenswert. Am einfachsten geht das wohl mit dch(1). War die alte

Re: mit apt-get source eignene Pakete erzeugen

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:48:34PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: apt-get install fuckroot Michelle bist du dir sicher :) Gruß Thorsten -- Debian Hint #17: Need someone to talk to about Debian? Install one of the many IRC clients (grep-available --field=Provides irc |

Re: mit apt-get source eignene Pakete erzeugen]

Hallo! On 05 Jan 2004 at 02:42 +0100, Manfred Schmitt wrote: Elmar W. Tischhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hast du vorher 'apt-get update' oder besser 'dselect update' ausgeführt? Was ist an einem 'dselect update' besser? 'apt-get update' bringt nur seine eigenen Caches auf den

  1   2   3   >