David Wittman wrote:
>> 3.16.0-4 is *not* the kernel version but the ABI name used.
> I feel dumb for asking, but the output of uname is not the exact
> kernel version I'm running? That seems contradictory to everything
> I've learned and read... including what I just read
Hi.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:43:17 -0600
David Wittman wrote:
> Danke, Sven.
>
> > 3.16.0-4 is *not* the kernel version but the ABI name used.
>
> I feel dumb for asking, but the output of uname is not the exact kernel
> version I'm running? That seems contradictory
Danke, Sven.
> 3.16.0-4 is *not* the kernel version but the ABI name used.
I feel dumb for asking, but the output of uname is not the exact kernel
version I'm running? That seems contradictory to everything I've learned
and read... including what I just read here[1]:
> Kernel version
> This is
4-amd64
> vagrant@debian-jessie:~$ dpkg-query --show linux-image-$(uname -r)
> linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 3.16.39-1
> ```
> So what ends up happening is `apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r)`
> pulls the source for the kernel at 3.16.39-1 instead of 3.16.0-4 and
> my module bu
)
linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 3.16.39-1
```
So what ends up happening is `apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r)` pulls
the source for the kernel at 3.16.39-1 instead of 3.16.0-4 and my module
builds with the incorrect magicver. I know I can do things to work around
the magicver, but I'm just curious
Hallo,
* Joel Roth [Thu, Nov 20 2014, 10:05:08PM]:
pkgcache.apt
pkgcache.bin
restore
sources.list
sources.list.destdir
srcpkgcache.bin
Hi Andrei,
Are you sure these files are from dbus? I'd rather guess they are from
the 'apt' source package. Anyway:
On Jo, 20 nov 14, 22:05:08, Joel Roth wrote:
Are you sure these files are from dbus? I'd rather guess they are from
the 'apt' source package. Anyway:
Yes, they are. I'm curious at which step they get generated.
Me too. Care to explain step by step what you did?
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
:
$ apt-get source dbus
All files in .pc directories are generated when the source package is
unpacked. Please read the dpkg-source manpage. You are unpacking the
most common source format 3.0 (quilt).
I found the files listed above also need to be present to
build the package.
If you unapply
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 08:03:58AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 20 nov 14, 12:29:32, Joel Roth wrote:
However, there are files that apt-get source downloads that
are not in the repository. Can someone tell me where they come from?
They appear necessary for the package to build
Hi list,
I'm trying to build the dbus package from source.
I can do it the usual way:
apt-get source
cd dbus-1.18.10
debuild -uc -us -b
However, I would like to use the git repository. apt-get
source helpfully announces:
NOTICE: 'dbus' packaging is maintained in the 'Git' version control
On Jo, 20 nov 14, 12:29:32, Joel Roth wrote:
However, there are files that apt-get source downloads that
are not in the repository. Can someone tell me where they come from?
They appear necessary for the package to build.
.pc/
Packages
Packages.gz
apt.conf
'make deb-pkg'.
Or I can install the source of the linux-package (apt-get source linux),
and run 'fakeroot debian/rules source', apply my patch, and run
'fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_amd64'.
Can someone explain to me which method I should use in which situation?
I have randomly
-source), unzip the .tar.bz, apply my patch and run 'make deb-pkg'.
Or I can install the source of the linux-package (apt-get source linux),
and run 'fakeroot debian/rules source', apply my patch, and run
'fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_amd64'.
Can someone explain to me which
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 05:46:18 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 03:23:04PM +, Camaleón wrote:
I don't recall Hugo has said what he tried (exactly) and what was the
result.
Really?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/08/msg00310.html
Really.
The post you
/bugreport.cgi?bug=683768 is present.
I want to do the installs with apt-get source.
How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say?
Does this help?
http://snapshot.debian.org/
Hint: Usage section :-)
I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries they give
to install consecutively to see if bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683768 is present.
I want to do the installs with apt-get source.
How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say?
Does this help?
http://snapshot.debian.org/
Hint: Usage section
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:09:20AM +, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 10:31:48 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 04:38:29PM -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries they give are
nothing like where the linux source files are.
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:47:18 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:09:20AM +, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 10:31:48 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 04:38:29PM -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 01:29:10PM +, Camaleón wrote:
Sorry, but I don't get what kind of documentation issue do you find here.
There's a small Usage section in the front page. Sources and binary
files are there, so...?
Not me, The OP found an issue, ... so ... why can't he bring it up
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 02:06:19 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 01:29:10PM +, Camaleón wrote:
Sorry, but I don't get what kind of documentation issue do you find
here. There's a small Usage section in the front page. Sources and
binary files are there, so...?
Not
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 02:32:49PM +, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 02:06:19 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
Not me, The OP found an issue, ... so ... why can't he bring it up
there? Entirely appropriate, IMNSVHO.
But you seemed to dissect the issue and found a documentation
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 03:06:25 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 02:32:49PM +, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 02:06:19 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
Not me, The OP found an issue, ... so ... why can't he bring it up
there? Entirely appropriate, IMNSVHO.
But
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683768 is present.
I want to do the installs with apt-get source.
How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say?
Does this help?
http://snapshot.debian.org/
Hint: Usage section :-)
I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 03:23:04PM +, Camaleón wrote:
I don't recall Hugo has said what he tried (exactly) and what was the
result.
Really?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/08/msg00310.html
Seems like problem solved?
--
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating
Hi,
http://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux/ has in it 8 debian kernel
source packages that I want to install consecutively to see if bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683768
is present.
I want to do the installs with apt-get source.
How does one do this? Specifically
-get source.
How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say?
Does this help?
http://snapshot.debian.org/
Hint: Usage section :-)
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
the installs with apt-get source.
How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say?
Does this help?
http://snapshot.debian.org/
Hint: Usage section :-)
I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries they give are
nothing like where the linux source files are.
Hugo
/bugreport.cgi?bug=683768 is present.
I want to do the installs with apt-get source.
How does one do this? Specifically, what should the sources.list say?
Does this help?
http://snapshot.debian.org/
Hint: Usage section :-)
I looked at that but the examples of the deb entries
Rob Owens wrote:
When I
apt-get source somepackage
as a regular user, does the system do a signature check on the source
that is downloaded? Where does the signature reside?
Yes; in the .dsc file.
A failure to verify the signature will only result in a warning message.
--
see shy jo
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 09:04:58AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Rob Owens wrote:
When I
apt-get source somepackage
as a regular user, does the system do a signature check on the source
that is downloaded? Where does the signature reside?
Yes; in the .dsc file.
A failure
When I
apt-get source somepackage
as a regular user, does the system do a signature check on the source
that is downloaded? Where does the signature reside?
Thanks. I can't find this info in any of the man pages.
-Rob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
I am trying to get the source code for a Debian package with
apt-get source xxx
where xxx is the name of the package. The retrieval of the source package
appears to have been successful, but I get error messages along the way:
gpg: new configuration file `/root/.gnupg/gpg.conf' created
gpg
On 2010-01-07 16:37 +0100, Stephen Powell wrote:
I am trying to get the source code for a Debian package with
apt-get source xxx
where xxx is the name of the package. The retrieval of the source package
appears to have been successful, but I get error messages along the way:
gpg: new
On 2010-01-07 at 11:04:18 -0500, Sven Joachim wrote:
Why do you run apt-get source as root?
I am used to being root when I run apt-get because this is required
when installing a binary package. I assumed (perhaps incorrectly)
that installing a source package also required root privileges
?
Are there THAT MANY Debian developers?
About thousand.
On 2010-01-07 at 11:04:18 -0500, Sven Joachim wrote:
Because it is not necessary if you don't work with source packages.
Well, I guess that makes sense. But apt does not recommend or
even suggest debian-keyring. It seems to me that if one runs
apt-get
Bonjour,
J'ai l'impression que apt-get source ne fonctionne pas si on n'est pas
root. Pourtant dans un howto (un peu vieux) sur APT
(http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/apt-howto.fr.txt), il est
indiqué que cela doit fonctionner en non root
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sources$ apt-get
Le Mer 29 octobre 2008 09:20, ludo a écrit :
[...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sources$ apt-get source hello
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des dépendances
Lecture des informations d'état... Fait
Nécessité de prendre 388ko dans les sources.
Err http
Hi,
I have found a way to re-create the official linux-image*.deb
packages using the apt-get source command [1]:
#!/bin/bash
apt-get source -t unstable linux-image-2.6.24-1-686-bigmem
cd linux-2.6-2.6.24
fakeroot debian/rules debian/build debian/stamps
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen
Estas en la maquina por ssh ??, si es así tienes un proceso de aptitude
corriendo, paralo o mira a ver q está haciendo (puede que no te hayas dado
cuenta) y listo.
El día 31/10/07, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:58:48PM +0100, Rene Lopez
El 30/10/07, rene lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Les explico en un momento, el caso es que quiero usar la fuuente de un
paquete y uso para eso el comando apt..., bien resulata a la ahora de
descarga dicho paquete me sale el siguinte error:
apt-get source pam-mysql
Leyendo lista de
:
apt-get source pam-mysql
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias... Hecho
E: No pude abrir el fichero
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.pl.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_contrin_source_Sources
- open (2 No existe el fichero o el directorio)
En mi lista de sources.list es
ahora de
descarga dicho paquete me sale el siguinte error:
apt-get source pam-mysql
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias... Hecho
E: No pude abrir el fichero
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.pl.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_contrin_source_Sources
- open (2
en un momento, el caso es que quiero usar la fuuente
de un
paquete y uso para eso el comando apt..., bien resulata a la ahora
de
descarga dicho paquete me sale el siguinte error:
apt-get source pam-mysql
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias
El 31/10/07, Rene Lopez Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Ok gracias el problema es que estoy con ambiente de textos solamente y el
comando no funciona, no lo reconoce. Y el error que me da con con el
comando: apt-get install libssl-dev el cual me devuel el siguiente error:
como puedo
Les explico en un momento, el caso es que quiero usar la fuuente de un paquete
y uso para eso el comando apt..., bien resulata a la ahora de descarga dicho
paquete me sale el siguinte error:
apt-get source pam-mysql
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias... Hecho
E
El mar, 30-10-2007 a las 15:13 +, rene lopez escribió:
Les explico en un momento, el caso es que quiero usar la fuuente de un
paquete y uso para eso el comando apt..., bien resulata a la ahora de
descarga dicho paquete me sale el siguinte error:
apt-get source pam-mysql
Leyendo lista
On 10/30/07, rene lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib
deb http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
Solo tienes repositorio de fuentes para las actualizaciones
Gracias por la recomendacion que me has dado, pero al parecer sigue la misma
dificultad a la hora de actulizar me dice:
No se pudo bloquear /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Recurso no disponible
temporalmente)
Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/), is another
process using it?
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:20:17PM +0100, Rene Lopez Carrera wrote:
Gracias por la recomendacion que me has dado, pero al parecer sigue la misma
dificultad a la hora de actulizar me dice:
No se pudo bloquear /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Recurso no disponible
temporalmente)
Unable to lock
[Por lo que más quieras, contesta a la lista, no al privado.]
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:53:42PM +0100, Rene Lopez Carrera wrote:
El día 30/10/07, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:20:17PM +0100, Rene Lopez Carrera wrote:
Gracias por la
Bien perdona tata lata es que por mucho que leo y pregunto no se aclara la
duda, ni encuentro respuesta revise los proceso que estaban corriendo y
todo normal no se que otra cosa de puede hacer.
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ?S 0:00 init [2]
2 ?S 0:00
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:58:48PM +0100, Rene Lopez Carrera wrote:
El día 30/10/07, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:53:42PM +0100, Rene Lopez Carrera wrote:
No eres root, o tienes otro administrador de paquetes ejecutandose al
mismo
I looked in the APT tutorial and also in a book but I could not find an answer
to this problem.
I want to get a source package from the testing release, not from stable,
so I did this:
apt-get -t testing source packagename
It does not seem to work. Is there a way to do this without
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 05:10:38PM +, Pollywog wrote:
I looked in the APT tutorial and also in a book but I could not find an
answer
to this problem.
I want to get a source package from the testing release, not from stable,
so I did this:
apt-get -t testing source packagename
to work. Is there a way to do this without temporarily
modifying the sources.list in order to get the desired sources?
Try apt-get source packagename=1.2.3-4 use whatever the version number is for
testing.
Stephen
--
GPG Pubic Key: http://users.eastlink.ca/~stephencormier/publickey.asc
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 03:10, Pollywog wrote:
[...]
I want to get a source package from the testing release, not from
stable, so I did this:
apt-get -t testing source packagename
It does not seem to work. Is there a way to do this without temporarily
modifying the sources.list in order
this:
apt-get -t testing source packagename
It does not seem to work. Is there a way to do this without temporarily
modifying the sources.list in order to get the desired sources?
Try apt-get source packagename=1.2.3-4 use whatever the version number is
for testing.
I didn't think
Vendredi 28 juillet 2006, 07:43:06 CEST, fred a écrit :
Bonjour,
'jour,
Je voudrais recompiler les sources de la libc6 2.3.2 de la sarge.
Seulement, par défaut, apt-get source me récupère les sources de la
testing. De même si je fais un apt-get source -t stable.
Où me goure-je
Selon Sylvain Sauvage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Vendredi 28 juillet 2006, 07:43:06 CEST, fred a écrit :
Bonjour,
'jour,
Je voudrais recompiler les sources de la libc6 2.3.2 de la sarge.
Seulement, par défaut, apt-get source me récupère les sources de la
testing. De même si je fais
. These are
the steps I follow:
1. `apt-get source pkg_name` in an empty directory.
2. Move into the package's build directory.
3. Change the build version (`dch` + editing debian/changelog, I
usually add 'mt' rather than bump the build version).
4. Make any changes I want to the build steps and the source
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 09:13:48AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
1. How do I do the equivalent of the usual gnu ./configure when I
install from source..?
This is all done from inside the debian/rules file. I'd suggest reading
the New Maintainer's Guide for a gentle introduction to Debian
packaging.
Magnus Therning wrote:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 09:13:48AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
1. How do I do the equivalent of the usual gnu ./configure when I
install from source..?
This is all done from inside the debian/rules file. I'd suggest reading
the New Maintainer's Guide for a gentle
1. How do I do the equivalent of the usual gnu ./configure when I
install from source..?
2. Can I just remove the source tree after having installed the binary
.deb without breaking anything? Or is there a recommended 'debian way'
to clean up?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:05:43 +0200
David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having failed to get apt-build to work, I tried this. I can easily compile
and
install stuff that the kde packages will not due to dependency problems
(around qt3 and kde) and I get the Debian version (versions posted
Having failed to get apt-build to work, I tried this. I can easily compile and
install stuff that the kde packages will not due to dependency problems
(around qt3 and kde) and I get the Debian version (versions posted on
kde-apps, sourceforge had unrelated compilation problems!).
A few kudos
Hi
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:43, Daniel Webb wrote:
I've been using Debian for 5 years, so I thought I understood how package
priorities work, but apparently I don't. Why is it pulling the packages
from unstable instead of stable?
$ apt-get source -b fakeroot
If you have deb-src lines
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:38:57PM +1100, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
If you have deb-src lines pointing at stable and unstable apt-get source
will get the latest (ie, unstable) version. Use apt-get source
pkg=version to get other versions.
From the apt-get manpage
source source
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:41, Daniel Webb wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:38:57PM +1100, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
If you have deb-src lines pointing at stable and unstable apt-get
source will get the latest (ie, unstable) version. Use apt-get source
pkg=version to get other versions.
From
package
priorities work, but apparently I don't. Why is it pulling the packages from
unstable instead of stable?
$ apt-get source -b fakeroot
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 981kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://ftp3.nrc.ca unstable/main fakeroot 1.5.6 (dsc
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 10:20:19PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
I can't believe that it would be a problem, as I imagine your
/etc/apt/preferences would cause an error, but do you have a stable
line in your /etc/apt/sources.list?
all i can say is that's weird
Yes, I regularly get
I've been using Debian for 5 years, so I thought I understood how package
priorities work, but apparently I don't. Why is it pulling the packages from
unstable instead of stable?
$ apt-get source -b fakeroot
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 981kB
Hello,
I installed the pentium-builder package and I made the export
DEBIAN_BUILDARCH=i686. However, after a apt-get build-dep and apt-get
source -b, the result was a i386 package. Why the result wasn't a i686
package? I tested with IPTraf and Postgresql-8.0.
Thanks,
Eriberto
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 10:37:08AM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
Hello,
I installed the pentium-builder package and I made the export
DEBIAN_BUILDARCH=i686. However, after a apt-get build-dep and apt-get source
-b, the result was a i386 package. Why the result wasn't a i686 package? I
tested
Ok. Thanks!
New doubt: how to see i686 in the package? The dpkg -I command don't
show this information.
Regards,
Eriberto
Roberto C. Sanchez escreveu:
Are you saying this because filename ends in _i386.deb? If so, that is
normal. Even the i686 kernel image packages end in that suffix:
Pessoal,
Instalei o pentium-builder e exportei a variável DEBIAN_BUILDARCH=i686.
No entanto, depois de fazer apt-get build-dep e apt-get source, o
resultado foi um pacote i386. Não tinha que ser i686? Testei com o
IPTraf e com o Postgresql-8.0.
Alguém pode me explicar o que houve?
Grato
'apt-get source' for me seems to ignore my pinning setup and downloads
newer source than it should. apt-get install/build-dep does not,
however. Is there something I'm doing wrong, or not understanding?
More detail below.
For example, apt-cache policy swf-player shows, as it should (I'm
Saudaes Todos,
Aqui voc pode obter a lista dos mirror oficiais primrios e secundrios...
http://www.debian.org/mirror/list
Eu utilizo:
http://ftp.br.debian.org (US)
http://non-us.debian.org (NON-US)
Voc pode tambm procurar por pacotes como apt-spy e netselect-apt, que verificam a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:44:17 -0300, Rafael Ferreira wrote:
Olá...
Eu sempre usei no source list os endereços da USP:
deb http://linorg.usp.br/debian unstable main contrib non-free
mas estou tendo problemas esses dias..
Alguem me indica mais algum
você pode usar esses:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib
non-free
Rafael Ferreira wrote:
Olá...
Eu sempre usei no source list os endereços da USP:
deb http://linorg.usp.br/debian
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:44:17 -0300
Rafael Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alguem me indica mais algum source list??
Que tal o oficial?
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free
--
Olá...
Eu sempre usei no source list os endereços da
USP:
deb http://linorg.usp.br/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
mas estou tendo problemas esses dias..
Alguem me indica mais algum source
list??
Obrigado
Rafael Ferreira / Ceará
---Outgoing mail is certified Virus
Free.Checked by
Hallo Leute,
nachdem ich mittlerweile gemerkt habe, das ich in der .config SIS5513
aktivieren muß, um einen SiS746 zum laufen zu bringen, gibt es jetzt
beim kompilieren probleme:
make-kpkg --append-to-version -server --revision 4 configure kernel_image
Ich habe:
(
I was perplexed by getting older source version(s) of file with apt-get
source gkrellm.
I asked a friend and went through:
I didn't have any pinning, didn't even know how to pin.
However:
zen8100a:/etc/apt# cat apt.conf
APT::Default-Release woody;
It appears there's some configuration for apt
) ___
/
| apt-get source fileutils=4.1-10
| Reading Package Lists...
| Building Dependency Tree...
| Failed to fetch
file:/home/ftp/debian/dists/woody/main/source/f/fileutils/fileutils_4.1-10.dsc Link
to fileutils_4.1-10.dsc failure
| Failed to fetch
file:/home
Amigos,
estou com um problema: baixei o fonte do postgresql
pelo apt-get source postgresql certo? até aí tudo bem, porém gostaria de saber o
que faço para poder alterar um dos arquivos .h que tenho que alterar e nao estou
vendo a possibilidade.. como instalo o pacote mecho nesse arquivo e
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 02:33:06PM -0300, Vitor Acioli wrote:
Amigos,
estou com um problema: baixei o fonte do postgresql pelo apt-get source
postgresql certo? até aí tudo bem, porém gostaria de saber o que faço para
poder alterar um dos arquivos .h que tenho que alterar e nao estou vendo
Bonjour,
j'aimerais savoir si quelqu'un sait comment préciser la distribution
pour laquelle on désire charger les sources :
dans mon fichier sources.list, il y a une ligne deb-src pour la woody et
une pour la testing.
Apparemment l'option -t stable ou -t woody ne fonctionne pas : il me
tu fais:
apt-get install tonpackage/tadistribution ou
apt-get -t testing tonpackage si testing est la distrib.
voilà
bonne journée
Le Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:11:48 +0100 , Cédric , prit sa plume pour
écrire:
Bonjour,
j'aimerais savoir si quelqu'un sait comment préciser la distribution
Et bien justement, ça ne marche pas.
Il ne prend pas en compte le paramètre -t que je lui donne.
ex: apt-get source samba/woody
- E: Unable to find a source package for samba/woody
et apt-get source -t woody samba
- Get:1 ftp://ftp.oleane.net testing/main samba 3.0.1-2 (dsc
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 16:00:32 +0100, Cédric Devillers wrote:
Et bien justement, ça ne marche pas.
Quel est donc le problème ? Ça ne marche pas avec les sources ?
Nan, ça marche pas avec les sources ... Perso, je commente et
décommente les lignes en fonction du besoin, c'est radical et
Am 2004-01-07 02:57:44, schrieb Thorsten Gowik:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:48:34PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
apt-get install fuckroot
Michelle bist du dir sicher :)
Sch... , Hatte probleme mich als root einzuloggen...
Jede mänge Erger !!!
Gruß
Thorsten
Grüße
# dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -tfakeroot -b
^
-t
Versuchs mal mit '-r' ;-)
danke, jetzt gibts dennoch einen Fehler:
#dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot -b
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is samba
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is
Hallo Heino.
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:03:33AM +0100, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
In diesem Buch
http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3936759006/qid=1073268062/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_3_1/028-0399334-4664536
steht allerdings, dass bei einem Sprung auf die eine neue debian
version (erwänt ist da der
* Heino Tiedemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040105 03:03]:
In diesem Buch
http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3936759006/qid=1073268062/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_3_1/028-0399334-4664536
steht allerdings, dass bei einem Sprung auf die eine neue debian
version (erwänt ist da der Sprung von Potato auf woody)
Moin,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:56:52AM +0100, Roland Schmid wrote:
[...]
/usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage: fakeroot: command not found
ist fakeroot denn auch installiert?
Gruss
-- hgb
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum
* Roland Schmid wrote:
/usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage: fakeroot: command not found
Na, was koennte da wohl fehlen...?
Norbert
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem
Am 2004-01-06 11:56:52, schrieb Roland Schmid:
danke, jetzt gibts dennoch einen Fehler:
#dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot -b
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is samba
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 2.2.3a-12.3
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo!
On 06 Jan 2004 at 01:14 +0100, Roland Schmid wrote:
Hallo,
- Changelog und Revisionsnummer des Pakets anpassen. Das ist bei einem
Backport Pflicht und auch bei Modifikationen am stable-Paket
empfehlenswert. Am einfachsten geht das wohl mit dch(1). War die alte
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:48:34PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
apt-get install fuckroot
Michelle bist du dir sicher :)
Gruß
Thorsten
--
Debian Hint #17: Need someone to talk to about Debian? Install one of the
many IRC clients (grep-available --field=Provides irc |
Hallo!
On 05 Jan 2004 at 02:42 +0100, Manfred Schmitt wrote:
Elmar W. Tischhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hast du vorher 'apt-get update' oder besser 'dselect update' ausgeführt?
Was ist an einem 'dselect update' besser?
'apt-get update' bringt nur seine eigenen Caches auf den
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo