Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

John Covici wrote: > I am trying to do something very simple, with the config file supplied > from Debian, I need to do a make bzImage and possible a make modules, > how can dI do this?  Do I need to change the config in some way in > order to do this? be patient and start reading - free means

Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:47:29 -0400, deloptes wrote: > > John Covici wrote: > > > Google did not give me that at all.  I am not trying to build a Debian > > package,just trying to compile the kernel. > > Then just do > > make deb-pkg > > You could read more about the make system used by the

Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

John Covici wrote: > I am doing a straight makebzImage not trying to build a deb package. > In Debian 9, I could do this with no problem. Obviously you are trying to build the kernel from debian source. You have to use the original source, without the debian directory. IF there is debian

Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

John Covici wrote: > Google did not give me that at all.  I am not trying to build a Debian > package,just trying to compile the kernel. Then just do make deb-pkg You could read more about the make system used by the kernel https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/ or in the directory $ less

Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:20:53PM -0400, John Covici wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:10:27PM -0400, John Covici wrote: > > > So, how do I turn this off so I can compile the thing? > > > > "dpkg-buildpackage -b" considers it a warning and skips it. > > At least it does so for me. > > I am

Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:05:16 -0400, deloptes wrote: > > John Covici wrote: > > > debian/certs/debian-uefi-certs.pem > > https://wiki.debian.org/BuildADebianKernelPackage > > I hope you can read - also find a good search engine - first hit > > Google did not give me that at all. I am not

Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:15:38 -0400, Reco wrote: > > Please do not top post. > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:10:27PM -0400, John Covici wrote: > > So, how do I turn this off so I can compile the thing? > > "dpkg-buildpackage -b" considers it a warning and skips it. > At least it does so for me.

Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

Please do not top post. On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:10:27PM -0400, John Covici wrote: > So, how do I turn this off so I can compile the thing? "dpkg-buildpackage -b" considers it a warning and skips it. At least it does so for me. Reco

Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

So, how do I turn this off so I can compile the thing? On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:02:02 -0400, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 03:46:41PM -0400, John Covici wrote: > > Hi. I am getting an error while compiling the kernel 4.19-0-6-amd64. > > > > CC kernel/rseq.o > >

Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

John Covici wrote: > debian/certs/debian-uefi-certs.pem https://wiki.debian.org/BuildADebianKernelPackage I hope you can read - also find a good search engine - first hit

Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

On 2019-09-30 15:46 -0400, John Covici wrote: > Hi. I am getting an error while compiling the kernel 4.19-0-6-amd64. > > CC kernel/rseq.o > AR kernel/built-in.a > make[1]: *** No rule to make target > 'debian/certs/debian-uefi-certs.pem', needed by >

Re: strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

Hi. On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 03:46:41PM -0400, John Covici wrote: > Hi. I am getting an error while compiling the kernel 4.19-0-6-amd64. > > CC kernel/rseq.o > AR kernel/built-in.a > make[1]: *** No rule to make target > 'debian/certs/debian-uefi-certs.pem',

strange error compiling kernel 4.19.0-6-amd64

Hi. I am getting an error while compiling the kernel 4.19-0-6-amd64. CC kernel/rseq.o AR kernel/built-in.a make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'debian/certs/debian-uefi-certs.pem', needed by 'certs/x509_certificate_list'. Stop. What package do I need to fix this

Re: Jessie, problem compiling kernel 4.3

I spoke too soon, someone in the ubuntu forums had the same problem, installed libssl-dev and it worked. Sorry to trouble y'all. Curt- On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Curt Howland wrote: > So, there I was, doing a compile of the new kernel, 4.3 > > I get the following

Jessie, problem compiling kernel 4.3

So, there I was, doing a compile of the new kernel, 4.3 I get the following interesting error: === scripts/extract-cert.c:21:25: fatal error: openssl/bio.h: No such file or directory #include ^ compilation terminated. === I'm accustomed to getting compile time

Re: Compiling kernel from Github - Howto?

csanyi...@gmail.com writes: Gary Dale garyd...@torfree.net writes: On 17/01/15 10:19 AM, csanyi...@gmail.com wrote: I have a headless powerpc box and run on it Debian Wheezy with kernel Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux . But this kernel doesn't have support

Re: Compiling kernel from Github - Howto?

On 17/01/15 10:19 AM, csanyi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a headless powerpc box and run on it Debian Wheezy with kernel Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux . But this kernel doesn't have support for the rtl8192cu kernel-module. One can to get the kernel source

Re: Compiling kernel from Github - Howto?

Gary Dale garyd...@torfree.net writes: On 17/01/15 10:19 AM, csanyi...@gmail.com wrote: I have a headless powerpc box and run on it Debian Wheezy with kernel Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux . But this kernel doesn't have support for the rtl8192cu

Compiling kernel from Github - Howto?

Hi, I have a headless powerpc box and run on it Debian Wheezy with kernel Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux . But this kernel doesn't have support for the rtl8192cu kernel-module. One can to get the kernel source from here:

Re: Compiling kernel: problem!

The same problem, with kernel 3.10, was present with Wheezy 486 on same computer. Thanks Regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: Compiling kernel: problem!

The same problem, with kernel 3.10, was present with Wheezy 486 on same computer. Thanks Regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Compiling kernel: problem!

Hi all I try compiling kernel 3.10 on Squeeze 6.0.7. with cpu Intel Centrino1 32bit. Unpack source in /usr/src, and: adduser user src chown -R root:src /usr/src chmod -R g+w /usr/src cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config make menuconfig, but don't change any! make deb-pkg After

Re: Compiling kernel: problem!

On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:07:58 -0500 (EST), Antispammbox-debian wrote: Hi all I try compiling kernel 3.10 on Squeeze 6.0.7. with cpu Intel Centrino1 32bit. Unpack source in /usr/src, and: adduser user src chown -R root:src /usr/src chmod -R g+w /usr/src cp /boot/config-`uname -r

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

Sorry, my mistake, nothing about 64 bit. I compiled the 32bit kernel in xfs. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Magicloud Magiclouds magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com wrote: I am using debian unstable 64 bit with lvm and ext3. All options are default. How did I find out? This OS is a VM. And the

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote: PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English country. Some people cannot pronounce my name right. So I use this pseudonym. That doesn't stop me from using my real name ;) Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

On Monday 28 June 2010 08:44:15 Andrei Popescu wrote: On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote: PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English country. Some people cannot pronounce my name right. So I use this pseudonym. That doesn't stop me from using

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:44:15AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote: PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English country. Some people cannot pronounce my name right. So I use this pseudonym. That doesn't stop

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

Op 28-06-10 13:12, Tzafrir Cohen schreef: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:44:15AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote: PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English country. Some people cannot pronounce my name right. So I

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:20:05 -0400 (EDT), Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: Op 28-06-10 13:12, Tzafrir Cohen schreef: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:44:15AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote: PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

On Monday 28 June 2010 12:12:23 Tzafrir Cohen wrote: So I guess we're still looking for an example of a non-English name that can't be pronounced right. Can't think of any. It isn't a case of whether it can be correctly pronounced, but of whether it is. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

On 27/06/10 10:51 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote: Thank you guys. I have not follow Stephen's guide, but I figured the reason out. It seems like an ext3's fault. The space (i-node wise) was used 5.x GB, but the actual space (data wise) was used only 1 GB. So a lot of space was just empty and

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

I am using debian unstable 64 bit with lvm and ext3. All options are default. How did I find out? This OS is a VM. And the disk data is in a non-fixed size file, not compressed. Sorry I forgot how to say this in English, by non-fixed size, I mean the VM software just allocate the actual disk space

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

Thank you guys. I have not follow Stephen's guide, but I figured the reason out. It seems like an ext3's fault. The space (i-node wise) was used 5.x GB, but the actual space (data wise) was used only 1 GB. So a lot of space was just empty and wasted. I attached another disk to get the job done.

Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

Hi, I am using debian unstable 64. Recently I wanted to compile a 2.6.34 kernel. Well, the source package is 64MB. Before `make-kpkg linux-image linux-headers --initrd` finished, the source directory took 6GB space, made the volume full. Tried a few times, the problem is still there, and

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 18:25, Magicloud Magiclouds magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am using debian unstable 64. Recently I wanted to compile a 2.6.34 kernel. Well, the source package is 64MB. Before `make-kpkg linux-image linux-headers --initrd` finished, the source directory

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:55:41 -0400 (EDT), Magicloud Magiclouds wrote: I am using debian unstable 64. Recently I wanted to compile a 2.6.34 kernel. Well, the source package is 64MB. Before `make-kpkg linux-image linux-headers --initrd` finished, the source directory took 6GB space, made the

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/25/2010 09:10 AM, Stephen Powell wrote: Magicloud Magiclouds? That can't be your real name! Can't you give us your real name? At least a first name? That is not the correct command syntax. I suggest that you read

Re: Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.

On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:34:29 -0400 (EDT), Jordan Metzmeier wrote: On 06/25/2010 09:10 AM, Stephen Powell wrote: That is not the correct command syntax. I suggest that you read http://www.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm Kernel building in Debian is a complex task fraught with many

Compiling kernel

Hello I have a doubt about kernel compilation. Two days ago I compiled by hand 2.6.31.6 and it crashed during the boot process. The configuration was made by hand, starting from the default configuration and perhaps I missed something. Since I had to restore my old slackware bakcup to recover

Re: Compiling kernel

On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 06:59:48AM -0700, deb...@toursbymexico.com wrote: I have a doubt about kernel compilation. Two days ago I compiled by hand 2.6.31.6 and it crashed during the boot process. The configuration was made by hand, starting from the default configuration and perhaps I missed

Re: Compiling kernel

Kumar Appaiah wrote: On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 06:59:48AM -0700, deb...@toursbymexico.com wrote: I have a doubt about kernel compilation. Two days ago I compiled by hand 2.6.31.6 and it crashed during the boot process. The configuration was made by hand, starting from the default configuration

Re: Compiling kernel

On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 11:11:08AM -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote: Yes. In addition, I would highly recommend using kernel-package to compile your kernel to generate a deb. Here's a nice primer: http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html I would recommend using the 'make-kpkg'

Problems compiling kernel 2.6.31

I am getting some problems while compiling kernel 2.6.31 using Debian Lenny make-kpkg The messages are - make[3]: Entering directory `/root/linux-2.6.31' CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h SYMLINK include/asm - include/asm-x86 CALLscripts

Re: Problems compiling kernel 2.6.31

On 29.10.09 1311 (+0530), surreal wrote: I am getting some problems while compiling kernel 2.6.31 using Debian Lenny make-kpkg The messages are - make[3]: Entering directory `/root/linux-2.6.31' CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h SYMLINK include/asm

Re: compiling kernel

[snip] Regarde du côté de make deb-pkg sinon. Make-kpkg est déprécié, il faut maintenant utilisé make deb-pkg [1] [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg3.html Thomas Preud'homme Salut, petit question à propos de ce make deb-pkg : je compile depuis qqs

Re: compiling kernel

Le mercredi 21 octobre 2009 09:30:06, mess-mate a écrit : Bonjour, j'ai un petit problème pour compiler mon noau: voici le message d'erreur: make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-amd64-mm kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-doc exec make kpkg_version=12.021 -f

Re: compiling kernel

Bonsoir, Le jeudi 22 octobre 2009 22:04:12, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit : Regarde du côté de make deb-pkg sinon. Make-kpkg est déprécié, il faut maintenant utilisé make deb-pkg [1] [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg3.html Merci pour cette info. Pour voir, j'ai

Re: compiling kernel

Le jeudi 22 octobre 2009 22:35:47, Jean-Damien Durand a écrit : Bonsoir, Le jeudi 22 octobre 2009 22:04:12, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit : Regarde du côté de make deb-pkg sinon. Make-kpkg est déprécié, il faut maintenant utilisé make deb-pkg [1] [1]

Re: compiling kernel

Le jeudi 22 octobre 2009 23:40:50, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit : Le jeudi 22 octobre 2009 22:35:47, Jean-Damien Durand a écrit : Bonsoir, Le jeudi 22 octobre 2009 22:04:12, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit : Regarde du côté de make deb-pkg sinon. Make-kpkg est déprécié, il faut maintenant

compiling kernel

Bonjour, j'ai un petit problème pour compiler mon noau: voici le message d'erreur: make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-amd64-mm kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-doc exec make kpkg_version=12.021 -f /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk debian APPEND_TO_VERSION=-amd64-mm

Re: compiling kernel

Le 21-10-2009, à 09:30:06 +0200, mess-mate (mess-m...@orange.fr) a écrit : Bonjour, Salut, j'ai un petit problème pour compiler mon noau: voici le message d'erreur: make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-amd64-mm kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-doc exec make kpkg_version=12.021 -f

Re: compiling kernel

Salut, mess-mate a écrit : j'ai un petit problème pour compiler mon noau: voici le message d'erreur: make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-amd64-mm kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-doc exec make kpkg_version=12.021 -f /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk debian

Re: compiling kernel

Pascal Hambourg wrote: Salut, mess-mate a écrit : j'ai un petit problème pour compiler mon noau: voici le message d'erreur: make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-amd64-mm kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-doc exec make kpkg_version=12.021 -f

Re: problem compiling kernel

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:50:10 +0200, Bernard wrote: - snip -- The initrd.img that I have on my working system, as well as those initrd.img that 'mkinitrd' generates when requested, are not compressed files. Filenames are : initrd.img-2.6.20-16-386 for instance. No .gz behind. I still

Re: problem compiling kernel

Amax wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:50:10 +0200, Bernard wrote: - snip -- The initrd.img that I have on my working system, as well as those initrd.img that 'mkinitrd' generates when requested, are not compressed files. Filenames are : initrd.img-2.6.20-16-386 for instance. No .gz

Re: problem compiling kernel

Bernard wrote: You really could use the recent 2.6.30.4. There were different problems with 2.6.20 to 2.6.30. I find 2.6.30.4 the best I've had since 2.6.20. I tried 2.6.30.4. Same result as with 2.6.26.2 : compiles without errors, but crashes on boot. so you are missing some essential

Re: problem compiling kernel

Emanoil Kotsev wrote: Bernard wrote: Emanoil Kotsev wrote: Bernard wrote: Compiling md in the kernel is the right approach to boot from raided root without initrd. You can try this just skipping (deleteing the line in grub temporary) I just tried that. Raid compiled

Re: problem compiling kernel

Emanoil Kotsev wrote: Bernard wrote: Compiling md in the kernel is the right approach to boot from raided root without initrd. You can try this just skipping (deleteing the line in grub temporary) I just tried that. Raid compiled into the kernel instead of modules. No initrd. Still

Re: problem compiling kernel

Bernard wrote: Emanoil Kotsev wrote: Bernard wrote: Compiling md in the kernel is the right approach to boot from raided root without initrd. You can try this just skipping (deleteing the line in grub temporary) I just tried that. Raid compiled into the kernel instead of modules. No

Re: problem compiling kernel

Emanoil Kotsev wrote: Emanoil Kotsev wrote: Sorry forgot to write Yes there is problem compiling the 2.6.20 with recent gcc The problem is the compiler. If you are compiling just grab the last version from kernel.org. 2.6.30.4 seems to be working fine Just to be objective the

Re: problem compiling kernel

Bernard wrote: 2.6.30.4 does compile all right, so does 2.6.26, but 2.6.20 does not. you find out why in the archives Problem is that I still can't boot those I compiled, i.e. 2.6.26. because the initrd.img is buggy. I did find something, still it is not enough to get the process to work.

problem compiling kernel

Hi to Everyone, I need to re-compile my kernel so that it does not include sound support inside. I am running Debian 3.1 (Sarge). My system is on RAID1. My /boot partition is from /dev/sda1 (mirror on /dev/sdb1) installed on /dev/md0 (ext3), while my '/' partition is from /dev/sda2 and

Re: problem compiling kernel

Bernard wrote: Hi to Everyone, I need to re-compile my kernel so that it does not include sound support inside. I am running Debian 3.1 (Sarge). My system is on RAID1. My /boot partition is from /dev/sda1 (mirror on /dev/sdb1) installed on /dev/md0 (ext3), while my '/' partition is from

Re: problem compiling kernel

Sorry forgot to write Yes there is problem compiling the 2.6.20 with recent gcc The problem is the compiler. If you are compiling just grab the last version from kernel.org. 2.6.30.4 seems to be working fine So, upon my failures to recompile kernel 2.6.20-16-386, I tried downloading

Re: problem compiling kernel

Emanoil Kotsev wrote: Sorry forgot to write Yes there is problem compiling the 2.6.20 with recent gcc The problem is the compiler. If you are compiling just grab the last version from kernel.org. 2.6.30.4 seems to be working fine Just to be objective the gnu compiler people said

Re: problem compiling kernel

Emanoil Kotsev wrote: Bernard wrote: why not just compile it on your notebook (or copy a compiled kernel) ?! you also can just disable the loading of the sound modules to make it more simple. Things would be easy if all sound support were in modules. But some functions are

Re: problem compiling kernel

Emanoil Kotsev wrote: do you have a not raid boot partition, where you can put the initrd image? My boot partition is not raid, or, at least, even though it is mirrored, it remains in ext2fs, while the rest is in LVM2. So, the initrd image that I am trying is available at

Re: problem compiling kernel

Emanoil Kotsev wrote: try compiling the necessary modules _in_ the kernel. This is the way it has been done. So, I re-tried compiling after de-activating raid0 in the config, leaving only raid1... to the same end result. In the config it should be [*] not [M] if booting

Re: problem compiling kernel

Bernard wrote: Emanoil Kotsev wrote: Bernard wrote: why not just compile it on your notebook (or copy a compiled kernel) ?! you also can just disable the loading of the sound modules to make it more simple. Things would be easy if all sound support were in modules. But some

RE: problem compiling kernel

From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Emanoil Kotsev Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 1:55 PM Bernard wrote: Emanoil Kotsev wrote: Bernard wrote: why not just compile it on your notebook (or copy a compiled kernel) ?! you also can just disable the loading of

About Compiling Kernel

Hi all, My box is on debian/testing, and I have compiled kernel by the debian way. Because it's testing and kernel-patches are often provided, I wonder whether I have to compile the kernel again after retrieving a kernel patch or even a new kernel via aptitude full-upgrade operation. Thanks for

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

On Tue, 08 May 2007 17:29:38 -0500 Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:11:54 -0400, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500 Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli [EMAIL

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

On Wed, 9 May 2007 15:32:08 -0400, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Tue, 08 May 2007 17:29:38 -0500 Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm. I should amend that to say: Step 5 does require (fake)root privileges. Huh? Here's a longer excerpt: Oops. I think I

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

pizzapie_linuxanchovies wrote: I was following a tutorial (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run this: fakeroot make-kpkg clean However, this command generated a bunch of errors saying this:

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

I just changed: 1. Processor type and features - Paravirtualization support (EXPERIMENTAL) OFF 2. Processor type and features - Timer frequency (1000 HZ) 3. Processor type and features - Preemption Model (Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)) 4. Device Drivers - Graphics support - Logo

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

Raffaele Morelli wrote: I just changed: 1. Processor type and features - Paravirtualization support (EXPERIMENTAL) OFF 2. Processor type and features - Timer frequency (1000 HZ) 3. Processor type and features - Preemption Model (Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop))

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200 Raffaele Morelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is considered such a bad habit. It's generally considered a bad idea to do anything as root unless it's absolutely necessary. I suppose it's

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

2007/5/8, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200 Raffaele Morelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is considered such a bad habit. It's generally considered a bad idea to do anything as root unless

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and do not log as root if unnecessary, but for kernel (and program) compile I can not picture 'make-kpkg' or 'configure make' doing something regrettable.

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Raffaele Morelli wrote: 2007/5/8, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200 Raffaele Morelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is considered such a bad

Problem with compiling kernel

Thanks to everyone who replied with ideas about my post. Let me give quick replies to the questions you asked me: Manoj--yes, dpkg is in /usr/bin, and is in the user's path, but no normal user has execute access to dpkg: $ ls -l /usr/bin/dpkg -rwxr-x--- 1 root root 174040 May 26 2005

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500 Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and do not log as root if unnecessary, but for kernel (and program) compile I can not

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:50:13PM +0200, pizzapie_linuxanchovies wrote: Andrew (and anyone else who can do a make-kpkg under a non-root account)--what permissions do YOU see when you say ls -l /usr/bin/root? I was referring to the general case of compiling source as a user and installing

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

On Tue, 8 May 2007 20:50:13 +0200 (CEST), pizzapie linuxanchovies [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Thanks to everyone who replied with ideas about my post. Let me give quick replies to the questions you asked me: Manoj--yes, dpkg is in /usr/bin, and is in the user's path, but no normal user has

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:11:54 -0400, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500 Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and do not log as

Problem with compiling kernel

I was following a tutorial (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run this: fakeroot make-kpkg clean However, this command generated a bunch of errors saying this: dpkg-architecture: failure: dpkg

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

On Tue, 8 May 2007 05:37:58 +0200 (CEST), pizzapie linuxanchovies [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I was following a tutorial (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run this: fakeroot make-kpkg clean However,

Re: Problem with compiling kernel

pizzapie_linuxanchovies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was following a tutorial (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run this: fakeroot make-kpkg clean However, this command generated a bunch of errors

Re: Compiling kernel 2.6.16 or higher under Sarge

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:23:20PM -0700, shahim essaid.com wrote: Hi all, I am somewhat new to Debian and Iam not sure if this is possible. I want to compile a 2.6.16 from source but the minimum requirement listed under Documentation/Changes

Compiling kernel 2.6.17.4 or higher

Hi everyone! I'm trying to upgrade my 2.6.14.2 kernel in my server to a 2.6.17.4 or higher using my current .config. There isn't any problem in compiling time and in grub i put the same config but with different vmlinuz file, but when i reboot i get a kernel panic error like that Kernel panic:

Re: Compiling kernel 2.6.16 or higher under Sarge

shahim essaid.com wrote: Hi all, I am somewhat new to Debian and Iam not sure if this is possible. I want to compile a 2.6.16 from source but the minimum requirement listed under Documentation/Changes are not satisfied under Sarge. udev, for example, has to be 071 or higher. I've never

Re: Compiling kernel 2.6.17.4 or higher

Mario de Frutos wrote: I'm trying to upgrade my 2.6.14.2 kernel in my server to a 2.6.17.4 or higher using my current .config. There isn't any problem in compiling time and in grub i put the same config but with different vmlinuz file, but when i reboot i get a kernel panic error like that

Compiling kernel 2.6.16 or higher under Sarge

Hi all, I am somewhat new to Debian and Iam not sure if this is possible. I want to compile a 2.6.16 from source but the minimum requirement listed under Documentation/Changes are not satisfied under Sarge. udev, for example, has to be 071 or higher. I did try backports.org but there were

problem compiling kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-smp

Hello everybody. I am trying to install anbd on a PIII cluster, and for that I have to compile the module that they provide. But unfortunately, I am not being capable of compile this module agaist the kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-686-smp. make menuconfig works nicely, but when I try to make or make

Re: compiling kernel module question

On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:51:55AM -0500, Amish Rughoonundon wrote: lemme see if I understand what you meant: The kernel-source files that I downloaded is common to all linux distribution while the kernel-header files is particular to a certain version and distribution. ...not so much the

compiling kernel module question

Hi, I have been trying to compile and insert a simple kernel module but without luck. This is what I did. Since the freshly installed debian sarge 3.1 distro did not have any source files under /usr/src, I di uname -a to make sure of the kernel version that is installed: Linux test

Re: compiling kernel module question

On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 05:36:26PM -0500, Amish Rughoonundon wrote: Hi, I have been trying to compile and insert a simple kernel module but without luck. This is what I did. Since the freshly installed debian sarge 3.1 distro did not have any source files under /usr/src, I di uname -a to make

Re: compiling kernel module question

me out, Amish - Original Message - From: Almut Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 9:43 PM Subject: Re: compiling kernel module question On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 05:36:26PM -0500, Amish Rughoonundon wrote: Hi, I have been trying

Re: Compiling Kernel for Bootsplash: The Whole Seven Metres.

On 9/22/05, Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1L.V.Gandhi on Monday 19 Sep 2005 12:46 wrote: I have found the problem with debian apt-get kernel which contains debian patches.Debian shipped kernels don't come with with bootsplash patch included.

Re: Compiling Kernel for Bootsplash: The Whole Seven Metres.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 L.V.Gandhi on Monday 19 Sep 2005 12:46 wrote: On 9/17/05, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know whether this is a stupid doubt, but are you using `pristine' kernel sources or Debian patched kernel sources (apt-got ones)? I

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >