Re: Diferencias en salida df -h en OpenVZ

2013-08-23 Thread Roberto José Blandino Cisneros
Probablemente en sea diferencia entre versiones. Puede que por la version no se muestre la unidad, o por que no esta montada no se vea. 2013/8/23 tq tqlis...@gmail.com On 23/08/13 11:41, Maykel Franco wrote: Archive:

Re: Wheezy. Ugly df -Th output

2013-05-26 Thread Chris Bannister
a rather long output of df? Probably. It IS unstable after all. That just means it is in a constant state of flux, not that the individual packages are buggy and untested. The maintainers are *supposed* to test their packages *before* they upload them. I'd say the main problem would

Wheezy. Ugly df -Th output

2013-05-24 Thread Leonid Korostyshevski
Hello, list! I've googled http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656067 and... a solution is?

Re: Wheezy. Ugly df -Th output

2013-05-24 Thread Darac Marjal
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 02:07:37PM +0400, Leonid Korostyshevski wrote: Hello, list! I've googled [1]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656067 and... a solution is? A solution to what? If you want the updated coreutils as mentioned in that bug report, it's in upstable

Re: Wheezy. Ugly df -Th output

2013-05-24 Thread Leonid Korostyshevski
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.ukwrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 02:07:37PM +0400, Leonid Korostyshevski wrote: Hello, list! I've googled [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656067 and... a solution is? A solution to what? If

Re: Wheezy. Ugly df -Th output

2013-05-24 Thread Darac Marjal
output of df? Probably. It IS unstable after all. It depends on what matters to you. Is the output of one command such an issue to you that you'd upgrade to an untested, volatile version? If so, go ahead, it might work. Other options available to you are to compile your own copy of coreutils

dispositivo sem espaço segundo o df mas com espaço, segundo o df

2013-05-23 Thread Fred Maranhão
Caros, montei um gps garmin para copiar um mapa para dentro dele, mas não há espaço para o mapa de 417M. O que o comando abaixo confirma: $ df -h Sist. Arq. Tam Usad Dispon. Uso% Montado em ... /dev/sdd

Re: dispositivo sem espaço segundo o df mas com espaço, segundo o df

2013-05-23 Thread Linux Polegato
mapa para dentro dele, mas não há espaço para o mapa de 417M. O que o comando abaixo confirma: $ df -h Sist. Arq. Tam Usad Dispon. Uso% Montado em ... /dev/sdd1,8G 1,6G 173M 91% /media/GARMIN

Re: dispositivo sem espaço segundo o df mas com espaço, segundo o df

2013-05-23 Thread Fred Maranhão
. vou fazer um backup e removê-lo, para ver no que dá []'s Junior Polegato Em 23/05/2013 21:15, Fred Maranhão fred.maran...@gmail.com escreveu: Caros, montei um gps garmin para copiar um mapa para dentro dele, mas não há espaço para o mapa de 417M. O que o comando abaixo confirma: $ df

Re: dispositivo sem espaço segundo o df mas com espaço, segundo o df

2013-05-23 Thread Linux Polegato
de 417M. O que o comando abaixo confirma: $ df -h Sist. Arq. Tam Usad Dispon. Uso% Montado em ... /dev/sdd1,8G 1,6G 173M 91% /media/GARMIN mas se dou um du, não vejo quem está ocupando

Re: dispositivo sem espaço segundo o df mas com espaço, segundo o df

2013-05-23 Thread Eduardo Rodrigues da Luz
backup e removê-lo, para ver no que dá []'s Junior Polegato Em 23/05/2013 21:15, Fred Maranhão fred.maran...@gmail.com escreveu: Caros, montei um gps garmin para copiar um mapa para dentro dele, mas não há espaço para o mapa de 417M. O que o comando abaixo confirma: $ df -h

Re: dispositivo sem espaço segundo o df mas com espaço, segundo o df

2013-05-23 Thread Fred Maranhão
Polegato Em 23/05/2013 21:15, Fred Maranhão fred.maran...@gmail.com escreveu: Caros, montei um gps garmin para copiar um mapa para dentro dele, mas não há espaço para o mapa de 417M. O que o comando abaixo confirma: $ df -h Sist. Arq. Tam

Re: Question about output from 'df'.

2013-04-07 Thread Bob Proulx
Claudius Hubig wrote: Christian Dysthe wrote: When I do 'df' (or look in System Monitor) I see the following for file systems: /dev/disk/by-uuid/3… 10896648 5101224 5235248 50% / /dev/sda5 769760 44844 684980 7% /boot /dev/sda7 599139368 344433792 224264420 61% /home Why is /dev

Question about output from 'df'.

2013-03-29 Thread Christian Dysthe
/home ext4 rw,errors=remount-ro 0 0 # /dev/sda8 UUID=38d6809f-8c95-43c8-9a22-23fa1cbecdd4 swap swap sw 0 0 When I do 'df' (or look in System Monitor) I see the following for file systems: /dev/disk/by-uuid/37de7813-0f65-41dd-b4ae-55912e454d0f 10896648 5101224 5235248 50% / /dev/sda5 769760 44844

Re: Question about output from 'df'.

2013-03-29 Thread Claudius Hubig
in the df output before. Likely because the busybox-mount in the initramfs during initial boot does not dereference the symlink, whereas the later /sbin/mount in the fully booted system does. This is then reflected in the content of /proc/mounts, which is read by df. Best, Claudius -- Please

Não há espaço disponível no dispositivo mas segundo o df, há

2012-12-05 Thread Fred Maranhão
, inclusive a /boot e /root, que ficam no mesmo disco, eu consigo. É só na / o problema. a / não está cheia, segundo o comando abaixo: # df Sist. Arq. 1K-blocos Usad Dispon. Uso% Montado em /dev/sda6 16218544 10543372 4851316 69% / tmpfs 4100056

Re: Não há espaço disponível no dispositivo mas segundo o df, há

2012-12-05 Thread Fabrício Lamonica
Fred, certamente é a quantidade de arquivos que chegou ao limite. É só dar o df -i que você vai ver que a quantidade de inodes estourou. Abraço, Fabrício Lamonica On Qua, 2012-12-05 at 15:01 -0300, Fred Maranhão wrote: Caros, tenho um debian squeeze 64bit instalado sobre uma vm do vmware

Re: Não há espaço disponível no dispositivo mas segundo o df, há

2012-12-05 Thread Fred Maranhão
é isto mesmo: # df -i Sist. Arq.Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Montado em /dev/sda61030176 1029825 351 100% / tmpfs1025014 5 10250091% /lib/init/rw udev 1023803 576 10232271% /dev tmpfs1025014 1

Re: obsolete df (file system disk space usage) values and NFS

2012-10-28 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2012-10-25 13:27:33 -0200, Pedro Eugênio Rocha wrote: Maybe the file was opened by another user? Did you check lsof? I didn't check with lsof, but did a ls -la to see whether there were .nfs* files (usually created after removing a file that is already open, and there wasn't any). I would

obsolete df (file system disk space usage) values and NFS

2012-10-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi, Yesterday, I removed a 700 MB directory over NFS with rm -rf, and I invoke df several times before and after the removal, but the Used value only decreased by 3 MB, including more than one hour after the operation. Before: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted

Re: obsolete df (file system disk space usage) values and NFS

2012-10-25 Thread Pedro Eugênio Rocha
Maybe the file was opened by another user? Did you check lsof? Best, On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote: Hi, Yesterday, I removed a 700 MB directory over NFS with rm -rf, and I invoke df several times before and after the removal, but the Used value

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-22 Thread David Cho-Lerat
Google returns: http://superuser.com/questions/289678/du-vs-df-output oops, should have had a look :P this pointed me to : server:~# lsof | grep /var | grep deleted smbd 2926 root2w REG 254,1 2665 65406 /var/log/samba/log.smbd.1 (deleted) smbd

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-22 Thread David Cho-Lerat
tune2fs -l /dev/md0 | grep Reserved block count Sorry, I forgot to mention that the result will be in Blocks. You can get the block size (in Bytes) with: tune2fs -l /dev/md0 | grep Block size Bye. cool. So : server:~# tune2fs -l /dev/mapper/vg00-var | grep Reserved block count Reserved

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-22 Thread Bob Proulx
David Cho-Lerat wrote: Google returns: http://superuser.com/questions/289678/du-vs-df-output I will also mention the GNU faq entry for it. Perhaps then it will rank higher in the search engine space. :-) http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/#df-and-du-report-different-information

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-22 Thread David Cho-Lerat
I will also mention the GNU faq entry for it. Perhaps then it will rank higher in the search engine space. :-) http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/#df-and-du-report-different-information thanks, I will send this link to the sysadmin. When I want to free up disk space used

[SOLVED] df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-22 Thread David Cho-Lerat
/289678/du-vs-df-output oops, should have had a look :P this pointed me to : server:~# lsof | grep /var | grep deleted smbd 2926 root2w REG 254,1 2665 65406 /var/log/samba/log.smbd.1 (deleted) smbd 2926 root6w REG 254,1 2665

df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-21 Thread David Cho-Lerat
Hi list, this might be a newbie question, but can anyone tell me why du and df don't seem to agree : server:~# df -h /var FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg00-var 5.0G 4.1G 624M 87% /var server:~# du -h -s /var 1.6G/var (/var is on a partition of its

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-21 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
Hi On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:35PM +0100, David Cho-Lerat wrote: Hi list, this might be a newbie question, but can anyone tell me why du and df don't seem to agree : server:~# df -h /var FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg00-var 5.0G 4.1G 624M 87

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-21 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:07:54PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote: Hi On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:35PM +0100, David Cho-Lerat wrote: Hi list, this might be a newbie question, but can anyone tell me why du and df don't seem to agree : server:~# df -h /var Filesystem

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-21 Thread David Cho-Lerat
Hi Karl, thanks for the prompt answer. FYI: I always use the -x flag on du too, as this will not recurse down other mounted file systems - e.g. if you have /var/cache on a separate logical volume. that's good to know. This doesn't change anything in this case, though : server:~# du -h -s

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-21 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:45:35 +0200, David Cho-Lerat wrote: this might be a newbie question, but can anyone tell me why du and df don't seem to agree : server:~# df -h /var FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg00-var 5.0G 4.1G 624M 87% /var server:~# du

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-21 Thread Denis Witt
Hi David, By the way, is there a command to see how big this reserved space actually is on a given partition/disk ? tune2fs -l /dev/md0 | grep Reserved block count Replace /dev/md0 with the device you want to check. Bye. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

2012-08-21 Thread Denis Witt
On 21.08.2012 18:14, Denis Witt wrote: By the way, is there a command to see how big this reserved space actually is on a given partition/disk ? tune2fs -l /dev/md0 | grep Reserved block count Sorry, I forgot to mention that the result will be in Blocks. You can get the block size (in

Re: Re (3): Apparent disagreement between df and cp.

2012-06-30 Thread Keith McKenzie
cp reporting 'no space left on device', whilst df said that there was space available. -- Sent from FOSS (Free Open Source Software) Debian GNU/Linux

Re: Re (3): Apparent disagreement between df and cp.

2012-06-30 Thread Chris Davies
Keith McKenzie km3...@gmail.com wrote: It was about cp reporting 'no space left on device', whilst df said that there was space available. The OS reported No space left on device (or more accurately, errno 28: ENOSPC) to cp. Rather than trying to guess whether this really meant what it said

Re (3): Apparent disagreement between df and cp.

2012-06-29 Thread peasthope
From: Dom to...@rpdom.net Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:02:45 +0100 Ok, I've just tested this. It is a FAT filesystem limitation. Nice analysis! On FAT12 (and FAT16, iirc) there is a limit of 512 files in the root directory. Other directories don't have this limit. I found additional

Re: Re (3): Apparent disagreement between df and cp.

2012-06-29 Thread Doug
On 06/29/2012 05:29 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: From: Domto...@rpdom.net Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:02:45 +0100 Ok, I've just tested this. It is a FAT filesystem limitation. /snip/ I've looked at this thread a number of times, but I was then and still am puzzled. According to Linux in a

Re (4): Apparent disagreement between df and cp.

2012-06-29 Thread peasthope
From: Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:41:17 -0400 cp ... none of the options mentions determining the size of a file- system or the remaining space therein. The primary function seen by the user is copying. The relative size of the projectile and its target are

Re: Apparent disagreement between df and cp.

2012-06-28 Thread Berni Elbourn
On 28/06/12 05:45, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: How can df report MiBs available while cp reports No space left on device? peter@dalton:~$ df /media/43* Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdd1 498648 18840479808 4% /media/4345-A417 peter

Re: Apparent disagreement between df and cp.

2012-06-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-06-28 09:32 +0200, Berni Elbourn wrote: On 28/06/12 05:45, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: How can df report MiBs available while cp reports No space left on device? peter@dalton:~$ df /media/43* Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdd1

Re: Apparent disagreement between df and cp.

2012-06-28 Thread Chris Davies
peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: How can df report MiBs available while cp reports No space left on device? peter@dalton:~$ df /media/43* Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdd1 498648 18840479808 4% /media/4345-A417 It's possible

Re (2): Apparent disagreement between df and cp.

2012-06-28 Thread peasthope
is the output of mount | grep sdd1 ... peter@dalton:~$ mount | grep sdd1 /dev/sdd1 on /media/4345-A417 type vfat (rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks,uid=1000 ,gid=1000,shortname=mixed,dmask=0077,utf8=1,showexec,flush) ... and also df -i /dev/sdd1? peter@dalton:~$ df -i /dev/sdd1 Filesystem

Re: Re (2): Apparent disagreement between df and cp.

2012-06-28 Thread Dom
: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:47:21 +0100 What is the output of mount | grep sdd1 ... peter@dalton:~$ mount | grep sdd1 /dev/sdd1 on /media/4345-A417 type vfat (rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks,uid=1000 ,gid=1000,shortname=mixed,dmask=0077,utf8=1,showexec,flush) ... and also df -i /dev/sdd1? peter

Apparent disagreement between df and cp.

2012-06-27 Thread peasthope
How can df report MiBs available while cp reports No space left on device? peter@dalton:~$ df /media/43* Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdd1 498648 18840479808 4% /media/4345-A417 peter@dalton:~$ ls -l Mail.Text -rw--- 1 peter

logwatch et df -h ne disent pas pareil

2012-05-13 Thread andre_debian
que la partition principale sda2 est pleine. Or, si je tape df -h : sys. de fichiers Tail. Occ.Disp.%Occ. /dev/sda2 146G 95G 45G 69% / Ici, la partition sda2 n'est occupée qu'à 69% Pourquoi le logwatch et df -h ne disent pas pareil ? Merci et bon dimanche

Taille de disque df vs fdisk

2011-04-17 Thread _Marty_
Bonjour la liste, pour faire simple j’ai augmenté la taille de mon disque dur chez mon hébergeur, en théorie tout parait correct fdisk me donne bien la bonne taille, celle ci est bien monté au bon endroit, mais quand j’utilise la commande df j’obtiens l’ancienne taille, j’imagine que df doit se

Re: Taille de disque df vs fdisk

2011-04-17 Thread Adrien Jeser
, mais quand j’utilise la commande df j’obtiens l’ancienne taille, j’imagine que df doit se baser sur une variable qui n’a pas été mise a jour. Mais est-ce que quelqu’un connait l’explication exacte ? En vous remerciant en ce doux dimanche Portez-vous bien, Marty Bonjour, Il faut peut

Re: Taille de disque df vs fdisk

2011-04-17 Thread _Marty_
-Message d'origine- From: Adrien Jeser Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 5:42 PM To: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Taille de disque df vs fdisk -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/04/2011 17:35, _Marty_ a écrit : Bonjour la liste, pour faire simple

Re: Taille de disque df vs fdisk

2011-04-17 Thread Adrien Jeser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, As tu pensé à agrandir la partition ? L'outils pour ext2/3/4 est resize2fs. Apluche -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

Re: Taille de disque df vs fdisk

2011-04-17 Thread daniel huhardeaux
Bonjour, Le 17/04/2011 17:50, _Marty_ a écrit : [...] J'avais tenté le sync, pas le remount mais sans succes voici un petit apercu : #df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/xvda13.0G 997M 1.9G 35% / tmpfs 123M 0 123M 0% /lib

Re: Taille de disque df vs fdisk

2011-04-17 Thread Adrien Jeser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/04/2011 17:57, Adrien Jeser a écrit : Bonjour, As tu pensé à agrandir la partition ? L'outils pour ext2/3/4 est resize2fs. Apluche Je voulais dire le système de fichier, désolé. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11

Re: Taille de disque df vs fdisk

2011-04-17 Thread _Marty_
-Message d'origine- From: Adrien Jeser Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 5:58 PM To: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Taille de disque df vs fdisk -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/04/2011 17:57, Adrien Jeser a écrit : Bonjour, As tu pensé à agrandir

df o du

2011-03-17 Thread Esteban Torres Rodríguez
Buenas, Esta es la salida de mi df de un repositorio. /dev/mapper/VG_Datos-VL_Datos 528443064 454190268 47409456 91% /opt/data Si calculais lo ofrecido menos lo ocupado no coincide con lo libre. Quiero sacar informes sobre esto y quiero que los numeros cuadren así que no se si utilizar

Re: df o du

2011-03-17 Thread Juan Antonio
El 17/03/11 08:50, Esteban Torres Rodríguez escribió: Buenas, Esta es la salida de mi df de un repositorio. /dev/mapper/VG_Datos-VL_Datos 528443064 454190268 47409456 91% /opt/data Si calculais lo ofrecido menos lo ocupado no coincide con lo libre. Quiero sacar informes sobre esto

Re: df o du

2011-03-17 Thread fernando sainz
2011/3/17 Esteban Torres Rodríguez mortenol.tor...@gmail.com: Buenas, Esta es la salida de mi df de un repositorio. /dev/mapper/VG_Datos-VL_Datos  528443064 454190268  47409456  91% /opt/data Si calculais lo ofrecido menos lo ocupado no coincide con lo libre. Quiero sacar informes

Re: df o du

2011-03-17 Thread fernando sainz
El día 17 de marzo de 2011 09:26, fernando sainz fernandojose.sa...@gmail.com escribió: 2011/3/17 Esteban Torres Rodríguez mortenol.tor...@gmail.com: Buenas, Esta es la salida de mi df de un repositorio. /dev/mapper/VG_Datos-VL_Datos  528443064 454190268  47409456  91% /opt/data Si

Re: df o du

2011-03-17 Thread Camaleón
El Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:50:01 +0100, Esteban Torres Rodríguez escribió: Esta es la salida de mi df de un repositorio. /dev/mapper/VG_Datos-VL_Datos 528443064 454190268 47409456 91% /opt/data Si calculais lo ofrecido menos lo ocupado no coincide con lo libre. Quiero sacar informes

Re: df o du

2011-03-17 Thread Esteban Torres Rodríguez
escribió: Buenas, Esta es la salida de mi df de un repositorio. /dev/mapper/VG_Datos-VL_Datos 528443064 454190268 47409456 91% /opt/data Si calculais lo ofrecido menos lo ocupado no coincide con lo libre. Quiero sacar informes sobre esto y quiero que los numeros cuadren así que

Re: df o du

2011-03-17 Thread Juan Antonio
mailto:push...@limbo.ari.es escribió: El 17/03/11 08:50, Esteban Torres Rodríguez escribió: Buenas, Esta es la salida de mi df de un repositorio. /dev/mapper/VG_Datos-VL_Datos 528443064 454190268 47409456 91% /opt/data Si calculais lo

Re: df o du

2011-03-17 Thread AngelD
Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Camaleón: El Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:50:01 +0100, Esteban Torres Rodríguez escribió: Esta es la salida de mi df de un repositorio. /dev/mapper/VG_Datos-VL_Datos 528443064 454190268 47409456 91% /opt/data Si calculais lo ofrecido menos lo ocupado no coincide con lo libre

Re: df o du

2011-03-17 Thread Camaleón
El Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:23:34 +0100, AngelD escribió: Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Camaleón: Si calculais lo ofrecido menos lo ocupado no coincide con lo libre. Quiero sacar informes sobre esto y quiero que los numeros cuadren así que no se si utilizar el du. (...) Recuerda que los sistemas de

FLISOL-DF 2011 - 09 de Abril na UNEB (910 SUL)

2011-02-05 Thread Ronald Emerson Scherolt da Costa
Este ano o FLISOL-DF será realizado na UNEB (910 Sul) no dia 09 de ABRIL. Quer ajudar a organização do evento? Tem vontade do colaborar e compartilhar o conhecimento e as informações que você tem sobre Software Livre? Esse é o momento. Mostre a força de vontade que você tem!!! *Inscreva-se como

Re: df: where is the root fs?

2010-09-02 Thread hugo vanwoerkom
Mike Bird wrote: On Wed September 1 2010 12:01:16 hugo vanwoerkom wrote: But that does not have the device: rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 none /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 none /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 udev /dev tmpfs rw,relatime,size=10240k,mode=755 0 0

Re: df: where is the root fs?

2010-09-02 Thread Anticept .
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:45 PM, hugo vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote: Hi, When I do 'df /' I get: Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda6             13456580   5923184   6849832  47% / tmpfs                   253024         0    253024   0% /lib

df: where is the root fs?

2010-09-01 Thread hugo vanwoerkom
Hi, When I do 'df /' I get: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda6 13456580 5923184 6849832 47% / tmpfs 253024 0253024 0% /lib/init/rw udev 10240 900 9340 9% /dev tmpfs

Re: df: where is the root fs?

2010-09-01 Thread Mike Bird
On Wed September 1 2010 11:45:14 hugo vanwoerkom wrote: What other way is there other than df to find where the root fs is mounted? cat /proc/mounts is authoritative even when /etc/mtab is messed up. --Mike Bird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: df: where is the root fs?

2010-09-01 Thread hugo vanwoerkom
Mike Bird wrote: On Wed September 1 2010 11:45:14 hugo vanwoerkom wrote: What other way is there other than df to find where the root fs is mounted? cat /proc/mounts is authoritative even when /etc/mtab is messed up. But that does not have the device: rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 none /sys

Re: df: where is the root fs?

2010-09-01 Thread Mike Bird
On Wed September 1 2010 12:01:16 hugo vanwoerkom wrote: But that does not have the device: rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 none /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 none /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 udev /dev tmpfs rw,relatime,size=10240k,mode=755 0 0 /dev/sda6 / ext2

Taller - Reformas a la Ley de Obras Públicas 2009, 30 de Octubre Hotel NH Mexico DF

2009-10-24 Thread Lic . Paulina Villegas
S E M I N A R I O - T A L L E R LEY DE OBRAS PÚBLICAS Y SERVICIOS RELACIONADOS CON LAS MISMAS 30 de Octubre de 2009 - Hotel NH México D.F. El presente programa esta basado en el Decreto modificatorio (DOF 28/05/2009), por el que se reforman, adicionan y derogan diversas disposiciones de

df/du shows big difference of used space

2009-09-09 Thread niclasw
I have a 1500G hard drive, encrypted. Different commands shows different usage: As root, from root directory: df -m Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/d 1390840 128452535665 98% / That is 1284G used of 1391G which

Re: df/du shows big difference of used space

2009-09-09 Thread Mike Castle
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:56 AM, niclaswniclaswm...@gmail.com wrote: I have a 1500G hard drive, encrypted. Different commands shows different usage: As root, from root directory: df -m Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/d 1390840

Re: df/du shows big difference of used space

2009-09-09 Thread Chris Jackson
Mike Castle wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:56 AM, niclaswniclaswm...@gmail.com wrote: I have a 1500G hard drive, encrypted. ... Traditionally, 5% of every file system is reserved for root to do with as it pleases. ... Additionally, depending on what filesystem you're using, you may have

Re: df/du shows big difference of used space

2009-09-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2009-09-09 13:10, Mike Castle wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:56 AM, niclaswniclaswm...@gmail.com wrote: I have a 1500G hard drive, encrypted. Different commands shows different usage: As root, from root directory: df -m Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use

output of df doesn't add up

2009-07-20 Thread Micha Feigin
For some reason the output for my main disk as given by df doesn't add up: FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 142G 123G 12G 92% / 142g - (123g + 12g) = 7g it seems that I have 7gb missing on the disk (its ext4, just crashed, I think because it went

Re: output of df doesn't add up

2009-07-20 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On Seg, 20 Jul 2009, Micha Feigin wrote: For some reason the output for my main disk as given by df doesn't add up: FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 142G 123G 12G 92% / 142g - (123g + 12g) = 7g it seems that I have 7gb missing on the disk (its

Re: output of df doesn't add up

2009-07-20 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: On Seg, 20 Jul 2009, Micha Feigin wrote: Any ideas on where the missing gb are? It's the space reserved for root. http://www.andremiller.net/content/recovering-reserved-space-ext2-and-ext3-filesystems I wouldn't recommend that approach for / though. 5% of disk

Re: output of df doesn't add up

2009-07-20 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2009-07-20 12:12, Micha Feigin wrote: For some reason the output for my main disk as given by df doesn't add up: FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 142G 123G 12G 92% / That's a whole lot, just for root. Is /home on a separate partition

Re: output of df doesn't add up

2009-07-20 Thread Micha Feigin
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:22:04 +0200 Johannes Wiedersich johan...@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de wrote: Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: On Seg, 20 Jul 2009, Micha Feigin wrote: Any ideas on where the missing gb are? It's the space reserved for root.

[HS] réponse de la commande df

2009-06-08 Thread mathias dufresne
Bonjour à tous, Je viens de m'apercevoir que la comande df affiche des résultats souvent incohérents sur mes FS en ext3, sur des serveurs Solaris en UFS, mais semble fonctionner convenablement sur les netapp : linuxhp001:/mnt/volm01_00/etc# df | egrep '^[ \t]*[0-9]' | awk '{ print $1, $2 + $3

Re: [HS] réponse de la commande df

2009-06-08 Thread Alain Vaugham
Le lundi 8 juin 2009 16:21, mathias dufresne a écrit : Bonjour à tous, Bonjour, Je viens de m'apercevoir que la comande df affiche des résultats souvent incohérents sur mes FS en ext3, sur des serveurs Solaris en UFS, mais semble fonctionner convenablement sur les netapp : [...] Une autre

Re: [HS] réponse de la commande df

2009-06-08 Thread Alain Baeckeroot
Le 08/06/2009 à 16:21, mathias dufresne a écrit : # df | egrep '^[ \t]*[0-9]' | awk '{ print $1, $2 + $3, $5 }' 7680168 7292304 / 18578172 17823200 /home On voit nettement ici que la somme espace utilisé + espace libre diffère de la taille totale sur de l'ext3 a mon avis, c'est que les

Re: [HS] réponse de la commande df

2009-06-08 Thread Rémi Vanicat
mathias dufresne mathias.dufre...@gmail.com writes: Bonjour à tous, Je viens de m'apercevoir que la comande df affiche des résultats souvent incohérents sur mes FS en ext3, sur des serveurs Solaris en UFS, mais semble fonctionner convenablement sur les netapp : linuxhp001:/mnt/volm01_00

Re: [HS] réponse de la commande df

2009-06-08 Thread Sylvain Sauvage
Alain Baeckeroot, lundi 8 juin 2009, 17:29:02 CEST Le 08/06/2009 à 16:21, mathias dufresne a écrit : # df | egrep '^[ \t]*[0-9]' | awk '{ print $1, $2 + $3, $5 }' 7680168 7292304 / 18578172 17823200 /home On voit nettement ici que la somme espace utilisé + espace libre diffère de la

df output

2009-05-17 Thread Adam Hardy
Hi, it looks like I've messed up one of my hard drives after filling the drive up to full - deleting files is not freeing up space, at least not according to 'df'. I get this output: FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 9.2G 2.8G 6.0G 33% / tmpfs

Re: df output

2009-05-17 Thread Javier Barroso
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Adam Hardy adam@cyberspaceroad.com wrote: Hi, it looks like I've messed up one of my hard drives after filling the drive up to full - deleting files is not freeing up space, at least not according to 'df'. I get this output: Filesystem            Size

Re: df output

2009-05-17 Thread Adam Hardy
Javier Barroso on 17/05/09 19:24, wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Adam Hardy adam@cyberspaceroad.com wrote: it looks like I've messed up one of my hard drives after filling the drive up to full - deleting files is not freeing up space, at least not according to 'df'. I get

Re: df output

2009-05-17 Thread Javier Barroso
- deleting files is not freeing up space, at least not according to 'df'. I get this output: Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1             9.2G  2.8G  6.0G  33% / tmpfs                 126M     0  126M   0% /lib/init/rw udev                   10M   64K   10M   1

Re: df output

2009-05-17 Thread Adam Hardy
Javier Barroso on 17/05/09 20:48, wrote: I get this output: FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 9.2G 2.8G 6.0G 33% / tmpfs 126M 0 126M 0% /lib/init/rw udev 10M 64K 10M 1% /dev tmpfs

Re: df output

2009-05-17 Thread Adam Hardy
Adam Hardy on 17/05/09 22:44, wrote: Javier Barroso on 17/05/09 20:48, wrote: I get this output: FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 9.2G 2.8G 6.0G 33% / tmpfs 126M 0 126M 0% /lib/init/rw udev 10M

Re: setuid safe for df?

2009-01-30 Thread Eric Gerlach
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:59:57AM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: Hi all, I'm having a problem at the moment with nagios monitoring of disk space. When a filesystem is mounted in a directory that's inaccessible to the nagios user, df doesn't work for it. Is df considered safe to be setuid

setuid safe for df?

2009-01-29 Thread Richard Hector
Hi all, I'm having a problem at the moment with nagios monitoring of disk space. When a filesystem is mounted in a directory that's inaccessible to the nagios user, df doesn't work for it. Is df considered safe to be setuid? Any other suggestions? Thanks, Richard signature.asc Description

Re: cmd 'df' trazendo informação errada

2009-01-21 Thread Fabiano Pires
2008/12/18 PEdroArthur_JEdi pedro.fo...@gmail.com Como dito pelo colega, os arquivos, apesar de apagados, ainda podem estar em uso. Com o comando a seguir você poderá mandar um sinal HUP para todos os processos que possuem arquivos abertos no /var, mas esses arquivos não existem: lsof |

cmd 'df' trazendo informação errada

2008-12-18 Thread Pedro Debian
Olá pessoal, Eu limpei os dados da partição /var que estava ficando cheia, mas no entanto, o quando executo o comando df -h /var, ainda é exibido o espaço que estava sento utilizado anteriormente mas se executo du -hs /var ele retorna que o espaço disponível é bem maior e compatível com o

Re: cmd 'df' trazendo informação errada

2008-12-18 Thread André Moura
quando executo o comando df -h /var, ainda é exibido o espaço que estava sento utilizado anteriormente mas se executo du -hs /var ele retorna que o espaço disponível é bem maior e compatível com o espaço liberado depois da eliminação dos arquivos que realizei. A pergunta é, é possível de alguma

Re: cmd 'df' trazendo informação errada

2008-12-18 Thread PEdroArthur_JEdi
Como dito pelo colega, os arquivos, apesar de apagados, ainda podem estar em uso. Com o comando a seguir você poderá mandar um sinal HUP para todos os processos que possuem arquivos abertos no /var, mas esses arquivos não existem: lsof | awk '$9 ~ /\/var\// {system(if ! [ -e $9 ]; then kill

Re: cmd 'df' trazendo informação errada - resolvido

2008-12-18 Thread Pedro Debian
não tinha interpretado o comando e ainda estava usando o log com tamanho antigo. Reiniciei o serviço e o 'df' agora está trazendo o espaço livre corretamente. Obrigado pelas dicas. Abraço Pedro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Festival Software Livre - DF

2008-08-11 Thread Flamarion Jorge
Bom dia todos. Estou enviando o link para o conhecimento de todos, lembrando que a submissão de trabalhos já está aberta. E em breve as inscrições estarão abertas também. Como esta mensagem está sendo enviada para varias listas, queria fazer um pedido ao pessoal da tradução, que façam um

Re: Festival Software Livre - DF

2008-08-11 Thread Flamarion Jorge
Puxa vida esqueci de enviar o link. Mas agora vai. http://www.festivalsoftwarelivre.org/evento/ Att Flamarion Jorge Flamarion Jorge escreveu: Bom dia todos. Estou enviando o link para o conhecimento de todos, lembrando que a submissão de trabalhos já está aberta. E em breve as inscrições

Re: [LDP-Br] Festival Software Livre - DF

2008-08-11 Thread ¡ElCheVive!
cade o link? abraços, Luiz Fernando 2008/8/11 Flamarion Jorge [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bom dia todos. Estou enviando o link para o conhecimento de todos, lembrando que a submissão de trabalhos já está aberta. E em breve as inscrições estarão abertas também. Como esta mensagem está sendo enviada

Re: [LDP-Br] Festival Software Livre - DF

2008-08-11 Thread Fernando Boaglio
Eu fui convidado por eles para falar sobre o KDE e a LDP-BR, já confirmei minha presença! =) []'s Fernando Boaglio 2008/8/11 Flamarion Jorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bom dia todos. Estou enviando o link para o conhecimento de todos, lembrando que a submissão de trabalhos já está aberta. E em

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >