in=gpg
>
> Concur. You didn't indicate whether you use mbox or maildir format (or
> something else). Claws-mail will likely be able to read your existing
> emails with no issues.
evolution also has good support for OpenPGP mail.
Both Claws and evolution use GnuPG as backend (as di
On Tuesday, 3 Jan 2023 at 21:27, Michel Verdier wrote:
> I use Gnus (on emacs). I fetch mails with pop3s from different providers,
> send mails to corresponding smtp servers based on sending address (could
> be different criteria). I use nnml backend which store 1 mail per file,
> so no big databa
Am 03.01.2023 um 15:04 schrieb Jeffrey Walton:> Claws email with the GPG
plugin is popular. It may be a good fit for you, too.
>
> https://www.claws-mail.org/plugin.php?plugin=gpg
>
> Jeff
Thank you so much. I am going to check it out, test it and possibly
prepare the transition if all goes well.
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 09:04:12 -0500
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Claws email with the GPG plugin is popular. It may be a good fit for
> you, too.
>
> https://www.claws-mail.org/plugin.php?plugin=gpg
Concur. You didn't indicate whether you use mbox or maildir format (or
something else). Claws-mail will
Le 3 janvier 2023 DdB a écrit :
> How are YOU dealing with encryption, with multiple providers, with
> addresses created on-the-fly, with a huge email history, and so on?
I use Gnus (on emacs). I fetch mails with pop3s from different providers,
send mails to corresponding smtp servers based on se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, January 3rd, 2023 at 12:46 AM, DdB
wrote:
> How are YOU dealing with encryption, with multiple providers, with
> addresses created on-the-fly, with a huge email history, and so on?
Protonmail with its
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 2:47 AM DdB
wrote:
>
> i feel the time has come to find a more up-to-date replacement for my
> email-solution, but ...
>
> Up til now, i am using Thunderbird (52.9.1 (64-Bit) + Enigmail +
> ToneQuilla + Virtual Identity and more ...) on stretch from inside
Hello List,
i feel the time has come to find a more up-to-date replacement for my
email-solution, but ...
Up til now, i am using Thunderbird (52.9.1 (64-Bit) + Enigmail +
ToneQuilla + Virtual Identity and more ...) on stretch from inside a
Virtualbox-VM.
That allowed to correspond seamlessly
Greg Marks wrote on 10/21/20 5:23 PM:
I had no problems transitioning from Enigmail to Thunderbird 78.3.1,
which has removed Enigmail. With an existing GPG installation, it
was necessary to run the command "gpg --export-secret-keys --armor >
private_key.asc" for importation int
> > I had no problems transitioning from Enigmail to Thunderbird 78.3.1,
> > which has removed Enigmail. With an existing GPG installation, it
> > was necessary to run the command "gpg --export-secret-keys --armor >
> > private_key.asc" for importation i
Greg Marks wrote on 10/13/20 9:37 AM:
I had no problems transitioning from Enigmail to Thunderbird 78.3.1,
which has removed Enigmail. With an existing GPG installation, it
was necessary to run the command "gpg --export-secret-keys --armor >
private_key.asc" for importation int
On 10/13/20 9:14 AM, D. R. Evans wrote:
[snip]
I'm wondering if
any enigmail user here has installed the update, and if they have had any
problems with the transition to the new enigmail-less encrypted e-mail system.
On Buster, I have installed the thunderbird update and removed eni
On 13-10-2020 23:26, D. R. Evans wrote:
> I see that the latest official updates to debian stable want to remove
> enigmail and install a new version of Thunderbird.
>
> I recall a couple of years ago the same thing happened, and encrypted e-mail
> was effectively broken for a c
Greg Marks wrote on 10/13/20 9:37 AM:
>> So I'd like to know if anyone who uses encrypted e-mail has taken
>> the plunge and installed the newer version of Thunderbird that the
>> official buster repository is offering (and also, therefore, removed
>> enigmail); an
> So I'd like to know if anyone who uses encrypted e-mail has taken
> the plunge and installed the newer version of Thunderbird that the
> official buster repository is offering (and also, therefore, removed
> enigmail); and, if so, have there been any issues with using e
On 10/13/2020 5:14 PM, D. R. Evans wrote:
to...@tuxteam.de wrote on 10/13/20 8:25 AM:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 07:26:28AM -0600, D. R. Evans wrote:
repository. But I seem to recall reading somewhere a while back that the
enigmail functionality was going to be incorporated into Thunderbird
to...@tuxteam.de wrote on 10/13/20 8:25 AM:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 07:26:28AM -0600, D. R. Evans wrote:
>> repository. But I seem to recall reading somewhere a while back that the
>> enigmail functionality was going to be incorporated into Thunderbird
>> upstream.
>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 07:26:28AM -0600, D. R. Evans wrote:
> I see that the latest official updates to debian stable want to remove
> enigmail and install a new version of Thunderbird.
>
> I recall a couple of years ago the same thing happened, and encrypted e-mail
> was effecti
I see that the latest official updates to debian stable want to remove
enigmail and install a new version of Thunderbird.
I recall a couple of years ago the same thing happened, and encrypted e-mail
was effectively broken for a couple of months until a version of enigmail
compatible with the
> > >> I see that the update to debian stable that I was going to do today
> > >> wants to update thunderbird but remove enigmail.
> >
> >
> > That seems to affect oldstable too, but kept back. I have:
> > ~# apt list --upgradable
> > Listing..
s to update thunderbird but remove enigmail.
>
>
> That seems to affect oldstable too, but kept back. I have:
> ~# apt list --upgradable
> Listing... Done
> icedove/oldstable,oldstable 1:68.2.2-1~deb9u1 all [upgradable from:
> 1:60.9.0-1~deb9u1]
> iceowl-extension/oldstab
On Mon 18/Nov/2019 21:15:41 +0100 Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:57:16PM -0700, D. R. Evans wrote:
>> I see that the update to debian stable that I was going to do today
>> wants to update thunderbird but remove enigmail.
That seems to affect oldstable too, but kep
D. R. Evans wrote on 11/18/19 12:57 PM:
> I see that the update to debian stable that I was going to do today wants to
> update thunderbird but remove enigmail. Does anyone have any insight into how
> long it is likely to take before enigmail will be made compatible with the
> thun
Hi.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:57:16PM -0700, D. R. Evans wrote:
> I see that the update to debian stable that I was going to do today
> wants to update thunderbird but remove enigmail. Does anyone have any
> insight into how long it is likely to take before enigmail will
I see that the update to debian stable that I was going to do today wants to
update thunderbird but remove enigmail. Does anyone have any insight into how
long it is likely to take before enigmail will be made compatible with the
thunderbird that debian stable wants to install?
I remember that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
> On 24/6/19 12:14 am, The Wanderer wrote:
>> The short version of this is that I think I need to clear out a
>> lot of irrelevant keys / signatures, et cetera, from my gnupg
>> configuration - but I don't want to do anything which risks losing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 24/6/19 12:14 am, The Wanderer wrote:
> The short version of this is that I think I need to clear out a
> lot of irrelevant keys / signatures, et cetera, from my gnupg
> configuration - but I don't want to do anything which risks losing
> m
trieve keys from
>>> keyservers when you verify a signature made by an unknown key.
>
>> An interesting suggestion. I'm not sure how it'd interact with
>> Enigmail (which is what is actually initiating the verification),
>> but it's worth investigating.
e made by an unknown key.
> An interesting suggestion. I'm not sure how it'd interact with
> Enigmail (which is what is actually initiating the verification), but
> it's worth investigating.
I have never used Enigmail but if it executes "gpg --verify" then gpg
will
eys and thus making your keyring large
> and slow.
An interesting suggestion. I'm not sure how it'd interact with Enigmail
(which is what is actually initiating the verification), but it's worth
investigating.
>> For reference, the file which I suspect contains those public keys
>
The Wanderer [2019-06-23 10:14:19-04:00] wrote:
> Some years ago, I got tired of manually importing the key every time I
> saw a signed message through the Debian mailing lists for which I didn't
> already have the necessary public key.
If you add line "auto-key-retrieve" to your ~/.gnupg/gpg.con
however, I want to lay out
the entire situation.
The primary way in which I make use of gnupg is via Thunderbird and the
Enigmail extension.
In addition to permitting me to sign and/or encrypt messages I send,
this serves to validate E-mails received from others, by checking the
signature a
Georgios [2019-03-03 10:02:01+02] wrote:
> After i send my email to the list I found a forum discussion that led
> nowhere. I solved my problem by changing enigmail settings. I changed
> "prefer s/mime" to "prefer enigmail(openpgp)"
S/MIME format is for X.509 certi
Thanks for your reply.
After i send my email to the list I found a forum discussion that led
nowhere. I solved my problem by changing enigmail settings.
I changed "prefer s/mime" to "prefer enigmail(openpgp)"
On 3/2/19 11:27 PM, riveravaldez wrote:
>> I want to repo
I found a discussion in a forum that led nowhere. I "solve" the problem
by changing my settings by choosing "prefer enigmail(openpgp)" vs
"prefer s/mime".
On 3/2/19 11:27 PM, riveravaldez wrote:
>> I want to report it as a bug. How should i report it
> I want to report it as a bug. How should i report it as a thunderbird or
> enigmail bug?
Have you checked upstream on Thunderbird [1,2,3] and Enigmail [4,5]
sites/communities?
[1] https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/
[2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Thunderbird
[3]
ified in
your Mail & Newsgroup Account Settings, or the certificate has expired."
If i press encryption button twice (encryption on encryption off) the
problem is solved.
Any ideas how to solve it?
I want to report it as a bug. How should i report it as a thunderbird or
enigmail bug?
T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/02/2019 12:26, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Dider Gaumet, on 2019-02-03 : >> In my previous test I did not close
> Thunderbird before reopening the
>> signed and encrypted draft message. >> this time I did it and nothing
changed: The right titl
Dider Gaumet, on 2019-02-03 :
> In my previous test I did not close Thunderbird before reopening the
> signed and encrypted draft message.
> this time I did it and nothing changed: The right title of the draft was
> still there.
Good Day,
It could have been temporary, I've seen these symptoms som
sent after reopening Thunderbird.
In case it could be significant:
- I use Gnome desktop environment (if you use a lighter DE or a WM it
would be possible that a library that improves Thunderbird/Enigmail (but
is neither considered recommand or suggest) is not installed.
- I used my gmail address, so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/02/2019 20:08, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> On 2/2/19, Thomas D Dial wrote: >> I noticed this a few weeks
> or a month ago and took it to be a
somewhat >> inelegant, maybe incompletely implemented, feature intended
to improve >> metadata secu
On 2/2/19, Thomas D Dial wrote:
> I noticed this a few weeks or a month ago and took it to be a somewhat
> inelegant, maybe incompletely implemented, feature intended to improve
> metadata security. I believe "Encrypted message" also becomes the
> subject of the transmitted message.
>
> Exposure o
On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 18:26 +, Paul Sutton wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thunderbird + Enigmail has an option in "account settings" OpenPGP
> Security to save a draft of a message with encryption, as expected
> this
> saves the draft but with a new subject as "Encrypted me
On 02/02/2019 13:12, Paul Sutton wrote:
> On 02/02/2019 09:14, didier gaumet wrote:
>> Hello Paul,
>>
>> Same versions of thunderbird and Enigmail here but Debian Buster.
>>
>> I do not observe the same thing as you do: the draft is saved with the
>> in
On 02/02/2019 09:14, didier gaumet wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> Same versions of thunderbird and Enigmail here but Debian Buster.
>
> I do not observe the same thing as you do: the draft is saved with the
> intended title
>
> It is probably of no importance but my Debian
Hello Paul,
Same versions of thunderbird and Enigmail here but Debian Buster.
I do not observe the same thing as you do: the draft is saved with the
intended title
It is probably of no importance but my Debian (and Thunderbird) is in french
On 01/02/2019 21:24, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> On 2/1/19 7:26 PM, Paul Sutton wrote:
>> If you save the message, close the compose window, then go to Drafts,
>> then reopen the message for more editing before sending the subject
>> remains as "Encrypted message" and you lose the original subject
On 2/1/19 7:26 PM, Paul Sutton wrote:
> If you save the message, close the compose window, then go to Drafts,
> then reopen the message for more editing before sending the subject
> remains as "Encrypted message" and you lose the original subject header.
>
> I just wondered if this is what is m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
Thunderbird + Enigmail has an option in "account settings" OpenPGP
Security to save a draft of a message with encryption, as expected this
saves the draft but with a new subject as "Encrypted message" and it
appears in dra
I see there is currently an update
> > (presumably security related?) for thunderbird. But as this upgrade would
> > remove enigmail I chose (at least for the moment) to not implement it.
> >
> > Does anyone know if there are plans in the works for an associated upgrade
his upgrade would
> remove enigmail I chose (at least for the moment) to not implement it.
>
> Does anyone know if there are plans in the works for an associated upgrade of
> enigmail so that it might be possible in the near future to upgrade
> thunderbird without losing embedded sup
Hi, Sven.
On 17/09/18 18:36, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I run debian stretch:
>>
>> ni@quark:/etc$ cat debian_version
>> 9.5
>>
>> and I use a number of email clients. I see there is currently an update
>> (presumably security related?) for thunderbird. But
On 2018-09-17 16:46 -0400, ernst doubt wrote:
> I run debian stretch:
>
> ni@quark:/etc$ cat debian_version
> 9.5
>
> and I use a number of email clients. I see there is currently an update
> (presumably security related?) for thunderbird. But as this upgrade would
> rem
ut as this upgrade would
> remove enigmail I chose (at least for the moment) to not implement it.
>
> Does anyone know if there are plans in the works for an associated upgrade of
> enigmail so that it might be possible in the near future to upgrade
> thunderbird without losing e
Greetings,
I run debian stretch:
ni@quark:/etc$ cat debian_version
9.5
and I use a number of email clients. I see there is currently an update
(presumably security related?) for thunderbird. But as this upgrade would
remove enigmail I chose (at least for the moment) to not implement it.
Does
D. R. Evans wrote on 08/07/2017 10:45 AM:
> Daniel Bareiro wrote on 08/07/2017 09:36 AM:
>
>>>
>>> BUT enigmail won't run because it seems that the current update requires a
>>> version of gnupg that is more recent than the official version that is part
&
Daniel Bareiro wrote on 08/07/2017 09:36 AM:
>>
>> BUT enigmail won't run because it seems that the current update requires a
>> version of gnupg that is more recent than the official version that is part
>> of
>> the repositories :-(
>
> I don't
Hi, Doc.
On 07/08/17 10:05, D. R. Evans wrote:
> I have been away for a week, and this morning saw that enigmail had been
> updated in my absence, so I updated all the jessie updates offered me by the
> official repositories.
>
> This updated thunderbird and enigmail, as exp
I have been away for a week, and this morning saw that enigmail had been
updated in my absence, so I updated all the jessie updates offered me by the
official repositories.
This updated thunderbird and enigmail, as expected.
BUT enigmail won't run because it seems that the current u
Hi, Jason.
On 25/07/17 21:54, Jason Wittlin-Cohen wrote:
> Sorry for the oversight.
No problem.
> I am actually running on Stretch, so I'm using
> Enigmail 1.9.7. Perhaps someone can backport the version from Stretch
> to Jessie to resolve this issue.
It seems that it
stall enigmail=2:1.8.2-4~deb8u1
apt -t jessie-backports install xul-ext-sogo-connector
And you need some kind of pinning...
Thanks for your contribution.
I see that yesterday was published the DSA-3921-1 referring to the bug
869774 talking about Enigmail 1.9.8.1 to restore full compatibility.
But I
graded, this worked for me:
>
> apt remove thunderbird icedove
> apt install thunderbird=1:45.8.0-3~deb8u1
> apt install thunderbird-l10n-nl=1:45.8.0-3~deb8u1
> apt install lightning=1:45.8.0-3~deb8u1
> apt install lightning-l10n-nl=1:45.8.0-3~deb8u1
> apt install icedove=1:45.8.0-3
urity/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found [IP: 217.196.149.233 80])
What do I miss?
Try: deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
Yes, I have that already, but according to apt-cache it still has enigmail
2:1.8.2-4~deb8u1.
Indeed. Looking at https://packages.debian.org/searc
md64/Packages
>> 404 Not Found [IP: 217.196.149.233 80])
>>
>> What do I miss?
>
> Try: deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
Yes, I have that already, but according to apt-cache it still has enigmail
2:1.8.2-4~deb8u1.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Op 29-07-17 om 12:20 schreef Alessandro Vesely:
(I tried ``deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie-security main'' but got W:
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/jessie-security/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found [IP: 217.196.149.233 80])
What do I miss?
Try: deb http://secu
ity.debian.org solved the problem for firefox-esr. However,
enigmail seems to be somewhere else.
root@pcale:/tmp# apt-cache policy enigmail
enigmail:
Installed: 2:1.8.2-4~deb8u1
Candidate: 2:1.8.2-4~deb8u1
Version table:
*** 2:1.8.2-4~deb8u1 0
500 http://debian.fastweb.it/debian/ jessi
worked for me:
apt remove thunderbird icedove
apt install thunderbird=1:45.8.0-3~deb8u1
apt install thunderbird-l10n-nl=1:45.8.0-3~deb8u1
apt install lightning=1:45.8.0-3~deb8u1
apt install lightning-l10n-nl=1:45.8.0-3~deb8u1
apt install icedove=1:45.8.0-3~deb8u1
apt install enigmail=2:1.8.2-4~
Hi, Doc.
On 26/07/17 11:05, D. R. Evans wrote:
>> I just updated Thunderbird on Jessie. Support for the 45.x series has
>> ended, so starting with this update Debian is now following the 52.x
>> releases.
>>
>> But after the update, Enigmail stopped working. In f
Hi, rpr.
On 26/07/17 07:20, rpr // wrote:
> According I see, the Debian Jessie package has the version 1.8.2 for
> Enigmail:
>
> root@orion:~# aptitude show enigmail | grep Versión
> Versión: 2:1.8.2-4~deb8u1
>
> But this version does not seem
Daniel Bareiro wrote on 07/25/2017 03:18 PM:
> Hi all!
>
> I just updated Thunderbird on Jessie. Support for the 45.x series has
> ended, so starting with this update Debian is now following the 52.x
> releases.
>
> But after the update, Enigmail stopped working. In fac
On 26 July 2017 at 01:47, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
>
> According I see, the Debian Jessie package has the version 1.8.2 for
> Enigmail:
>
> root@orion:~# aptitude show enigmail | grep Versión
> Versión: 2:1.8.2-4~deb8u1
>
> But this version does not seem to be compatibl
Sorry for the oversight. I am actually running on Stretch, so I'm using
Enigmail 1.9.7. Perhaps someone can backport the version from Stretch to
Jessie to resolve this issue.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Daniel Bareiro
wrote:
> Hi, Jason.
>
> Thanks for your reply. But ple
Hi again, Georgi.
On 25/07/17 20:21, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
>>>> I'll try to sign this message because I have not used Enigmail for a
>>>> long time.
>>> Thanks for trying this. I appreciate it. Did you manage to sign it?
>> Yes, I signed the mes
Hi, Jason.
Thanks for your reply. But please respond to the list so that we can all
take advantage of the contribution.
On 25/07/17 18:54, Jason Wittlin-Cohen wrote:
> I'm not seeing the behavior you described with Thunderbird + Enigmail.
Thats weird. Are you using Debian Jessie pack
Hi, Georgi.
On 25/07/17 19:26, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
>>> I'll try to sign this message because I have not used Enigmail for a
>>> long time.
>> Thanks for trying this. I appreciate it. Did you manage to sign it?
> Yes, I signed the message, you should be a
On 07/26/2017 01:05 AM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
>
> On 25/07/17 18:23, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
>
>>> I just updated Thunderbird on Jessie. Support for the 45.x series has
>>> ended, so starting with this update Debian is now following the 52.x
>>> releases.
&g
On 25/07/17 18:23, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
>> I just updated Thunderbird on Jessie. Support for the 45.x series has
>> ended, so starting with this update Debian is now following the 52.x
>> releases.
>>
>> But after the update, Enigmail stopped working. In f
On 07/26/2017 12:18 AM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I just updated Thunderbird on Jessie. Support for the 45.x series has
> ended, so starting with this update Debian is now following the 52.x
> releases.
>
> But after the update, Enigmail stopped working. In fac
Hi all!
I just updated Thunderbird on Jessie. Support for the 45.x series has
ended, so starting with this update Debian is now following the 52.x
releases.
But after the update, Enigmail stopped working. In fact, when I go to
(my email account) -> Settings-> OpenGPG security, none
Am 02.04.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:15:44PM +0200, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> I've got a quiet big keyring (>2k keys inside it) and since last updates
>> of enigmail I'm recognizing issues with it. Ehenever it's
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:15:44PM +0200, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> I've got a quiet big keyring (>2k keys inside it) and since last updates
> of enigmail I'm recognizing issues with it. Ehenever it's about
> verifying a signature Enigmail is starting a gpg2 process l
Hi folks,
I've got a quiet big keyring (>2k keys inside it) and since last updates
of enigmail I'm recognizing issues with it. Ehenever it's about
verifying a signature Enigmail is starting a gpg2 process like that
/usr/bin/gpg2 --charset utf-8 --display-charset utf-8 --batch
On 2013-10-31 20:44 +0100, Matej Kosik wrote:
> I have recently noticed that it is no longer possible to install
> enigmail from Debian (Jessie) repositories without uninstalling
> icedove.
> Aptitude reports:
>
>"enigmail breaks icedove"
>
> This is puzzlin
Dear fellows,
I have recently noticed that it is no longer possible to install enigmail from
Debian (Jessie) repositories without uninstalling icedove.
Aptitude reports:
"enigmail breaks icedove"
This is puzzling because enigmail without icedove is not useful.
My workaround is
It's magically started working. Thank you, computer Gods.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:55 AM, John Tate wrote:
> Enigmail is no longer automatically decrypting emails or allowing me
> to do it manually in Icedove. There is nothing out of the ordinary in
> the
Enigmail is no longer automatically decrypting emails or allowing me
to do it manually in Icedove. There is nothing out of the ordinary in
the console output.
--
www.johntate.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On 02/04/12 03:15, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> On 01.04.2012 19:30, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
>> On 01/04/12 15:00, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:07:48 +0300, Matthias Andersson wrote:
>>>
>>>> The latest version of enigmail isn't compatible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01.04.2012 19:30, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> On 01/04/12 15:00, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:07:48 +0300, Matthias Andersson wrote:
>>
>>> The latest version of enigmail isn't compatible with icedove
>&g
On 01/04/12 15:00, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:07:48 +0300, Matthias Andersson wrote:
>
>> The latest version of enigmail isn't compatible with icedove 3.1.16. Is
>> there a version that will work or another extension that will perform
>> the same task (
El 2012-04-01 a las 17:30 +0100, Sian Mountbatten escribió:
(resending to the list)
> On 01/04/12 15:00, Camaleón wrote:
> > On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:07:48 +0300, Matthias Andersson wrote:
> >
> >> The latest version of enigmail isn't compatible with icedove 3.1.16.
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:07:48 +0300, Matthias Andersson wrote:
> The latest version of enigmail isn't compatible with icedove 3.1.16. Is
> there a version that will work or another extension that will perform
> the same task (gpg encryption)?
In what way "incompatible"?
On 01/04/12 20:07, Matthias Andersson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The latest version of enigmail isn't compatible with icedove 3.1.16. Is
> there a version that will work or another extension that will perform
> the same task (gpg encryption)?
>
> //Matthias
>
>
I don&#
Hi!
The latest version of enigmail isn't compatible with icedove 3.1.16. Is
there a version that will work or another extension that will perform
the same task (gpg encryption)?
//Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
On Fri, 06 May 2011 20:04:36 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> On 2011-05-06 20:02, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>> On 2011-05-06 19:46, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
There is an additional '>' char at the beginning of the 3rd line of
the body (nothing was quoted in this e-mail, it was a "new
On 2011-05-06 20:02, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> On 2011-05-06 19:46, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Fri, 06 May 2011 19:08:11 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>>
>>> Today I sent an e-mail from my Icedove 2.0.0.24 and I am pretty sure it
>>> looks different in my Sent folder (and in Sent folder file) tha
On 2011-05-06 19:46, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 06 May 2011 19:08:11 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>
>> Today I sent an e-mail from my Icedove 2.0.0.24 and I am pretty sure it
>> looks different in my Sent folder (and in Sent folder file) than it was
>> when I was sending it.
>>
>> There is an
, but with no result.
>
> How weird... Can you reproduce it?
>
> Maybe was just a "fat-finger" issue (you looked for "shif+Z" but pressed
> "shift+<" instead) :-)
>
> > I have Enigmail 0.95.0 plugin. Is that so, that each outgoing Icedove
; issue (you looked for "shif+Z" but pressed
"shift+<" instead) :-)
> I have Enigmail 0.95.0 plugin. Is that so, that each outgoing Icedove
> e-mail is processed by Enigmail, and Enigmail can change it?? What is
> the workflow here?
Did you encrypt or sign the mes
it was a "new mail").
Has anyone encountered anything similar?
I ran memtest86+, but with no result.
I have Enigmail 0.95.0 plugin. Is that so, that each outgoing Icedove
e-mail is processed by Enigmail, and Enigmail can change it?? What is
the workflow here?
--
Eisenbits - proven s
Hello Camaleón,
Am 2010-06-13 16:31:01, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Unfortunately
> PGP/MIME is not supported by all mailclients; those that currently are
> compatible with it are Enigmail, Apple Mail, Becky, Evolution, KMail,
> Mulberry, Sylpheed, and The Bat!.
Arg
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
