Le 12-06-2023, à 21:25:40 +0200, Michel Verdier a écrit :
On 2023-06-11, steve wrote:
After a few days with this configuration, same errors are still present.
I guess I'll have either to reinstall or go the postfix way.
Just to be sure before you reinstall can you provide
exim -bP |
On 2023-06-11, steve wrote:
>>> After a few days with this configuration, same errors are still present.
>>>
>>> I guess I'll have either to reinstall or go the postfix way.
>>
>>Just to be sure before you reinstall can you provide
>>exim -bP | gr
stall can you provide
exim -bP | grep syslog
syslog_duplication
syslog_facility =
syslog_pid
syslog_processname = exim
syslog_timestamp
On 2023-06-10, steve wrote:
> Hi Michel and al,
>
> After a few days with this configuration, same errors are still present.
>
> I guess I'll have either to reinstall or go the postfix way.
Just to be sure before you reinstall can you provide
exim -bP | grep syslog
Hi Michel and al,
After a few days with this configuration, same errors are still present.
I guess I'll have either to reinstall or go the postfix way.
Have a nice day,
steve
Le 05-06-2023, à 10:50:00 +0200, Michel Verdier a écrit :
Le 5 juin 2023 Steve a écrit :
if one succeed without me
Le 05-06-2023, à 10:50:00 +0200, Michel Verdier a écrit :
Le 5 juin 2023 Steve a écrit :
if one succeed without message and with code 0, add in
/etc/logrotate.d/exim4-base and /etc/logrotate.d/exim4-paniclog
postrotate
systemctl exim4-base
endscript
if you add reload but still get
Le 5 juin 2023 Steve a écrit :
>>if one succeed without message and with code 0, add in
>>/etc/logrotate.d/exim4-base and /etc/logrotate.d/exim4-paniclog
>>
>>postrotate
>>systemctl exim4-base
>>endscript
>>
>>if you add reload but still get the error try restart, I don't know if
>>th
error
+tls_certificate_verified +tls_peerdn
exim writes directly to the logfiles. If you get the error almost every
day it can be because of the rotation.
This error appears everyday. I boot my machine every morning at 6 am.
I don't know it exim provide a reload command, so try
systemctl reload exim4-base
Le 5 juin 2023 Steve a écrit :
> Merci pour ton aide Michel.
De rien :) Let's continue in english for the list
> log_file_path = /var/log/exim4/%slog
> log_selector = +smtp_protocol_error +smtp_syntax_error
> +tls_certificate_verified +tls_peerdn
exim writes directly to the
Le 05-06-2023, à 09:09:05 +0200, Michel Verdier a écrit :
Le 5 juin 2023 Steve a écrit :
Yes, nothing is done after rotation. But I don't remember the default
exim logging mechanism. Can you provide
grep -r log_file_path /etc/exim*
This gives nothing.
Then can you provide
exim -bP
Le 5 juin 2023 Steve a écrit :
>>Yes, nothing is done after rotation. But I don't remember the default
>>exim logging mechanism. Can you provide
>>
>>grep -r log_file_path /etc/exim*
>
> This gives nothing.
Then can you provide
exim -bP
(snip ip adresses if you want)
Le 04-06-2023, à 19:11:57 +0200, Michel Verdier a écrit :
Le 4 juin 2023 Steve a écrit :
Does this help?
Yes, nothing is done after rotation. But I don't remember the default
exim logging mechanism. Can you provide
grep -r log_file_path /etc/exim*
This gives nothing.
Le 4 juin 2023 Steve a écrit :
> Does this help?
Yes, nothing is done after rotation. But I don't remember the default
exim logging mechanism. Can you provide
grep -r log_file_path /etc/exim*
Le 04-06-2023, à 14:30:08 +0200, Michel Verdier a écrit :
Le 4 juin 2023 Steve a écrit :
2023-06-04T06:30:54.117016+02:00 box exim[24894]: 2023-06-04 06:30:54
1q5fOD-0006TT-2C failed to write to main log: length=91 result=-1 errno=9 (Bad
file descriptor)
2023-06-04T06:30:54.150516+02:00 box
Le 4 juin 2023 Steve a écrit :
> 2023-06-04T06:30:54.117016+02:00 box exim[24894]: 2023-06-04 06:30:54
> 1q5fOD-0006TT-2C failed to write to main log: length=91 result=-1 errno=9
> (Bad file descriptor)
> 2023-06-04T06:30:54.150516+02:00 box exim[24894]: write failed on panic log:
Hi,
Running Debian bookworm fully updated.
Since a couple of weeks, i see strange lines in the logs:
2023-06-04T06:30:54.117016+02:00 box exim[24894]: 2023-06-04 06:30:54
1q5fOD-0006TT-2C failed to write to main log: length=91 result=-1 errno=9 (Bad
file descriptor)
2023-06-04T06:30
On Sun 26 Mar 2023 at 12:47:45 (-0700), pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
>
> (4) "TLS on connect is not natively supported." OK but the test
> confirmed that it can work. Documentation could tell how to
> configure. Otherwise link to instructions at least.
>
> (5)
>
onnect mail.easthope.ca:465
After the certificate stuff, you should then see lines like:
...
And you carry on from there with:
AUTH PLAIN encodedstring
The test message was transmitted. Good!
(1) Section 1. in
https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_h
On Sat 25 Mar 2023 at 19:47:35 (-0700), pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> > That looks fine, and shows that you're going to send through their
> > port 465, which will require TLS and authentication. So first you need
> > to encode your username and password with:
> >
> > $ echo -e -n '\0username\0passw
ARTTLS?
TLS is seriously broken here?
Before trying the interactive process, checked a bunch of details
including instructions in https://wiki.debian.org/Exim. Generated
fresh /etc/exim4/exim.crt and /etc/exim4/exim.key.
Requested delivery of the last message in the queue.
$ e
e like:
$ openssl s_client -starttls smtp -crlf -connect hornby.islandhosting.com:465
EHLO dalton.invalid
AUTH PLAIN encodedstring
where encodedstring is the output from running the echo…base64
command. Note that it's sent encrypted.
Unlike the test of exim that you conducted with:
&g
t to: pe...@easthope.ca
data
from: pe...@easthope.ca
to: pe...@easthope.ca
subject: hand written test 01
← that's a blank line
Hand written test 01
.← that's nothing but a fullstop
Return
quit
root@dalto
On Wed 22 Mar 2023 at 13:52:00 (-0700), pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
>
> After configuring exim for a new smarthost, message sending fails.
What are the contents of /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf, the
configuration file?
> This might help to identify the problem.
>
> root@da
Hi,
In case this message is duplicated, apology in advance.
After configuring exim for a new smarthost, message sending fails.
This might help to identify the problem.
root@dalton:/home/root# exim -bh 142.103.1m.1n
SMTP testing session as if from host 142.103.1m.1n
but without any
Am 07.05.21 um 02:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
exim4 is unfortunately still SysV-only and doesn't ship a native systemd
.service file. So the correct command is
"update-rc.d exim4 disable"
For the curious: you can run "systemctl disable exim4" as well.
This will just run the above command though
exim4 is unfortunately still SysV-only and doesn't ship a native systemd
.service file. So the correct command is
"update-rc.d exim4 disable"
"update-rc.d exim4 remove" will remove the symlinks in /etc/rc?.d/ but on
the next package update, they will be recreated.
So if you want to make this a p
d this)
> update-rc.d is the correct tool and it should even take care of
> synchronizing state between systemd and sysv-rc.
Hmm. Well, I suppose it's possible, especially if the OP kept using the
wrong filename (exim vs. exim4).
I still wouldn't care to try it, personally. Knowing
On Mi, 05 mai 21, 07:46:03, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> You're using a package that has not yet been converted to systemd. It's
> still using an old init.d script, and systemd is performing a conversion
> on the fly.
>
> The basic start and stop subcommands will work fine, but disable may
> not wor
ng up
> > one of the automatically converted init.d scripts. If so, this will
> > be made clear in the systemctl status report.
>
> ● exim4.service - LSB: exim Mail Transport Agent
>Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/exim4; generated)
>Active: active (running) since Wed 2021-0
On Tue, 4 May 2021 18:44:12 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:14:45PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> > ...and buster. It's exim4.service as stated by:
> > systemctl --type=service | grep exim
>
> According to packages.debian.org[1] there is no such file
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:14:45PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> ...and buster. It's exim4.service as stated by:
> systemctl --type=service | grep exim
According to packages.debian.org[1] there is no such file in any
package.
Of course, that's not proof of the nonexistence of such a
On Tue, 4 May 2021 18:27:57 +0100
Joe wrote:
> On Tue, 4 May 2021 13:15:51 -0400
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:03:43AM -0700, John Conover wrote:
> > > That was the question, Greg:
> > >
> > > "Searching
:
> > > As per the man page for System V init, to disable launching of exim:
> > >
> > > update-rc.d -f exim remove
> >
> > What man page is this allegedly from, exactly?
unicorn:~$ man update-rc.d | grep exim
unicorn:~$ man 8 update-rc.d | grep exim
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 01:27:56PM -0700, John Conover wrote:
> As per the man page for System V init, to disable launching of exim:
>
> update-rc.d -f exim remove
What man page is this allegedly from, exactly?
For the archives, this issue was created by looking for penetration
vulnerabilities during the boot of a Debian Buster machine using
tcpdump(1) on a machine between Buster, and the it's Internet facing
router.
There was exim traffic when exim boots, but exim was SUPPOSED to be
disabled d
On 5/4/2021 7:28 PM, Erwan David wrote:
Le 04/05/2021 à 19:26, Joe a écrit :
On Tue, 4 May 2021 10:03:43 -0700
cono...@rahul.net (John Conover) wrote:
Greg Wooledge writes:
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:17:38AM -0700, John Conover wrote:
Searching for exim in
/etc/systemd/system/multi
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:27:17AM -0700, John Conover wrote:
>
> Thanks, Greg. "update-rc.d -f exim remove" is the command for
> /etc/init.d. But its broken.
You forgot to reply to the list.
Nobody with any sense uses update-rc.d for system admin work. It's
there fo
Le 04/05/2021 à 19:26, Joe a écrit :
> On Tue, 4 May 2021 10:03:43 -0700
> cono...@rahul.net (John Conover) wrote:
>
>> Greg Wooledge writes:
>>> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:17:38AM -0700, John Conover wrote:
>>>> Searching for exim in
>>>> /
On Tue, 4 May 2021 13:15:51 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:03:43AM -0700, John Conover wrote:
> > That was the question, Greg:
> >
> > "Searching for exim in
> > /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/* and
> >
On Tue, 4 May 2021 10:03:43 -0700
cono...@rahul.net (John Conover) wrote:
> Greg Wooledge writes:
> > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:17:38AM -0700, John Conover wrote:
> > > Searching for exim in
> > > /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/* and
> > >
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:03:43AM -0700, John Conover wrote:
> That was the question, Greg:
>
> "Searching for exim in
> /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/* and
> /lib/systemd/system/* yields nothing."
>
> so, it wasn't there. Which serv
Greg Wooledge writes:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:17:38AM -0700, John Conover wrote:
> > Searching for exim in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/*
> > and /lib/systemd/system/* yields nothing.
> >
> > How do I stop exim from launching across boots?
>
&
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:17:38AM -0700, John Conover wrote:
> Searching for exim in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/*
> and /lib/systemd/system/* yields nothing.
>
> How do I stop exim from launching across boots?
Presumably there is a systemd service, which is enable
I use either exim or another MTA. When I want to use the other MTA,
"update-rc.d -f exim remove" does not remove exim from "ps eax" after
today's exim update.
Searching for exim in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/*
and /lib/systemd/system/* yields nothing.
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 18. Mai 2020, 19:58:06 CEST schrieb Dan Ritter:
> > Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > I think you're overcomplicating it.
> >
> > Your domain can and should have two or more MX records, with
> > different priority levels. The MX records don't even have to
> > point to nam
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:10:33PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Just curious, if I have multiple MX records, how would you sync the incoming
> emails (*) ? I can see with an NFS mounted home directory with Maildir
> mailboxes that could work and dovecot could probably run on multiple hosts
> (o
Am Montag, 18. Mai 2020, 19:58:06 CEST schrieb Dan Ritter:
> Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am just wondering how a efficient setup for TLS/DNS for exim looks like:
> >
> > Right now I have an A entry in the DNS server for smtp. and a
> > letsenc
the very simplest systems, they can be
> > > configured to look up the MX record and use that. (Postfix has a
> > > fallback_relay option, Exim can accept multiple hosts in a
> > > route_list statement, and so forth.)
> >
> > Thanks again for your reply.
> >
; > understand that they can make use of the MX record).
> >
> > It depends on the MTA you choose for your email clients, but
> > unless you choose the very simplest systems, they can be
> > configured to look up the MX record and use that. (Postfix has a
&g
gt;
> > I was more concerned about the outgoing server configured in the email
> > clients and used to send main from my domain (at least so far I did not
> > understand that they can make use of the MX record).
>
> It depends on the MTA you choose for your email clients, b
not understand
> that they can make use of the MX record).
It depends on the MTA you choose for your email clients, but
unless you choose the very simplest systems, they can be
configured to look up the MX record and use that. (Postfix has a
fallback_relay option, Exim can accept multiple ho
Am Montag, 18. Mai 2020, 19:58:06 CEST schrieb Dan Ritter:
> Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am just wondering how a efficient setup for TLS/DNS for exim looks like:
> >
> > Right now I have an A entry in the DNS server for smtp. and a
> > letsenc
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am just wondering how a efficient setup for TLS/DNS for exim looks like:
>
> Right now I have an A entry in the DNS server for smtp. and a
> letsencrypt certificate as well.
>
> If I setup a new server and call it SMTP2, I need to
Hi,
I am just wondering how a efficient setup for TLS/DNS for exim looks like:
Right now I have an A entry in the DNS server for smtp. and a
letsencrypt certificate as well.
If I setup a new server and call it SMTP2, I need to reconfigure this in all my
email clients. If I install the SMTP
On Sat 17 Aug 2019 at 07:20:45 (-), Curt wrote:
> On 2019-08-16, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 02:20:09PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> >> AIUI exim should be able to deliver emails into a user's mbox, but
> >> I'm confused about how exim
On 2019-08-16, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 02:20:09PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>> AIUI exim should be able to deliver emails into a user's mbox, but
>> I'm confused about how exim is meant to do that, because it runs as
>> user Debian-ex
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 02:20:09PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> AIUI exim should be able to deliver emails into a user's mbox, but
> I'm confused about how exim is meant to do that, because it runs as
> user Debian-exim, but mailbox permissions are normally group:mail.
I do
AIUI exim should be able to deliver emails into a user's mbox, but
I'm confused about how exim is meant to do that, because it runs as
user Debian-exim, but mailbox permissions are normally group:mail.
For example, with exim4 on hostR set up as …
internet site; mail is sent an
who wants to scan for this vulnerability is
just going to buy access to a list of every host on the Internet
that has an open port 25, maybe an open port 25 running the
vulnerable versions of Exim if that is offered. That will be a very
manageable list of IPs. They won't have to do the scanning
themsel
On Fri 21 Jun 2019 at 21:14:42 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 21/6/19 4:08 pm, Reco wrote:
> > What I'm most interested is here is the time distribution. I.e. has
> > the number of exploitation attempts lowered after the Exim banner
> > change? Stayed the same?
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/6/19 4:08 pm, Reco wrote:
> What I'm most interested is here is the time distribution. I.e. has
> the number of exploitation attempts lowered after the Exim banner
> change? Stayed the same?
Not a single one since, so far...
51.15.227.108108-227-15-51.rev.cloud.scaleway.com.
> 1051.77.148.55 55.ip-51-77-148.eu.
> 1185.58.114.228228.pool85-58-114.dynamic.orange.es.
> 1289.248.171.57scanner20.openportstats.com.
> 1398.158.184.125 206.217.215.125.static.midphase.com.
What I'm most interested is here is the time distribution.
I.e. has the number of exploitation attempts lowered after the Exim
banner change? Stayed the same?
Reco
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:50:08PM +0100, Brian wrote:
So? Looks like a normal day. Announcing exim as version 4.92 (or any
other value) is most unlikely to reduce the number of these attempts.
I'm seeing the same attempts on postfix servers...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 21/6/19 4:49 am, Reco wrote:
>> Thank you, I've changed the banner for now let's hope that
>> lessens the problem.
>
> Please share the results if possible.
>
> On this particular MTA I've counted whopping 4 attempts to exploit
> CVE-2
On Fri 21 Jun 2019 at 04:15:35 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 20/6/19 11:57 pm, Brian wrote:
> > On Thu 20 Jun 2019 at 23:26:08 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> >
> >> # dpkg-query -l|grep \ exim|awk '{print $2,$3}'|column -t exim4
> >> 4.89-2+deb
> >
> > # rgrep banner /etc/exim4/
> > /etc/exim4/conf.d/main/02_exim4-config_options:# smtp_banner =
> > $smtp_active_hostname ESMTP Exim $version_number $tod_full
> > /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template:# smtp_banner =
> > $smtp_active_hostname ESMTP Exim $version
utsiders trying to pound on and
>> exploit the server? Even though they won't be able to do
>> successfully due to up to date patch status.
>
> # rgrep banner /etc/exim4/
> /etc/exim4/conf.d/main/02_exim4-config_options:# smtp_banner =
> $smtp_active_hostname ESMTP Exim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 20/6/19 11:57 pm, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 20 Jun 2019 at 23:26:08 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>
>> # dpkg-query -l|grep \ exim|awk '{print $2,$3}'|column -t exim4
>> 4.89-2+deb9u4 exim4-base 4.89-2+d
On Thu 20 Jun 2019 at 23:26:08 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> # dpkg-query -l|grep \ exim|awk '{print $2,$3}'|column -t
> exim4 4.89-2+deb9u4
> exim4-base 4.89-2+deb9u4
> exim4-config4.89-2+deb9u4
> exim4-daemon-heavy 4.89-2+deb9u4
>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:26:08PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Shodan [1] reports loads of vulnerable [2] servers running pre 4.92
> versions of Exim, those include Debian Exim variants reporting 4.89
> even for fully patched servers.
General answer:
https://www.debian.org/sec
uccessfully due to up to
> date patch status.
# rgrep banner /etc/exim4/
/etc/exim4/conf.d/main/02_exim4-config_options:# smtp_banner =
$smtp_active_hostname ESMTP Exim $version_number $tod_full
/etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template:# smtp_banner = $smtp_active_hostname ESMTP Exim
$version_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Shodan [1] reports loads of vulnerable [2] servers running pre 4.92
versions of Exim, those include Debian Exim variants reporting 4.89
even for fully patched servers.
$ telnet mail.example.org 25
Trying ip_add_re_ss...
Connected to
On 2019-06-10, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 04:50:06PM -, Curt wrote:
>> https://lwn.net/Articles/790553/
>>
>> I was actually going to point to another article on the subject, but as
>> it revealed the exact modus operandi for the (local) exploit (which is
>> trivial to an
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 04:50:06PM -, Curt wrote:
> https://lwn.net/Articles/790553/
>
> I was actually going to point to another article on the subject, but as
> it revealed the exact modus operandi for the (local) exploit (which is
> trivial to an extreme) I thought better of it.
https://ww
https://lwn.net/Articles/790553/
I was actually going to point to another article on the subject, but as
it revealed the exact modus operandi for the (local) exploit (which is
trivial to an extreme) I thought better of it.
--
“Decisions are never really made – at best they manage to emerge, from
On 12/09/18 19:49, Peter Wiersig wrote:
I think there is quite a lot of *.Debian.gz documentation in the various
exim4 packages.
Yes, maybe I got lost.
What's the correct way to specify a
macro (that one or others) in the Exim configuration?
I created /etc/exim4/conf.d/main/00_
Lucio writes:
>
> undocumented line IGNORE_SMTP_LINE_LENGTH_LIMIT=1 found in
> /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf, generating exim macro
>
> and that does not sound good to me.
Yeah, remove that.
I think there is quite a lot of *.Debian.gz documentation in the various
exim4 pack
I need to add the IGNORE_SMTP_LINE_LENGTH_LIMIT macro to my Exim, but I
don't know which is the configuration file where I have to write it and
I don't know the correct syntax.
I've already tried appending
IGNORE_SMTP_LINE_LENGTH_LIMIT='1'
to /etc/exim4/update-
how to get a suitable password for your userID.
(I would use this approach merely because I don't know anything
about oath.)
Anyway, what doesn't work for you and what response do you get
from exim?
What doesn't work? Can't send mail.
Long before Verizon and Oath were involved w
the wrong one.
>
> The second shows how to get a suitable password for your userID.
> (I would use this approach merely because I don't know anything
> about oath.)
>
> Anyway, what doesn't work for you and what response do you get
> from exim?
What doesn't work?
the table rows are labelled wrongly,
but it seems to show SMTP on smtp.mail.att.net ports 465 or 587
as well as the hostname you gave. I would also try port 587 on
both hostnames: it won't be the first to give the wrong one.
The second shows how to get a suitable password for your userID.
(I
On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 09:52 +0200, Kamil Jońca wrote:
> kjo...@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca) writes:
>
> [...]
> >
> > Hmm. Good point. There are two options:
> > 1. onet (my isp) is broken
> > 2. fetchmail is broken
>
> Well, quick look into fetchmail manual and we have:
> --8<---cut
kjo...@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca) writes:
[...]
>
> Hmm. Good point. There are two options:
> 1. onet (my isp) is broken
> 2. fetchmail is broken
Well, quick look into fetchmail manual and we have:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
-n | --norewrite
Tixy writes:
[..]]
>
> is a valid way of specifying a group in a field that expects an address
>
> But the log snippet the OP posted had:
>
> ... failing address in "To:" header is:
> ): "@" or "." expected after
> "Undisclosed-Recipient": failing address in "To:" header is:
>
>
> which does
On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 20:41 +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Kamil Jońca wrote:
>
> > How can I achieve this?
> > I looks like I have write custom acl, but it is not obvious to me how to
> > write proper condition in such acl.
>
> hi,
> where is the recipient?
It's specified as part of the SMTP protoco
Kamil Jońca wrote:
> How can I achieve this?
> I looks like I have write custom acl, but it is not obvious to me how to
> write proper condition in such acl.
hi,
where is the recipient?
why would you want to receive for "Undisclosed-Recipient".
I suggest you look deeper and see where it is comin
;To:" header
is:
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
If I am not wrong default configuration changed in
/etc/exim4/conf.d/acl/40_exim4-config_check_data (now headers are
syntactically checked by default)
Unfortunately I got quite a lot "Undisclosed-R
ote:
> Hi,
>
> >[]
> > so, if I want to use mail.example.com as my fqdn, and the old fqdn was
> something.else and r...@something.else was redirecting mail to
> m...@something.else ... then what do I need to change in Exim to make this
> happen?
>
> Is it maybe the alia
Hi,
>[]
> so, if I want to use mail.example.com as my fqdn, and the old fqdn was
> something.else and r...@something.else was redirecting mail to
> m...@something.else ... then what do I need to change in Exim to make this
> happen?
Is it maybe the aliases setting?
Prob
ng mail to
> m...@something.else ... then what do I need to change in Exim to make this
> happen?
>
> root@localhost is bouncing
> r...@mail.example.com <mailto:r...@mail.example.com> is bouncing
> m...@mail.example.com <mailto:m...@mail.example.com> is working
>
&g
.com as my fqdn, and the old fqdn was
something.else and r...@something.else was redirecting mail to
m...@something.else ... then what do I need to change in Exim to make this
happen?
root@localhost is bouncing
r...@mail.example.com is bouncing
m...@mail.example.com is working
/etc/mailna
.com as my fqdn, and the old fqdn was
something.else and r...@something.else was redirecting mail to
m...@something.else ... then what do I need to change in Exim to make this
happen?
root@localhost is bouncing
r...@mail.example.com is bouncing
m...@mail.example.com is working
/etc/mailna
Would anyone know offhand what might be changing the value of variable
$spam_score in the acl/40_exim4-config_check_data section of the exim4
configuration file exim4.conf.template?
It's an idle question but I'm curious why I would be getting a header like this:
X-Spam_score: 10.8
X-Spam_score_in
On 2016-10-02, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 02 Oct 2016 at 21:41:50 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 12:52:44PM +0100, Brian wrote:
>> >
>> > I have the same setup and all customisations (apart from hubbed_hosts)
>> > have been done via debconf. TBH, I cannot see why /etc/hosts s
6 at 01:05:20 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > > > On 2016-10-01, Brian wrote:
> > > > > Exim's default behaviour, as has been mentioned a couple of
> > > > > times in this thread, is to use DNS; nsswitch is not involved.
> > > >
>
On Sun 02 Oct 2016 at 21:41:50 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 12:52:44PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> >
> > I have the same setup and all customisations (apart from hubbed_hosts)
> > have been done via debconf. TBH, I cannot see why /etc/hosts should be
> > consulted because I tho
> > > Exim's default behaviour, as has been mentioned a couple of
> > > > times in this thread, is to use DNS; nsswitch is not involved.
> > >
> > > Doing an strace on the exim command shows that /etc/nsswitch is
> > > consulted first, then /etc/r
ned a couple of times in
> > > this thread, is to use DNS; nsswitch is not involved.
> >
> > Doing an strace on the exim command shows that /etc/nsswitch is
> > consulted first, then /etc/resolv.conf (followed by a DNS lookup of the
> > smarthost).
>
> T
[Some snipping. Not too much, I hope].
On Sun 02 Oct 2016 at 01:05:20 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2016-10-01, Brian wrote:
> >
> > Exim's default behaviour, as has been mentioned a couple of times in
> > this thread, is to use DNS; nsswitch is not involved.
&
ly asked about.
>
> Mark
>
>
My setup is more or less as you describe. The only difference is that
all machines are mail capable and use the local server as their
smarthost, while the server in turn uses an external smarthost.
Brian seems to be experiencing a more fundamental issue, where exim
refuses to resolve domain names in the expected manner. That one has me
stumped.
--
Liam
1 - 100 of 4695 matches
Mail list logo
