W liście z śro, 12-03-2003, godz. 15:53, Daniel Koć pisze:
zrobilem dist-upgrade Sarge i przestalo dac sie sprawdzac poczte. =o
przebudowalem ze zrodel pam -- nie pomoglo, glibc -- tez nie...
ha, ale pomoglo jak zrobilem restart systemu... =}
--
czemu nie?
tentei reconfigurar e/ou
| | | reinstalar o pacote locales, mas ele diz que não
| encontra
| | o
| | | glibc-2.2.5-11.2. Não sei como incluir esta biblioteca
| | pois
| | | não existe pacote para a mesma. E amis, neste fim de
| | semana
| | | tentei compilar um programa que baixei em codigo fonte,
| e
outro
| | aplicativo
| | | funcionasse, desde então o locales parou de funcionar.
| | | Seguinto as dicas da lista tentei reconfigurar e/ou
| | | reinstalar o pacote locales, mas ele diz que não
| encontra
| | o
| | | glibc-2.2.5-11.2. Não sei como incluir esta biblioteca
| | pois
| | | não
- Forwarded message from John H. Robinson, IV -
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:38:25 -0800
From: John H. Robinson, IV
Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Recent glibc time_t redefinition?]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remember the time_t thing we were discussing? how dates
Wenn Du von Knoppix bootest und Deine alte Platte unter /mnt/
eingebunden hast, dann müsstest Du eigentlich mit dem Knoppx-dpkg und
der --root-Option auch Pakete installieren können, ohne auf die glibc
des alten Systems zurückzugreifen.
dpkg --root=/mnt -i *.deb
Sebastian
--
Häufig gestellte
Danke fuer eure Tips,
habe leider mein Download Limit fast ueberschritten
diesen Monat (Uninetz :-)) und habs deswegen noch nicht
probieren koennen.
Also blieb mir nix anderes als ne Neuinstallation uebrig
(natuerlich nach vorheriger Datensicherung), und jetzt laeufts
wieder.
Werde mir die CD
* Sven Richter schrieb am 29.01.03 um 22:22 Uhr:
Hi,
Ich hab ganz grossen Mist gemacht.
Ich wollte auf ner anderen Partition die ich eingemountet habe
ne neue glibc compilieren, als root.
In der Konsole habe ich chroot gemacht.
Beim rummehren hin und her, habe ich dann irgendwann mal
Am Mit, 2003-01-29 um 22.22 schrieb Sven Richter:
Hi,
Ich hab ganz grossen Mist gemacht.
Schaut so aus :)
Als Rettungs-CD kann ich nur Knoppix empfehlen (knopper.net/knoppix).
Ist ein Debian mit Hardwareerkennung, X und allem, und startet direkt
von CD.
Viel Erfolg, leider kann ich mehr
help to resolve the situation:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-14.3
E: Sorry, broken packages
...but if I try to install glibc-2.2.5, I get:
# apt-get install glibc-2.2.5
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 06:05:02AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I try to install locales using apt-get I get:
# apt-get install locales
[snip]
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-14.3
dependencies:
locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-14.3
^--^
E: Sorry, broken packages
It looks like you are trying to install the testing version of
locales. Since you have a woody installation, check your
/etc/apt/sources.list to make sure it includes
an internal glibc
symbol that they shouldn't have. I think someone has told me that
blackdown has released a fixed 1.3 release, otherwise you'll have to use
the 1.4 and complain to Sun :)
-rob
msg18334/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I just tried to shutdown Tomcat 4.1.12-2 using Sun JDK
1.3.1_03 on my box running unstable. I got the
following undefined symbol message and Tomcat does not
shutdown. Does anyone have a suggestion for what I
should do other than kill the Tomcat pids? I wonder if
I do that will Tomcat be able to
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:19:41PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Is it possible to rebuild the gcc and glibc in woody with some optimized gcc
argument? I've noticed that gentoo has a /etc/make.conf in which I can defile
glibc should work. gcc is one of the few packages that won't work, it
uses
Hello list,
Is it possible to rebuild the gcc and glibc in woody with some optimized gcc
argument? I've noticed that gentoo has a /etc/make.conf in which I can defile
CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu
CFLAGS=-march=i686 -O3 -pipe
is it possible for debian woody to do so to rebuild the gcc and glibc
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:19:41PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Hello list,
Is it possible to rebuild the gcc and glibc in woody with some optimized gcc
argument? I've noticed that gentoo has a /etc/make.conf in which I can defile
CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu
CFLAGS=-march=i686 -O3 -pipe
onsdagen den 30 oktober 2002 13.43 skrev Johan Kristell:
Därför undrar jag nu om det finns något sätt att nergradera libc
tillbaks till min tidigare version. troligtvis var det väll 2.1
Jag gjorde de precis när libc6 2.3.1 var ny och hade en bugg i sig, fast är
numera tillbaka till 2.3.1-3,
-
From: Márcio de Araújo Benedito [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lista Debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Voltar a glibc da unstable para stable [era: Re: problemas
comsites em java
Em Qui, 2002-10-31 às 16:31, Nelson Luiz Campos escreveu:
É o que eu tô tentnado fazer. :)))
Pessoal;
Como consigo retornar a glibc da unstable que esta instalada para a
versao stable?
Tenho alguns pacotes nao-oficiais, como o X4.2 e kde3, que exigem
pacotes da unstable, logo se eu
Velox? Visite o Grupo Velox-Rio: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Velox-rio/
Em Qui, 2002-10-31 s 15:31, Mrcio de Arajo Benedito escreveu:
Em Qui, 2002-10-31 s 16:31, Nelson Luiz Campos escreveu:
o que eu t tentnado fazer. :)))
Pessoal;
Como consigo retornar a glibc da unstable
Em Qui, 2002-10-31 às 18:08, Adilson Junior escreveu:
Tem kde pra woody
deb http://people.debian.org/~schoepf/kde3/woody ./
Isso eu ja sei. Agora eu quero saber e como voltar a glibc do meu
sistema de unstable para stable.
[]'s
--
Marcio de Araujo Benedito - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Empresa de
not run any more:
gellert@ritch:~$ javac
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Unable to load native library: /usr/local/java/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so:
symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with
link time reference
Woah. Downgrading to older glibc would have
On 0, Gottfried Szing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig Dickson wrote:
I don't know what PSE Pro is; does it really work only on 1.3? You can't
use 1.4.1? What I've done for a few things is use 1.4.1 with the
j2ee.jar from 1.3 (since AFAIK there is still no jdk1.4-ee). I haven't
found this to
Nie wiecie przypadkiem gdzie znajdę polską dokumnętację do Apache'a i glibc.
Piotrek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
michael loeffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[perror() ändert errno]
Zum Thema undefinierter zustand von errno, entweder eine funktion ändert
nichts an errno und führt auch keine anderen funktionen aus die etwas
ändern könnten, oder sie ädert errno bzw. führt weitere funktionen aus
welche
I need a version of glibc that uses the GS segment register to access
pthread-local storage*. I've neither been able to find one for debian nor is it
obvious to me from looking through the sources how to compile it to use %gs.
Any suggestions welcomed.
I currently have kernel 2.4.18, libc6
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:23:02 +0200, michael loeffler wrote:
errno = 0; /* errno sollte sowiso auf null stehen, aber das hier um das
* nochmal zu betonen */
perror(A); /* das macht nun irgendwas daß nen Illegal Seek verursacht,
* was imho nicht sein sollte
for the package on:
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
and replace the i386 in the filename with
alpha.
Only this is the first time there does not exist
and alpha version of:
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.2.5-6_i386.deb
So now my question is:
Does there exist an alpha
preciso dessa glibc-2.2.5-11.1 to da vez que tento instalar algo ele
aparece como dependencia.. mas nao
encontrei informações de onde consegui-la e nem como instalar...
qualquer dica é bem-vinda.
grato!
--
Adriano Brand
Técnico de automação bancaria
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
licq 29819060
preciso dessa glibc-2.2.5-11.1 p/ instalar o licq e o plugin flash, mas nao
encontrei informações de onde consegui-la e nem como instalar...
qualquer dica é bem-vinda.
grato!
--
ADRIANO BRAND
TÉCNICO DE AUTOMAÇÃO BANCÁRIA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
licq 29819060
RODANDO GNU/LINUX DEBIAN 3.0 QUASE LEGAL
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:26:07AM +0200, Marcin Błażejowski wrote:
2. mam pytanie o tego nieszczesnego glibc'a z 13 sierpnia, a dokladnie, czy
ktos ostatnio robil update bezpieczenstwa i system mu sie nie zawalil?
Mam regularnie uaktualnianego Woody'ego.
System działa stabilnie, dpkg i inne
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:26:07AM +0200, Marcin Błażejowski wrote:
2. mam pytanie o tego nieszczesnego glibc'a z 13 sierpnia, a dokladnie, czy
ktos ostatnio robil update bezpieczenstwa i system mu sie nie zawalil?
U siebie zainstalowałem glibc-a z 'sida' (łącznie z paroma pakietami
que
locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable
apt-cache show locales ne mentionne pas une telle dépendance.
Quelqu'un a une idée de ce qui m'arrive ? mirroir debian corrompu,
peut-être ?
Alexandre Fayolle
--
LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:01:35PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
Bonjour,
Bonjour,
Je suis en woody, plutôt content.
Mais il y a un truc que je ne comprends pas. J'ai fait un apt-get
update, suivi d'un apt-get upgrade -su pour voir, ce matin, et il me dit
que des paquets sont kept back, libc6,
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:01:35PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
Bonjour,
Je suis en woody, plutôt content.
Mais il y a un truc que je ne comprends pas. J'ai fait un apt-get
update, suivi d'un apt-get upgrade -su pour voir, ce matin, et il me dit
que des paquets sont kept back, libc6,
et locales.
Si je fais apt-get install locales, on me répond que
locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable
Je viens de faire un apt-get update et apt-get dist-upgrade et je
n'ai pas eu ce genre de problème. Peut-être que tu as un package
d'installé et qui bloque
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:19:29PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Un dpkg --status locales me dit que j'ai la version 2.2.5-6 et qui
dépend de glibc-2.2.5-6 (entre autres). Au fait, que signifie cette
dépendance? Car il n'y a pas de package dont le nom commence par
glibc à part glibc-doc
répond que
locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable
O le gros vilain !!
En fait ton PB c'est que t'as pas les lignes pour le miroir de sécurity.
J'ai pas vu l'advisory pour la libc mais le nom du package .woody.X me
fait pensé aux nom des paquets qui ont été
apt-get install libc6 libc6-dev locales
[...]
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable
E: Sorry, broken packages
[pounk]~$ sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:38:53 +0200, Jeffo wrote:
J'ai pas vu l'advisory pour la libc mais le nom du package .woody.X me
fait pensé aux nom des paquets qui ont été diffusés lors du pb avec ssh.
Je ne pense pas que ce soit les seuls. Il semble que tous les nouveaux
paquets pour woody
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:50:17 +0200, Charles Goyard wrote:
[pounk]~$ sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Calculating Upgrade... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
language-env locales
The following packages will be
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:30:09 +0200, Arthur wrote:
glibc est un meta-paquet, apt-cache show libc6 :
...
Provides: glibc-2.2.5-11
Y a-t-il une commande qui permette de savoir quels paquets réels
fournissent tel meta
Alexandre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour,
Salut,
Si je fais apt-get install locales, on me répond que
locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable
http://bugs.debian.org/153424
C'est en cours de résolution.
@+ JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Alexandre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour,
Salut,
Si je fais apt-get install locales, on me répond que
locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable
http://bugs.debian.org/153424
C'est en cours
Tengo debian 2.2 r 6 y necesito instalar firebird que requiere una version
2.2.
Donde la consigoi y como la instalo
Saludos y gracias
Eduardo Beltran
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi all,
i upgraded to XFree86 4.1 and now when i try to run emacs, vi, etc. i keep
getting this error:
/lib/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.2' not found required by
/user/X11R6/libX11.so.6
did i overwrite a library file or does my C library needs updating?
thanx
ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 04:02:02PM -0700, ian wrote:
i upgraded to XFree86 4.1 and now when i try to run emacs, vi, etc. i
keep getting this error:
/lib/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.2' not found required by
/user/X11R6/libX11.so.6
How did you upgrade? It sounds like you've forced
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:49:05PM +0200, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
Hi,
as I've posted to debian-glibc-list I want to program a little bit with
the new async IO implementation from Ben LeHaise. The kernel is patched
and libaio (provides the native async io api) is also installed. In
order
Hi,
as I've posted to debian-glibc-list I want to program a little bit with
the new async IO implementation from Ben LeHaise. The kernel is patched
and libaio (provides the native async io api) is also installed. In
order to access linux new feature over a POSIX.4 interface I've to
patch glibc
Hi,
as I've posted to debian-glibc-list I want to program a little bit with
the new async IO implementation from Ben LeHaise. The kernel is patched
and libaio (provides the native async io api) is also installed. In
order to access linux new feature over a POSIX.4 interface I've to
patch glibc
On 15-May-2002 Oliver Kowalke wrote:
Hi,
as I've posted to debian-glibc-list I want to program a little bit with
the new async IO implementation from Ben LeHaise. The kernel is patched
and libaio (provides the native async io api) is also installed. In
order to access linux new feature
Hi all,
wie kann ich bei meinem Debian SID die Glibc wieder downdaten auf
2.2.5-3 und es auch gleich so einrichten das sie beim nächsten apt-get
update apt-get -y upgrade nicht upgedated wird ?
Greets und besten dank für jede hilfe
Adrian
--
Aus einem Geschichtsbuch aus dem Jahre 2010 ueber
* Adrian Neumaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020328 08:31]:
wie kann ich bei meinem Debian SID die Glibc wieder downdaten auf
2.2.5-3 und es auch gleich so einrichten das sie beim nächsten apt-get
update apt-get -y upgrade nicht upgedated wird ?
Hallo Adrian,
schau mal im Listarchive die Mails der
I am new to debian...
I keep having problems whenever I want to install an
app on this host
because of glibc dependancies...This is an out the box
debian potato
install and as a result has glibc 2.1.3-19 many of
the applications
that i want to install require at least glibc 2.2.X.
Is there some
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:09:03AM -0800, dinni bartholomew wrote:
I am new to debian...
I keep having problems whenever I want to install an app on this host
because of glibc dependancies...This is an out the box debian potato
install and as a result has glibc 2.1.3-19 many
Does anyone know where I can get the latest version of glibc (2.2) which
apparently is needed for the latest version of XFree86? I downloaded the
glibc source but can't get it to compile cleanly. It appears the version of
glibc in the stable Debian site is 2.1.13 or there abouts.
Thanks!
Bruce
You should install this package : libc6
apt-cache show libc6 --
[...]
Version: 2.2.5-3
Provides: glibc-2.2.5-3
[...]
See you
--
R.Pac
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:23:13PM -0500, Bodnyk, Bruce W wrote:
Does anyone know where I can get the latest version of glibc (2.2) which
apparently is needed for the latest version of XFree86?
You should get the version of XFree86 4 which is built for Debian stable
instead. You can find
Buenas...
Como dice el asunto...mi problema pasa por haber necesitado glibc6-2.2.5 que
en debian se llama libc6-2.2.5la cuestión es que yo quería instalar kylix
oe y este necesitaba de una libc = a 2.1.3...y por mas que en potato la libc
que viene es la 2.1.3...no había forma de que se
Hi,
I open again the problem, which was here discussed.
Description of problem:
System Debian 2.2, glibc 2.1.3,
kernel 2.4.17 patched for XFS (journaling 64bit filesystem from SGI)
On XFS I can make large files ( 2GB ), but I have problem with
manipulating with these large files. I cannot delete
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Petr Linke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I open again the problem, which was here discussed.
Description of problem:
System Debian 2.2, glibc 2.1.3,
kernel 2.4.17 patched for XFS (journaling 64bit filesystem from SGI)
On XFS I can make large files ( 2GB )
You can
Hola a todos,
Se que es un problema comun para las versiones de openoffice, las
librerias glibc. Tengo una debian sid funcionando con las glibc2.2.5 i
el garrulo de openoffice necessitas las..2.1.x!!! increible pero cierto.
Lo de siempre renombrar la libstdc+--libc6.1os funciona? a mi
Hallo!
Weiß zufällig jemand, wann oder ob die neue glibc-2.2.5 nach Woody
wandert?
Mich würde auch interessieren, wo man solche Info über evtl.
zukünftige Pakete aus erster Hand nachlesen kann.
Manche Pakete brauchen ja Ewigkeiten (Mozilla, xcdroast-0.98..),
manche nur Tage, wie z.B. der VIM
Stefan Volmer wrote:
Weiß zufällig jemand, wann oder ob die neue glibc-2.2.5 nach Woody
wandert? Mich würde auch interessieren, wo man solche Info über evtl.
zukünftige Pakete aus erster Hand nachlesen kann. Manche Pakete
brauchen ja Ewigkeiten (Mozilla, xcdroast-0.98..), manche nur Tage
No właśnie to samo mi się wydawało i dlatego mam zainstalowane.
libc6
...
Provides: glibc-2.2.4-6
A locales dalej twierdzą co napisałem wcześiej :-(
KJ
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 04:12:29AM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 12:07:50AM +0100, Kamil Jonca wrote:
Witam
Hola a todos,
Estaba curioseando la nueva version de openoffice pero no me deja ni arrancar
el instalador...Se queda frito cuando detecta la glibc2.2.4 de mi debian sid.
Es porque solo requiere glibc2.2.1? no hay alguna manera (simbolic link o
similar) para instalarlo? lo habeis probado?
--
Olah povo!
Bom, como ninguém me respondeu ainda, retorno a mesma pergunta:
Como
faco para atualizar a libc da versão 2.1.3 que vem com o potato para a
nova versão da libc ? Onde posso encontrá-la no formato deb ?
[]'s,
--
Nelson Luiz Campos
Electrical Engineer
Linux User #89621 UIN
Isso pode lhe ajudar:
www.debian.org/distrib/packages
--- Nelson Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olah povo!
Bom, como ninguém me respondeu ainda, retorno a
mesma pergunta:
Como
faco para atualizar a libc da versão 2.1.3 que vem
com o potato para a
nova versão da libc ? Onde posso
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Hélio Perroni Filho wrote:
Há um bug na Glibc, chamado de 'loading bug' na documentação do Kylix,
que compromete a compilação de programas gerados por essa ferramenta.
Minha versão da Glibc é a 2.1.3, o que segundo o instalador do Kylix não
é recente o suficiente para
O Unstable e testing têm a 2.2.4... mas upgrade de glibc implica em
praticamente trocar de distribuição (stable-testing).
O que torna bastante apropriada a pergunta por um patch... Mas a
propósito, qual o nome do package da Glibc no Debian? Procurando por
*glibc* nos CD's do Potato, só achei
Olah!
GLibc eh a GNU Libc. Como ela substitui a libc que era o padrao ateh
uns anos atras (a ultima grande distro a trocar foi o slackware,
mesmo assim soh na versao 7), o pacote eh chamado de libc. A ultima
versao da libc antiga foi a libc5, entaum a glibc eh chamada por
muitos de
Há um bug na Glibc, chamado de 'loading bug' na documentação do Kylix,
que compromete a compilação de programas gerados por essa ferramenta.
Minha versão da Glibc é a 2.1.3, o que segundo o instalador do Kylix não
é recente o suficiente para estar livre do bug. Como faço para obter um
patch ou
I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box.
The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version.
I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found
it.
The only package that names glibc is libstdc++
What package should I install to satisfy the glibc
2.1.3
requirement?
thanks
snip
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:56:58PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote:
but anyway...your answers:
glibc == libc6
Woody meets that requirement.
You might need libc6-dev too for headers and such.
Are there different versions of libc available? What if you are using
Woody (glibc 2.2), and need support
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 11:01:12PM -0700, John L. Fjellstad wrote:
Are there different versions of libc available? What if you are using
Woody (glibc 2.2), and need support for glibc2.1?
I know you can do both libc5 and libc6 (glibc2.x), but can you do
different versions of glibc? My
Hi all.
I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box.
The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version.
I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found
it.
The only package that names glibc is libstdc++
What package should I install to satisfy the glibc
2.1.3
requirement?
thanks
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:28:25PM -0700, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
| Hi all.
|
| I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box.
| The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version.
| I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found
| it.
| The only package that names glibc is libstdc++
It's
ethics debate
RMS would be very disappointed if he knew you wanted to install Oracle...
/ethics debate
but anyway...your answers:
glibc == libc6
Woody meets that requirement.
You might need libc6-dev too for headers and such.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:28:25PM -0700, Eduardo Gargiulo scribbled
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:56:58PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote:
| You might need libc6-dev too for headers and such.
Not likely -- I doubt Oracle gave him the source :-).
-D
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 04:28 pm, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
Hi all.
I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box.
The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version.
I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found
it.
The only package that names glibc is libstdc++
What package should
Hello...
I have update my debian server and there's a problem with the glibc 2.2.3-10
package!
When I want to start apache wit php4-support, I become this error-message:
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so into server:
/usr/lib/libpcre.so.3: undefined symbol: atexit
Somebody knows
#include hallo.h
Severin Olloz wrote on Tue Aug 14, 2001 um 12:58:01PM:
I have update my debian server and there's a problem with the glibc 2.2.3-10
package!
Speak after me:
Unstable is unstable is unstable is unstable...
I have to read debian-devel, I have to read debian-devel
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 13:12, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Speak after me:
Unstable is unstable is unstable is unstable...
I know :-)
I have to read debian-devel, I have to read debian-devel...
OK I will do this!
http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/libc6_2.2.3-10.0.1_i386.deb or wait
for a fixed
I'm trying to setup a machine for development and I just can't get
glibc-2.2.3 to build on potato.
background
In the past I've used debian-unstable for doing development, the
trouble is I find that, well, too unstable.
I considered using debian-testing but the stuff I'm working on
(network
Hi list
I just ran apt-get update apt-get upgrade, just to see that locales
are going to be removed. Why? because it depends on glibc, and glibc is
not available. Hmm, I always thought that glibc is a rather important
lib, on ehich most c-programs are based. So, what is wrong? Is glibc
Joerg Johannes wrote:
I just ran apt-get update apt-get upgrade, just to see that locales
are going to be removed. Why? because it depends on glibc, and glibc is
not available. Hmm, I always thought that glibc is a rather important
lib, on ehich most c-programs are based. So, what is wrong
Craig Dickson wrote:
Joerg Johannes wrote:
I just ran apt-get update apt-get upgrade, just to see that locales
are going to be removed. Why? because it depends on glibc, and glibc is
not available. Hmm, I always thought that glibc is a rather important
lib, on ehich most c-programs
I just installed CUPS 1.1.9 on a machine running 2.2r3 (2.2.18pre21
kernel). It is working fine.
Next, I installed it (with the 2.4.* deb file from http://www.cups.org)
on a machine running 2.2r3 with the 2.4 support packages and with the
2.4 kernel.
CUPS installs okay, but when I try to start
Hi Randy,
I've got the same problem when trying to install the 2.4.* deb-file
for cups 1.1.9. They've linked the executables against the new version
2.2 of glibc. I like to run a stable system, that's the reason why I
still stay with potato. So for me it was no choice to upgrade such a
vital
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:44:30PM -0300, Edson Yassuo Fugio wrote:
Você achou um bug crítico, se ainda não o fez, gaste um tempinho para
ajudar a comunidade debian enviando o bug para o Bug Tracking System
(BTS).
Use o reportbug para enviar este erro. O problema foi o uso de um recurso
do cp
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:03:09PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
Em Sat, 21 Jul 2001 05:32:28 -0300
KrIsSkRoSs [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Senhores,
Na tentativa de atualizar meu sistema da versão 2.2r2 para a
unstable encontrei o seguinte problema ao atualizar a libc6.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 05:26:56PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
diretório
|- DEBIAN
|- usr
|- etc
|- sbin
|- lib
daí você faz:
dpkg --build diretório pacote_versão-revisão_i386.deb
e instala...
Ok. Feito. Precisei remover o parametro -L passado ao cp no
When trying to dselect upgrade to woody, I keep running into errors that
say that GLIBC_2.2 is required, I tried adding things that say they have
glibc, but it doesn't seem to fix it. Any recommendations?
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote:
When trying to dselect upgrade to woody, I keep running into errors that
say that GLIBC_2.2 is required, I tried adding things that say they have
glibc, but it doesn't seem to fix it. Any recommendations?
glibc = libc6
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote:
When trying to dselect upgrade to woody, I keep running into errors that
say that GLIBC_2.2 is required, I tried adding things that say they have
glibc, but it doesn't seem to fix it. Any recommendations?
Do you mean
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:41:05PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
The easiest way to upgrade to woody is with 'apt-get dist-upgrade'.
Also note that the most durable way is to use dselect.
Cheers,
Joost
while I'm upgrading, and the libc6 package was already included
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Joost Kooij wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:55:16 +0200
From: Joost Kooij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Glibc
Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 14:56:04 -0700
Resent-From
Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote on Sun Jul 15, 2001 at 03:04:25PM:
while I'm upgrading, and the libc6 package was already included
potato is based on glibc-2.1 -- woody is based on glibc-2.2
So although a libc6 package is installed it may be the case that it
is not the one from woody. As already
]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Glibc
Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 14:56:04 -0700
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote:
When trying to dselect upgrade to woody, I keep running into errors
Hello folks,
I am struggling with getting nisplus to work on Debian. I installed the
(unofficial) nisplus packages from http://www.realbodo.de/ and set
everything up correctly. I've already set up nisplus successfully on
RedHat, so at least I know what I'm doing and that I can get it right.
401 - 500 of 739 matches
Mail list logo
