Use the email addresses/URLs to subscribe, if you wish.
mint-users Discussion of the Mint Linux distribution
mint-users-requ...@firemountain.net
http://www.firemountain.net/mailman/listinfo/mint-users
(independent, not affiliated with the Mint
gt;>>
>>>
>>> On 23/01/2018 21:56, Michael Fothergill wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Paul,
>>>
>>> I have agreed a meeting with the executive from Calysta at the Wilton
>>> site in February.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
&
consider recent trends.
I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Conflicts of interest are not just financial. Even
my main concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict
voting rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian
or in any project used by Debian, to promote and protect the
public interest.
Conflicts of interest
On 10/16/2014 11:30 PM, Marty wrote:
On 10/16/2014 08:41 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
But, I consider it idiotic to bash Red Hat as ~anyone~ with the guts can
do what Bob Young did. Just gather some talented people together around
a kitchen table and create your own distro. That is perfectly legal
with
increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main
concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict
voting rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian
or in any project used by Debian, to promote
an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Conflicts of interest are not just financial. Even an unpaid developer should
probably not be voting as a technical committee
consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Conflicts of interest are not just financial. Even an unpaid developer should
probably not be voting as a technical
hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Conflicts of interest are not just financial. Even an unpaid
developer should probably
you mean, job-related ethics?
to do there just as we do on this list.
I'm glad you replied because you're just the person to query.
When you discussed job-related ethics at lunchtime, did the subject of
conflict of interest ever come up, regarding voting in Debian?
Debian who??
Ha! We had
On 10/16/2014 08:41 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
But, I consider it idiotic to bash Red Hat as ~anyone~ with the guts can
do what Bob Young did. Just gather some talented people together around
a kitchen table and create your own distro. That is perfectly legal and
now they are worth billions, by
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
surprise.
Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe betide any
company that actually gets us there...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
surprise.
Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe
betide any
company that actually gets
On Mi, 15 oct 14, 10:41:12, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Maybe you want.
But I think that most users just want it to work fine and efficiently, which
does not necessarily imply being sold massively around the world.
The fact is, that linux is actually a success, but it has never
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
surprise.
Damned for their success. We
Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers.
Surprise,
On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
Check out
Comments inline below:
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 06:37:57 Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan
Le 15.10.2014 12:37, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at
Steve Litt writes:
Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
surprise.
Better Red Hat than just about anybody else.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Why, what is the reason for that? Explain why they are less objective
or anyone having no financial interest is more
Ahoj,
Dňa Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:09:53 +0100 Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk
napísal:
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
Check out what single
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:11:10 +0100
Jonathan Dowland j...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
surprise.
Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe
betide
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:37 +0900
Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/10/15 1:47 Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk:
Give me swearing in posts rather than innuendo and attempted
character assassination of a group dedicated workers.
Do you realize that a lot of your posts, jumping on
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 12:53:52 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:37 +0900
Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/10/15 1:47 Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk:
Give me swearing in posts rather than innuendo and attempted
character assassination of a group dedicated
contributors and keeping existing contributors happy.
I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Everyone who contributes to Debian
On 10/15/2014 07:08 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
Check out
On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company
Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean).
Wonderful Linux company Corel changed their CEO, and promptly accepted
money from Microsoft and dropped all their
2014/10/16 5:46 Ric Moore wayward4...@gmail.com:
On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company
Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean).
Wonderful Linux company Corel changed their CEO, and promptly
On Mi, 15 oct 14, 21:37:57, Scott Ferguson wrote:
As far as I'm aware Debian has *never* been sold anywhere, nor are
there plans to - did I miss another meeting down the docks?
http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/
No, that's not meant as a joke. As far as I understand, this is about
the only
On Wednesday 15 October 2014 22:44:18 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 15 oct 14, 21:37:57, Scott Ferguson wrote:
As far as I'm aware Debian has *never* been sold anywhere, nor are
there plans to - did I miss another meeting down the docks?
http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/
No, that's not
On 10/15/2014 05:06 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
2014/10/16 5:46 Ric Moore wayward4...@gmail.com
mailto:wayward4...@gmail.com:
On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company
Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I
on this list.
I'm glad you replied because you're just the person to query.
When you discussed job-related ethics at lunchtime, did the subject of
conflict of interest ever come up, regarding voting in Debian?
If it's impossible to imagine, then consider a purely hypothetical case.
A developer
On 16/10/14 00:14, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 12:37, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
Le 15.10.2014
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:06:00 +0900
Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/10/16 5:46 Ric Moore wayward4...@gmail.com:
On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company
Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what
a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/543d0f78.7060
to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Why, what is the reason for that? Explain why they are less objective or
anyone having no financial interest is more objective.
Define
interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
--
David Guyot
Administrateur système, réseau et télécom / Sysadmin
Europe Camions Interactive / Stockway
Moulin Collot
F-88500 Ambacourt
03 29 30 47 85
signature.asc
Description
as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Why, what is the reason
, as I consider recent trends.
I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Why, what is the reason for that? Explain why they are less
to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main
concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote
quality. It's my main
concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Why, what
that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Everyone who contributes to Debian has an interest in what the project
does, whether or not its financial
On 14/10/14 16:05, Scott Ferguson wrote:
And how should we interpret that in light of your signature and constant
plugging of your business on the list?
Perhaps Joey Hess's signature holds the answer?
I presume you mean Joel Rees (yes, I get their names mixed up
occasionally too), since Joey
interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Why, what is the reason for that? Explain why they are less objective
or anyone having no financial interest is more objective.
You know darn well, Henning. In anything
and keeping existing contributors happy.
I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Everyone who contributes to Debian has an interest in what
for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Why, what is the reason for that? Explain why they are less objective
or anyone having no financial interest is more objective.
You know darn well, Henning
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 20:35:54 -0400
Marty mar...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/whos-writing-linux
Say hello to our new bosses?
Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
surprise.
SteveT
Steve Litt*
Hello,
A simple question:
from a server point of view does autofs costs less (cpu, io, memory) than
traditionnal nfs ?
From a client point of view I think the fact to unmount directories frees
ressources?
But does a moint point consumes so much (memory ?)
And concerning the network
Thanks
Stephane Durieux wrote:
A simple question:
from a server point of view does autofs costs less (cpu, io, memory)
than traditionnal nfs ?
AutoFS is simply a automated mount service for NFS. AutoFS doesn't
replace NFS. The autofs simply gets nfs going by mounting remote nfs
filesystems on
On Sunday 07 January 2007 04:27, Andrei Popescu wrote:
I think this gmail quirk should go to Raju's FAQ:
Q: I posted from my gmail account, but I don't receive my own posts.
But I receive other posts and even answers to my own posts.
A: gmail will discard your own posts because they
On Mon January 8 2007 08:42, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
On Sunday 07 January 2007 04:27, Andrei Popescu wrote:
I think this gmail quirk should go to Raju's FAQ:
Q: I posted from my gmail account, but I don't receive my own posts.
But I receive other posts and even answers to my own posts.
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:42:59 -0500
Kamaraju Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 January 2007 04:27, Andrei Popescu wrote:
I think this gmail quirk should go to Raju's FAQ:
Q: I posted from my gmail account, but I don't receive my own posts.
But I receive other posts and
on Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 07:18:27PM +0200 Andrei Popescu mumbled:
A more primitive hack is to configure your MUA to save outgoing mail to
the same folder. This way you can still follow the thread correctly,
but you have to check in the archives if your message reached the list.
Nah. If
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:20:08 -0500
Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6 Jan 2007 15:16:56 -0800, wurong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was rejected for my first one so I want to try again
Unless someone replies to a gmail email, it doesn't show up in your
inbox. Perhaps that's why
On 6 Jan 2007 15:16:56 -0800, wurong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was rejected for my first one so I want to try again
Unless someone replies to a gmail email, it doesn't show up in your inbox.
Perhaps that's why you thought your message was rejected?
Patrick
I have a new email address!You can now email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]FINANCIAL PROPOSAL OF $32M WITH YOUR DEFINITE DETAILS OF INTEREST FROM JULIAN P FOERSTER LONDON- JulianPThurston Thurston
spent some time over the last few days
Debianizing it. The packages are still very rough so I'm not making
them public (yet), but I am curious to know whether there is enough
interest in Geant 4 on Debian to make it worthwhile to eventually have
it in the official archive.
The total installed size
This is a forwarded message
From: websmartid
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, December 2, 2005, 9:45:28 AM
Subject: This may interest you
===8
http://www.iamagel.com/my/signup_country.asp
Wednesday, November 30, 2005, 6:23:06 AM, you wrote:
Frankie Hi
Frankie Could you please send me
Something that some might find of interest...
The MINIMUM PRIZE 2005 to Richard Stallman
Cittadellarte Fondazione Pistoletto gives the prize, in Tunis, to Richard
Stallman for the GNU/Linux project. The prize will be delivered by Minister
Gilberto Gil.
_
minimum prize
Jesus Garcia Carrillo wrote:
May be:
1.- Interest
2.- Time
3.- Read, read, read, read :-D
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 9:11 PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Ready to join the club
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Eduardo wrote:
Thanks
you will need a real-time distro that supports the resolution and
hardware you need vs a generic linux distro
google/yahoo for your hardware you want to support and linux
to come up with suitable distro ... or tweek/change any existing
distro to be
I'm returning discussion to the mailing list. Debian list policy is that
private replies are discouraged unless requested.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:22:37AM -0700, Eduardo wrote:
Thanks for answering.
I want to program real time applications, like a robot using PC-104
platforms, so I'm not
May be:
1.- Interest
2.- Time
3.- Read, read, read, read :-D
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 9:11 PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Ready to join the club..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
and online
documentation to try to solve them. If that doesn't work, post
well-thought-out questions to mailing lists, and people will probably
help you as long as you're polite.
Hope this helps,
Christian
On 10/24/05, Exal de Jesus Garcia Carrillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May be:
1.- Interest
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 9:11 PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Ready to join the club..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The best way of learning it (to the extent that means anything) is to do it.
If you could be just a bit more specific on what you want to learn, people
might be more helpful.
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you attempt to fix something that isn't broken,
Dear Applicant,
Your application was processed and approved. You are eligible for $ 400,000
with a 2.1 % rate.
Please verify your information here: http://quoteyourrate.com/?partid=aaks9
We look forward to hearing from you.
Estee Preben.Lerdorff, Account Manager
Bell Marketing
4206 Central
Your request has been entered into our tracking system. A sales representative will be
contacting you shortly to answer all of your questions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My name is Jashwant Joseph and my phone number is 310 542-7758.
I am applying for Accounts Payable jobs in your company. If you have any openings in this field please contact me. I am sending my resume.
Thank you.
Joseph3.doc
Description: Binary data
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My name is Jashwant Joseph and my phone number is 310 542-7758.
I am applying for Accounts Payable jobs in your company. If you have
any openings in this field please contact me. I am sending my resume.
Thank you.
First: Ahum?
Second: Isn't *ACHEIVMENTS* actually
become available.
We appreciate your interest in joining the Lakeshore team.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Would anyone be interested in a bzedit package? It's the world
editor for the bzflag game. I'm doing a quick pole to see if anyone
has interest, and if so, the bzflag maintainer may consider creating
a package.
I'm not subscribed to the list - please send/Cc: replies directly to
me
Hi.
$ uname -a
Linux pupkin 2.4.19 #1 SMP Mon Sep 16 08:45:01 EEST 2002 i686 unknown
I have 2 processors, 256 memory, 256 swap
cd /usr/src/linux
see Documentation/smp.txt;
grep MAKE conf.vars
MAKE = /usr/bin/make -j3
time make-kpkg --revision=pupkin.0.6
If you're using make-kpkg, I think you'll have to set CONCURRENCY_LEVEL.
The option is documented in the kernel-pkg.conf man page.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 05:13:19AM +0300, Egor Tur wrote:
grep MAKE conf.vars
MAKE = /usr/bin/make -j3
time make-kpkg --revision=pupkin.0.6
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
Looks like someone is already working on cyrus2:
Yes I know but they are taking their time about it. I have a mostly
functioning package now, I just need to tidy it up some more before making
another announcement.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL
On Wed, 06 Feb 2002, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
Looks like someone is already working on cyrus2:
Yes I know but they are taking their time about it. I have a mostly
functioning package now, I just need to tidy it up some more before making
another
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
How did you get it to work with the currently broken SASL v2 which is what
is holding my packages from being uploaded?
Cyrus 2.1 CVS REQUIRES SASL2 to work. Or are you packaging 2.0.x ?
Yes this is 2.0.16 which I believe is the latest
On Wed, 06 Feb 2002, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
Btw, I'm doing this mainly because I needed it for a project. If you want
to be the official maintainer be my guest. I can send you my work when it
is finished.
Well, I am packaging cyrus 2.1, and all packages are named cyrus21-*, not
cyrus2-*. You
Nigel Pauli wrote:
On Saturday 02 February 2002 06:58, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
[Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of
days ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.]
The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer
seems to be MIA so I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Looks like someone is already working on cyrus2:
http://people.debian.org/~hmh/cyrus2/
and in wnpp:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=108942repeatmerged=yes
I currently use my own cyrus2 and will do so until there is a cyrus2
in the debian
On Saturday 02 February 2002 06:58, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
[Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of
days ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.]
The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer
seems to be MIA so I'm thinking of doing a package
[Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of days
ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.]
The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer seems
to be MIA so I'm thinking of doing a package for cyrus2. The limiting
factor right now is my little girl is
I would love to see a cyrus2 package!
Sean
On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 01:58, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
[Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of days
ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.]
The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer seems
to be
existingbusiness model in a huge way.If there
is significant interest please contact me at once.
Best Regards,Linda
Perrotti
MarketShareAdvisory
sosresources services.com
631-592-1360
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
i'm not an expert in these things, but i would send the changes to the
upstream maintainers from aureal.
Are there any upstream maintainers? I've heard stuff about them
abandoning Linux development and possibly going out of business
altogether.
Sure there's interest.
* Alan Sobey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-04-2000 10:08 PM +0100]
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:18:51PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
Subject says it all, I made this for my own needs and I thought other
people might be interested. It is a source diff to Aureals 1.0.5
Interested. VERY.
Didi Damian wrote:
Sure there's interest.
* Alan Sobey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-04-2000 10:08 PM +0100]
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:18:51PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
Subject says it all, I made this for my own needs and I thought other
people might be interested
Also interested...
- Original Message -
Interested. VERY.
Didi Damian wrote:
Sure there's interest.
* Alan Sobey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-04-2000 10:08 PM +0100]
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:18:51PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
Subject says it all, I made this for my own
Subject says it all, I made this for my own needs and I thought other
people might be interested. It is a source diff to Aureals 1.0.5 tarball
and compiles into .debs for au8810, au8820, and au8830. i386 platform
only.
I'll put it up somewhere if there is interest.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL
Subject says it all, I made this for my own needs and I thought other
people might be interested. It is a source diff to Aureals 1.0.5 tarball
and compiles into .debs for au8810, au8820, and au8830. i386 platform
only.
i'm not an expert in these things, but i would send the changes to the
.
Yes, there's interest here.
If anyone is interested...
I've posted an experimental (unofficial) package of mrtg-2.4.1 at:
http://www.mindspring.com/~stk3/debian/mrtg.html
or
ftp://ftp.mindspring.com/users/stk3/debian/mrtg/mrtg_2.4.1-2_i386.deb
--==_Exmh_-19745690190
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Steve
Ed Donovan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
[snip]
It might still be a good candidate for some work; the package is
version 2.2, and MRTG 2.3 has been out for a while now.
[snip]
Looks like we have the inevitable bit of duplication going on...
I've got a (~) package of MRTG-2.4 that I made for my
Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joey R. Chris Ross wrote:
For the past couple of weeks I have been using a package called
MRTG.
Joey It's already a debian package:
(snip)
It might still be a good candidate for some work; the package is version
2.2, and MRTG 2.3
For the past couple of weeks I have been using a package called
MRTG. Both the current release and the beta for the next release are
running nicely, showing html graphic display of SNMP data. The package is
set up for monitoring network traffic but can be easily modified to monitor
other
R. Chris Ross wrote:
For the past couple of weeks I have been using a package called
MRTG.
It's already a debian package:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~dpkg -s mrtg
Package: mrtg
Status: install ok installed
Priority: extra
Section: contrib/net
Installed-Size: 223
Maintainer: Dermot Bradley [EMAIL
97 matches
Mail list logo
