No matter what I do, I cannot boot my PC off the hard disk. I updated to
kernel 2.4 which worked fine until I tried to recompile the kernel again.
I made a boot diskette which works fine, although I have the same boot
kernel on the hard disk, which won't boot.
I receive a message of garbage
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 04:49:28PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
Well, I can't say I've got the same problems. I've been using 2.4.0
since about test8 on my laptop, with almost complete success WRT PCMCIA.
One difference is that I don't use the PCMCIA modules that ship with the
kernel,
Well, I can't say I've got the same problems. I've been using 2.4.0
since about test8 on my laptop, with almost complete success WRT PCMCIA.
One difference is that I don't use the PCMCIA modules that ship with the
kernel, but the pcmcia-cs package from unstable.
What kind of network card do you
Yesterday I compiled a 2.4 kernel using make-kpkg. All seems to have gone
well. I used the pcmcia features in the kernel, and chose not to separately
compile pcmcia modules. All seems to work well, I boot fine, start up
pcmcia fine, get a dhcp address fine. However, I do have one problem, I
Hopefully this will be my last problem for today :-)
I can't seem to get the 2.2.17 kernel to build and install correctly.
It seems to run, but there are three problems that concern me.
1. When the kernel boots, it complains that some symbols don't match
what's in the System.map. That can't be
Did you use kernel-package? It's a wonderful thing for maintaining kernels.
It will help you easily create a .deb package from which you can install your
custom kernel image. And you can create that package as a regular user (one
less thing you have to do as root!).
Once installed, check
/ Robert Guthrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Did you use kernel-package? It's a wonderful thing for maintaining
| kernels.
I hadn't been, but I gave it a try. I created
kernel-doc-2.2.17_Custom.1.00_all.deb
kernel-headers-2.2.17_Custom.1.00_i386.deb
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 07:01:20 +1100
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
From: Carel Fellinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Archive/kernel problems
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 01:49:49AM +1100, Kaleb Daark wrote:
I have now downloaded both
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 07:34:18 +1100
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
From: Carel Fellinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Archive/kernel problems
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 12:13:43AM +1100, Kaleb Daark wrote:
After downloading kernel-source
Have you tried unmounting that partition and e2fsck-ing it? If it's your
root partition, you might be able to accomplish that in single-user mode.
--
Did you know that if you play a Windows 2000 cd backwards, you
will hear the voice of Satan?
That's nothing! If you play it forward, it'll
]
Subject: Re: Archive/kernel problems
Have you tried unmounting that partition and e2fsck-ing it? If it's your
root partition, you might be able to accomplish that in single-user mode.
--
Did you know that if you play a Windows 2000 cd backwards, you
will hear the voice of Satan
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 01:49:49AM +1100, Kaleb Daark wrote:
...
I have now downloaded both kernel-source-2.2.17_2.2.17pre6-1.deb and
kernel-source-2.2.15_2.2.15-3.deb, first from ftp.de.debian.org,
ftp.au.debian.org, and ftp.debian.org which seemed to go OK, dpkg even
installed them with no
Sorry, on the first post, I forgot a subject.. I apologise for the
duplication...
After downloading kernel-source-2.2.17_2.2.17pre6-1.deb (for the third
time) from both ftp.debian.au.org, www.au.debian.org and ftp.debian.org
and then executing tar -Ixvf kernel-source-2.2.17.tar.bz2 in /usr/src
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 12:13:43AM +1100, Kaleb Daark wrote:
After downloading kernel-source-2.2.17_2.2.17pre6-1.deb (for the third
I just tried it, downloading seems okee, but diffing it to an older
download gives an error in char 313705, line 1282. So it seems it has
been replaced lately with
:: On Fri, 7 Jul 2000 23:11:01 +0200 (MET DST), Rolf Schillinger [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
Oh, well, I suspected it could be the kernel. Indeed - I tried test2
twice, and had some serious filesystem problems at both times. I also
thought it could be UDMA66 (I'm now using that new VIA IDE driver
Hey,
I have used Red Hat 5.2 in the past, and recently switched to
Debian 2.1. I had trouble getting the ALSA modules to work with the
default 2.0.36 kernel, so I compiled my own 2.2.10, and then I could
get sound to work, after manually loading the modules every boot, but
my cdrom drive
On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Ryan Chouinard wrote:
Hey,
I have used Red Hat 5.2 in the past, and recently switched to
Debian 2.1. I had trouble getting the ALSA modules to work with the
default 2.0.36 kernel, so I compiled my own 2.2.10, and then I could
get sound to work, after manually
At 07:53 09-08-99 -0500, Paul Miller wrote:
I usually see this error when IDE support has not been compiled in the
kernel. So I'd make sure that in the Block Devices section you have
'Enhanced IDE/MFM/RLL disk/cdrom/tape/floppy support'
'Include IDE/ATA-2 DISK support' set to yes.
Right on!
I'm using slink, and need to recompile the kernel.
This is on a computer where LILO won't install, so I have to boot off
a floppy.
Ran 'make menuconfig', and double-checked that Second
extended fs support was not compiled as a module.
In the Makefile, I set :
ROOT_DEV = /dev/hdb3
Ran make-kpkg
Daniel Lesage wrote:
VFS: Cannot open root device 03:43
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:43
I'm not exactly sure how to troubleshoot this. Any advice?
I usually see this error when IDE support has not been compiled in the
kernel. So I'd make sure that in the Block Devices
VFS: Cannot open root device 03:43
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:43
I'm not exactly sure how to troubleshoot this. Any advice?
I usually see this error when IDE support has not been compiled in the
kernel. So I'd make sure that in the Block Devices section you have
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Guilherme Soares Zahn wrote:
VFS: Cannot open root device 03:43
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:43
I'm not exactly sure how to troubleshoot this. Any advice?
I usually see this error when IDE support has not been compiled in the
kernel. So
Hi !
We have the following 2 problems with NFS: ( Clients and Server running
Debian Linux 2.1 with kernel 2.2.6 )
1) When a user edits a file on one client and then changes to another
client to edit the file again , it takes
about 10-15 seconds until the second client recognizes that
currently
using my original boot floppy.
Thanks again
Cristov
-Original Message-
From: Cristov Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 06, 1998 11:03 AM
To: Debian-User List (E-mail)
Subject: More kernel problems
After recompiling my kernel I'm noticing some error messages
After recompiling my kernel I'm noticing some error messages during the boot
concerning memory. Hoping that someone here could help me, I dumped the
kern.log to the attached log.txt.file. If I should send something else
please let me know.
I also get an error about LD 4 which I believe is the
I trying to set up diald. I had to recompile my kernel to enable
slip support. I made it a module. I did
make mrproper,
make config,
make dep,
make clean,
make zImage,
make modules,
make modules-install.
It looked to me as
Hi,
G == G Crimp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
G Sep 13 02:55:46
Gmodprobe: no dependency information for module:
G/lib/modules/2.0.30/net/slip.o
You must have recompiled the same kernel version that you were
running, and the old modules were still around. So the
Hi,
I trying to set up diald. I had to recompile my kernel to enable
slip support. I made it a module. I did
make mrproper,
make config,
make dep,
make clean,
make zImage,
make modules,
make modules-install.
It looked
Perhaps this isn't the proper list to send kernel problems to but I not sure
where else to post it. Anyways, I have never been able to properly make a
kernel...i dloaded the kernel-source kernel-headers .deb packages and then did
unpack them...it created a kernel-sources and headers dir in my
Matthew D. Myers wrote:
When I recompile my kernel with all the stuff I don't need turned off, for
example scsi support. At bootup I get messages about unresolved symbols and
stuff. What did I do wrong and how can I fix it?
The error messages are happening because you now have a
When I recompile my kernel with all the stuff I don't need turned off, for
example scsi support. At bootup I get messages about unresolved symbols and
stuff. What did I do wrong and how can I fix it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
I had essentially the same symptoms with an Adaptec 2840 (I believe
that is the correct model number). I did try a kernel compiled with
only the AIC7XXX SCSI support and had no change in symptom.
I tried the 1.3.1 disks and the hamm disks (the aic7xxx only kernel
disk was tried only with the
I downloaded the Official CD images 2 or 3 months ago and did all the
checks and balances before burning a CD. I also checked the CD image
file against the burned image (dd and cmp under a UNIX system) and found
no errors.
I tried to install from the CD using a DOS boot and running the
On Thu, 7 May 1998, Bob McGowan wrote:
: I downloaded the Official CD images 2 or 3 months ago and did all the
: checks and balances before burning a CD. I also checked the CD image
: file against the burned image (dd and cmp under a UNIX system) and found
: no errors.
:
: I tried to install
Lately, I keep getting errors similar to the following message:
Jan 26 13:49:19 saigon kernel: general protection:
Jan 26 13:49:19 saigon kernel: CPU:0
Jan 26 13:49:19 saigon kernel: EIP:0010:[_getitimer+220/240]
Jan 26 13:49:19 saigon kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246
Jan 26 13:49:19 saigon
is the kernel on the rescue disk a bzkernel? I have a 386 dx 40 with 4MB
RAM, and when I try and boot up, it freezes and give me the message:
RAMDISK: COmpressed image found in block 0
Is there a zkernel available somewhere?
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe
is the kernel on the rescue disk a bzkernel? I have a 386 dx 40 with 4MB
RAM, and when I try and boot up, it freezes and give me the message:
RAMDISK: COmpressed image found in block 0
Is there a zkernel available somewhere?
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe
Regarding Re: PCMCIA/kernel problems [scheme]; Mike Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] adds:
Mike Cardctl works fine for me, but my question was about how the
Mike SCHEME variable gets set. When I insert my network card and
Mike watch some diagnostic messages (echo $SCHEME) that I've
Thanks for you help. My problem was that I didn't add support for
Advanced Power Management (APM). I would have never figured that...
Thanks again for everyone's help!
Dennis
--
dpk [EMAIL PROTECTED], Systems/Network | work: 353.4844
Division of Enginnering Computing Services |
brian == Brian Mays [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Miller) writes:
Here's a related question - where is the SCHEME variable
set in a Debian 1.3 system? The pcmcia docs state that
the default value is `default', but on my system, the
default value
dpk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I recompiled a 2.0.29 kernel to replace the Debian 'stock' kernel because
it is so large and it hangs for a long time loading the 'md driver'
Actually, it's probably what gets loaded *after* the md driver which
is taking the time. It might not even print anything
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Miller) writes:
After making a new kernel (using make-kpkg and so on, as
specified in /usr/doc/kernel-source-version/debian.README), you
will have to make a new set of pcmcia modules. Instructions are
in /usr/doc/pcmcia-source/README. If you make both the kernel
and
I recompiled a 2.0.29 kernel to replace the Debian 'stock' kernel because
it is so large and it hangs for a long time loading the 'md driver' and
With the debian kernel, I installed the pcmcia packages and had
successfully working my 3COM 589B card. When I boot the new kernel I get
error
I have a working setup for the 3c589. When I get home from work I'll send
you any information you need from it...if you want?
On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, dpk wrote:
I recompiled a 2.0.29 kernel to replace the Debian 'stock' kernel because
it is so large and it hangs for a long time loading the 'md
Yes Please!
Thanks,
dpk
--
dpk [EMAIL PROTECTED], Systems/Network | work: 353.4844
Division of Enginnering Computing Services | page: 222.5875
On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, Matthew Tebbens wrote:
I have a working setup for the 3c589. When I get home from work I'll send
you any
After making a new kernel (using make-kpkg and so on, as
specified in /usr/doc/kernel-source-version/debian.README), you
will have to make a new set of pcmcia modules. Instructions are
in /usr/doc/pcmcia-source/README. If you make both the kernel
and the pcmcia modules according to the Debian
Ok,
First, I'm using kernel 2.0.30 (I would suggest upgradeing to that). I
remember upgradeing to that for a pcmcia reason, not sure what it was
though.
Get the sources and recompile. I was FORCED to add support for pci and
apm and maybe a few other laptop specific stuff, if I didn't add those
Hello,
I'm sort of new at this, so if this has already been discussed before
i'm sorry. I've recently installed Debian (i've used RedHat before...)
and i've
been trying to set up a PPP connection to my ISP. I recompilied my
kernel (2.0.27),
making sure it included support for PPP. But,
If you set it as a module in the config you have to do: make modules ;
make modules_install.
Also make sure you have the TCP/IP in the kernel.
It's best to put these in the kernel instead of making them modules.
On Wed, 7 May 1997, Regina O'Rear wrote:
Hello,
I'm sort of new at
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
