rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
...
> ... Sometimes I feel
> like an idiot.
>
> All seems well.
:)
i've had days like that... glad you figured it out.
completely OT from your issue, but today i finally upgraded
my stable partition from whatever it was on (last major update
was probably a
Intentionally top posting:
Thanks to all who replied, I got the Arris DG2470A modem (/ router) working in
bridge mode with my existing router (Ubiquiti Edge Router X).
I made a dumb mistake -- I had my router and another computer plugged into the
Arris (I used the other computer to configure
On Fri 28 Apr 2023 at 14:25:20 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Some key phrases / sub topics:
>* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
>* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
>* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
[ … ]
> I
On 4/28/23 20:25, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Some key phrases / sub topics:
* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
I'm tired but I'm lost at your set up and I'm
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Some key phrases / sub topics:
>* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
>* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
>* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
> I've now signed up to a new ISP (Astound / RCN
Some key phrases / sub topics:
* Astound (cable based) ISP in eastern Pa. area
* Arris DG2470A modem / router in bridge mode with Ubiquiti Edge Router X
* Ubiquiti Edge Router X in DMZ
Aside: I'm in a catch 22 -- my new, cable-based ISP (Astound / RCN) says my
questions are out
gar més
trastos
> apart de l'ordinador. Per això ja em serviria el telèfon
mòbil que
> té el
> mateix paper, i el què tinc em resulta lent.
>
> El dispositiu es detecta en un primer moment com a emmagatzematge
> (0685:2000 ZD
r més trastos
> > apart de l'ordinador. Per això ja em serviria el telèfon mòbil que
> > té el
> > mateix paper, i el què tinc em resulta lent.
> >
> > El dispositiu es detecta en un primer moment com a emmagatzematge
> > (0685:2000 ZD Incorpo
èfon mòbil que
té el
mateix paper, i el què tinc em resulta lent.
El dispositiu es detecta en un primer moment com a emmagatzematge
(0685:2000 ZD Incorporated USB Qualcomm Storage), però en uns segons
canvia a modem (12d1:1001 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
E161/E169/E620/E800
alcomm Storage), però en uns segons
> canvia a modem (12d1:1001 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
> E161/E169/E620/E800 HSDPA Modem). Suposo que es tracta d'una correcció
> que fa el udev o el què sigui que organitza els dispositius.
>
> 1. Utilitzo el NetworkManager. Com s'enumeren les
El 17/3/23 a les 11:23, Adrià ha escrit:
Am 16/03/2023 um 14:18 schrieb Narcis Garcia:
No tinc ni idea de què fer amb Wireshark per a comprovar no sé el què.
A GNU/Linux el dispositiu es configura (IP, porta, DNS), però no
aconsegueixo arribar a cap servei extern, ni tan sols respon ping cap
, i el què tinc em resulta lent.
El dispositiu es detecta en un primer moment com a emmagatzematge
(0685:2000 ZD Incorporated USB Qualcomm Storage), però en uns segons
canvia a modem (12d1:1001 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
E161/E169/E620/E800 HSDPA Modem). Suposo que es tracta d'una correcció
Hola, Adrià, Narcís,
A la feina ens vam trobar que a partir d'una determinada versió Ubuntu
determinats USB 3G van deixar de funcionar.
Actualment s'utilitzen "encaminadors" amb bateria (que es carreguen per
USB) que porten la SIM i engegats donen una WiFi a la que diversos equips
poden connectar
Am 16/03/2023 um 14:18 schrieb Narcis Garcia:
No tinc ni idea de què fer amb Wireshark per a comprovar no sé el què.
A GNU/Linux el dispositiu es configura (IP, porta, DNS), però no
aconsegueixo arribar a cap servei extern, ni tan sols respon ping cap a
la porta d'enllaç ni els servidors DNS,
les targetes SIM que utilitzo no
són per a modem sinó per a terminals amb sistema operatiu xungo
(Android, iOS) i em derivaven a una botiga de la cadena.
I a la botiga em diuen que l'operador no diferencia entre targetes SIM
per aquest tema. I a la botiga em van demostrar que la meva targeta SIM
Am 06/02/2023 um 14:08 schrieb Narcis Garcia:
> He arribat fins al punt que realitza la connexió de xarxa (indica
> cobertura, autoassigna IP pròpia, porta d'enllaç i DNS), però
> aconsegueixo fer CAP comunicació via TCP, ICMP o DNS.
> El «ping» es queda esperant sense resultat per a qualsevol
Bones,
Estic intentant utilitzar una connexió mòbil amb un ordinador portàtil
que ja porta integrat un modem GSM (HP, Inc lt4112 Gobi 4G Module
Network Device).
Li he ficat una targeta SIM (que abans he comprovat amb un telèfon que
connecta amb tots els serveis), i m'hi he anat trencant el
Replaying to myself:
To get iIP information use the following:
# mmcli -m 0 -b 1
General| dbus path: /org/freedesktop/ModemManager1/Bearer/1
| type: default
Status |
On 5/25/21 10:33 PM, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
Hi !
How about using dhclient ?
Does not work (like udhcpc).
Greg
Hi there,
I managed to connect _but_ I do no know how to obtain address. I tried:
udhcpc -q -f -n -i wwan0
no luck, unfortunately. Any suggestions?
To connect I use the following:
# mmcli -m 0 --simple-connect="apn=darmowy"
successfully connected the modem
#
On Tuesday, March 09, 2021 03:54:18 PM David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 09 Mar 2021 at 08:12:47 (-0500), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I have DSL service, and a spare modem that I've occasionally put in
> > service (for testing the "main" modem) and have not had to notify the
routers.
MAC address is only visible inside of one Ethernet network, so anyone on
the other side of the router doesn't know your MAC address.
Both DOCSIS (cable) modem and DSL modem can run in one of two modes:
* Router mode. In this mode it acts as a router (Level 3 device) and your
Ethernet traffic
atisfactory,
> > > then before you complained, you'd want to check that it's not your
> > > modem at fault. Would you expect your spare modem to work, because it
> > > has a different MAC from what's expected by the ISP's end of the line.
> >
> > >
t; I realise that, but if your service were to become unsatisfactory,
> > then before you complained, you'd want to check that it's not your
> > modem at fault. Would you expect your spare modem to work, because it
> > has a different MAC from what's expected by the ISP's end of the lin
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 10:18:51 +0200
Grzesiek Sójka wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> To be more specific: I already installed Debian Sid and the tablet is HP
> Elite X2 1013 G3. I'm trying to learn how to use the modem mentioned to
> connect to the internet.
Disclaimer: I hav
Hi there,
To be more specific: I already installed Debian Sid and the tablet is HP
Elite X2 1013 G3. I'm trying to learn how to use the modem mentioned to
connect to the internet.
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:33:58 +0200
Grzesiek Sójka wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a tablet equipped with the modem mentioned above. I do not have
> any experience with such devices. I would be grateful for some links
> with some information how to use it on Debian.
Are you tr
Grzesiek Sójka wrote:
> I have a tablet equipped with the modem mentioned above. I do not have
> any experience with such devices. I would be grateful for some links
> with some information how to use it on Debian.
Is your tablet running debian - can you share make and model of the tablet?
Hi there,
I have a tablet equipped with the modem mentioned above. I do not have
any experience with such devices. I would be grateful for some links
with some information how to use it on Debian.
regards
Olivier a écrit :
> 3. Echec avec Chromium/GalliumOS, Chromium/Jessie.
Certes, mais que ce passe-t-il exactement dans ce cas là ? Quel est le
message d'erreur et/ou le comportement constaté ?
Sébastien
--
Sébastien Dinot, sebastien.di...@free.fr
http://www.palabritudes.net/
Ne goûtez pas au
1. L'erreur exacte est ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED.
Sur Windows, quand je saisis l'URL http://192.168.1.1 du modem, il y a un
formulaire "Sécurité Windows" (Edge/win10) ou "Ouvrir une session"
(Chrome/win10) qui s'affiche
et qui me demande la saisie d'un login-mot de passe.
Le D
r le message d'erreur exact, il est bien difficile
de poser un diagnostic. Par expérience (générale et non de ce modem que
je ne connais pas), je pencherais pour un problème de certificat TLS/SSL
auto-signé, refusé par les navigateurs, de plus en plus pointilleux - et
avec raison - sur ce point. Je dirai
Bonjour,
Je souhaite accéder à l'interface de configuration d'un modem ADSL D-Link
DSL-320B.
J'ai réussi à le faire avec un PC sous Windows 10 mais j'ai
systématiquement un message d'erreur (je ne me rappelle plus du message
exact) quand je le fais avec le navigateur d'une machine sous debian
Eri wrote:
> I'm using Debian Bullseye on a Thinkpad T490s with FIBOCOM L830-EB-00 WWAN
> modem.
> I would like to know if it is possible to make voice calls with that
> modem. I was able to make a phone call with AT COMMANDS
> ATD + NUMBER;
> or answer
> ATA
>
> T
I'm using Debian Bullseye on a Thinkpad T490s with FIBOCOM L830-EB-00 WWAN
modem.
I would like to know if it is possible to make voice calls with that modem.
I was able to make a phone call with AT COMMANDS
ATD + NUMBER;
or answer
ATA
Tha user manual of the modem says that voice calls are allowed
Selamlar,
On 4/9/19 6:10 AM, Recai Uyan wrote:
Merhaba, Conexant Systems (Rockwell), Inc. SoftK56 Data Fax Voice CARP
usb fax modem i günlerdir ubuntu 14.04 ve raspbian jessie ye
tanıtamıyorum. Bu konuda daha önce çalışmış olan yardımcı olabilecek
bir arkadaşa ihtiyacım var. Lütfen
Merhaba, Conexant Systems (Rockwell), Inc. SoftK56 Data Fax Voice CARP
usb fax modem i günlerdir ubuntu 14.04 ve raspbian jessie ye
tanıtamıyorum. Bu konuda daha önce çalışmış olan yardımcı olabilecek
bir arkadaşa ihtiyacım var. Lütfen biliyorsanız yardımınızı rica
ediyorum.
Recai Uyan
On Monday, June 18, 2018 08:44:20 AM Michael Stone wrote:
> He really doesn't want a sensible solution, just let it go.
+1
On 06/18/2018 07:17 AM, David wrote:
On 1 June 2018 at 00:21, Richard Owlett wrote:
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What is the make and model number of each computer?
No longer a relevant question.
I have
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:17:21PM +1000, David wrote:
On 1 June 2018 at 00:21, Richard Owlett wrote:
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What is the make and model number of each computer?
He really doesn't want a
On 1 June 2018 at 00:21, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What is the make and model number of each computer?
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 08:07:15AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 22:26 -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Richard Owlett writes:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers
> did.
> Then we used RS232-C with
On 2018-06-07, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> This depends on what you mean by "universal". It was intended to be a
> protocol for computers to use to communicate with peripherals;
> "universal" in this context was restricted to peripherals.
And to the planet earth rather than all the way to the
On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 22:26 -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Richard Owlett writes:
>
> > I have two computers with USB ports.
> > I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers
> > did.
> > Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropr
Richard Owlett writes:
> On 06/01/2018 08:21 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
back and plays "gadget"
Richard Owlett writes:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
> software at both ends.
>
> The underlying problem is that both end
On Fri 01 Jun 2018 at 09:08:53 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/01/2018 08:21 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >>>The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
> >>>back and plays "gadget" [...]
> >
> >>The
tarted out talking about RS232 and null modem cables, so
don't be surprised if people are having trouble figuring out what you're
asking for. Then you asked for better ideas. Then you got mad about all
the ideas and started laughing hysterically. I have no idea what you
actually want at this point.
o.
We are now leaving the realms of simplicity and performance for more
subjective lands of doing things "just because" or for the retro
computing experience. You can certainly use a pair of USB serial adaptors
and then run a null modem cable between them, then run PPP over
that. Absolutel
On 06/01/2018 09:01 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:56:32AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 05/31/2018 06:58 PM, David Wright wrote:
(thanks for your link) gives an idea of the price, and in this case I
can see some justification for it because they describe the
electronics
ne of the worse compatibility violators.
> > The "way back machine" to simulate a "null modem" serial cable
> > exists, as you've seen, but it's rarely the best solution for
> > nowadays's needs,
>
> "Best" is not an invariant absolute.
>
> &g
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:01:57 -0400
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:56:32AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >On 05/31/2018 06:58 PM, David Wright wrote:
> >>(thanks for your link) gives an idea of the price, and in this case
> >>I can see some justification for it because they
On Fri 01 Jun 2018 at 05:26:01 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/01/2018 01:27 AM, deloptes wrote:
> >Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> >>I have two computers with USB ports.
> >>I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> >
On 06/01/2018 08:21 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
back and plays "gadget" [...]
The gadget API is the programming API
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:56:32AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 05/31/2018 06:58 PM, David Wright wrote:
(thanks for your link) gives an idea of the price, and in this case I
can see some justification for it because they describe the
electronics hidden inside the plugs (we hope).
But
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
> > back and plays "gadget" [...]
> The gadget API is the programming API offered by the kernel for the OTG
> ports: no
> The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
> back and plays "gadget" (the jargon term, somewhat unfortunate
> as search engine fodder). There seems to be something out there
> for that, e.g. [2].
The gadget API is the programming API offered by the kernel for the OTG
ports:
>> In some cases one of the two computers's USB port is an "OTG" port,
>> meaning that it can act either as "master" or not, in which case you can
>> just use a regular USB cable (and usually you then configure the OTG
>> side to pretend it's a network card, so it ends up looking to the
>>
On 06/01/2018 01:27 AM, deloptes wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
software at both ends.
J., why not take a cross
to do file
copying/sharing over RS232 - even I would not actually attempt to implement.
The "way back machine" to simulate a "null modem" serial cable exists,
as you've seen, but it's rarely the best solution for nowadays's needs,
"Best" is not an invariant a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:27:13AM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> > I have two computers with USB ports.
> > I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> > Then we used R
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
> software at both ends.
>
J., why not take a crossover cable - all pc
> If none of that are options, you can resort to using an "ethernet
> dongle" on both sides and an ethernet cable between the two.
[ If one of the two computers has a free ethernet port, you can of
course also such a dongle on the other computer. ]
BTW, those ethernet dongles can be found
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What kind of "communicate" do you need there?
The "way back machine" to simulate a "null modem" serial cable exists,
as you've seen, but it's rar
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:21:27AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software software
> at both ends.
>
>
Hi.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:21:27AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software software
&
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
software at both ends.
The underlying problem is that both ends egotistically expect to be
*MASTER*.
The hard
On Tue 02 Jan 2018 at 08:50:13 (+0100), john doe wrote:
> On 1/2/2018 8:16 AM, john doe wrote:
> >On 1/2/2018 8:01 AM, Tom Furie wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:52:31AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> >>
> >>>My default route is not 192.168.1.1 and host(1) gives me that
> >>>same error.
> >>
>
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 02:59:41PM +, Glenn English wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Max Power wrote:
>
> > with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been
> > replaced
>
> Wipe your disk and install Buster. You get route++ back.
Worst
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Max Power wrote:
> with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
Wipe your disk and install Buster. You get route++ back.
Or create some shell scripts...
--
Glenn English
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 12:12:47AM +0100, Max Power wrote:
> Hi guys,
> with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
> but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/router gateway...?
> # route
> gateway = home.telecomitalia.it
> #
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 12:12:47AM +0100, Max Power wrote:
> with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
> but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/router gateway...?
> # route
> gateway = home.telecomitalia.it
> # ip route
> gat
On 1/2/2018 8:16 AM, john doe wrote:
On 1/2/2018 8:01 AM, Tom Furie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:52:31AM +0100, john doe wrote:
My default route is not 192.168.1.1 and host(1) gives me that same
error.
What the error actually means is that there is no reverse DNS resolution
for that IP
On 1/2/2018 8:01 AM, Tom Furie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:52:31AM +0100, john doe wrote:
My default route is not 192.168.1.1 and host(1) gives me that same error.
What the error actually means is that there is no reverse DNS resolution
for that IP address, in other words the IP
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:52:31AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> My default route is not 192.168.1.1 and host(1) gives me that same error.
What the error actually means is that there is no reverse DNS resolution
for that IP address, in other words the IP address cannot be resolved to
its hostname. It
On 1/2/2018 7:45 AM, Tom Furie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:38:54AM +0100, john doe wrote:
Looks like 192.168.1.1 is not your default route.
What led you to that conclusion?
My default route is not 192.168.1.1 and host(1) gives me that same error.
--
John Doe
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:38:54AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> Looks like 192.168.1.1 is not your default route.
What led you to that conclusion?
Cheers,
Tom
--
A good scapegoat is hard to find.
A guilty conscience is the mother of invention.
-- Carolyn Wells
signature.asc
On 1/2/2018 7:15 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Tue 02 Jan 2018 at 06:25:29 (+0100), john doe wrote:
On 1/2/2018 12:12 AM, Max Power wrote:
Hi guys,
with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/router gateway
On Tue 02 Jan 2018 at 06:25:29 (+0100), john doe wrote:
> On 1/2/2018 12:12 AM, Max Power wrote:
> >Hi guys,
> >with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
> >but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/router gateway...?
On 1/2/2018 12:12 AM, Max Power wrote:
Hi guys,
with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/router gateway...?
# route
gateway = home.telecomitalia.it
# ip route
gateway = 192.168.1.1
Thanks for reply
Hi guys,
with the new release of Debian 'Stretch', the route command has been replaced
but what other command returns the hostname of the modem/router gateway...?
# route
gateway = home.telecomitalia.it
# ip route
gateway = 192.168.1.1
Thanks for reply, Max Power.
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 09:29:30PM +1000, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
> -Original Message- From: Dan Ritter
> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 8:08 PM
> To: Stephen Grant Brown
> Cc: Debian User
> Subject: Re: iinet modem, esternal usb hdd
>
> On Thu, Sep 07, 201
-Original Message-
From: Dan Ritter
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 8:08 PM
To: Stephen Grant Brown
Cc: Debian User
Subject: Re: iinet modem, esternal usb hdd
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:39:57PM +1000, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
Hi All,
I am seeing the external usb hdd connected
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:39:57PM +1000, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am seeing the external usb hdd connected to the iinet modem via the usb
> port as being accessible via both Samba and DLNA.
>
> How do I access it on a Debian machine.
https://wiki.debian.org/S
Hi All,
I am seeing the external usb hdd connected to the iinet modem via the usb port
as being accessible via both Samba and DLNA.
How do I access it on a Debian machine.
Yours Sincerely
Stephen Grant Brown
o download,
> supuestamente tiene que ser detectado como un modem, y así lo hace:
> udev detecta un modem USB 1.0, carga el módulo cdc_acm, pero no
> genera un dispositivo ttyACM, si enciendo el teléfono lo enciendo en
> otro modo, debug, si genera el ttyACM.
>
> He probado en testin
El 13 ago. 2017 3:21 PM, <angel...@wanadoo.es> escribió:
Hola a todos.
Estoy conectando un teléfono Galaxy Ace en modo download, supuestamente
tiene que ser detectado como un modem, y así lo hace: udev detecta un
modem USB 1.0, carga el módulo cdc_acm, pero no genera un dispositivo
ttyA
Hola a todos.
Estoy conectando un teléfono Galaxy Ace en modo download, supuestamente
tiene que ser detectado como un modem, y así lo hace: udev detecta un
modem USB 1.0, carga el módulo cdc_acm, pero no genera un dispositivo
ttyACM, si enciendo el teléfono lo enciendo en otro modo, debug, si
sbserial: USB Serial support registered for generic
[6.550227] usbcore: registered new interface driver sierra
[6.550235] usbserial: USB Serial support registered for Sierra USB modem
[6.550251] sierra 2-1.4:1.0: Sierra USB modem converter detected
[6.550748] usb 2-1.4: Sierra USB
El 11/05/17 a las 03:49, Alan escribió:
> Saludos a todos. Tengo un conocido que tiene un extraño inconveniente
> con un modem 4G de Movistar. El modelo es un Huawei E1756.
>
> Resulta que ese modelo en algunas distribuciones GNU/Linux anda
> perfecto, y en otras no hay forma d
Saludos a todos. Tengo un conocido que tiene un extraño inconveniente
con un modem 4G de Movistar. El modelo es un Huawei E1756.
Resulta que ese modelo en algunas distribuciones GNU/Linux anda
perfecto, y en otras no hay forma de hacerlo andar...
Funciona en una distro con un kernel cargado de
ire.
Il faut sans doute qu'une personne de la liste possède un tel modem
pour pouvoir m'aider.
Bon dimanche.
André
Bonsoir,
Pour le wifi il s'agit des fréquences utilisé (en gros 5Ghz pour A & N
2,4Ghz B,G & N)
Une petite copie d'écrans pourrait nous aider.
@+Alex
Le 28/01/2017 à 21:30, andre_deb...@numericable.fr a écrit :
> Bonsoir,
>
> Y a t-il parmi vous des personnes qui ont un mode
Bonsoir,
Y a t-il parmi vous des personnes qui ont un modem
SagemCom F@st 3284 ?
(c'est le modèle pour SFR et Numericable)
Je ne vois absolument pas comment configurer la WiFi,
il y a 2 types de WIFI : WI-FI 2,4 GHZ et WI-FI 5 GHZ
Laquelle choisir et comment choisir sa clé ?
qui propose 3
50:47 mohot pppd[256]: In file /etc/ppp/peers/alditalk: unrecognized
option '/dev/ttyUSB0'
Dec 11 08:50:56 mohot kernel: [ 17.462944] usb 1-1: GSM modem (1-port)
converter now attached to ttyUSB0
root@mohot:~#
Is there a way to get this dependency included in the boot process?
Many thanks
Rainer
--
primer ce compte par défaut pour en
créer un ou plusieurs de son choix. N'est-ce pas suffisant ?
- Mail original -
> De: "Michel Memeteau - EKIMIA" <cont...@ekimia.fr>
> À: "debian-user-french" <debian-user-french@lists.debian.org>
> Envoyé: Samed
Bonjour , aucune réponse ?
ça nous gêne un peu car on vends des Pcs avec debian préinstallé et on est
obligé de pré configuré un compte et un mot de passe.
Si quelqu'un a une idée ...
[image: photo]
*Michel Memeteau*
Directeur, Ekimia SAS
+33 (0)9 72 30 83 34 <+33+9+72+30+83+34> |
Existem algum outro modem que trabalha com MER além do D-LINK DSL 500B?
Charles Forsburg has passed away.
http://www.anewtradition.com/obituaries/obituary/12060_Charles_Alton_Forsberg
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
On Friday 20 November 2015 14:04:48 Ric Moore wrote:
> Charles Forsburg has passed away.
> http://www.anewtradition.com/obituaries/obituary/12060_Charles_Alton_F
>orsberg
Oh fudge. Damn. His rzsz software that I last built at version 3.3.6,
but made some serious speedups in, for the
1 - 100 of 7848 matches
Mail list logo