Hi all!
A few minutes ago I just experienced a horrible crash on one of my
computers with Debian Jessie:
---
Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.832919] general protection fault:
[#1] SMP
Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01
94057] firefox: Corrupted page table at address 7f0fc100d3b8
> > [10756.194061] PGD 4d55f067 PUD 4d551067 PMD 5e346067 PTE
> 807b43e44067
> > [10756.194064] Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP
>
> (...)
>
> > I use xfce as the windows manager and gdm as the display manager.
cation named firefox got freeze, not responding.
>
> [quote]
> $ dmesg
>
> [10756.194057] firefox: Corrupted page table at address 7f0fc100d3b8
> [10756.194061] PGD 4d55f067 PUD 4d551067 PMD 5e346067 PTE 807b43e44067
> [10756.194064] Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP
(...)
&g
[10756.194057] firefox: Corrupted page table at address 7f0fc100d3b8
[10756.194061] PGD 4d55f067 PUD 4d551067 PMD 5e346067 PTE 807b43e44067
[10756.194064] Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP
[10756.194066] last sysfs file:
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:04.0/:02:00.0/class
[10756.194069] CPU 0
following message :
>>
>> root@aster:~#
>> Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ...
>> kernel:[1202001.893158] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP
>
> (...)
>
> Being a kernel oops, I would report it in Debian BTS.
okay, will do. thanks
--
--
>
> root@aster:~#
> Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ...
> kernel:[1202001.893158] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP
(...)
Being a kernel oops, I would report it in Debian BTS.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &quo
] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP
Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ...
kernel:[1202001.893165] last sysfs file:
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/usb3/3-1/3-1.3/3-1.3:1.0/host8/target8:0:0/8:0:0:0/block/sdc/uevent
Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ...
kernel:[1202001.893435] Stack
gt;
>>>> Joey L wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi..i am getting the same issue on ibm 3650 - did you get any answers
>>>>> or found solution ?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> mj
>>>>>
>>>>> On
2011-04-19 15:29, alex.padoly skrev:
I would like to know if I can choose a smp kernel when I going to
install DEBIAN 6.0
I believe there is no choice. All kernels are smp-kernels.
A related bug report was closed in 2007 with the comment:
"As recent Linux kernels in Debian all hav
Hi,
I would like to know if I can choose a smp kernel when I going to install
DEBIAN 6.0
Regards.
Alex PADOLY
Arthur Machlas put forth on 7/30/2010 9:04 AM:
>> BTW, I'm curious as to your motivations for this. Is this basically a
>> "Windows can do 800MHz, so $deity dammit, Linux should be able to do it as
>> well!" thing?
>
> Not as such. More like a my processor is supposed to scale from 800Mhz
> to 1
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> How do you read the possible cpu frequencies?
>
> Your kernel needs cpufreq support and ondemand, powersave, etc.
> governors; check with
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
> cat /sys/devices/system/cp
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Arthur Machlas put forth on 7/29/2010 12:01 PM:
>
>> Things are running nicely, but the problem I hoped
>> to resolve hasn't been. Namely, the lowest frequency my cpu can reach
>> is 1Ghz... instead of the 800Mhz that it reaches on windows a
Arthur Machlas put forth on 7/29/2010 12:01 PM:
> Things are running nicely, but the problem I hoped
> to resolve hasn't been. Namely, the lowest frequency my cpu can reach
> is 1Ghz... instead of the 800Mhz that it reaches on windows and in the
> spec sheets.
>
> Advice on how to proceed from he
How do you read the possible cpu frequencies?
Your kernel needs cpufreq support and ondemand, powersave, etc.
governors; check with
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors
cat /sys/devices/system/cp
odels currently on the market.
Probably just a problem with linuxinfo, which I'd never heard of
before, but installed when cpuinfo was not found and aptitude
suggested linuxinfo provided it. In any event, cat /proc/cpuinfo shows
all the right information.
You can't.. or rather, I can'
ther doesn't support CPU_ID or doesn't have the tables
for Atom CPUs, or both. This is a kernel config option.
> r...@hpm210:/home/arthur/Misc/Linux/2.6.34-1# linuxinfo
> Linux HPm210 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:59:47 UTC 2010
> Two Intel Unknown 1666MHz processors, 6650.42
Greetings,
According to the spec sheet on the Atom N450 it has a single core,
though it does support two threads. However, linuxinfo (replaces
cpuinfo I suppose) says two unknown processors.
r...@hpm210:/home/arthur/Misc/Linux/2.6.34-1# linuxinfo
Linux HPm210 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:59
Scott Berry:
>
> I am using the kernel in my subject. It seems as though this kernel
> likes to lock up quite a bit when the CPu fan is at a higher rate of
> speed due to other tasks being done in the background. I am using Lenny
> and I never can remember before Debian being this unstable.
Sou
Hello there,
I am using the kernel in my subject. It seems as though this kernel
likes to lock up quite a bit when the CPu fan is at a higher rate of
speed due to other tasks being done in the background. I am using Lenny
and I never can remember before Debian being this unstable. Is there a
ke
which seems to have done the trick nicely.
However I am a little concerned about the messages produced when apm
is loaded:
apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x03 (Driver version 1.16ac)
apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe (power off active).
This is a SMP motherboard with two c
server with a second Opteron CPU. When we tried
to boot the system with the SMP kernel it gave the following messages
just after the login prompt and hung:
Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI
hang ?
Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:04:12PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
> I am hoping that there might be some kernel experts out there that can
> offer some suggestions as to what might be going wrong with the 686
> kernel, and which I might be able to try in order to resolve (or at least
> explain) the p
p : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse
bogomips: 896.10
I tried booting the 686 kernel with the 'nosmp' option to see if there was
a problem with the SMP implementation on this machine, but
;>> just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
> >>> supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
> >>> CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
> >>> SMP kernel wor
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:17:21PM -0400, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload
> > is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of
>
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload
> is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of
^^
No!, it is yet another American
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Robert Cates wrote:
Ok, but 16x better? Or 16x more efficient? I know that if we're talking
about a 2GHz quad core CPU we're not getting 8GHz of speed, but what exactly
is the (performance) advantage of SMP?
Not much, unless you can write software tha
supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
>>> CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
>>> SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of
>>> cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel
will the
SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of
cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel will support?
Thanks much,
Robert
don't expect things to go 16x faster
Ok, but 16x better? Or 16x more efficient? I know that if we're
talki
from etch, will the
> SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of
> cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel will support?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /boot/config-2.6.18-5-686 | grep CONFIG_NR_CPUS
CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8
This was the "vanilla" config al
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
> supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
> CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from
Hi all,
just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current lim
2007/9/23, Pál Csányi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2007/9/23, Curt Howland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > One thing I forgot to mention, there is little or no performance hit
> > for using an SMP kernel with a single-CPU machine. So I wouldn't
> > worry about that.
On 09/23/2007 10:50 AM, Pál Csányi wrote:
> How can I turn off SMP and then disable local APIC with this kernel?
For the options to persist across kernel updates/upgrades, add the
options 'nosmp' and 'noapic' to /boot/grub/menu.lst on the kopt= line,
then run 'updat
Hello!
Debian Etch system with linux-image-2.6.18-5-686.
How can I turn off SMP and then disable local APIC with this kernel?
Any advices will be appreciated!
--
Regards, Paul Csanyi
http://www.freewebs.com/csanyi-pal/index.htm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
sing acpi=force),
> > someone on the Fedora list suggested that it could be a problem with SMP
> > kernels.
> >
> > I Googled a bit the other day, and found stuff about recompiling the
> > kernel, and disabling SMP in it, but is there a way to disable SMP by
> > app
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Nigel Henry wrote:
I've been trying to help someone on the list with acpi related shutdown
problems, with no success up to now.
When I had shutdown problems with FC5 (fixed with using acpi=force), someone
on the Fedora list suggested that it could be a problem wit
I've been trying to help someone on the list with acpi related shutdown
problems, with no success up to now.
When I had shutdown problems with FC5 (fixed with using acpi=force), someone
on the Fedora list suggested that it could be a problem with SMP kernels.
I Googled a bit the other day
Hi,
In debian stable/testing system, how to force mysql to use multiple CPU (I
have Core2 Duo)?
I host a Database and all queries are issued by a single user/pass (the
frontend).
When monitoring the server, mysql never span to the second core...
How to?
Thank you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Hello,
On dual proc Xeon with dual ethernet Intel e1000, when I run a tcpdump,
according to network traffic my system freezes.
The console is dead, the only way to restore the system is an electric power
restart.
My configuration is :
# uname -a
Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp #1 SMP Tue Aug 16 12:08:30
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Hi all,
might be the wrong NG for such request but I'm not willing to get into a
MSFT one!
Problem:
Using a recent Vista Family premium, I could not see the content on a
Samba shared folder (folder
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> might be the wrong NG for such request but I'm not willing to get into a
> MSFT one!
>
> Problem:
> Using a recent Vista Family premium, I could not see the content on a
> Samba shared folder (folder could be open
Hi all,
might be the wrong NG for such request but I'm not willing to get into a
MSFT one!
Problem:
Using a recent Vista Family premium, I could not see the content on a
Samba shared folder (folder could be opened but i's empty...). Same
works when used by other XP or NT Windows based PC.
I
the
>>> host is showing two cpu's but the guest does not...
>>> Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or am I doing something
>>> wrong?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Did you assigne the guest to more than one CPU in your configuration?
>
Roberto C. Sanchez skrev:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:15:56PM +0100, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote:
Hi list.
I'm running Xen under Etch and running an instance of Etch under Xen, the
host is showing two cpu's but the guest does not...
Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:15:56PM +0100, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote:
> Hi list.
> I'm running Xen under Etch and running an instance of Etch under Xen, the
> host is showing two cpu's but the guest does not...
> Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or am I d
Hi list.
I'm running Xen under Etch and running an instance of Etch under Xen, the
host is showing two cpu's but the guest does not...
Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or am I doing something
wrong?
Thanx
Sturla
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
about 1m 15s, I don't know if bz2 is
multithreaded but even if it's not I would expect a slight speed
increase but in fact with a SMP 2.6 kernel it take 13 ~ 15m, with a SMP
2.4 kernel it takes 1m 28s and with a 2.4 UP 1m 35s.
with 2.6.18 from sid I get
nas:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/h
.18 from sid but it's displaying the same problems.
As a test of CPU power I've been decompressing the kernel tree, with a
UP 2.6 kernel this takes about 1m 15s, I don't know if bz2 is
multithreaded but even if it's not I would expect a slight speed
increase but in fact wi
>Linux supports "smp-alternatives" since 2.6.17. This
>means, that additional processors can be added
>dynamically while the boot process of the kernel.
>Or in other words: all Debians kernel images do
support >smp (i386,powerpc and some other archs).
Thanks for the
Enrique Morfin wrote:
> Does the package linux-image-2.6.18-1-686-bigmem is
> smp?
Linux supports "smp-alternatives" since 2.6.17. This means, that
additional processors can be added dynamically while the boot process of
the kernel.
Or in other words: all Debians kernel image
Hi!
Im running sid with kernel 2.6.16-1-686-smp
I want to upgrade the kernel.
The question is:
Does the package linux-image-2.6.18-1-686-bigmem is
smp?
or where are the 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 smp images?
Thanks.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Madden wrote:
[[snip]]
>
> I don't have an answer.I thought ACPI was for power management, esp
> laptops, a heavily used server doesn't seem to me to need power
> management. I have a smp PIII Gz that gives me fits, IRQ a
On 10/5/06, Greg Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't have an answer.I thought ACPI was for power management, esp
laptops, a heavily used server doesn't seem to me to need power
management. I have a smp PIII Gz that gives me fits, IRQ allocation on
the pci slots. This is a
em corruption
> > > because of dodgy RAID drivers. I disabled ACPI, which fixed
> > > this, but now I am down to running on two cores.
> > >
> > > My question is, is there any way to run SMP (that will give me all
> > > four cores) without ACPI?
> &g
gt; running on two cores.
>
> My question is, is there any way to run SMP (that will give me all
> four cores) without ACPI?
If you are running on two cores, and you see both in /proc/cpuinfo, then
you have SMP enabled.
I can see two cores in /proc/cpuinfo, but I used to see four, since
t
ow I am down to
> running on two cores.
>
> My question is, is there any way to run SMP (that will give me all
> four cores) without ACPI?
>
If you are running on two cores, and you see both in /proc/cpuinfo, then
you have SMP enabled.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http:
Hi all...
I have a dual Xeon machine that was running fine on all four cores,
but then I started getting some filesystem corruption because of dodgy
RAID drivers. I disabled ACPI, which fixed this, but now I am down to
running on two cores.
My question is, is there any way to run SMP (that
Hello,
before sending a bug report to Debian, i prefer ask you for this problem.
I've got 18 minutes difference between ps command and date command.
I don't know if it's a ps bug or not.
Here is an example :
kernel:2.6.8-3-686-smp
node# date; ps faux | grep 'ps'
Hello,
I may be totally not getting something here, but I was planing to play
around with Xen and had a look at what's present in the unstable
repository. I'm running a amd64 SMP machine and was wondering whether Xen
enabled SMP kernels are in the works - maybe I'm misunderstand
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:25:53 -0700
"Martin J. Hillyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 03:52:07PM -0400, S Scharf wrote:
> >I just installed the etch linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp package
> > on my machine
> >along with linux-head
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 03:52:07PM -0400, S Scharf wrote:
>I just installed the etch linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp package on my
>machine
>along with linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686-smp. I than tried to run the
>vmware-config.pl to use the new kernel. I get:
>
>---
On Sunday 23 July 2006 3:52 pm, S Scharf wrote:
> I just installed the etch linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp package on my
> machine
>
> along with linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686-smp. I than tried to run the
> vmware-config.pl to use the new kernel. I get:
>
>
> What is the l
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:52:07 -0400
S Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just installed the etch linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp package on my
> machine
>
> along with linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686-smp. I than tried to run the
> vmware-config.pl to use the new kernel. I get:
&g
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:52:07 -0400
S Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just installed the etch linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp package on my
> machine
>
> along with linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686-smp. I than tried to run the
> vmware-config.pl to use the new kernel. I get:
&g
I just installed the etch linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp package on my machine along with linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686-smp. I than tried to run thevmware-config.pl to use the new kernel. I get:What is the location of the directory of C header files that match your running
kernel? [/usr/src/linux
Hello!
Problem with definition of the new equipment!
Probably any adjustment at experiments was broke, therefore for
loading a network card it is necessary to register manually ` modprobe
xircom_b `. In what there can be a problem?
--
Best regards,
MEGAnet [EMAIL PROTECT
out the version magic, basically saying that the version
> magic is 2.6.16.2-686-smp gcc 4.1 instead of what it should say which
> is gcc 4.0.
>
> I have linux-headers-2.6.12.2-686-smp installed and I suspect its down
> to the fact that the headers have been built with gcc 4.0 rather th
-smp gcc 4.1 instead of what it should say which is
gcc 4.0.
I have linux-headers-2.6.12.2-686-smp installed and I suspect its down
to the fact that the headers have been built with gcc 4.0 rather than
the current 4.0.
Two questions, should I log a bug and also what can I do to solve the issue
El Jueves, 18 de Mayo de 2006 20:25, escribió:
Thank you,
I thought that I had already answered to the list. It is a reported bug of
xorg and the ati driver. I had to disable dri, I do not what is that for.
--
http://antares.sip.ucm.es/~luis
pgpeZHX1EpOZt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Luis Fernando Llana Díaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In short, I have to disable DRI, although I do not what it is.
Usually if you don't know what it is you don't need it :) Seriously now,
it is Direct Rendering Infrastructure and it has to do with hardware 3d
acceleration.
HTH
Andrei
--
To
that kernel failed, I added the sid repositories to the sources.list and
then I installed linux-image-2.6.16-1-686-smp
Anyway, thank you for your help. I have been searching and it seems it is a
bug in the ati driver of xorg:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=366114
In short, I
El Sábado, 13 de Mayo de 2006 04:53, Grant Thomas escribió:
> On 5/12/06, Luis Fernando Llana Díaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have just installed a new debian box (etch version). Everything runs
> > perfect until I have installed a smp kernel, I have
On 5/12/06, Luis Fernando Llana Díaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have just installed a new debian box (etch version). Everything runs
perfect until I have installed a smp kernel, I have tried 2.6.15-1-686-smp
and 2.6.16-1-smp. It has a hyperthreading (or something similar) penti
Hello,
I have just installed a new debian box (etch version). Everything runs
perfect until I have installed a smp kernel, I have tried 2.6.15-1-686-smp
and 2.6.16-1-smp. It has a hyperthreading (or something similar) pentium and
it seems that in order to take advantage of that feature I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> I've seen this once before on an overheating Opteron system. A rethink
> of the cooling strategy fixed it.
thanks for a hint. this also came to my mind, since the machine was
really under constant load (scientific calculation) for very long tim
Lubos Vrbka wrote:
thanks for any hints. with best regards,
I've seen this once before on an overheating Opteron system. A rethink
of the cooling strategy fixed it.
--
Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ | Anti-spam & anti-virus
Consultant| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi guys,
today, my smp machine (amd64 dual dualcore opteron) crashed with the
following error
Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed May 3 18:44:22 2006 ...
localhost kernel: invalid operand: [1] SMP
i had 2 crashes today, hoever i didn&#
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 04:27:16PM -0400, Yu,Glen [Ontario] wrote:
> What I'm wondering now is if we upgrade to the 2.6.8-3-686-smp kernel via
> apt would it have any ill effects (i.e. it can't detect any hard disks
> again)?
If you're willing to sacrifice your upt
ror citing no hard disks were found.
However, it worked with a regular install (with 2.4.27 kernel), which is
probably because of the lack of the megaraid or megaraid2 driver/module in the
2.6.8 kernel. Since then, we've upgraded our stock 2.4.27 to an smp kernel
which is more fitting fo
Simon wrote:
so that would mean going from kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp to
kernel-image-2.6.8-12-em64t-p4-smp? Is this correct given your comment
above?
Hm, hard to say, check out
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=kernel-image-2.6&searchon=names&s
On 4/6/06, listrcv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon wrote:
> > Hi There, We have a mail server (postfix>amavis>dbmail) running debian
> > sarge (2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp) running dual xeons with a tyan
> > motherboard and 3ware hardware raid5. Everything has been r
Simon wrote:
Hi There, We have a mail server (postfix>amavis>dbmail) running debian
sarge (2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp) running dual xeons with a tyan
motherboard and 3ware hardware raid5. Everything has been running fine
up to now, but in the last week it has frozen twice. Completly stuck
nee
Hi There, We have a mail server (postfix>amavis>dbmail) running debian
sarge (2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp) running dual xeons with a tyan
motherboard and 3ware hardware raid5. Everything has been running fine
up to now, but in the last week it has frozen twice. Completly stuck
needing a hard reb
On Thursday 30 March 2006 08:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello, have a sun workstation and decided to install debian etch on it,
> everything goes fine, i installed 2 different kernels
> linux-kernel-2.6.15-1-k7-smp and linux-kernel-2.6.15-1-686-smp, when
> any of that kernel boots
hello, have a sun workstation and decided to install debian etch on it,
everything goes fine, i installed 2 different kernels
linux-kernel-2.6.15-1-k7-smp and linux-kernel-2.6.15-1-686-smp, when any of
that kernel boots it hangs up several seconds during scsi probe, kernel finds
scsi host 0
l-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp with no problems.
Now kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686-smp is available and I get the warning
about installing over the running kernel. Prudently I decided against
it.
The problem is only that if your new kernel doesn't work, you won't have
the old, known-working kern
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 04:28:42AM +, Ramsay D. Seielstad wrote:
>
> Greetings all, seems the kernel-images have recently been updated
> and I'm not sure how to proceed. I'm running an IBM dual xeon 2.4 ghz
> system on the stock kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp with
On (25/03/06 04:28), Ramsay D. Seielstad wrote:
> Greetings all, seems the kernel-images have recently been updated and
> I'm not sure how to proceed. I'm running an IBM dual xeon 2.4 ghz
> system on the stock kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp with no problems.
>
> Now
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 04:28 +, Ramsay D. Seielstad wrote:
>Greetings all, seems the kernel-images have recently been updated and
> I'm not sure how to proceed. I'm running an IBM dual xeon 2.4 ghz
> system on the stock kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp with no problems.
Greetings all, seems the kernel-images have recently been updated and
I'm not sure how to proceed. I'm running an IBM dual xeon 2.4 ghz
system on the stock kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp with no problems.
Now kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686-smp is available and I get the warn
> The only reference in the online manual from your websight says to
> install the single processor kernel first then compile new kernel
> (even though the installation DVD has 2.4 smp and 2.6 smp on it). If
> it is possible, I would like to be able to select 2.6 smp from the
&g
The easiest way I've found to get a 2.6 SMP kernel on installation is to
select the 'expert26' install mode. There's an option to choose which
kernel you'd like to install, and 2.6-SMP is one of the choices. The
'expert' part of it is somewhat misleading
I have a question on how to install Debian 3.1 with the option of
using the 2.6 smp kernel.
I have just installed Debian 3.1 and had to chose the 2.6
kernel (the linux26 option) since there was no smp option. After the
installation was completed and working fine, I installed the 2.6 smp
Hello everybody. I am trying to install anbd on a PIII cluster, and for
that I have to compile the module that they provide. But unfortunately,
I am not being capable of compile this module agaist the
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-686-smp. make menuconfig works nicely, but when I
try to make or make
Joshua Swink wrote:
When I try to install kernel-image-2.6-686-smp, the package fails to
set up. I get the following errors:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp (2.6.15-1) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
yaird error: '/dev
When I try to install kernel-image-2.6-686-smp, the package fails to
set up. I get the following errors:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp (2.6.15-1) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
yaird error: '/dev/hda1' not found (
I have a dual processor system running sarge with an SMP kernel. It cannot
find my modem.
When I run the system with a uniprocessor kernel, the modem works fine.
The SMP kernel I am using is 2.6.8-2-686-smp.
What I would like to know is: does this mean I need to compile a kernel with
I suspect, if you're running Sid, that you've run into a fairly commonissue of /tmp/.ICE-unix file not belonging to root. "chmod -R
root.root/tmp/.ICE-unix" should fix this is this is the problem.I looked at the files in that folder and the folder itself. They all belong to root.
If KDM is runnin
1 - 100 of 526 matches
Mail list logo
