ft porting apt to Windows ?
Because they didn't select YUM. :) Ric
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
http://linuxcounter.net/user/44256.html
De: "Ric Moore"
> and the GPL notice is included. I saw no mention to avoid the GPL in his
> request for information. Ergo, as long as the GPL is honored, this plan
> is actually a plus for Debian.
How is Debian better off from Microsoft porting apt to Windows ?
icrosoft),
we started to think about lib acquisition (still a painful process for
C++ on Windows) and we are imaging different options, one is to port
apt-get on Windows.
Porting Apt-Get mean using Debian format (we love it) and providing
Windows binary inside the package…
For doing that we imagine
Em 22-02-2016 10:56, Jonathan Dowland escreveu:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:21:46PM -0300, Thiago wrote:
> Since this is a development query, debian-devel would be more appropriate than
> debian-user, and unless I'm mistaken, you should make it clear that you do not
> speak for Debian as you are n
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:21:46PM -0300, Thiago wrote:
> Why did you send this message on Debian Apache and not in the main
> mailing list?
Since this is a development query, debian-devel would be more appropriate than
debian-user, and unless I'm mistaken, you should make it clear that you do not
Em 21-02-2016 23:49, John Hasler escreveu:
> I don't know what you mean by that. It's Free Software. They can do
> with it what the license terms permit and no more absent special
> permission from the copyright owner. The authors released it under the
> GPL and that's that. Debian, not owning
Thiego writes:
> I don't like the idea of Debian allowing the restrictions.
I don't know what you mean by that. It's Free Software. They can do
with it what the license terms permit and no more absent special
permission from the copyright owner. The authors released it under the
GPL and that's
ethics to the copyright. Knowledge, owned, must not be
knowledge restricted. Sharing is helpful. Education is respectful. Helps
when people adopts academic behavior to quote the authors.
Em 21-02-2016 18:37, Gary Dale escreveu:
> I don't see why you object so strongly to the idea of porting apt
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 04:37:27PM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
> I don't see why you object so strongly to the idea of porting apt-get to
> Windows. The idea may be a little crazy in that Windows programs don't
> install the same way or use the same libraries but there are lots
I don't see why you object so strongly to the idea of porting apt-get to
Windows. The idea may be a little crazy in that Windows programs don't
install the same way or use the same libraries but there are lots of
other programs that run on Linux and Windows without provoking a hostile
is a right kind of
> crazy!
>
>
>
> I’m PM in the Visual C++ Team (VC Lib to be precise here at Microsoft),
> we started to think about lib acquisition (still a painful process for
> C++ on Windows) and we are imaging different options, one is to port
> apt-get on Windows
Has anyone else experienced problems with nautilus windows becoming
"stuck" - i.e. they cannot be moved using the mouse on the title bar?
They move fine using the default Gnome keyboard shortcut Alt-F7.
In this state the right click menu on the title bar does not show
either.
I am
ia would be next. But
actually i assume you want to install Debian on some computer.
Tell us about it. Especially if there is a DVD drive and/or a
connection to the internet.
i wrote:
> > Shall it still offer the opportunity to start MS-Windows ?
> > Do you need to perform special
otmail.com
Objet : Re: jigdo-lite for windows (from debian-cd list)
Hi,
we should move this to debian-user mailing list, as it is more about installing
from the MS-Windows world and not about the installation ISOs themselves.
Please send your further replies to
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Th
Hi,
we should move this to debian-user mailing list, as it is more
about installing from the MS-Windows world and not about the
installation ISOs themselves.
Please send your further replies to
debian-user@lists.debian.org
The start of the thread is (in french) at
https://lists.debian.org
After a couple system reboots for various things, mostly some hardware
changes, adding disks, etc., my Windows shares aren't mounting any
more, plus I'm getting a console error that the mount failed error
connecting to socket, error 115 mount operation in progress, etc. What
I want to k
On Sunday 17 January 2016 21:48:48 Bob Holtzman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 03:59:57PM +0200, Moreanu Robert - Nicolae wrote:
> > hi
> > i'm looking to resolve this problem when I want to install debian 8.2 or
> > 8.1. I receive this message after it's take to Grub install
> >
> > " the 'grub-
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 03:59:57PM +0200, Moreanu Robert - Nicolae wrote:
> hi
> i'm looking to resolve this problem when I want to install debian 8.2 or
> 8.1. I receive this message after it's take to Grub install
>
> " the 'grub-pc' package failed to install into /target/ "
> after the operatio
hi
i'm looking to resolve this problem when I want to install debian 8.2 or
8.1. I receive this message after it's take to Grub install
" the 'grub-pc' package failed to install into /target/ "
after the operation of clean up on installing, i have a failed operations.
i make the install of debian
Sorry,
The problem was solved using sec=ntlm
2016-01-17 11:26 GMT+01:00 Nemeth Gyorgy :
> 2016-01-17 00:48 keltezéssel, Steve Matzura írta:
>>> modprobe cifs maybe can help you.
>>
>> What is supposed to happen when I enter that command? All I got was
>> another shell prompt.
>
> After modprobe t
2016-01-17 00:48 keltezéssel, Steve Matzura írta:
>> modprobe cifs maybe can help you.
>
> What is supposed to happen when I enter that command? All I got was
> another shell prompt.
After modprobe try mount again
--
--- Friczy ---
'Death is not a bug, it's a feature'
Emanuel,
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:41:11 +0100, you wrote:
>modprobe cifs maybe can help you.
What is supposed to happen when I enter that command? All I got was
another shell prompt.
0}) = 0
> mount("//DISKSTATION1/BigVol1", ".", "cifs", 0,
> "ip=192.168.1.156,unc=DISKSTATI"...) = -1 EOPNOTSUPP (Operation
> not supported)
> capset({_LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_3, 1580}, {CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
> CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE|CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH|CAP_SYS_ADMIN, 0}) = 0
> write(2, "mount error(95): Operation not s"..., 41mount error(95):
> Operation not supported
> ) = 41
> write(2, "Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manua"..., 61Refer to the
> mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)
> ) = 61
> munmap(0x7f98fa20f000, 11264) = 0
> exit_group(32) = ?
> +++ exited with 32 +++
>
> The volume is still quite useable from all Windows systems, but
> somehow since my last reboot, something has changed that I cannot
> identify. As always, help greatly appreciated.
>
--
.~.
/V\
// \\
/( )\
^`~'^
pported)
capset({_LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_3, 1580}, {CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE|CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH|CAP_SYS_ADMIN, 0}) = 0
write(2, "mount error(95): Operation not s"..., 41mount error(95):
Operation not supported
) = 41
write(2, "Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manua"...,
rojector displayed "no
> > input" icon. If this is not faulty mini display to HDMI cord, what
> > might me a problem?
> >
> >
> > The third time, Windows machine was connected to projector. By
> > HDMI-HDMI cable. Again, only wallpaper of computer w
HDMI cable. For a while I got computer's
> wallpaper on the wall ( but not the icons and other stuff which is on
> Mac's display) and connection was lost ( projector displayed "no
> input" icon. If this is not faulty mini display to HDMI cord, what
> might me a proble
s on Mac's
display) and connection was lost ( projector displayed "no input" icon.
If this is not faulty mini display to HDMI cord, what might me a
problem?
The third time, Windows machine was connected to projector. By
HDMI-HDMI cable. Again, only wallpaper of computer was projected on
* Steve Matzura [2016-01-10 11:19 -0500]:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:48:55 +0100, Sven wrote:
>
> >You might want to check /var/log/messages for more verbose error
> >message.
>
> In three days, this is all messages has in it:
[...]
Well, that sould be /var/log/syslog.
> >And perhaps also run
I added the "Everyone" username object to the list of those permitted
to access the drives, and it worked. No username or password required.
Now I have to get it into fstab and I'm totally done with system
setup!
ord=""
mount.cifs kernel mount options:
ip=192.168.1.140,unc=\\box1\d,vers=2.1,user=Steve
Matzura,pass=
mount error(13): Permission denied
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)
I had the idea of separating the two words of the username with
backslash-s
On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 17:00 -0500, Steve Matzura wrote:
> Mea culpa. I didn't read far enough down the page.
>
> After trying `vers=2.1', now I get error 13, permission denied.
> Getting closer. Now it's probably a username or password problem, but
> the Windows acco
On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 17:00 -0500, Steve Matzura wrote:
> Mea culpa. I didn't read far enough down the page.
It was quite easy to miss. I will try to remember to quote the relevant
parts in the message to the list, instead of just adding the URL.
After all, web sites change and can become inacces
On Sunday 10 January 2016 02:31:54 Steve Matzura wrote:
> Let me rephrase/clarify that. There are lots of things on which
> screenreaders can be blamed, but this one wasn't one of them.
>
> On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 20:49:59 -0500, you wrote:
> >On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:46:20 +, Lisi wrote:
> >>On Satur
Let me rephrase/clarify that. There are lots of things on which
screenreaders can be blamed, but this one wasn't one of them.
On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 20:49:59 -0500, you wrote:
>On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:46:20 +, Lisi wrote:
>
>>On Saturday 09 January 2016 22:00:46 Steve Matzura wrote:
>>> Mea culpa.
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:46:20 +, Lisi wrote:
>On Saturday 09 January 2016 22:00:46 Steve Matzura wrote:
>> Mea culpa. I didn't read far enough down the page.
>
>The fact you have to do so is clearly the result of your screen reader,
>Steve - the link actually opens at the comment in a GUI.
>
N
On Saturday 09 January 2016 22:00:46 Steve Matzura wrote:
> Mea culpa. I didn't read far enough down the page.
The fact you have to do so is clearly the result of your screen reader,
Steve - the link actually opens at the comment in a GUI.
Lisi
Mea culpa. I didn't read far enough down the page.
After trying `vers=2.1', now I get error 13, permission denied.
Getting closer. Now it's probably a username or password problem, but
the Windows account has no password. I suppose if I must put one on,
in order to make this wo
n "guaranteed" for you, but two firewalls plus
a few pieces of software running on the Linux machine is all I have,
and it's always been more than sufficient. To me, a "guaranteed"
network means nothing to the outside, and this isn't quite that good.
But almost.
>And as
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 21:05:40 +
Joe wrote:
>
> And as I've said, Windows clients will silently use the current user's
> credentials if they are accepted by the server, and only request
> credentials if they are not. I don't know if mount.cifs tries this.
>
A
>
> I've not heard cifs mounting without password but this is interesting
>
Yes, it can be arranged, but of course it's a bad idea unless the
network is guaranteed (!) to be secure.
And as I've said, Windows clients will silently use the current user's
credentials
On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 13:59 -0500, Steve Matzura wrote:
> I tried it, but nothing changed. And it's not even the same error.
> Mine is 121, an I/O error of some kind, while the one in the article
> is error 12, a memory error.
The link is to a comment on the article, with the same error.
--
Ch
On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 17:53:38 +0100, Sven wrote:
>On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 11:04 -0500, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> The Windows username is my own name, I have no password set on that
>> acount. It mounts flawlessly from another Windows machine, but when I
>> try:
>>
>>
On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 11:04 -0500, Steve Matzura wrote:
> The Windows username is my own name, I have no password set on that
> acount. It mounts flawlessly from another Windows machine, but when I
> try:
>
> # mount -t cifs //box1/d /mnt/d -o username="Steve
> Matzura&
The Windows username is my own name, I have no password set on that
acount. It mounts flawlessly from another Windows machine, but when I
try:
# mount -t cifs //box1/d /mnt/d -o username="Steve
Matzura",password=""
I get:
mount error(121): Remote I/O error
Refer to the mount
the IP address of the Windows box
>worked.
That one gave me an error 5, input/output error. I changed back from
the address to the DNS name and got error 13. It's a problem on the
sharing computer's side. I'll fix it and report.
you're running it as non-root, IIRC the "specify
both mount point and device to mount" will be rejected as "only
root can do that". Either way, this doesn't look quite right.
I'm running it as root all right.
I also tried '-o user="Steve Matzura"
y; if you're running it as non-root, IIRC the "specify
>>> both mount point and device to mount" will be rejected as "only
>>> root can do that". Either way, this doesn't look quite right.
>>
>> I'm running it as root all right.
e the same username
and password on client and server, make sure the mounting user has
appropriate permissions on the share (both share permissions and file
ACLs apply) and with luck you won't need to specify anything in advance.
This works with Windows clients ('pass-through authenticati
On 02/01/16 02:47 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
I have a Windows machine called 'box' with a directory called 'users'
which is shared publicly with no access username or password as
'users2'. On my Jessie system, I created the mount point successfully:
mkdir -p /mnt/us
e:"Steve Matzura"
and got back:
Username specified with no parameter
That syntax is invalid. You'd need something like -o username="Steve
Matzura", assuming Steve Matzura is a valid username.
The system responds:
mount error(13): Permission denied
Is there a def
> I'm running it as root all right. I just now tried:
>
> mount -t cifs //box/users2 /mnt/share -o username:"Steve Matzura"
>
> and got back:
>
> Username specified with no parameter
Try it with '-o username=' instead of '-o username:'.
A
27;t look quite right.
I'm running it as root all right. I just now tried:
mount -t cifs //box/users2 /mnt/share -o username:"Steve Matzura"
and got back:
Username specified with no parameter
>> The system responds:
>>
>> mount error(13): Permission denied
>&g
On 2016-01-02 at 14:47, Steve Matzura wrote:
> I have a Windows machine called 'box' with a directory called
> 'users' which is shared publicly with no access username or password
> as 'users2'. On my Jessie system, I created the mount point
> success
I have a Windows machine called 'box' with a directory called 'users'
which is shared publicly with no access username or password as
'users2'. On my Jessie system, I created the mount point successfully:
mkdir -p /mnt/users
I then installed the cifs-utils package a
Hi.
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:54:01 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 22:40:24 +0300, Reco wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:37:34 +0100
> > Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > Try downloading this document and reading it with mupdf (or a Linux
> > > viewer of your choice).
> > >
> > >
On 10/13/2015 10:34 AM, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Tue, October 13, 2015 7:26 am, Joseph Loo wrote:
>> have you tried installing
>> ghostscript on your windows machine? It will convert ps and possibly pdf to
>> pcl or some other printers they have drivers for.
>
>
On Mon, October 12, 2015 11:15 pm, Stuart Longland wrote:
> There's also a Windows port of Evince.
Stuart,
As a test, I found a running Windows 7 system with printer. I downloaded
Evince and installed it without difficulty. Then I viewed a PDF document
and printed it, without having t
El 13/10/15 a las 16:42, Lisi Reisz escribió:
On Tuesday 13 October 2015 21:52:02 Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
El 13/10/15 a las 14:55, Adrian O'Dell escribió:
Never tell a business partner to change.
One of the problems of society is that it is driven by economic
interests, and more often th
> on debian-user.
> > >
> > > Yes, but it is usually soluble, and anyway, I thought that pdf was easier
> > > from Windows. It used to be. But I haven't used Windows for a very long
> > > time, so I may easily be wrong.
> >
> > The only
On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 17:23:22 -0500, Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> El 13/10/15 a las 16:42, Lisi Reisz escribió:
> >On Tuesday 13 October 2015 21:52:02 Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> >>El 13/10/15 a las 14:55, Adrian O'Dell escribió:
> >>>Never tell a business partner to change.
> >>
> >>One of
forget: standards are good; everyone can have one. :)
> > >
> > :-)
> > :
> > > I have a clear recollection of your having met this and asking about it
> > > on debian-user.
> >
> > Yes, but it is usually soluble, and anyway, I thought that pdf
; standard. Don't forget: standards are good; everyone can have one. :)
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > > I have a clear recollection of your having met this and asking about it
> > > on debian-user.
> >
> > Yes, but it is usually soluble, and anyway,
gt;
> :-)
>
> > I have a clear recollection of your having met this and asking about it
> > on debian-user.
>
> Yes, but it is usually soluble, and anyway, I thought that pdf was easier
> from
> Windows. It used to be. But I haven't used Windows for a very lo
El 13/10/15 a las 14:55, Adrian O'Dell escribió:
Never tell a business partner to change.
One of the problems of society is that it is driven by economic
interests, and more often than not, the interests which govern behavior
are those of megacorporations (employers) instead of individuals. W
On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 22:40:24 +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:37:34 +0100
> Brian wrote:
> >
> > Try downloading this document and reading it with mupdf (or a Linux
> > viewer of your choice).
> >
> > wget
> > https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/
On Tuesday 13 October 2015 21:52:02 Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> El 13/10/15 a las 14:55, Adrian O'Dell escribió:
> > Never tell a business partner to change.
>
> One of the problems of society is that it is driven by economic
> interests, and more often than not, the interests which govern behav
;
> > > Thanks for bringing up the utf8 issue; I keep forgetting about it.
> > >
> > > But is the PDF file I produce with whatever is in Jessie likely to be
> > > readable by Windows XP or Vista? I ask this because I have an older HP
> > > laserjet whi
El 13/10/15 a las 14:38, Brian escribió:
On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 14:04:44 -0500, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
On Tue, October 13, 2015 1:37 pm, Brian wrote:
There may be an ISO standard for a PDF but not all PDF's conform to the
standard. Don't forget: standards are good; everyone can have one. :)
Never tell a business partner to change.
On 10/13/2015 02:45 PM, Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
El 13/10/15 a las 14:38, Brian escribió:
On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 14:04:44 -0500, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
On Tue, October 13, 2015 1:37 pm, Brian wrote:
There may be an ISO standard for a PDF but not
tf8 support.]
> > >
> > > Thanks for bringing up the utf8 issue; I keep forgetting about it.
> > >
> > > But is the PDF file I produce with whatever is in Jessie likely to be
> > > readable by Windows XP or Vista? I ask this because I have an older HP
>
e .doc and .docx documents. The senders assume I can read them.
What do I do? Complain to them or just deal with it. Fortunately, Debian
makes it relatively easy to take the latter course of action. Why foul
up a relationship?
Now send a .dvi file to a Windows user. You will not hear the last of
it
ot;enhanced" over the years, similar to the enhancement of
Postscript by the introduction of Postscript levels 2 and 3.
Russ
"Windows is like the cat: to understand it is to hate it."
> But is the PDF file I produce with whatever is in Jessie likely to be
> > readable by Windows XP or Vista? I ask this because I have an older HP
> > laserjet which cannot decipher Postscript Level 3.
>
> Surely the whole point of .pdf is that it is an open standard whi
On Tue, October 13, 2015 7:26 am, Joseph Loo wrote:
> have you tried installing
> ghostscript on your windows machine? It will convert ps and possibly pdf to
> pcl or some other printers they have drivers for.
Ghostscript is one of the first solutions which occurred to me. I found a
H
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> But is the PDF file I produce with whatever is in Jessie likely to be
> readable by Windows XP or Vista?
Yes, assuming they have installed acrobat reader (or similar), which is
basically a requirement.
--
Don Armstrong
pecification.
>>>
>>> [It's also probably time to move away from pdflatex to xelatex or
>>> some other LaTeX engine with real utf8 support.]
>>
>> Thanks for bringing up the utf8 issue; I keep forgetting about it.
>>
>> But is the PDF file I pr
ly time to move away from pdflatex to xelatex or
> > some other LaTeX engine with real utf8 support.]
>
> Thanks for bringing up the utf8 issue; I keep forgetting about it.
>
> But is the PDF file I produce with whatever is in Jessie likely to be
> readable by Windows XP or Vist
On 13/10/15 15:45, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Mon, October 12, 2015 11:15 pm, Stuart Longland wrote:
>> There's also a Windows port of Evince.
>
> Thanks, Stuart; that knowledge may be useful. But installing Evince
> likely is beyond the technical ability of my ass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:54:28AM -0500, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
[...]
> Many thanks, Tomas. For years I have been wary of Adobe Reader, but I had
> no idea that there were alternatives to Adobe Reader for Windows.
Hey, thank *you*, Ru
On Tue, October 13, 2015 1:55 am, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> (Executive summary: there are lots of nice, free PDF viewers, even for
> Windows. The FSF has been making an effort to publicize that fact [3] and
> to get web pages to recommend those alternatives too).
> [1] <http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:45:33AM -0500, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Mon, October 12, 2015 11:15 pm, Stuart Longland wrote:
> > There's also a Windows port of Evince.
>
> Thanks, Stuart; that knowledge may be useful. B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 09:23:19PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> [...] I haven't looked
> at a .dvi for years. I remember they're very quick to page through
> multi-page documents, but graphic includes were a problem.
FWIW I still use dvi for the "loc
On Mon, October 12, 2015 11:15 pm, Stuart Longland wrote:
> There's also a Windows port of Evince.
Thanks, Stuart; that knowledge may be useful. But installing Evince
likely is beyond the technical ability of my associate. I hope that he
has Adobe Reader running.
Recently I was in a
On 13/10/15 14:09, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Debian, I have been using evince, but that is to view documents which I
> obtain from other sources.
There's also a Windows port of Evince.
--
Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)
I haven't lost my mind...
...it'
page documents, but graphic includes were a problem.
.pdf it is, then. If my associate does not already have Adobe Reader, I
presume that he can download a free copy which runs under any version of
Windows, including XP and Vista.
On Debian, I have been using evince, but that is to view document
tf8 support.]
Thanks for bringing up the utf8 issue; I keep forgetting about it.
But is the PDF file I produce with whatever is in Jessie likely to be
readable by Windows XP or Vista? I ask this because I have an older HP
laserjet which cannot decipher Postscript Level 3.
Russ
at he can print a copy and file
> it. There is no need for him to edit the file. But my associate is
> running Windows, and does not have a Postscript printer.
>
> Is there a fool-proof solution to this need? I have considered asking
> my associate to install ghostscript, and I
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> I would like to send a document file (.tex or .dvi or .ps) as an email
> attachment to an associate so that he can print a copy and file it.
> There is no need for him to edit the file. But my associate is running
> Windows, and doe
file. But my associate is
running Windows, and does not have a Postscript printer.
Is there a fool-proof solution to this need? I have considered asking
my associate to install ghostscript, and I have considered purchasing
a Postscript printer for him. I do not know which Windows
(XP, Vista, or 7
Thanks for help :)
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Seeker wrote:
>
>
> On 9/18/2015 10:59 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> can you please also advice any client for windows. right now the only
>> platform i have is Windows to access the machi
On 9/18/2015 10:59 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
can you please also advice any client for windows. right now the only
platform i have is Windows to access the machine. and Remmina does not
work for Windows.
Any suggestion please?
Thanks,
Yousuf
RealVNC or UltraVNC if you want
27; by *user*, not *root*.
And you're supposed to run 'gsettings' from the X session.
> can you please also advice any client for windows. right now the only
> platform i have is Windows to access the machine. and Remmina does not work
> for Windows.
>
> Any suggesti
without X11 $DISPLAY.
can you please also advice any client for windows. right now the only
platform i have is Windows to access the machine. and Remmina does not work
for Windows.
Any suggestion please?
Thanks,
Yousuf
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> O
It is for this propose but I think strange the lightdm/xdm not work after
installing NVIDIA driver.
This NVIDIA driver package create only one directory for all files needed
by driver, this makes it easy for the user.
Em 18/09/2015 00:51, "Charlie Kravetz"
escreveu:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 22:41:38
ly client that seems to support that
cryptic 'VNC security type 18' seems to be Remmina.
So - you need to connect from the Windows client - you need to have an
insecure configuration on server side. Presumably - it's done like this:
gsettings set org.gnome.Vino require-encryption false
Reco
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 22:41:38 -0400
real bas wrote:
>Hi guys, I can't install NVIDIA driver and bumblebee manually or using
>debian repository. The solution? Using ubuntu oficial repository of NVIDIA
>(driver 355) but nvidia-settings still no given information about graphics
>card even open with o
I am using Debian 8.2. i enable screen sharing but when i try to connect
client side shows me this message
unable to connect VNC server using your chosen security setting. Either
upgrade the VNC server to more recent version from realVNC or select weaker
level of encryption
and i see this on s
Hi guys, I can't install NVIDIA driver and bumblebee manually or using
debian repository. The solution? Using ubuntu oficial repository of NVIDIA
(driver 355) but nvidia-settings still no given information about graphics
card even open with optirun
2015-09-17 11:11 GMT-04:00 real bas :
> Then, I
Then, I need install the bumblebee (without nvidia-xconfig)?
2015-09-17 11:02 GMT-04:00 Darac Marjal :
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:18:01AM -0400, real bas wrote:
> > Hi Darac,
> > I follow this article [2] and still black screen with lightdm error
> (attached
> > 1). When execute nvidia-detected
Le 17/09/2015 17:02, Darac Marjal a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:18:01AM -0400, real bas wrote:
>> Hi Darac,
>> I follow this article [2] and still black screen with lightdm error (attached
>> 1). When execute nvidia-detected says 'No nvidia gpu detected' but in lspci
>> say
>> that I have
601 - 700 of 6028 matches
Mail list logo
