Re: kernel 4.14.15 compilation using GCC 8 in unstable.......

On 27 January 2018 at 13:38, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:12:13 + > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ​I think I will sign up on the gcc gnu help page and ask people if they > >

Re: kernel 4.14.15 compilation using GCC 8 in unstable.......

On 26 January 2018 at 22:59, Michael Lange wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:41:07 +0100 > Michael Lange wrote: > > > When I check /proc/cpuinfo I see that "msr" is listed in the "flags" > > section. So why doesn't the driver load automagically? > > But

Re: kernel 4.14.15 compilation using GCC 8 in unstable.......

On 27 January 2018 at 13:17, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:32:24 + > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 27 January 2018 at 11:59, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote: > > >

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

o install soon like a deck of cards. Cheers Regards Michael Fothergill ​ > > Thanks a lot > >

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 29 January 2018 at 13:26, <rhkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, January 29, 2018 06:22:50 AM Michael Fothergill wrote: > > ​I accept that are some kernels that you could run in stable apparently > > that address the security issue etc. > ​Do they work on spectre as

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 29 January 2018 at 10:17, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 08:35:58 + > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ​Your need to upgrade to unstable (Debian Sid). Then you need to get > >

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 29 January 2018 at 10:17, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 08:35:58 + > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ​Your need to upgrade to unstable (Debian Sid). Then you need to get > >

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 29 January 2018 at 10:10, deloptes <delop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Michael Fothergill wrote: > > > Your need to upgrade to unstable (Debian Sid). Then you need to get the > > latest kernel from the kernel.org website. > > worst BS ever seen - DON'T LISTEN TO THIS P

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 29 January 2018 at 13:28, deloptes <delop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Michael Fothergill wrote: > > > I accept that are some kernels that you could run in stable apparently > > that address the security issue etc. > > I apologise for inaccuracy there. > > But pe

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 30 January 2018 at 13:22, Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:13:47PM +0100, Michael Lange wrote: > > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The response from Greg was the following: > > > &

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 31 January 2018 at 18:31, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:54:36 + > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > What about if you became sid, made the spectre kernel and backed it up > > on

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 4 February 2018 at 22:50, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 4 February 2018 at 15:20, Andy Smith <a...@strugglers.net> wrote: > >> Hi Michael, >> >> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 11:44:39PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: &g

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 4 February 2018 at 15:20, Andy Smith <a...@strugglers.net> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 11:44:39PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > On 3 February 2018 at 23:14, Andy Smith <a...@strugglers.net> wrote: > > > If you want to make genu

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 31 January 2018 at 23:13, Richard Hector <rich...@walnut.gen.nz> wrote: > On 01/02/18 11:51, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > > > > > On 31 January 2018 at 22:46, Richard Hector <rich...@walnut.gen.nz > > <mailto:rich...@walnut.gen.nz>> wrote: >

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 31 January 2018 at 22:46, Richard Hector <rich...@walnut.gen.nz> wrote: > On 01/02/18 11:20, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > As it turns out I have installed debian on a usb before and booted it up > > successfully. > > It did occur to me that you could

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 29 January 2018 at 12:49, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 29 January 2018 at 10:17, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 08:35:58 + >> Michael Fothergill <mich

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 29 January 2018 at 13:35, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 29 January 2018 at 13:28, deloptes <delop...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Michael Fothergill wrote: >> >> > I accept that are some kernels that you cou

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 3 February 2018 at 15:37, Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflyby...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/3/18, rhkra...@gmail.com <rhkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, February 03, 2018 02:47:43 AM Michael Fothergill wrote: > >> On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smi

Re: I do not want to install Linux

On 7 February 2018 at 21:52, Richard Owlett wrote: > [Reply-to ] > > Good afternoon. > You chose the wrong list for your particular question. > Don't worry about it, it frequently happens. > > This list is specifically for: > >> Web pages design

Re: I do not want to install Linux

On 8 February 2018 at 07:37, <to...@tuxteam.de> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:01:57AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > [...] > > > It sounds like a dietary supplement. > > > > MF >

Re: I do not want to install Linux

On 8 February 2018 at 08:01, Michelle Konzack < linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net> wrote: > Good Morning, > > Am 2018-02-07 hackte Michael Fothergill in die Tasten: > > On 7 February 2018 at 21:52, Richard Owlett <rowl...@cloud85.net> wrote: > >> However

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 3 February 2018 at 17:12, David Wright <deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: > On Sat 03 Feb 2018 at 07:47:43 (+), Michael Fothergill wrote: > > On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith <a...@strugglers.net> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > >

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 3 February 2018 at 23:14, Andy Smith <a...@strugglers.net> wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 09:43:33PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > I am trying to suggest one would want to move faster than the approximate > > cycle time of new stable relea

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 3 February 2018 at 21:43, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 3 February 2018 at 17:12, David Wright <deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk> > wrote: > >> On Sat 03 Feb 2018 at 07:47:43 (+), Michael Fothergill wrote: >> &g

Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown

On 3 February 2018 at 17:24, David Wright <deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: > On Sat 03 Feb 2018 at 10:37:34 (-0500), Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > > On 2/3/18, rhkra...@gmail.com <rhkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 03, 2018 02:47:43 AM Michael

Re: I do not want to install Linux

On 8 February 2018 at 12:30, Curt <cu...@free.fr> wrote: > On 2018-02-08, deloptes <delop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Michael Fothergill wrote: > > > >> I guess I could give it a try. I have run Bodhi Linux. That is quite > >> good. > > > >

Re: I do not want to install Linux

On 15 February 2018 at 13:55, Ken Heard <k...@heard.name> wrote: > On 2018-02-08 15:57, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > > Actually Kali Linux [1] is pretty cool and definitely worth a look. > > And, as a Debian derivative, it is a wonderful illustration of the > > t

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 20 February 2018 at 05:09, Andy Smith <a...@strugglers.net> wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:03:20PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > On 19 February 2018 at 19:10, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> > wrote: > > > no, I meant to say t

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

and there may well be one that deals with both the meltdown and spectre vaulbnerabilities jointly. Regards Michael Fothergill

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 20 February 2018 at 10:01, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:05:19 + > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ​For me at any rate if the new version of gcc 4.9 makes it easier

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 19 February 2018 at 14:10, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:13:42PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming > wrote: > > What are the patches that I can download and install to be protected > > against the Meltdown and Spectre security vulnerabilities? > >

Re: problems with manual page usermod.8 and useradd.8

On 22 February 2018 at 21:12, MarkusHiereth wrote: > Hello, > > when updating the German translations of the shadow package, I > encountered strange things in the documentation. For example an option > --non-unique for the commands useradd and usermod. With the first, the

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 23 February 2018 at 16:28, Michael Lange wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:52:12 +0100 > Felipe Salvador wrote: > > (...) > > > CVE-2017-5715 [branch target injection] aka 'Spectre Variant 2' > > > * Mitigated according to the /sys

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 23 February 2018 at 16:14, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 23 February 2018 at 14:14, Michael Fothergill < > michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 23 February 2018 at 14:05, mlnl <m...@mailbox.

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 23 February 2018 at 14:14, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 23 February 2018 at 14:05, mlnl <m...@mailbox.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > ​Can it be true? A version of gcc that runs on stretch that will &g

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 23 February 2018 at 18:41, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:27:23 + > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > ​Sure enough, looking at the spectre meltdown checker on the kernel I

Re: Debian Sid spectre-meltdown

On 21 February 2018 at 16:25, Jimmy Johnson wrote: > As reported by Linus kernel 4.15 would have the spectre-meltdown fix, > Debian Sid just got 4.15 and I installed it on both AMD and Intel and then > I ran the spectre-meltdown-checker and Sid is no longer vulnerable

Re: Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 21 February 2018 at 17:46, Julien Aubin wrote: > Hi, > > Do you have any clue on when the gcc fix for stretch is to be released ? > > Actually the retpoline-compliant kernel is ready, and gcc fixes for > stretch seem to have already been implemented. So I dunno what is

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 19 February 2018 at 17:03, Reco <recovery...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi. > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 04:40:19PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > I had thought up to now that e.g. kernel 4.15.4-1 was new enough that if > > you compiled it with gcc 7.3

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 19 February 2018 at 19:10, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 18:46:15 + > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Are you saying that this link: > > ​ > > https://security-tracker.de

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 19 February 2018 at 18:24, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 16:40:19 + > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 19 February 2018 at 14:10, Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org> wrote:

Re: Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 23 February 2018 at 13:42, Reco <recovery...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 01:14:16PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > On 23 February 2018 at 12:43, Reco <recovery...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi. > >

Re: Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 23 February 2018 at 12:43, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 06:46:05PM +0100, Julien Aubin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Do you have any clue on when the gcc fix for stretch is to be released ? > > > > Actually the retpoline-compliant kernel is ready, and

Re: Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 23 February 2018 at 14:08, Reco <recovery...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 01:47:25PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > On 23 February 2018 at 13:42, Reco <recovery...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi. > >

Re: Is Debian Linux protected against the Meltdown and Spectre security flaws?

On 23 February 2018 at 14:05, mlnl wrote: > Hi, > > > ​Can it be true? A version of gcc that runs on stretch that will > > compile the latest fancy spectre fixes etc? > > with latest vanilla kernel 4.15.4 and updated gcc-6: > > CVE-2017-5753 [bounds check bypass] aka 'Spectre

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

I have 3 case fans in the box here but lm-sensors only sees two of them apparently as well as not seeing the cpu fan. Funny stuff. Regards MF On 28 December 2017 at 11:50, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Folks, > > I am running stretch on an

lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

rather than 4 pin could that explain the zero here? Suggestions on a tweak that could awaken the sensor or stimulate lm-sensors truffle hound hunting skills here would be appreciated. Googling around gives quite complex suggestions. Is there something simple I could try here? Regards Michael

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option in the config file: CONFIG_SENSORS_CORETEMP=m Comments appreciared Regards MF On 28 December 2017 at 12:52, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear All, > > I looked at the config-4.9.0-4-amd64 file

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have 3 case fans in the box here but lm-sensors only sees two of them > apparently as well as not seeing the cpu fan. > > Funny stuff. > > Regards > > MF > > On 28 December 2017 at 11:50, Michael Fothergill <

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp > > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device > > > >

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp > > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device > > > >

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp > > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device > > > >

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp > > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device > > > >

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp > > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device > > > >

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp > > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device > > > >

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes <delop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Michael Fothergill wrote: > > > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13 > > cooler. > > I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes <delop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Michael Fothergill wrote: > > > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13 > > cooler. > > I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes <delop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Michael Fothergill wrote: > > > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13 > > cooler. > > I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is

Re: lm-sensors doesn't see the cpu rpm.....

On 28 December 2017 at 18:30, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes <delop...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Michael Fothergill wrote: >> >> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box w

Re: Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Debian 8.9

> > The neowin link above has a link to a Phoronix article[1], which > suggests you need GCC 8.0, or maybe 7.3 if a backport succeeds. That was > 9 days ago, of course ... Stretch only has 6.3, and even sid only has > 7.2, so I don't see it hitting debian soon. > > Richard > > [1] >

Re: Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Debian 8.9

d be I guess. Someone who is smarter than the average bear has written a patch for the spectre problem with no performance penalty: https://www.neowin.net/news/retpoline-patch-coming-to-linux-49-and-linux-414 ​I am not sure if you can do this as debian testing or experimental. Cheers Michael

Re: Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Debian 8.9

r than the average bear has written a patch for the > spectre problem with no performance penalty: > > https://www.neowin.net/news/retpoline-patch-coming-to- > linux-49-and-linux-414 > > ​I am not sure if you can do this as debian testing or experimental. > > Cheers > > Mi

Re: Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Debian 8.9

On 24 January 2018 at 11:52, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 24 January 2018 at 11:21, Michael Fothergill < > michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 24 January 2018 at 10:53, Michael Fother

Re: Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Debian 8.9

On 24 January 2018 at 10:53, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> >> The neowin link above has a link to a Phoronix article[1], which >> suggests you need GCC 8.0, or maybe 7.3 if a backport succeeds. That was >> 9 days

Re: Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Debian 8.9

On 24 January 2018 at 12:58, Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote: > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The link within the above one: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-01/msg00148.html > > also has a link to the ftp downlo

Re: Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Debian 8.9

On 24 January 2018 at 11:21, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 24 January 2018 at 10:53, Michael Fothergill < > michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >>> >>> The neowin link above has a lin

Re: Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Debian 8.9

On 24 January 2018 at 14:15, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 24 January 2018 at 14:11, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote: > >> On 2018-01-24 14:44:18 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote: >> > Michael Fothergill <michael

Re: Question on CVE-2017-5754 on Debian 8.9

On 24 January 2018 at 15:49, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 24 January 2018 at 14:15, Michael Fothergill < > michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 24 January 2018 at 14:11, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@

Re: Please consider unblocking Chromium and linux packages for Buster

install gentoo prefix on debian. But I have figured out how to do it with the help of the gentoo prefix dev team. I am grateful to them. Cheers Michael Fothergill > > Likewise, linux package in Buster lack recent fixes for SACKs > Panic vulnerabilities. I hope it will also be uploaded soon. > > Regards, > Lazar > >

Re: Chromium 76

ich I have running on debian buster. Chromium 77 is out there somewhere. I am interested to try out bedrock linux at some point. I think it could help get around some of these problems. Regards Michael Fothergill

Re: Chromium 76

I have installed Google chrome v 77.0.3865.10 (Official Build) dev (64-bit) in Debian buster. It's not chromium. If that is still OK I did as follows: Go here and download the dev channel version of chrome: https://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel You should see a file like this

Re: Chromium 76

On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 11:09, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have installed Google chrome v 77.0.3865.10 (Official Build) dev > (64-bit) in Debian buster. > > It's not chromium. If that is still OK I did as follows: > > Go here and download

Re: Chromium 76

I think I have fixed the post now: I have installed Google chrome v 77.0.3865.10 (Official Build) dev (64-bit) >> in Debian buster. >> >> It's not chromium. If that is still OK I did as follows: >> >> Go here and download the dev channel version of chrome: >> >>

<    1   2   3   4   5