Two topics for the candidates' consideration and discussion.
First: "The Debian Project is an association of individuals who have made
common cause to create a free operating system." Presumably this means
our primary focus should be on putting together great free software and
getting it out to us
Anthony Towns writes:
> [...]
> Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> a dialogue with people who provide criticism consisting of suggestions
> of alternatives, discussion of tradeoffs that can and should be made
> and helpful bits of code, or people who accom
Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Anthony Towns writes:
> > > [...]
> > > Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> > > a dialogue with people who provide criticism consisting of suggesti
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
>
> > [...]
> > Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> > a dialogue with people who provide criticism consisting of suggestions
> > of alternatives, discussion of tradeoffs
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> > a dialogue with people who provide criticism consisting of suggestions
> > of alternatives, discussion of tradeoffs that can and
Anthony Towns writes:
> That's only one question quoted there. Are you saying you think all
> of the others are unreasonable too, or just that one?
I answered this in another mail.
> I think it's reasonable, and I'd certainly like to know the
> project's position on it.
Do you really think a u
* Anthony Towns [2004-03-02 20:11]:
> First: "The Debian Project is an association of individuals who have
> made common cause to create a free operating system." Presumably
> this means our primary focus should be on putting together great
> free software and getting it out to users.
That's righ
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 12:44]:
> I, as DPL, am willing to listen to them because there concerns might
> be valid. However, I don't think that most people will listen to a
> mail which basically says "YOU SUCK". Again, I think communication
> is important, and this applies to everyone.
Hi,
this morning I wrote in private to the DPL candidates but tbm asked me to
foreward my questions to debian-vote which I'm doing hereby ...
Here are my questions:
1. My concern is to propagate Custom Debian Distributions because
I think we should set a stronger focus to the end user. I
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 01:31:19PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Do you really think a useful and productive discussion could come from
> a candidate trying to answer this question? I don't. I would be pretty
> annoyed if I was to answer them.
I don't think this is a reasonable question, and I dis
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think this is a reasonable question, and I disagree with the
> point I think you're trying to make.
>
> On the other hand, I think the questions you're talking about were
> reasonable, if a bit verbose. I hope the candidates address at least
> so
On 02 Mar 2004 13:31:19 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Do you really think a useful and productive discussion could come
> from a candidate trying to answer this question? I don't. I would be
> pretty annoyed if I was to answer them.
But you are not the candidate. They
On 02 Mar 2004 11:43:29 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Anthony Towns writes:
>> [...] Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally
>> willing to have a dialogue with people who provide criticism
>> consisting of suggestions of alternatives, discussion of tradeoffs
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 02 Mar 2004 13:31:19 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Do you really think a useful and productive discussion could come
> > from a candidate trying to answer this question? I don't. I would be
> > pretty annoyed if I was to an
Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 02 Mar 2004 11:43:29 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Please unsubscribe from debian-vote if you do not wish to hear
> the opinions of the candidates on politically charged issues as well
> as ordinary technical
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 15:20]:
> this morning I wrote in private to the DPL candidates but tbm asked
> me to foreward my questions to debian-vote which I'm doing hereby
Yes, I think it's important to share these answers with everyone who
is interested.
> 1. My concern is
Join over 400 000 americains using a great diploma not limited to
Bachelors. All profession accepted.
1 212 629 1971
Foreword: Do NOT take my answers seriously. I'm trying to make people
laugh.
> Here are my questions:
>
> 1. My concern is to propagate Custom Debian Distributions because
> I think we should set a stronger focus to the end user. I see
> Debian as a missing link between upstream deve
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Seems I have still not made myself clear. I am not objecting to asking
> about the issues mentioned. I am not objecting to abybody answering
> them.
And I disapprove of you objecting to candidates answering those questions.
> I am o
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Seems I have still not made myself clear. I am not objecting to asking
> > about the issues mentioned. I am not objecting to abybody answering
> > them.
>
> And I disapprove of you objecti
Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Easy one. As seen on debian-devel@ recently, Progeny (I think,
> correct me if I'm wrong) has this Componentized Linux idea. Which is
> all nice and good, and should help custom distros all right. So, the
> plans are set straight already.
I saw Ian's onl
On 02 Mar 2004 17:53:14 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I am not objecting to asking about the issues mentioned. I am not
> objecting to abybody answering them. I am objecting to abusing a
> questionnaire as a platorm for a rant.
A DD can ask a question that they feel pa
On 02 Mar 2004 17:55:08 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On 02 Mar 2004 11:43:29 +0100, Falk Hueffner
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> Please unsubscribe from debian-vote if you do not wish to hear the
>> opinions of the ca
Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have no problem with that content. I dislike reading rants, though.
Actually, I would like to hear how the candidates deal with a rant.
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I think James is an excellent contributor to the project. I know him
> personally, and I can assure you that he is not on a power trip. He
> ...
Well thanks for the clarification. I just want to make sure that this
explanation is given to _everyone_
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 04:12, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 15:20]:
> > 3. Do you think Debian should continue to support non-free?
>
> No. Debian is about creating a operating system with free software,
> and I don't think we should be in the business o
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about Debian distributing documentation - do you see it as
> software, do you see all documentation (eg. philosophical) as software?
>
> Eg. GFDL documentation?
> RFCs?
Another thing that would be useful to add to all questions of this
type is s
> > What about Debian distributing documentation - do you see it as
> > software, do you see all documentation (eg. philosophical) as software?
> >
> > Eg. GFDL documentation?
> > RFCs?
>
> Another thing that would be useful to add to all questions of this
> type is something along the lines of "
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 20:31]:
> Well thanks for the clarification. I just want to make sure that this
BTW, there's something else I wanted to clarify. Something asked me
about this in private, and I thought I'd answer her as well.
Basically the question is whether I am
* David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 22:51]:
> Another thing that would be useful to add to all questions of this
> type is something along the lines of "and as DPL, do you think you
> can do anything about it, or plan to?" to hear whether the
> candidates plan to do anything either pe
As a female hacker/geek/DD I find myself more and more concerned about
the gender ratio in the Debian Developer/User comunity. How can we say
make a "Universal" OS when it's do scarcely related to half the
population of the world... I think we all agree we want to see more
women involved in or usin
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 11:12, Amaya wrote:
> As a female hacker/geek/DD I find myself more and more concerned about
> the gender ratio in the Debian Developer/User comunity. How can we say
> make a "Universal" OS when it's do scarcely related to half the
> population of the world... I think we all a
* Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-03 01:12]:
> As a female hacker/geek/DD I find myself more and more concerned
> about the gender ratio in the Debian Developer/User community. How
> can we say make a "Universal" OS when it's do scarcely related to
> half the population of the world... I think w
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 20:31]:
> > something works as expected. You only notice when it suddenly
> > breaks. So if 95% of communication with James works well, we will
> > never hear about it. But we hear about the 5% which fails.
> Damn users ... this is always the same.
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:11:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Two topics for the candidates' consideration and discussion.
>
> First: "The Debian Project is an association of individuals who have made
> common cause to create a free operating system." Presumably this means
> our primary focus s
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:27:16PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I think you're positing a false dilemma. That creating a technically
> excellent distribution of 100% Free Software is our primary goal, and
> raison d'être, doesn't mean that every activity not in obvious and
> direct service of
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:27:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:11:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Of the technical issues that aren't being communicated about well
> > enough, Branden says "In my opinion, and on balance, we do an adequate
> > job on these points
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:27:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Who do you think should be subscribed to -devel, and what sort of
> > discussions do you think should make up the majority of the traffic? If
> > reality doesn't match those desires, what, if anything, will you do to
> > change t
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:27:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
As is probably obvious, I have a tendency to answer questions that
interest me, whether they were intended rhetorically or not.
> > First: "The Debian Project is an association of individuals who have made
> > common cause to creat
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:52:33PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:27:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Who do you think should be subscribed to -devel, and what sort of
> > > discussions do you think should make up the majority of the traffic? If
> > > reality does
Hi,
Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not?
Would you change this?
Do you believe the Tech Committee is effective in its role for the project?
Cheers,
Pasc
[1]: http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
--
Pascal Hakim
Two topics for the candidates' consideration and discussion.
First: "The Debian Project is an association of individuals who have made
common cause to create a free operating system." Presumably this means
our primary focus should be on putting together great free software and
getting it out to us
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> a dialogue with people who provide criticism consisting of suggestions
> of alternatives, discussion of tradeoffs that can and should be made
> and helpful bits of code,
Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > [...]
> > > Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> > > a dialogue with people who provide criticism con
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [...]
> > Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> > a dialogue with people who provide criticism consisting of suggestions
> > of alternatives, discu
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> > a dialogue with people who provide criticism consisting of suggestions
> > of alternatives, discussion of trad
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's only one question quoted there. Are you saying you think all
> of the others are unreasonable too, or just that one?
I answered this in another mail.
> I think it's reasonable, and I'd certainly like to know the
> project's position on it.
Do y
* Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 20:11]:
> First: "The Debian Project is an association of individuals who have
> made common cause to create a free operating system." Presumably
> this means our primary focus should be on putting together great
> free software and getting it out to
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 12:44]:
> I, as DPL, am willing to listen to them because there concerns might
> be valid. However, I don't think that most people will listen to a
> mail which basically says "YOU SUCK". Again, I think communication
> is important, and this applies to everyone.
Hi,
this morning I wrote in private to the DPL candidates but tbm asked me to
foreward my questions to debian-vote which I'm doing hereby ...
Here are my questions:
1. My concern is to propagate Custom Debian Distributions because
I think we should set a stronger focus to the end user. I
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 01:31:19PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Do you really think a useful and productive discussion could come from
> a candidate trying to answer this question? I don't. I would be pretty
> annoyed if I was to answer them.
I don't think this is a reasonable question, and I dis
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think this is a reasonable question, and I disagree with the
> point I think you're trying to make.
>
> On the other hand, I think the questions you're talking about were
> reasonable, if a bit verbose. I hope the candidates address at least
> so
On 02 Mar 2004 13:31:19 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Do you really think a useful and productive discussion could come
> from a candidate trying to answer this question? I don't. I would be
> pretty annoyed if I was to answer them.
But you are not the candidate. They
On 02 Mar 2004 11:43:29 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [...] Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally
>> willing to have a dialogue with people who provide criticism
>> consisting of suggestions of alternatives, disc
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 02 Mar 2004 13:31:19 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Do you really think a useful and productive discussion could come
> > from a candidate trying to answer this question? I don't. I would be
> > pretty annoyed if I was to an
Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 02 Mar 2004 11:43:29 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Please unsubscribe from debian-vote if you do not wish to hear
> the opinions of the candidates on politically charged issues as well
> as ordinary technical
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 15:20]:
> this morning I wrote in private to the DPL candidates but tbm asked
> me to foreward my questions to debian-vote which I'm doing hereby
Yes, I think it's important to share these answers with everyone who
is interested.
> 1. My concern is
Join over 400 000 americains using a great diploma not limited to
Bachelors. All profession accepted.
1 212 629 1971
Foreword: Do NOT take my answers seriously. I'm trying to make people
laugh.
> Here are my questions:
>
> 1. My concern is to propagate Custom Debian Distributions because
> I think we should set a stronger focus to the end user. I see
> Debian as a missing link between upstream deve
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Seems I have still not made myself clear. I am not objecting to asking
> about the issues mentioned. I am not objecting to abybody answering
> them.
And I disapprove of you objecting to candidates answering those questions.
> I am o
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Seems I have still not made myself clear. I am not objecting to asking
> > about the issues mentioned. I am not objecting to abybody answering
> > them.
>
> And I disapprove of you objecti
Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Easy one. As seen on debian-devel@ recently, Progeny (I think,
> correct me if I'm wrong) has this Componentized Linux idea. Which is
> all nice and good, and should help custom distros all right. So, the
> plans are set straight already.
I saw Ian's onl
On 02 Mar 2004 17:53:14 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I am not objecting to asking about the issues mentioned. I am not
> objecting to abybody answering them. I am objecting to abusing a
> questionnaire as a platorm for a rant.
A DD can ask a question that they feel pa
On 02 Mar 2004 17:55:08 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On 02 Mar 2004 11:43:29 +0100, Falk Hueffner
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> Please unsubscribe from debian-vote if you do not wish to hear the
>> opinions of the ca
Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have no problem with that content. I dislike reading rants, though.
Actually, I would like to hear how the candidates deal with a rant.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I think James is an excellent contributor to the project. I know him
> personally, and I can assure you that he is not on a power trip. He
> ...
Well thanks for the clarification. I just want to make sure that this
explanation is given to _everyone_
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 04:12, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 15:20]:
> > 3. Do you think Debian should continue to support non-free?
>
> No. Debian is about creating a operating system with free software,
> and I don't think we should be in the business o
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about Debian distributing documentation - do you see it as
> software, do you see all documentation (eg. philosophical) as software?
>
> Eg. GFDL documentation?
> RFCs?
Another thing that would be useful to add to all questions of this
type is s
> > What about Debian distributing documentation - do you see it as
> > software, do you see all documentation (eg. philosophical) as software?
> >
> > Eg. GFDL documentation?
> > RFCs?
>
> Another thing that would be useful to add to all questions of this
> type is something along the lines of "
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 20:31]:
> Well thanks for the clarification. I just want to make sure that this
BTW, there's something else I wanted to clarify. Something asked me
about this in private, and I thought I'd answer her as well.
Basically the question is whether I am
* David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 22:51]:
> Another thing that would be useful to add to all questions of this
> type is something along the lines of "and as DPL, do you think you
> can do anything about it, or plan to?" to hear whether the
> candidates plan to do anything either pe
As a female hacker/geek/DD I find myself more and more concerned about
the gender ratio in the Debian Developer/User comunity. How can we say
make a "Universal" OS when it's do scarcely related to half the
population of the world... I think we all agree we want to see more
women involved in or usin
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 11:12, Amaya wrote:
> As a female hacker/geek/DD I find myself more and more concerned about
> the gender ratio in the Debian Developer/User comunity. How can we say
> make a "Universal" OS when it's do scarcely related to half the
> population of the world... I think we all a
* Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-03 01:12]:
> As a female hacker/geek/DD I find myself more and more concerned
> about the gender ratio in the Debian Developer/User community. How
> can we say make a "Universal" OS when it's do scarcely related to
> half the population of the world... I think w
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 20:31]:
> > something works as expected. You only notice when it suddenly
> > breaks. So if 95% of communication with James works well, we will
> > never hear about it. But we hear about the 5% which fails.
> Damn users ... this is always the same.
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:11:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Two topics for the candidates' consideration and discussion.
>
> First: "The Debian Project is an association of individuals who have made
> common cause to create a free operating system." Presumably this means
> our primary focus s
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:27:16PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I think you're positing a false dilemma. That creating a technically
> excellent distribution of 100% Free Software is our primary goal, and
> raison d'être, doesn't mean that every activity not in obvious and
> direct service of
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:27:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:11:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Of the technical issues that aren't being communicated about well
> > enough, Branden says "In my opinion, and on balance, we do an adequate
> > job on these points
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:27:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Who do you think should be subscribed to -devel, and what sort of
> > discussions do you think should make up the majority of the traffic? If
> > reality doesn't match those desires, what, if anything, will you do to
> > change t
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:27:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
As is probably obvious, I have a tendency to answer questions that
interest me, whether they were intended rhetorically or not.
> > First: "The Debian Project is an association of individuals who have made
> > common cause to creat
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:52:33PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:27:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Who do you think should be subscribed to -devel, and what sort of
> > > discussions do you think should make up the majority of the traffic? If
> > > reality does
Hi,
Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not?
Would you change this?
Do you believe the Tech Committee is effective in its role for the project?
Cheers,
Pasc
[1]: http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
--
Pascal Hakim
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:17:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:27:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> As is probably obvious, I have a tendency to answer questions that
> interest me, whether they were intended rhetorically or not.
I seldom ask purely rhetorical q
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:20:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Here are my questions:
>
> 1. My concern is to propagate Custom Debian Distributions because
> I think we should set a stronger focus to the end user. I see
> Debian as a missing link between upstream developers and end
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:12:44PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > 3. Do you think Debian should continue to support non-free?
>
> No. Debian is about creating a operating system with free software,
> and I don't think we should be in the business of distributing
> non-free software. I think
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:47:35PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Easy one. As seen on debian-devel@ recently, Progeny (I think,
> > correct me if I'm wrong) has this Componentized Linux idea. Which is
> > all nice and good, and should help custom di
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:24:11AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 04:12, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-02 15:20]:
> > > 3. Do you think Debian should continue to support non-free?
> >
> > No. Debian is about creating a operating sy
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:51:18PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What about Debian distributing documentation - do you see it as
> > software, do you see all documentation (eg. philosophical) as software?
> >
> > Eg. GFDL documentation?
> > RFCs
David N. Welton wrote:
> > Easy one. As seen on debian-devel@ recently, Progeny (I think,
> > correct me if I'm wrong) has this Componentized Linux idea. Which is
> > all nice and good, and should help custom distros all right. So, the
> > plans are set straight already.
>
> I saw Ian's online jou
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > No. Debian is about creating a operating system with free software,
> > and I don't think we should be in the business of distributing
> > non-free software. I think we should focus on what we do best (create
> > and integrate free software), and this would also get us
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:12:11AM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> As a female hacker/geek/DD I find myself more and more concerned about
> the gender ratio in the Debian Developer/User comunity. How can we say
> make a "Universal" OS when it's do scarcely related to half the
> population of the world... I t
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 06:58:12AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:12:44PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > 3. Do you think Debian should continue to support non-free?
> > Having said this, I don't think the current non-free removal vote is
> > being done correctly.
92 matches
Mail list logo
