Il mer, 2003-04-23 alle 02:06, Frank Lichtenheld ha scritto:
Hi.
There is one file left over from the renaming in the debian-med
subproject
(italian/devel/debian-med/talks/200210_lux_internal/index.wml).
Should I just remove this or move it to the new directory?
(I find it somewhat
I subscribed to debian-boot and debian-cd mailing lists sometime back. After
some time, I unsubscribed from both but I still keep getting mails from
list.
Kindly help.
This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain
privileged information. If you are not the addressee you
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 01:50:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
It's disk space against cpu usage. Clearly the first is much cheaper.
Perhaps I should also mention the exact cause of those 500 errors that was
briefly mentioned on -www recently -- the MaxClients 300 setting on gluck
exceeds
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 08:36:58AM +0100, Khedkar, Sumit wrote:
I subscribed to debian-boot and debian-cd mailing lists sometime back.
After some time, I unsubscribed from both but I still keep getting mails
from list.
Kindly help.
I've unsubscribed you manually.
--
2. That which
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:20:48AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 01:50:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
It's disk space against cpu usage. Clearly the first is much
cheaper.
Perhaps I should also mention the exact cause of those 500 errors that
was briefly
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:20:48AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 01:50:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
It's disk space against cpu usage. Clearly the first is much
cheaper.
Perhaps I should also
Stop sending me offers - click here.
Don't want any more adverts? Simply click here.
Credit-on-line.com vous présente:
CLIQUEZ ICI
Si vous ne souhaitez plus recevoir les dernières
informationsde Optimum, merci de bien vouloir retirer votre adresse
éléctronique de la liste de diffusion : Cliquez
ici
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:37:53AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote:
[some usefull thoughts skipped]
Hmm. IMHO it would be good to have a test system, where one can
commiting to the CVS without breacking the running system.
What do you others think of an alioth project for this?
It could start with a
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:12:47PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:05:45PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 09:33:06AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ should
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 04:18:36PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:37:53AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote:
[some usefull thoughts skipped]
Hmm. IMHO it would be good to have a test system, where one can
commiting to the CVS without breacking the running system.
Just
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
It's disk space against cpu usage. Clearly the first is much
cheaper.
Perhaps I should also mention the exact cause of those 500 errors that
was briefly mentioned on -www recently -- the MaxClients 300 setting
on gluck
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 08:43:53AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
[some usefull thoughts skipped]
Hmm. IMHO it would be good to have a test system, where one can
commiting to the CVS without breacking the running system.
Just test your changes before committing.
They require access to a
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 05:53:44PM +0200, Kaare Olsen wrote:
Both have been added to the Who's using Debian? list, the webpage will
be updated within four hours on our primary webserver.
Just a nitpick -- a large majority of web mirrors are in the push system so
as soon as the update finishes
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 04:35:10PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:12:47PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:05:45PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 09:33:06AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
Processing
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:47:25 +0200
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a nitpick --
You're welcome. :-)
a large majority of web mirrors are in the push system
so as soon as the update finishes on www-master, it propagates onto most
of the mirrors within a few minutes (commonly www.d.o
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 06:36:39PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 04:35:10PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Fixed (somewhat belatedly, sorry). I've prepared and tested the
following patch to webwml; does it look OK, and may I commit it? I've
used a separate tag-
Hullo all...
Pewnego dnia (Wednesday 23 of April 2003 10:20), niejak(i/a) Josip Rodin
wystukał/a na klawiaturze:
JRMaking packages.d.o backend first parse all Packages files from all
JRarchitectures, sort -u the list, and then go through the data ordering it
JRper package, would seem to do the
Hullo all...
Pewnego dnia (Wednesday 23 of April 2003 10:20), niejak(i/a) Josip Rodin
wystukał/a na klawiaturze:
JRMaking packages.d.o backend first parse all Packages files from all
JRarchitectures, sort -u the list, and then go through the data ordering it
JRper package, would seem to do the
Empresa de São Paulo procura interessados com internet,
para trabalhar em tempo parcial ou integral, com altos
ganhos.
Se interessar, visite: www.redebiz.com.br/diniz
Reginaldo.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 07:27:49PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[...]
Well, if they were to contain the same English text but have different
translations, that would be bad.
Sure, as explained in webwml/english/po/README, one can add
void id=blah / to make msgids unique.
I've convinced myself
And sorry for the duplicates
Pozdrawiam
--
Marek 'TamCaP' Łaska
Zdrowy rozsądek to zbiór uprzedzeń nabytych do osiemnastego roku życia. -
Albert Einstein
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2003 04:06:27 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#133127: Processed: including/excluding tags
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2003 04:06:27 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#133127: Processed: including/excluding tags
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
25 matches
Mail list logo
