Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.11.1-1
Severity: important
Hi,
I've just upgraded xserver-xorg-core from 2:1.11.0 to 2:1.11.1 (due to
#641344) and the rendering glitches are gone now (had no crashes),
instead Xorg takes up full CPU for 5 to 10 seconds every time I switch
between two
On 08.10.09 21:05:51, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 20:20:13 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: important
Hi,
Since upgrading X11 lately everytime I switch from VT7 to VT1-6 the X11
session is being
Hi,
just wanted to add that this also breaks suspend to ram here (from KDE4
desktop) because the suspend switches to VT mode before suspending and that
crashes the X server. Don't have a log at hand unfortunately, but its
definetly caused by the last upgrade from Xorg 7.3 to 7.4 (and the related
On 04.03.08 14:26:59, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 13:39:52 +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
The crash is triggered by doing changes to my xkb configuration, hence
I moved this to libxkbfile1. Thats the component thats shared by both
kxkb and setxkbmap as far as I could see
Package: xkb-data
Version: 1.1~cvs.20080104.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
seems like one of the X11 upgrades changed to produce the key code 178
for the XF86WWW key. This maps to symbol I32 and thus using the cymotion
layout I don't get my mapped action for that key anymore. The cymotion
layout
On Mittwoch, 19. September 2007, Brice Goglin wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
One thing I just noticed though: x11-utils changelog doesn't
mention xrandr 1.2.2 it only mentions 1.2.0, so may I have a
too-old xrandr?
x11-xserver-utils (7.2-2) experimental; urgency=low
* Add xrandr 1.2.2
On Freitag, 2. November 2007, Brice Goglin wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
- the dpi setting seems to be set wrongly, I've got a 332x205
laptop display (mm) and a 365x275 mm CRT. And xorg sets 96dpi and
xrandr tells me that the screen size is actually 888x220 mmm???
Right would be something
On Freitag, 2. November 2007, Brice Goglin wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
- most importantly: I can't start either XFC4 or KDE3 session from
that xterm or from kdm. As soon as they're up and running the 2nd
head is switched off and when I set a mode on it again and then use
xrandr
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.7.192-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
today I upgraded my unstable system and with it came Xorg 7.3 including
xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.6.193-3. After restarting the XServer I had a
garbaged display and couldn't access
reopen 443102
retitle 443102 Missing information about deprecation of Xinerama
On 18.09.07 18:03:06, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.6.193-3. After restarting the XServer I had a
garbaged display and couldn't access the second monitor-part. I'm
running a pretty
On 18.09.07 21:50:43, Brice Goglin wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Re-Opening, IMHO this information belongs into a NEWS file, as it
completely breaks existing XServer installation and its not mentioned
anywhere in the docs of the package.
Yes, we will have to document this for the release
On 18.09.07 23:25:13, Brice Goglin wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
I tried to find howtos in the net, but there were onyl few, the attached
xorg.conf is what I'm using right now. As soon as I remove the comments
from the Options in the Device section Xorg doesn't start anymore,
telling me
On 18.09.07 23:25:13, Brice Goglin wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
I tried to find howtos in the net, but there were onyl few, the attached
xorg.conf is what I'm using right now. As soon as I remove the comments
from the Options in the Device section Xorg doesn't start anymore,
telling me
On 16.06.07 16:51:14, Brice Goglin wrote:
Does this problem about X saying in the log that RandR is enabled while
it is not still occurs nowadays with latest xserver-xorg-core and drivers?
Yes, I still get the message that RandR is enabled even though xrandr
fails on execution. I also get the
On 22.03.07 21:34:31, Brice Goglin wrote:
Hi Andreas,
What is the status of the patch that you sent upstream to fix cherry
keyboard layouts? Did it get merged? Is there an url to the relevant thread?
As far as I know: no. I still apply my patch after each upgrade of
xkb-data (had to change
On 23.03.07 00:20:06, Brice Goglin wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 22.03.07 21:34:31, Brice Goglin wrote:
Hi Andreas,
What is the status of the patch that you sent upstream to fix cherry
keyboard layouts? Did it get merged? Is there an url to the relevant
thread
On 02.02.07 17:27:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 08:43:54PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
I think I found why my XFCE4 fails to start when starting it via
startx. It seems that the .ICE-unix directory in /tmp is created as
the current user, but the session-manager
Package: xkb-data
Version: 0.8-17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I'm using the mentioned keyboard here and have produced a xkb
configurartion that makes more keys work than the current cymotionlinux
one. I already sent this to one of the bugs upstream, but it hasn't been
included yet.
The
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I wanted to try Google Earth's linux version, but I cannot get DRI
working anymore. The dri-module is loaded and X11 tells me that the
DRI-Extension is activated, however the radeon module later disables
direct rendering,
On 14.06.06 10:59:14, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 09:54 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
I wanted to try Google Earth's linux version, but I cannot get DRI
working anymore. The dri-module is loaded and X11 tells me that the
DRI-Extension is activated, however the radeon module
reassign 332548 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.5.7.3-3
forwarded 332548 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5447
stop
On 13.04.06 15:40:37, Stian Jordet wrote:
tor, 13,.04.2006 kl. 02.40 +0200, skrev Andreas Pakulat:
On 21.03.06 17:40:51, Stian Jordet wrote:
Just to inform everyone
On 21.03.06 17:40:51, Stian Jordet wrote:
Just to inform everyone; by using latest ati-driver from cvs it works
perfect again ;)
Hi Stian,
I just fetched cvs head of driver/xf86-video-ati and used the debian
diff.gz to build a debian package out of it. However I had no luck, the
problem still
On 21.03.06 17:40:51, Stian Jordet wrote:
Just to inform everyone; by using latest ati-driver from cvs it works
perfect again ;)
So if I use Xorg 7.0 from experimental and build the ati-driver from cvs
I should be fine again?
Maybe I'll try that next weekend and report here.
Andreas
--
Is
On 16.03.06 21:59:12, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:30:19PM +0100, Andreas Kroschel wrote:
* Denis Barbier:
Can you please send your /var/log/Xorg.0.log file?
X Window System Version 6.9.0 (Debian 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 20060114230205 David
Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 16.03.06 23:10:47, Denis Barbier wrote:
Of course I am not happy with the current situation, breaking XKB is
no fun for users.
If there is a note in /usr/share/doc/xkb-data/README.Debian about
xorg 6.9, do you believe that this is enough to close this bug report?
Maybe you could add a
On 01.03.06 20:18:16, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On 3/1/06, Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01.03.06 17:52:25, Chris Lawrence wrote:
I can't duplicate this problem here; perhaps it was an intermittent
problem with bugs.debian.org
No it's not.
Hi,
I got around writing a small
On 01.03.06 20:18:16, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On 3/1/06, Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01.03.06 17:52:25, Chris Lawrence wrote:
I can't duplicate this problem here; perhaps it was an intermittent
problem with bugs.debian.org
No it's not.
or you have proxy issues
On 01.03.06 20:18:16, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On 3/1/06, Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01.03.06 17:52:25, Chris Lawrence wrote:
I can't duplicate this problem here; perhaps it was an intermittent
problem with bugs.debian.org
No it's not.
or you have proxy issues
On 16.01.06 08:32:38, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 18:41:29 +, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Attaching the log from the last try (leaving out the HSync/VRefresh
information from xorg.conf).
Hi Andreas,
it seems you forgot to actually attach your log file.
Oooops
merge 345509 332548
stop
Hi,
I'm replying to all mails for this bug as I never received any of them
via mail.
Regarding the Warning about MergedFB/Cline mode, I do get the same
warning when using 6.8.2 and in fact I don't want to use MergedFB mode.
Regarding switch to MergedFB: While MergedFB
On 18.10.05 12:53:07, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 20:02 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 14.10.05 15:39:05, Michel Dänzer wrote:
SubSection Display
Depth 24
Modes 1400x1050 # change to the mode you want on the CRT
Virtual 1680 1050
On 14.10.05 15:39:05, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Because that's the normal xinerama-thing to do when there is a
non-rectangular layout. Xinerama takes the width of both heads+the
maximum height and creates a desktop from this. And then it opens the 2
viewports, when one is non-virtual and
On 10.10.05 12:44:54, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 20:11 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
with Screen1 being the CRT, Screen0 being the Laptop-Panel. Now I get a
3320x1200 Xinerama desktop, with a scrolling CRT and a fixed
Laptop-Panel. Only problem is: There are 150x1680 pixel
On 07.10.05 18:13:49, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 18:05 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
What I want to have is running my Laptop-Screen and my CRT-Monitor with
their heighest resolution together in a Xinerama-Setup using the
vertical size of my Laptop display (1050
On 07.10.05 18:13:49, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 18:05 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 06.10.05 15:19:24, Michel Dänzer wrote:
The relation
physical resolution = virtual resolution
is invariant.
That seems to be true for Xorg, but not for XFree86 4.3
On 06.10.05 15:19:24, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 22:09 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
This worked perfectly with the settings below under xfree86,
but it's not working anymore with X.org. X11 now makes the CRT 1680x1050
with a 60Hz refresh rate (which is quite horrible), if I
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm filing this against xbase-clients, because it's the package that
contains xinit and I couldn't find any occurence of LD_LIBRARY_PATH in
/etc/X11 or in the startx-script, thus I assume xinit itself does this.
If this is not
On 15.09.05 16:18:31, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:50:10PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6
Severity: normal
...
The problem I have is, that startx /usr/bin/xterm removes
LD_LIBRARY_PATH from my environment. When logging
reassign 328479 kdm
On 15.09.05 17:51:15, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:49:25PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
For the same reason, (or perhaps they're using old-style pty's) several
other programs (I see Eterm, aterm, rxvt) are setuid. gnome-terminal
and konsole
39 matches
Mail list logo
