Tom,
It drive my processor to 100% when attempting to load only 55
messages from the virus folder. W2K server, dual P3 500 Mhz, 1GB
memory.
Thursday, March 21, 2002, 6:51:11 PM, Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TS I just posted an update to the Beta version of SpamReview (v1.0.27).
TS I
$.02
All ORBZ did was send a SPAM mail message through a suspected open relay to
themselves. If the law does not provide for the prosecution of the real
SPAMers, then how can they prosecute ORBZ for doing the same thing? By
operating a mail server, you are giving permission for many as yet
I'm not sure either, however, Spam is like a virus and it takes away from
other legitimate businesses that want to tell you about their services
and/or
sales. I have consulted with allot of my clients, most of them just hit
delete
when they don't know where the e-mail came from. So what's the
Anyone have a link or information on the most recent news about ORBZ and
Battle Creek? I see on some of the posts at the Battle Creek guest book
that apparently the charges may have been dropped. The most I have
enjoyed reading such a poorly written guest book application in ages.
Some of the
At 11:34 PM 3/21/2002, you wrote:
In one sense, isn't this what ORBZ was doing? Port Scanning everyone,
and sending in unsolicited emails because they want to test other
people's
systems without them asking for permission to do so?
ORBZ was not Port Scanning ORBZ was only after being
We're passing some PHP generated emails through our mail server, and
they're failing the SPAMHEADERS test. As these are for our internal
use only, what's the minimum headers required to let these pass through?
Douglas Hardison
Bits, Bytes and Pieces Internet Service
3332A-3 Airport Boulevard
Since installing declude junkmail we decided to use the alert option to
notify any possible legitimate email senders that their email was not
delivered. However, the problem that arrises is that we are getting 50-100
returned messages to the postmaster account per day that bounce from spam
Currently NO.
Scott has to enable us to use third party mailers (other than Imail's
built-in tool).
This way we can send our notifications from(the null sender) - which
is HOW bounce messages SHOULD be sent in the FIRST place. That would
eliminate the big problem of returned emails.
Best
Hi all,
I have a website I am hosting on the same server where I run iMail and
Declude. The website has a response form that uses a simple third party
script to send the results of the form to an email address on that server.
The script was probably written 5 years ago and probably does not
Exactlybut they are *my* IPs anyway
Maybe what I'm concerned about is some hijacker spoofing one of my IP
addressesbut then I run Declude Hijack as well! ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, March
Exactlybut they are *my* IPs anyway
Maybe what I'm concerned about is some hijacker spoofing one of my IP
addressesbut then I run Declude Hijack as well! ;)
It's very, very difficult for a hijacker to spoof IP
addresses. Technically possible, but extremely unlikely (and
If I want to just ignore outgoing mail instead of warn in the global do
I just put IGNORE for each one in the outgoing section?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of The Park Net
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, I have used this program for a while, but it still marks some
legitimate mail as spam. Does anyone have a sample cfg file that blocks a
good amount but doesn't mark legit mail spam I could look at? Do most people
just have it mark it spam or have it automatically delete it? Thanks, Mark
Scott,
Can you do this? (Enable us to send our bounce notifications from - the
null sender)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
14 matches
Mail list logo
