Yes, I sent to abuse and support as per their tech support.
I just got off the phone with them. They are still disinterested in shutting
down the site.
I have been doing some research on a place to report these issues and
actualy have someone care. This is what I found
Electronic Crimes Task
I called.. Said that he would let his abuse team handle it. Guess
California has strange laws or AUP's?
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 1:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Use matts 888-301-2516 number instead. Make them pay for the call I kept
them on the phone for 30 minutes.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 12:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott, I am noticing SpamDomains test is not working consistently. Lots of
messages are being properly flagged, but many that should be flagged but are
not. I can provide samples, if you would like.
Thanks for looking into this.
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
From: Buya Phenchalee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: Beach Hotel in Chicago.
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004
If a message is sent to an account that doesn't exist on the mail domain.
Does imail still pass it for declude for processing ?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
John..
Yes I agree it is a scam.. I visited the site and it is definitely a scam.
Needless to say PayPal would never send such an email.
But my question was not posed right... It is confusing .. The email shows as
if it has come through a PayPal computer. The IP, REVDNS, etc. All show
PayPal.
If a message is sent to an account that doesn't exist on the mail domain.
Does imail still pass it for declude for processing ?
Yes. By default, Declude will scan all E-mails that the server handles.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced
Scott, I am noticing SpamDomains test is not working consistently. Lots of
messages are being properly flagged, but many that should be flagged but are
not. I can provide samples, if you would like.
Yes, samples would be very helpful. Also, what version are you running?
I have deleted thousands of email accounts on my domain, and those accounts
still receive 10s of thousands of mainly spam messages. To decrease server
load, would it be possible to make it so declude doesn't see the email for
non-existing email accounts? I think this will also help decrease load
Kami-
Why not use a blacklist file for this domain?
Say it is mydomain.com
in global.cfg:
MYDOMAINBLACKLIST fromfile
C:\imail\declude\mydomain.com\blacklist_mydomain.txt x 10 0
in default.junkmail within the mydomain.com folder:
MYDOMAINBLACKLIST DELETE
in blacklist_mydomain.txt within the
I have deleted thousands of email accounts on my domain, and those accounts
still receive 10s of thousands of mainly spam messages. To decrease server
load, would it be possible to make it so declude doesn't see the email for
non-existing email accounts?
If you have deleted the accounts, IMail
Declude will only process what Imail hands to it. So, if Imail receives the
message, it will be handed off to Declude for processing.
So, you have to look at Imail to see why it is accepting messages for
non-existent users.
Reasons for this are:
1. It is acting as a gateway.
2. You are use the
Hmm, from my limited understanding, that seems to contradict your initial
answer when you said declude will process any email that's handed to the
server. I would appreciate it if you can elaborate more.
Declude JunkMail does not see any E-mails that IMail rejects (due to the IP
being in the
Kami I think your confusion was my fault. In one of my posts I incorrectly
posted the bounce message from payplas abuse email.
I later posted the correct headers.
Sorry,
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent:
The damn site is still up...24 hours later and these people haven't
pulled the site. I just called their sales line and asked that they
find someone at a higher level to direct this to. It's beyond me how
these people can pull up the address in a Web browser and still not get
that there is a
I just got off the phone with them and they said their manager is working on
it.
How many people can we get to start calling in about 15 minutes?
So, Matt I see you have called multiple times. On my last call they asked if
I was Matt or Kevin.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From:
Still running from my end. I turned caching off on my machine.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New Phishing
Well...I called in to join the fight...but checked the site while I was on hold and it
looks like they've finally taken it down...so I hung up.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Bilbee
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 12:56 PM
Subject: RE:
Below is an email we received - it is an Ebay scam or so it seems. I notified verio
just to be on the safe side. It points to:
http://198.173.234.225/stats.htm
-Nick Hayer
Received: from 061093114108.ctinets.com [61.93.114.108] by mx1.vtbass.com
(SMTPD32-8.05) id A4A56045A; Sat, 14 Feb 2004
My fault...I scrolled down in the email to click on the link, but evidently the IP
address in the HTML link had been removed/corrected...it is still up.
I'm on hold...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
So, Matt I see you have called multiple times. On my last call they
asked if I was Matt or Kevin.
:)
I only spoke to their support line once, however I also called their
sales line this morning and then got a call back from a higher up after
an impassioned and forceful
This is not accessable from my machine. Good job if verio already took this
site down
The other one is still up.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of nick
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott, I am noticing SpamDomains test is not working consistently. Lots
of
messages are being properly flagged, but many that should be flagged but
are
not. I can provide samples, if you would like.
Yes, samples would be
I've got someone's personal E-mail address and phone number that
supposedly is at a higher level. If he doesn't take action in another
30 minutes, I'll share that info here for others to use instead of
waiting on hold with their inept support.
Here's a copy of the message that I sent him (as
Just got off the phone with them and told them very clearly that
they are now considered an accessory to the crime. The person I
talked too that answered the phone would not let me talk to any one
else, he just kept saying that his supervisor has been notified.
To be fair, the
They were notified of this issue 24 hours ago.
7.8. Gathering personally identifiable information for unlawful purposes.
This is directly from their acceptable use policy.
This issue should have been give priority status yesterday morning when they
were notified of the illegal activity and
I updated to the Gibberish 2.1.0 filter and now the filter is not
working. The previous 1.07 filter worked fine. I have DJ Pro v 1.77 -
re-downloaded today to be sure.
Todd Hunter
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
Here's someone to contact directly. This is the person that I spoke
with earlier today, supposedly a manager at their company. Note that
the phone number might not be active, it's only what showed up on my
caller ID.
David Thompson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(858) 450-5034
I would recommend that
Todd,
You have to use at least the 1.77i7 or higher interim release. In the
initial beta release the END functionality would always trigger which
effectively disabled the test.
Matt
Todd wrote:
I updated to the Gibberish 2.1.0 filter and now the filter is not
working. The previous 1.07
Resending...
Original Message
Here's someone to contact directly. This is the person that I spoke
with earlier today, supposedly a manager at their company. Note that
the phone number might not be active, it's only what showed up on my
caller ID.
David Thompson
[EMAIL
I think it may be time to Slashdot this thing. Anyone with an account
that could post it there?
These guys need to be taught a lesson.
BTW, I tried calling David with that phone number that I gave out and
it doesn't take incoming phone calls. The E-mail address though does
work.
John,
Or CNET, or anyone else that is in the press, would
do quite a bit of damage to the host...
- Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 12:14
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New
Phishing Scam
I think it may be
I dont see a link on the Declude manual to that version of the beta. Is
this something that I can dl?
Thanks,
Todd
At 02:02 PM 2/14/2004, you wrote:
Todd,
You have to use at least the 1.77i7 or higher interim release. In the
initial beta release the END functionality would always trigger
http://www.declude.com/interim/
Note that I'm not using the very latest interim release, and there can
be issues or other unexplained behavior from one version to the next,
and they change frequently. Certainly monitor things if you are going
to install this just in case, though I haven't
Thanks Matt,
I have the interim release in now and the filter is working. I do
use DLAlalyzer so I will check that I have the latest version of that. I
see what you mean about the Declude logs. The Low setting is much different.
Thanks again,
Todd
At 03:18 PM 2/14/2004, you
They have knowledge that a crime is taking
place using their resources and are not taking steps to stop the use of their
resources in the act of that crime, that makes them an accessory to the crime.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original
Title: Message
Of
course - it could be that law enforcement asked them to MAINTAIN the site so
that they can collect evidence.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I thought about that earlier too.. But then I soon realized.. They are not
that swift.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 7:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New
Todd,
Yes we do have a version that is compatible with the new log file changes.
You need to download 2.0.6R.
Darrell
Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com
Todd writes:
The site is finally non-responsive.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Klinge
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 5:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New Phishing Scam
I thought about that
41 matches
Mail list logo
