Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Buffer overflow in Ipswitch products

2006-09-11 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> On the IMail list they indicated that IMail 8.x is also affected and > possibly older versions as well. A non-Ipswitch poster said that an anonymous tech indicated so. We all know that if that was a first-level tech... their word is not exactly gold. True, the IMail product manager chimed in to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Buffer overflow in Ipswitch products

2006-09-11 Thread Matt
On the IMail list they indicated that IMail 8.x is also affected and possibly older versions as well. The biggest issue here is that the first version with rudimentary Safari support in webmail happens to be the latest with the patch, and there are a lot of people still on 8.22 due to that iss

[Declude.JunkMail] Phone Number spammers

2006-09-11 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
Hi All, Maybe my last post did not make it through some filters. Anyone interested in discussing spam containing phone numbers with ever changing character patterns? Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Buffer overflow in Ipswitch products

2006-09-11 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Here are the published details.  The anonymous researcher provided no information for other than the 2006 versions, so your question is still open, Gunter.   http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-06-028.html   Andrew.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reed Business

2006-09-11 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
I dunno if they're the same people, but ReedExpo.com is similarly allowed here. I have a few users who want that mail and they don't seem to spam other accounts. Andrew. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Darin Cox > Sent: Monday, Sep

[Declude.JunkMail] Phone number spam

2006-09-11 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
Hi All, Of those of you that examine spam messages, are you bothered by phone number spam? If you have eliminated it, how did you do that? Were you able to eliminate it with Declude? I am getting a little tired of the spammer whose number ends in 3 x 9 x 0 x 0, if you know what I mean... Michae

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reed Business

2006-09-11 Thread Darin Cox
Hi John, We let them through, but it's really only one main customer that gets email from them, and it's directly related to their line of business. Darin. - Original Message - From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 12:05 PM Subject: [Declude.J

[Declude.JunkMail] per-userl configuration

2006-09-11 Thread Schmeits, Roger
We have a distribution list that emails all employees. Can I specific by domain who can post to this list such as "@clarksoncollege.edu" users only? I am looking at the online help but vaguely remember seeing something like that sometime ago. ## Roger Schmeits Sr. Netwo

[Declude.JunkMail] Reed Business

2006-09-11 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Any one have comments about ReedBusiness.com? Good, Bad, Spammer, great company, always allow, always block, some where in the middle? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMA

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newest version

2006-09-11 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Title: Message and dont forget to back up your old declude files in case.    That I have already done!   Thanks, I'll call support as well and have them walk me through it. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PRO

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newest version

2006-09-11 Thread Craig Edmonds
Title: Message and dont forget to back up your old declude files in case.   Kindest RegardsCraig Edmonds123 Marbella InternetW: www.123marbella.comE : [EMAIL PROTECTED]   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Butch AndrewsSent: Monday, September 11, 2006 5:07 PMTo:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newest version

2006-09-11 Thread Butch Andrews
Title: Message My advice, since I just did the upgrade from the same version, is to call support and have them talk you through the update. They will do this since there are many changes between the two versions -Butch*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***On 9/11/2006 at 10:43 AM Sharyn Schm

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newest version

2006-09-11 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Title: Message Ok, so according to my service agreement, I can download 3.11 (finally found where to download it).   The software seems to have an exe set up file.   I do NOT want to overwrite my current global config, I want to just get the new one and add some of the newer tests to it.  

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newest version

2006-09-11 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Title: Message I am running 2.06.   Yeah, I know, really outdated.   I have a current service agreement, but for the life of me, I can't figure out where to download the latest version from the declude site.   Guess I haven't done this in a really long time.     -Original Message-

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newest version

2006-09-11 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Mike, Yes, GP1/GP2's are created. Darrell --- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. Mike

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newest version

2006-09-11 Thread Scott Fisher
Title: Newest version I don't think there are any significant anti-spam advances in the new Declude base product.   Declude added the CommTouch addon. Or look at INVURIBL (cheapest solution) or Message Sniffer. - Original Message - From: Sharyn Schmidt To: declude.junkma

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newest version

2006-09-11 Thread jdoyle
Sharyn I'm not sure what version of declude you are running, I'm on the latest release here. I'd suggest getting a trial version of sniffer and seeing what that does for you. I had instant luck with it. I run sniffer, and INVul (I'm on the road and cant remember how to spell that) It's a geat

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newest version

2006-09-11 Thread Mike N
I am running the latest versions ... The Decludeproc does crash on average 1-2 times per day for me, but it restarts itself. Do the crashes produce Declude.GP1 and Declude.GP2 files? Does Declude Support still accept Declude.GP1 and GP2 files?Nobody writes perfect code, but if Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newest version

2006-09-11 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sharyn, I am running the latest versions and have not been having any major issues with it. The Decludeproc does crash on average 1-2 times per day for me, but it restarts itself. I have the AutoReview option set to on which moves the files placed on subsequent decludeproc restarts back into

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail doesn't show attachments

2006-09-11 Thread LDS
Thanks Greg for your hint. We checked it immediately, but the problem still exists.   We have similar problems concerning the attach-functionality of Declude 3.1.0: (a) Viewing a mail that has such an automatic generated attachment within the IMail 7.15 web-client shows only the body of the

[Declude.JunkMail] Newest version

2006-09-11 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Title: Newest version Good morning, I am still running an older version of Declude but it seems that it is not really effective anymore. We are getting tons of spam lately and I'm thinking about upgrading to the newest version in hopes that this will help. What is the newest version and

[Declude.JunkMail] Buffer overflow in Ipswitch products

2006-09-11 Thread LDS
Hello,   at the Heise news ticker http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/77889 an IMail-security-problem was posted. Just new versions seem to be involved. We are wondering whether the old IMail version we use (7.15) is affected by this problem, too.   Best regards, Guenter Gans LDS NRW - German