Please review the posts I made on 3.0.5.3 earlier this week.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 5:07 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [D
My understanding is Deccon is no longer used. A new GUI is in the works.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lyndon Eaton
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 6:41 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declu
might have addressed the stability thing.
There's nothing worse than having a customer call up and ask you why you are
passing multiple spams or even viruses. I don't however know that this
causes leakage, but it is a bug and bugs aren't always predictable.
Matt
John Tolmachof
Robert, may I make a suggestion?
Put all the logs into debug mode. Allow
it to run until you know this issue has occurred. Put the logs back the way you
had them.
Extract from the JM log all the lines
for a message in question. Send those along with the d and q file to Declude
supp
Did you create the file declude.cfg in
the imail\declude folder per instructions on the down load site?
Look at the Windows Event log, any Decludeproc
stops noted?
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
Per Bill at Declude, number 3
is fixed and number 4 is being fixed.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Monday,
September 26, 2005 12:44 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail
Stop the Imail SMTP service
Stop the Imail Queue Manager service.
Perform the upgrade.
Make sure the DecludeProc service is
started.
Restart the Imail SMTP and Queue Manager
service.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
Current release is 3.0.5.3
Reactions/observations so far:
1. Dropping known bad d and q files, decludeproc
moves them to a new folder \proc\review. The Decludeproc did crash and stop,
but it was restarted. I am not sure if the files were moved upon restart or at
the time of the cra
In a few minutes, I am going to drop the
known bad files into the proc folder and watch what happens.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
Sent: Monday,
September 26, 2005
#x27; services to stop. The message
content looks
> very similar to the 3 files you posted, and I thought you might want to
take a look at
> it (out of curiosity).
>
> Kim
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "John Tolmach
aring this
information, but we definitely don't detect every issue, or share every known
issue. I personally have a list that I am not bothering to share with
Declude because they are busy dealing with much greater issues at the moment
(supporting IMail 8.2+ users).
Matt
John Tolmachof
f when
called by IMail so that crashes are self-recoverable. I would imagine
that if decludeproc.exe is called and it isn't running as a service, it should
be able to start itself.
Matt
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Through a time consuming process, I have apparently identified
gt;
> John,
>
> The REVDNS entries I've seen all show [a letter]proxy.gmail.com, so a
> second entry shouldn't be needed but .google.com couldn't hurt. If
> you need to use @, make it
>
> @gmail.com.gmail.com
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Sep
Looks like it might end with .turner.com.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Sullivan
> Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 2:05 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude
24, 2005 1:46 PM
> To: John Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Beta 3.0.4.4 update 09/24/05A
>
> John Tolmachoff (Lists),
>
> This is Joseph Trimboli, System Administrator, Cyberlink, Inc. I am
running Spam
> Interceptor to get rid of junk email. Please f
Through a time consuming process, I have apparently identified the trigger
for the problem with the decludeproc stopping and messages backing up.
Attached are text files which are D files for messages that caused this. The
2 times in the last 4 days that the decludeproc has stopped. Each time, one
Does any one know what the SpamDomains entries should be for @gmail.com?
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://
I would ask that you go back to 3.0.4.4 and keep running. If you have this
problem again, please do the same think and isolate the files, then send
them to Declude along with the log files.
This was seen before and was hopefully fixed, but if you are seeing it
please continue to run 3.0.4.4 and if
David, too clarify, is that THREAD or THREADS? Originally it was THREAD.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 9:00 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@dec
Sunpentown units are very good, and are supposed to be efficient on water
collection, meaning there is not supposed to be as much drainage. They do
have a tank and a drain.
www.spt-usa.com
You can usually get them at a discounted price on eBay from a reseller, but
they are all shipped directly fr
FYI, it appears the Beta may be wrapping up soon. So if you can, maybe wait
a week or two for version 3.x.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Sent: Wednesday, Sep
Responding to 3 responses:
Thanks, I had a feeling it was the ALLRECIPS, but it appears there is no
other variable to use for the recipient. I guess I could use NOTCONTAINS
instead of NOTENDSWITH.
I was hoping for an exact match as possible.
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from t
I have created filter files for each domain that warrants them to counteract
tests failed because of keywords or other things some what unique to that
domain.
Here is the END line in the filter:
ALLRECIPS END NOTENDSWITH local-domain.com
However, in the log lines below, you can see
Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but participating in a Beta requires
active participation, meaning if you notice a problem, you need to take
steps to gather information surrounding that problem.
Did you read my posts about the beta, and did you take any steps that I did?
The point of a public
re.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kim
>
>
> ------ Original Message --
> From: "John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >The problem appears to be caused/centered/triggered/co-incidental to 4
spam
> >messages. Also, a large D
to Declude
for review.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 4:44 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: RE:
I am confirming this is occurring in 3.0.4.1 as well. 3.0.4.1 was sent to me
to hopefully fix this. In my case, I am getting error lines in the Virus
log, left over .vir directories, misplaced log lines, (JM line in the virus
log and hijack log) and events in the windows event log.
John T
eServic
Ya know, I thought about asking about that, but said nah, no one could do
some thing dumb like I did.
;)
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Premuda
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 11:3
TLD-TRUSTED-REVDNS=WARN[0]
>
> Is this another sign that the 'decludeproc.exe' was not doing anything?
Also, please
> remember, we are using the older IMail 8.05 HF3, and that our results can
definitely
> be different from yours.
>
> With regards,
>
> Kim
>
And yes, as of midnight my time, I am running 3.0.4 and it is working as
expected so far.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Thursday, September 15
I am sure you did, but let's check.
Did you stop the Imail SMTP service, stop the Imail Queue Manager service,
wait for both the proc and work folders to be empty, stop the DecludeProc
service, copy in the new decludeproc.exe file, start the DecludeProc
service, start the Imail Queue Manager servi
I have been running the latest beta for about 9 hours now.
The previously reported problem by me with false triggers on External tests
appears to be resolved.
Currently, Hijack is not working reporting can not find Declude Console.
Declude is aware of this and working on it.
Windows Server 2000
> 1. The only Beta that should currently be running is 3.0.3.7 you should
not
> be reverting to a previous version of the Beta at this point.
I said to a pre 3.x version which is what that means. Pre means before.
> 4. Your concern of the external tests working incorrectly is currently
being
> lo
I do not know why I did not think of this before. Of course, knowing my
fortune, many of you probably already figured this out.
It appears that using IS to check the subject line has always been iffy.
I thought of a solution: Use ENDSWITH instead of IS.
Just an FYI.
John T
eServices For You
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:19 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Major problem with External tests and Beta
3.0.3.4
>
> All tests
OS result code of "259" as the returned weight instead of
> defaulting to zero.
>
> Darrell
>
>
> John Tolmachoff (Lists) writes:
>
> > FYI to all running the Beta, I have reviewed and verified a problem
brought
> > to my attention by Kami.
> >
&
FYI to all running the Beta, I have reviewed and verified a problem brought
to my attention by Kami.
It appears that some times, even though the external test is reporting an
exit code of 0, DecludeJM is treating it as a fail and adding the configured
weight.
This goes for both positive weights l
> We have been running iMail 7.07 under windows 2000. We had some input
that
> there may be some problems in this environment. We are not keen on
> upgrading to 8.x since IPSwitch is walking away from iMail the product.
Ipswitch is not walking away from Imail. It is still alive and well, and in
I am running Declude 2.0.14 consistently on my Imail 8.21 server with no
problems that would allow viruses and spam to get through. Granted, my
server only has a volume of about 5K per day.
I am going to being running the betas as soon as I can get to that.
John T
eServices For You
> -Origin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 8:02 PM
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Question
>
>
> > Best thing is to ask on the Sniffer List.
> >
>
I have responded to each e-mail, including the one you sent 15 minutes ago.
On the phone on Wednesday, I did explain that AutoWhite is not tested in a
SmarterMail configuration.
AutoWhite for Declude does indeed look at the Imail registry for the OHN.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original
Best thing is to ask on the Sniffer List.
I actually have 17 Sniffer tests based upon exit code, with weights ranging
from 15 to 35. I hold at 25 and delete at 35.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
Any comments about this ISP?
It was in my bad mail file and I can not find why it was put in there.
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The arch
Sorry, but can't resist...
>> Any one have opinions good/bad on www.linkedin.com?
>>
> Has a lot of members I know
>
> Barry
Is that good or bad?
;-)>
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Found in 3 held messages: (Spaces inserted in the e-mail address)
Donate a
$1 now or $1,000 - Send donation to donate @ katrinahelpfund . com on
paypal
every little bit helps
Just a paypal account up right now, but it is all i can do with internet
up
and down.
Any one have opinions good/bad on www.linkedin.com?
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
BODY filters are generally the LAST test you want to rely on for several
reasons, including problems with encoding (such as you are witnessing) and
resources used.
However, what concerns me is why are any actions being taken on messages
sent from one person in a domain to another person in the sa
't
restart for any reason until I rebooted it to swap out the decludeproc.exe
later in the day. Looking in my inbox this morning, the problem doesn't
seem to have reoccurred since yesterday afternoon.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Tol
John Tolmachoff (Lists) <> wrote on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 2:11 PM:
Dan, I am at a client right now so I do not have the time to reviewall, but could it be an old Imail issue where since the Decludeprocess was having an issue, the QueueManager did a batch run andgrabbed the message before Declu
Dan, I am at a client right now so I do not have the time to review all, but
could it be an old Imail issue where since the Declude process was having an
issue, the QueueManager did a batch run and grabbed the message before
Declude finished it?
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message--
> It has now been an hour and the decludeproc service has only processed
> around 1000 objects, which I believe corresponds to 500 messages. I
> created the declude.cfg and put in THREADS 25. I also dl'ed the newer
> decludeproc.exe, but when I went to stop the service so I could replace
> it, th
This is not a Declude issue, but a SmarterMail issue.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:18 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject:
Uh, it is not a Declude issue but rather SmarterMail does not support it.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:18 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@de
And back to my original question.
> Is PIDDEBUG still available to use in 2.0.6.x?
Yes, it appears to be still available.
However, I have noticed something interesting. When a postmaster message is
created or processed, including forwards done by Imail, the PID file does
not get deleted when fi
> Also, John - DEBUG mode now lists PID's.
While that is true (and something I know about) leaving the log in DEBUG
mode for several days waiting for it to occur again is not acceptable.
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
No wonder I like using PowerChute Plus 5.2.1 so much. Plain simple and
easily configurable via the ini file.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Marchette
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 1
Is PIDDEBUG still available to use in 2.0.6.x?
I am seeing a problem where after a couple days I notice there are 15
Declude processes running but not doing anything. This is on the 0xc142
error. There are no Q or D files in limbo. I can not stop the processes, I
must restart the server. (This
Title: Message
If you are seeing 100,000 messages
without Declude JunkMail and 200,000 messages with Declude JunkMail, that is a red
flag that something is probably wrong in the Declude JunkMail configuration.
How are you getting the figure 100,000
and 200,000?
John T
eServices
Matt beat me to it. I hope you are not
using a nobody alias anywhere. The large amount of GSE files are indicative of
a misconfiguration or improper configuration within Imail.
Also as Matt said, some people are
becoming too quick to point a finger at Declude. I posted some questions f
What is your daily total volume?
What server are you using for DNS?
What version of Imail?
What have you tried to tweak? (First thing that comes to my mind is AFTERJM
in the Virus.cfg file.)
Are you using the Default JunkMail configuration, or have you made changes?
John T
eServices For You
>
Even it was a test, a test of what, valid e-mail addresses?
I would think that banning txt attachments would be a little over kill.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno
> Sent: Sat
Anybody?
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 7:44 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMa
Does SPAMDOMAIN check the PTR of the previous IP if the servers your Imail
server receives from are all configured as IPBYPASS, meaning you have front
end servers doing the receiving for the Imail server?
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
u
2005 3:12 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with Network Solutions DNS
Servers
>
> And me not monitoring the imail list. What were the problems (in summary)?
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: "John Tolmachoff \(Li
de.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with Network Solutions DNS
Servers
>
> And me not monitoring the imail list. What were the problems (in summary)?
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: "John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Correction:
"I actually sent out a broadcast to my clients earlier..."
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 2:50 PM
Known problem as posted on the Imail list. I actually sent out a broadcast
earlier informing them of possible problems.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
> Sent: Friday, July
Well, I saw not attachment with that
message. The header of it shows that it only failed one test and had a weight
of 8.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris
Sent: Thursday, July
0
I am really busy right now, but just a quick thought, restart the Imail
server. Are the text attachments going to all users or just a couple?
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris
Here is a personal experience that proves the bit about initials on checks
is wrong:
Doing my monthly personal bills, I inadvertently sent my water payment check
to the mortgage company. Guess what, they processed it and applied it to our
account.
So, if a bank does not even check to see who the
FYI, I will be around off and on Saturday and Monday.
Unless something major happens, it usually gets quite right before a holiday
and through it.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
>
I am looking for a Web Designer/Programmer to do work for me on a project
basis.
I currently have 2 projects pending with a possible third. The projects I
have pending are fairly small. Both are updating existing sites, the third
one would be a new webmail site. None are e-commerce or have DB inv
il] Question about load balancers and source
IP
>
> SKIPIP = new setting in Declude?
> Sorry... Been off the list for a while.
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
> > Tolmach
Use SKIPIP
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark E. Smith
> Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:02 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about load balancer
I think I can safely say that we have all been there done that.
At least it is working now.
Oh, no need to apologize.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
> Sent: Monday
In the HOSTS file, you do have IP address then space or tab and then the
domain, correct?
What I meant about aliases is while most of us used to do that, now we do
not because of all the dictionary type attacks. Instead, thanks to Sandy's
scripts, we now create Imail aliases for users on gatewayed
I am successfully relaying for 2 Exchange servers with no problems running
8.20 HF2.
Is there a carriage return after the domain name in the HOSTS file?
Why aren't you using aliases instead of accepting all?
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
I was just going to say, sounds like a DNS problem. Check all DNS servers
for response.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 4:37 PM
>
Title: Message
There are actually a good number of
Imail/Declude installs that either are pure gateway only or do a significant
amount of their load for gateway service.
IMHO, for a gateway service,
Imail/Declude is and will be a great combination into the foreseeable future.
Joh
AH, User configurable actions is different. I know at one time at least
Sandy had either a Demo or production running for a client.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Kratka
> Sent: Frida
In case Declude is not able to respond right now, the 2-3 projects that were
either in development or ready to go to development in the last couple of
years did not get very far AFAIK. At this time, Declude is not working on
one AFAIK.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From
> I opened a ticket with Ipswitch but they blamed it on Declude, as usual.
I'll bet it was not Eric that said that.
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Junk
Update: Since installing Imail 8.20 HF2 last Saturday, the problem so far
has not reoccurred.
Any one else still having this problem?
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubs
Did you not see my response to your earlier post?
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:53 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.
Check your server event log for Error messages Event ID 4 Source SRV.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 5:58 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
>
This has been covered for a couple of hours now on the Declude Virus list.
You need to update your F-Prot configuration to include the virus code 8 as
a match.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Right idea Ralph. We need to all work together to find this, as it happened
again this morning.
> What version of Windows are you using?
Windows 2000 server standard
> What SP's are installed?
SP4
> What version of Declude are you using?
2.0.6 NOTE: I also tried 2.0.6.14 and it occurred as well.
A recap:
5 people including me have reported having this problem in the last week or
so.
One of those does not use AVG.
Alex has reported to me that since disabling AVG he has not seen the problem
reoccur in 1 1/2 days.
I have not disabled AVG as I do not think it is the culprit. My server has
gt; > It gone now.
> > I couldn't even rename the log file, Insufficient system resources error,
> > even from another computer thru the network.
> > Robert Whitaker
> > The Modem Pool
> > 517-789-5689
> > 1-888-377-5689
> >
> > Be sure to try
really not sure :)
> We where hardly hit from the german Spam (we filtered it, but the mails came
> in).
>
> We run Imail on a Dual Xeon (Intel SR7520JR2 Board), 2 GB RAM, 3*Raid-1
> (System/Spool/Mail), 2003 SP1 (since Saturday), Imail 8.15 HF1 (since
> Saturday, before 8.14), Decl
.
>
> Do you run F-Prot/Clam/AVG? Maybe it's one of them? I didn't change anything
> on the system.
> (ok, some new domains, some new accounts, but the system was up since
> february).
>
> Alex
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Tolmachoff
Major problem on my server on 05/22/05 starting at 06:30 AM. I do not think
this is caused by Imail or Declude as nothing has changed in the 3 weeks.
It appears at 6:30 AM I started getting the 2020 event error on the server
and repeating every couple of minutes. Imail services kept working but
De
> Lets sign him up for a lot of spam from Korea, Japan, etc and see how he
> feels about blocking foreign IPs then...
>
> Sorry to go off on a rant here
The point is a company such as Verizon providing service to a wide and far
reaching ranged of customers can not arbitrarily make such a deci
Well, since Declude.exe is called from Imail SMPTD.exe and Declude.exe
closes as soon as it is done processing it would be nearly impossible to say
that Declude.exe had a memory leak and was holding memory unless the process
never ended in which case messages processed by Declude.exe never got
deli
Yes, I would say the next step is to
review the Message Tracking logs on their Exchange server.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Monday, May 16,
2005 9:26 PM
To: Declude.J
Incorrect. The missing line of the SMTPD
log is a missing line, meaning either something interrupted the session or the
lines are missing. Declude knows nothing of the message until after Imail SMTP
service has received it in its entirety.
John T
eServices For You
-Origi
Title: Message
Andrew, great idea. Never thought of
disabling inbound connections on the firewall. That would indeed allow existing
to continue but prevent any new.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
Title: Message
True, there is no way to stop new
connections yet allow existing connections to complete.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005
2:36 PM
To: D
Title: Message
The incomplete T and associated D files
are a result of stopping the Imail SMTP service.
FYI, any such files will be retried by
the sending client or server as the session was incomplete.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PRO
That is because COPYALL is an Imail configuration, not a Declude
configuration.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Patterson
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 7:06 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail
1 - 100 of 1113 matches
Mail list logo
