Does BANNAME work on file names within a zip
file?
-Scott
FisherDirector of ITFarm Progress Companies191 S Gary AveCarol
Stream, IL 60188630-462-2323
This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recip
We have mcafee at our location. I understand that I can use declude virus
with it - but got some questions
1. which version of mcafee should I use? I have access to both the windows
Virus Scan Enterprise 7.1.0 and the dos based Version 4.3.20.
You can use any version of VirusScan (or NetShield) wi
Doug,
Should post these to the declude virus list...
> virus with it - but got some questions 1. which version of mcafee
> should I use?
scan.exe
I think it comes with all of them but not sure.
> based 4.3.20, does anyone have a good automated update routine for it?
> If you say 7.1.0 then updat
We have mcafee at our location. I understand that I can use declude virus
with it - but got some questions
1. which version of mcafee should I use? I have access to both the windows
Virus Scan Enterprise 7.1.0 and the dos based Version 4.3.20.
2. If the suggestion is dos based 4.3.20, does anyone h
ry
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude virus hanging...
>
> Todd, is the production file called virus1.cfg? I don't know if that
> would
> cause any problems, but the default file name is just virus.cfg.
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude virus hanging...
>
>
> When I have Declude.Virus active it creates a .vir directory for each
> message, then never finishes the message, just leaves it hanging
> forever. When I turn off virus, messages flow properly. I have tri
When I have Declude.Virus active it creates a .vir directory for each
message, then never finishes the message, just leaves it hanging
forever. When I turn off virus, messages flow properly. I have tried
switching from f-prot to AVG with the same result. Virus.cfg attached.
Any thoughts??
Todd
terim
update yesterday to resolve this.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:45 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude virus hanging...
> When I have Declude.Virus active i
How can I get on the Declude Virus scan list
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The arc
> The problem has been identified; there was a problem with v1.76 (beta) and
> subsequent interim releases and the BANNAME option. This issue is fixed
in
> a new interim release v1.76i30 at
> http://www.declude.com/release/176i/declude.exe . Alternatively, you can
> comment out the BANNAME option
Several people have reported issues with E-mail not being delivered over
the past few days.
The problem has been identified; there was a problem with v1.76 (beta) and
subsequent interim releases and the BANNAME option. This issue is fixed in
a new interim release v1.76i30 at
http://www.declud
> I don't delete on any one test. But currently any e-mail messages that
have
> an overall weight of 50 get deleted automatically.
But that's using junkmail. I'm talking Declude Virus. There's no weights in
virus scanning, it is or it isn't. Some people ignore the vulnerability
detections, others
quarantine, quick san once a month and have only rescued one -- rest to the
bit bucket. Most don't even have correctly spelled subject lines.
> -Original Message-
> From: paul
> What about the rest on the list? Do you delete vulnerabilities?
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declud
I'm seeing a lot of these:
08/11/2003 00:05:37 Q1610005b050c0a12 Outlook 'CR' vulnerability [From: "
vi] in line 7
08/11/2003 02:12:51 Q33e12758026284fb File(s) are INFECTED [[Outlook
'Blank Folding' Vulnerability]: 0]
The 'CR' are messages that do not have attachements.
The 'CR' vulnerability
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of paul
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Virus Pro and Fprot (DOS)
>
> > In almost all cases
Hi Matt,
MR> So, since I can't find this setting in Outlook XP I'm going to assume
MR> its due to an old copy of Outlook 97 or somesuch. Or am I wrong about
MR> that?
well, I didn't see it in XP version (outlook 2002) but I could have
missed it I guess. But, I did see it in Outlook 2000
At 12:34 PM 8/11/2003 -0400, you wrote:
I'm seeing a lot of these:
08/11/2003 00:05:37 Q1610005b050c0a12 Outlook 'CR' vulnerability [From: "
vi] in line 7
08/11/2003 02:12:51 Q33e12758026284fb File(s) are INFECTED [[Outlook 'Blank
Folding' Vulnerability]: 0]
The 'CR' are messages that do not h
John.
Would you mind sharing the vulnerability.eml message.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:31 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Virus Pro and Fprot
I've always wondered about this. So how do you desensitize Outlook?
i.e. tell it not to break apart attachments as John posted?
In exactly the same way that it became broken in the first place. :)
Assuming that the problem is the Partial Vulnerability, the reason it
started occurring is becaus
nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hawk
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Virus Pro and Fprot (DOS)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Declude is catching
TECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarelli
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Virus Pro and Fprot (DOS)
>
> John.
>
> Would you mind sharing the vulnerab
I've been doing more
analysis and I'm hoping within 2 weeks to have my delete weight pushed down
to 40.
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Hi,
Declude is catching all of the MS Outlook attachments due to vulnerability
issue. How can desensitize the scan?
Thank you.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Friend.ly.net.]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from t
Interesting. I've been using email since FidoNet but never messed with
that. Ignorance truly is bliss :D
So, since I can't find this setting in Outlook XP I'm going to assume
its due to an old copy of Outlook 97 or somesuch. Or am I wrong about
that?
--Matt--
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
Declude is catching all of the MS Outlook attachments due to vulnerability
issue. How can desensitize the scan?
That's Declude Virus that is doing it -- and you need to desensitize
Outlook, not Declude Virus. :) We're not aware of any vulnerabilities
that are generating false positives.
Whi
I've always wondered about this. So how do you desensitize Outlook?
i.e. tell it not to break apart attachments as John posted?
Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com
---
ineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarelli
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.
> In almost all cases, this is a situation where someone thought it would be
> cool to tweak a setting that they weren't familiar with (Gee, "Split
> attachments into multiple E-mails" probably will make my E-mail faster!",
> they think).
Heh, in our case it would be "Hey, good way to get your mes
D]]On Behalf Of Adam Hobach
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Virus & Junkmail
Hello,
We are ISP using Imail and we are evaluating Declude Virus & Junkmail. I was
wondering anyone can offer insight on how much of a load thes
Hello Adam,
we run both on one server. A Dual P-II 350 /w 256MB ram. Imail deliver
about 4k e-mails each day and we have about 8-8.5k incoming e-mails of
which 4-4.5k gets blocked by declude junkmail.
Rarely gets over 10% load. This is on about 60+ domains which one
domain is for our dial-up serv
>We are ISP using Imail and we are evaluating Declude Virus & Junkmail. I was
>wondering anyone can offer insight on how much of a load these 2 programs
>will put on our servers.
>Our machines have roughly 200 domains on each server.
That depends mostly on how many E-mails you send/receive per
Hello,
We are ISP using Imail and we are evaluating Declude Virus & Junkmail. I was
wondering anyone can offer insight on how much of a load these 2 programs
will put on our servers.
Our machines have roughly 200 domains on each server. The server does both
web and email services. If we install
>The Klez.E virus, and maybe some other ones, fake the "from" address when
>they are sent. Would it be possible to allow administrators the option to
>send or not send virus warning messages depending upon the virus?
This has been added to the suggestion database. I can't say for sure
if/when
Scott,
The Klez.E virus, and maybe some other ones, fake the "from" address when
they are sent. Would it be possible to allow administrators the option to
send or not send virus warning messages depending upon the virus?
Thanks,
Greg
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
sday, January 29, 2002 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Virus and Junkmail
>
> >I have to say that in my 7 years running this ISP business, I have NEVER
> >found a product that works as well as your Virus and Junkmail software.
I
> >highly recommend your pr
>I have to say that in my 7 years running this ISP business, I have NEVER
>found a product that works as well as your Virus and Junkmail software. I
>highly recommend your products to EVERYONE. They have SURPASSED my
>expectations. I am glad I bought it at this price before you realize how
Scott,
Last week my mailbox was overflowing with SPAM, viruses and major complaints from
customers that were fed up with the junk and viruses.
I installed the Declude Virus and Junkmail software and now this week my mailbox is
STILL overflowing with mail, however, this time it is from customer
> In Declude Virus, if you add in BANEXT .xxx will Declude treat the e-mail
>as a virus and move the e-mail to a quarantine area just like a virus. I
>have noticed since I have added a couple of these lines that directory has
>received more files but I have not been notified.
That's correct (n
Scott,
In Declude Virus, if you add in BANEXT .xxx will Declude treat the e-mail
as a virus and move the e-mail to a quarantine area just like a virus. I
have noticed since I have added a couple of these lines that directory has
received more files but I have not been notified.
Jeff
**
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:53 PM
> Can I setup Declude virus with f-prot as the scanner for scanning emails
and
> keep Norton AV as the real-time system scanner? I would probably have to
> "tell" NAV to ignore the f-pr
>Can I setup Declude virus with f-prot as the scanner for scanning emails and
>keep Norton AV as the real-time system scanner? I would probably have to
>"tell" NAV to ignore the f-prot definitions file/dir. Any other issues with
>doing this?
This should be possible, but you'll also need to tel
Can I setup Declude virus with f-prot as the scanner for scanning emails and
keep Norton AV as the real-time system scanner? I would probably have to
"tell" NAV to ignore the f-prot definitions file/dir. Any other issues with
doing this?
Todd
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
42 matches
Mail list logo
