[Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread Jeffrey M Donley
I have had a continuing problem with Hijack. I have several business customers with 25 plus work stations, these customers are getting caught in hijack on outgoing mails. I have added ALLOWIP entries for all the customers with no success. It seems as though declude reads hijack cfg for a certain

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread Nick Hayer
On 22 Jun 2004 at 7:07, Jeffrey M Donley wrote: Hi Jeff, So in your hijack.cfg file you have ALLOWIP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and in the HOLDx dir hijack is retaining emails from the allowip addresses? If that is the case I suggest stopping and restarting declude console to reset hijack; if that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have had a continuing problem with Hijack. I have several business customers with 25 plus work stations, these customers are getting caught in hijack on outgoing mails. I have added ALLOWIP entries for all the customers with no success. It seems as though declude reads hijack cfg for a certain

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread John Tolmachoff
Wait, the DAISYCHAIN option has a big effect on any one hosting lots of users using Web Mail. Anyone thinking about this needs to consider the following: If you have 1000 users using web mail, it is very likely that just normal usage of those users will trigger the hold values. If you are going

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
than an email client (Outlook, etc.) Thoughts? Thanks. b -Original Message- From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ? Importance: High Wait, the DAISYCHAIN option has

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread John Tolmachoff
In regards to the web messaging possible trap, Do I really need to up the limits for hijack? It's always been my understanding that web messaging shouldn't send out as much email as frequently than an email client (Outlook, etc.) It depends on how many Web Mail users you have. If you are

RE: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
I've made the changes below, but the SMTP service on Imail wouldn't start back up. b -Original Message- From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:06 AM To: Brian Cunningham Subject: Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ? I made

RE: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
Should I be using the SMTP32.exe or the SMTPd32.exe for this process? Thanks. b -Original Message- From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:06 AM To: Brian Cunningham Subject: Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ? I made

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Anyone thinking about this needs to consider the following: If you have 1000 users using web mail, it is very likely that just normal usage of those users will trigger the hold values. That is a good point -- I don't know offhand how IMail handles this situation (specifically, what Received:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
-Original Message- From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:06 AM To: Brian Cunningham Subject: Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ? I made these changes and restarted services. But then I stopped receiving emails. Try

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Should I be using the SMTP32.exe or the SMTPd32.exe for this process? It *must* be SMTP32.exe (SMTPd32.exe is the SMTP Daemon, the service which accepts incoming E-mail, as opposed to the process that delivers the E-mail). -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Really dumb questions? Is the syntax of renamed files case sensitive? No. Does the Daisychain call go within the hijack.cfg file or another config file? It can go in any of the Declude .cfg files. Does the Daisychain call need quotes or simply just a call out? It should not have any quotes in

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread John Tolmachoff
Anyone thinking about this needs to consider the following: If you have 1000 users using web mail, it is very likely that just normal usage of those users will trigger the hold values. That is a good point -- I don't know offhand how IMail handles this situation (specifically, what

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ? In regards to the web messaging possible trap, Do I really need to up the limits for hijack? It's always been my understanding that web

SPAMCOP:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
Gotcha. I've been using SMTP32.exe (not the daemon). I just wanted to check because every time I make the change it stops delivery (even after I roll the SMTP service within Imail, which does start up successfully). b -- Original Message -- From: R.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've been using SMTP32.exe (not the daemon). I just wanted to check because every time I make the change it stops delivery (even after I roll the SMTP service within Imail, which does start up successfully). The key here is that both IMail and Declude must be set up properly: [1] IMail needs

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Sandy, do you have this config working on your Imail system? Of course. Many systems. If so, what version of Imail are you running? 6.06 and 7.15. Sorry, but I have to guess that you're not following the directions accurately. It's easy to stop mail from being transmitted if the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
We've got a locked down public Imail server where anyone can register for a free email, but all users have to authenticate before relaying mail. We've also got Declude with HiJack in order to stop spammers from using our system But somehow we've got registered users sending hundreds of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
spam messages in the queue. Help! Thanks. b -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ? We've got a locked down public Imail server where anyone

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
And the log files have not held anything today. Everything went through as OK with juat a couple not local users. Note that Declude Hijack allows unlimited E-mail to local users, and doesn't count that towards a user's quota. But I see that [EMAIL PROTECTED] now has about 300 outgoing spam

SPAMCOP:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
Thanks Scott. I've emailed you the file. We do have a few ALLOWIP's, but I they are for IP's we own. I checked the W log files and it looks like they are coming in through web messaging (god knows how they are sending that much email through web messaging) under several IP's ranging from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
I checked the W log files and it looks like they are coming in through web messaging (god knows how they are sending that much email through web messaging) under several IP's ranging from Nigeria to Israel. I blocked those IP's within Imail Control Access. Ah, that explains what is going on.

SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
I've got you up until the DAISYCHAIN ipsmtp.exe point. Do you want me to rename the two files and then add the daisychain line above to the config file of hijack? Thanks. b -- Original Message -- From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL

SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
Will renaming declude.exe to smtp32.exe cause problems with junkmail or virus? Do I need to rename or make a copy of declude.exe as renamed? b -- Original Message -- From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 26 Mar

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've got you up until the DAISYCHAIN ipsmtp.exe point. Do you want me to rename the two files and then add the daisychain line above to the config file of hijack? That is correct. Will renaming declude.exe to smtp32.exe cause problems with junkmail or virus? No. Do I need to rename or

SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
Scott, I made these changes and restarted services. But then I stopped receiving emails. When I reverted back, I'm now receiving emails again. Any thoughts? Thanks. b -- Original Message -- From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL

Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Eje Gustafsson
Not besides that your listed yourself in spamcop and that you need to take a look at the logs to see what's in them and/or show them to us so we can see what is failing. I see a couple of things right of. 1) no reverse DNS for 208.253.112.168 which is your sending ip for you mailserver. 2) your

Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
The reverse dns is because of a nat'ing scheme we have behind two firewalls and a load director (posts in the past have already described our config). The freaking SpamCop is because I apparently have Spammers sending an incredible amount of spam through our web messaging (i.e. bypassing hijack

RE: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Cunningham Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ? The reverse dns is because of a nat'ing scheme we have behind two firewalls and a load director (posts in the past

Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I made these changes and restarted services. But then I stopped receiving emails. Try implementing the DAISYCHAIN function as follows: (a) COPY SMTP32.EXE to SMTP32.EXB (this step just for backup) (b) RENAME SMTP32.EXE to IPSMTP32.EXE (c) COPY DECLUDE.EXE to SMTP32.EXE (d) Add the