Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-15 Thread Darin Cox
riginal Message - From: Robert E. Spivack To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:35 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License A professional business does not use grey market licenses.  Yes, you should switch to Linux so you can “get what you p

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-14 Thread Robert E. Spivack
@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License   Robert, I think that did a good amount of research and I do in fact have my facts straight.  It appears rather that you just simply didn't read my message fully. At this moment, SPLA isn't a good deal for me

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-12 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License Robert, I think that did a good amount of research and I do in fact have my facts straight.  It appears rather that you just simply didn't read my message fully. At this moment, SPLA isn't a good deal for me, though I reco

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-12 Thread Fox,Thomas
OTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans MartinSent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 3:00 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License I’m generally more of a lurker on this list than an active participant but … Craig, get a life.  I di

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-12 Thread Craig Edmonds
n ella.=   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans MartinSent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 3:00 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License I’m generally more of a lurker on this l

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-12 Thread Evans Martin
lf Of Matt Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 12:00 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License Craig, I don't know whether or not you figured this out, but it is somewhat rare that someone from Declude posts to this list, and most of the conversati

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-12 Thread Craig Edmonds
e.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License Craig,I don't know whether or not you figured this out, but it is somewhat rare that someone from Declude posts to this list, and most of the conversations are between fellow administrators and can span a wide range of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread Matt
FUD that some people spread about the SPLA.   There’s enough stuff to complaint about; SPLA is not one of them.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 12:05 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread Matt
urday, March 11, 2006 3:07 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License   John, I haven't looked at the SQL Server license, but the Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition license states:     "Renting, leasing, or lending the Soft

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread Robert E. Spivack
(Lists) Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 3:41 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License   On the one hand, if it that was upheld as true as you say and enforceable, do you think that would help get rid of all those fly-by-night hosting companies out

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread Robert E. Spivack
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 12:05 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License   Shayne (and Kevin), Rant = on I see now that under the SPLA program, they seem to indicate in a very round-about way that you have to use

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread John T \(Lists\)
  "Seek, and ye shall find!"   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 3:07 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License   John, I haven't lo

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread Matt
ehalf Of Matt Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 12:34 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License   The popular understanding is exactly the opposite in fact, but even Microsoft's own reps don't always tell it the same way. The

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread Matt
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 9:05 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License Shayne (and Kevin), Rant = on I see now that under the SPLA program, they seem to indi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread John T \(Lists\)
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Edmonds Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 12:32 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License Importance: High   um I thought this was a junk mail list aimed at discussing Declude?

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread John T \(Lists\)
al Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 12:34 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License   The popular understanding is exactly the opposite in fact, but even Microsoft&

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread Matt
f Matt Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 12:05 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License   Shayne (and Kevin), Rant = on I see now that under the SPLA program, they seem to indicate in a very round-about way that you have to use SPLA, i

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread Craig Edmonds
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 9:05 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License Shayne (and Kevin),Rant = onI see now that under the SPLA program, they seem to indicate in a very round-about way that you

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread John T \(Lists\)
ubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License   Shayne (and Kevin), Rant = on I see now that under the SPLA program, they seem to indicate in a very round-about way that you have to use SPLA, in fact, you have to purchase a separate license per processor for anonymous access to IIS over th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-11 Thread Matt
Shayne (and Kevin), Rant = on I see now that under the SPLA program, they seem to indicate in a very round-about way that you have to use SPLA, in fact, you have to purchase a separate license per processor for anonymous access to IIS over the Internet.  What a crock of s#*t that is.  This is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-10 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Matt I think you may be looking for this     http://www.microsoft.com/serviceproviders/programs/windowswebhosting.mspx     Kevin Bilbee -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Shayne EmbrySent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:19 PMTo: Dec

re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-10 Thread Shayne Embry
Matt,I think as you continue your investigation you'll find that Microsoft states the only type of "legal" licensing for hosting services is the Service Providers License. We discovered this not-so-well publicized fact last year. It requires a monthly licensing fee. I won't go into all the deta