RE: [Declude.Virus] BitDefender updates

2005-05-27 Thread Jerry Murdock
Look under: \Program Files\Common Files\Softwin\BitDefender Scan Server -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 1:06 AM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: RE:

RE: [Declude.Virus] BitDefender updates

2005-05-27 Thread Jerry Murdock
Have to admit this has been on my list of things to investigate as well. The auto-update is there, but looks to require the console logged in - but have to admit I haven't looked hard. Any luck running the update as a service or via command line? Jerry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.Virus] OT: Installing Sophos/Anti Virus

2005-04-20 Thread Jerry Murdock
Consider Clam AV, open source and in some ways does a better job for mail scanning than most commercial products. It can be a little resource intensive, so if your utilization at the edge you may want to monitor it for a while. For Trend products, you may need a serverprotect or officescan

RE: Re[6]: [Declude.Virus] testvirus.org #22

2004-12-20 Thread Jerry Murdock
For TEST 17, Whatever the technical vulnerability is called - there is a copy of eicar encoded in the headers that Outlook (at least) can see - haven't tested OE or others. Symantec and Trend gateways catch it, as do the command line scanners previously noted. Jerry -Original Message-

Re: [Declude.Virus] fprot 3.12b and Declude?

2002-10-07 Thread Jerry Murdock
They've changed the location of the real dos files on the ftp server. They are now in /pub/dos. There are symlinks in /pub, but wget can be a little flaky when following symlinks. It's probably best to change the location for the fp-3*.zip to dos/fp-3*.zip to insure minimal duplicate

Re: [Declude.Virus] script for f-prot update

2002-10-04 Thread Jerry Murdock
The script has not updated the exe for a very simple reason - they have not updated the DOS distro yet. All those steps shouldn't be necessary if not installing the Windows stuff. At most stopping SMTP is all that is needed. Jerry - Original Message - From: Panda Consulting S.A - Luis

Re: [Declude.Virus] MacAfee kosher or not?

2002-08-20 Thread Jerry Murdock
Isn't Command just F-Prot dressed up a little? Jerry - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 4:02 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MacAfee kosher or not? I am currently looking into Kaperseky and Command AV,

HELO:Re: [Declude.Virus] Virus software

2002-07-15 Thread Jerry Murdock
- Original Message - From: "Thomas E. Hall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 2:59 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Virus software Has anyone writen a ftp script to auto-update Trend Micro's PCscan virus def's? Here as an attachment and in-line.

HELO:Re: [Declude.Virus] Virus Scanner

2002-07-08 Thread Jerry Murdock
NOD32 has uncluttered server licensing at $300. Same for Kaspersky but at $560. Not sure how compatible with Declude either of the report formats are. Norman is decent and will install, but licensing may be an issue. Trend's PCScan is freely available via their emergency disk download, with no

HELO:Re: [Declude.Virus] W32/Frethem-Fam

2002-06-12 Thread Jerry Murdock
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 10:22 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] W32/Frethem-Fam Very interesting, since McAfee never sent out an alert about it. However, McAfee seems to use their E-mail virus

HELO:Re: [Declude.Virus] W32/Frethem-Fam

2002-06-12 Thread Jerry Murdock
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:39 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] W32/Frethem-Fam It seems to also use the MIME header exploit. This is such a common virus element, maybe Declude should have an

HELO:Re: [Declude.Virus] W32/Frethem-Fam

2002-06-12 Thread Jerry Murdock
Original Message - From: Thomas E. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:11 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] W32/Frethem-Fam We are using scripts to update F-Prot. Does the windows F-Prot update run as a service or do you have to leave the

DEWS:Re: [Declude.Virus] Which F-Prot scanner to call?

2002-05-30 Thread Jerry Murdock
, 2002 9:08 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Which F-Prot scanner to call? Hmmm, so it does work then...? Thanks, Jerry, I'll do some testing, as well. Scott, has Declude tested both and which one is officially recommended? Thanks, Bill -Original Message- From: Jerry Murdock

Re: [Declude.Virus] OT queston

2002-05-28 Thread Jerry Murdock
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jerry Murdock Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] OT queston Works fine for our purposes running smtp/imap/pop through it. Not knowing your load, I should point out we're dealing with a few hundred

Re: [Declude.Virus] NJABL:McPhee Problems

2002-05-22 Thread Jerry Murdock
Only relatively old patterns should be missing Klez. Make sure your running the latest engine. Mcafee is not good about updating the engine sometimes. Have you run the latest SDAT? Jerry - Original Message - From: Dan Olsen (DANO) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [Declude.Virus] As usual, Scott came up with the answer

2002-03-24 Thread Jerry Murdock
fpcmd.exe may work OK if you want to keep the 8.3 name generation turned off. I wouldn't though, unless absolutely 100% sure of everything that may EVER run on the server. Jerry - Original Message - From: David Dodell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-prot def files

2002-03-14 Thread Jerry Murdock
I've had no problems with my scripts that use ftp.f-prot.com, the updater, or the links on the f-prot site. The date listed in the html for the defs on the f-prot site are almost always wrong, but the files themselves are current, ie: the site says the defs are dated 3/7, but the downloaded

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-prot def files

2002-03-14 Thread Jerry Murdock
, 2002 10:38 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot def files ftp.f-prot.com/pub shows a .zip from today but when you open the file it contains a file dated in january or december -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jerry Murdock Sent

Re: [Declude.Virus] OT: McAfee/Trend

2002-03-06 Thread Jerry Murdock
PC-Cillin and Officescan include pcscan, probably the other products as well. OR You can grab it from http://www.antivirus.com/pc-cillin/support/edisks.htm. This is their emergency disk creator, but I can find no restrictions on it's use. There is no license file in the distro, no

Re: [Declude.Virus] OT: McAfee vs. Symantec NAV

2002-02-20 Thread Jerry Murdock
I prefer the Trend product line over both McAfee and Norton. In general, fewer workstation problems, fewer server problems, fewer deployment problems. Trend recently upgraded their OfficeScan product (the desktop scanning solution) from 3.54 to 5.0. We are responsible in some form for 10+

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] JS.Menger.Worm Norton AV

2002-02-14 Thread Jerry Murdock
Same here. The update actually came down at 8:00am EST here, so was posted sometime between 7-8am EST. Trend had their update out by 2:00am. Jerry - Original Message - From: Smart Business Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002

Re: [Declude.Virus] New lower-bandwidth f-prot update script.

2002-01-29 Thread Jerry Murdock
- Original Message - From: "Jerry Murdock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:49 AM Subject: [Declude.Virus] New lower-bandwidth f-prot update script. Attached is a new updfprot script using wget instead of ftp. It does no

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Daily DAT Command Line Scanner Update Script

2002-01-29 Thread Jerry Murdock
- Original Message - From: "Jerry Murdock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 6:53 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Daily DAT Command Line Scanner Update Script As requested a few times, attached is a script to update the engine and

Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Daily DAT Command Line Scanner Update Script

2002-01-29 Thread Jerry Murdock
I'm not sure what your asking. Update instructions are clearly described in the virus listing on McAfee's site. Jerry - Original Message - From: Steve Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:32 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Daily DAT

Re: [Declude.Virus] MY Party

2002-01-28 Thread Jerry Murdock
The downside of McAfee updates is that it takes an EXTREME event for them to budge from weekly updates of the release version of the dat file, which means the built-in auto update is slow to react in these situations. You either need to manually get the extra.dat file from their web site, or the

Re: [Declude.Virus] Magistr.32678

2002-01-12 Thread Jerry Murdock
That's been my experience as well. Usually a fairly benign office-macro type virus that may have been around on the originating system for a while, coming from a laptop or home pc that is not well-controlled. Never been a real problem, but you still get how did this get through type questions.

Re: MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Rif: [Declude.Virus] Fprot

2002-01-08 Thread Jerry Murdock
What OS? My experience is it's only an NT4 problem, and then only the Windows on-demand scanner. For me this makes it basically a non-issue for imail, but it is an annoyance. Jerry - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:45

[Declude.Virus] F-Prot Updated

2002-01-08 Thread Jerry Murdock
FP-Win has been updated. The Can't run more than one instance of this program! under NT4 appears to be fixed now. They haven't updated the version number. Jerry --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus

[Declude.Virus] Fw: New version of F-PROT (3.11b)

2001-12-21 Thread Jerry Murdock
FYI, for those that don't auto-update the engine via FTP: I don't think all the mirrors are updated yet. Jerry - Original Message - From: fp-admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:24 AM Subject: New version of F-PROT (3.11b) This is a

Re: [Declude.Virus] Mail upgrade

2001-12-19 Thread Jerry Murdock
The 7.0 reset the registry entry for Declude. Just run declude.exe once manually, and it will re-install the entry. Jerry - Original Message - From: Jim Colunio To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:59 AM Subject: [Declude.Virus] Mail

Re: [Declude.Virus] Multiple Scanner Support - Pricing

2001-12-18 Thread Jerry Murdock
Have you ever known a product with Pro and Standard versions to always add new features to both? Generally Standard version are effectively feature-frozen until a major upgrade. Declude has continually put most of the incremental upgrades into the Standard version. Saving a few bells and

Re: [Declude.Virus] TempDir

2001-12-18 Thread Jerry Murdock
Will MAXATONCE also help limit it, or does Declude go ahead and decode everything before the prior instances have finished? Jerry - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:05 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus]

Re: [Declude.Virus] TempDir

2001-12-18 Thread Jerry Murdock
Thanks, saved me testing it. Jerry - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:24 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] TempDir Will MAXATONCE also help limit it, or does Declude go ahead and decode everything

Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude v1.29 beta released

2001-12-06 Thread Jerry Murdock
Wow, a lot of stuff for a .01 rev. Sounds great. Clarification please on DELETEVIRUSES. I assume it doesn't try to remove the attachment, but deletes the queue files. Jerry - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06,

Re: [Declude.Virus] New W32/Goner-A virus

2001-12-04 Thread Jerry Murdock
I've caught about 30 with f-prot since noon-ish(EST) when the patterns were updated. Jerry Subject: Hi Incoming/Outgoing: incoming Number Recepients: 1 Message ID: 001401c17cf8$2ce20c70$6664a8c0@XX Date: 12/04/2001 Time: 14:17:52 QueueFile Name: D215d228.SMD Infected File: gone.scr Virus

Re: [Declude.Virus] Warning - Incomplete BadTrans Detection with McAfee

2001-11-29 Thread Jerry Murdock
Does Mcafee's auto-update update the engine, or is it still broken? - Original Message - From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:44 AM Subject: [Declude.Virus] Warning - Incomplete BadTrans Detection with McAfee

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot

2001-11-28 Thread Jerry Murdock
www.frisk.is - Original Message - From: Grant Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:25 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Where can I get the DOS virus scanner to use with Declude Virus? I just purchased this and need to get the

[Declude.Virus] New Mcafee Scan Engine Released - 4.1.50

2001-10-05 Thread Jerry Murdock
FYI: I just noticed my Mcafee installs have a new Scan engine. The new Mcafee scan engine - 4.1.50 was released on the 9/26. CHECK YOUR VERSION. Some versions of Mcafee's auto-update only update the .dat files and and not the engine. Most important addition from a Declude perspective -- TNEF

[Declude.Virus] F-Prot does TNEF now too

2001-10-05 Thread Jerry Murdock
Seeing that Mcafee now does TNEF, I checked out F-Pror again too. To my surprise, it appears works as well, just make sure /archive is on the command line. The support was evidently slipped in somewhere between 3.08b and 3.10. As it was never announced from what I can see, I don't know how

Re: [Declude.Virus] still some log file errors...

2001-10-04 Thread Jerry Murdock
It would be nice, but I'd still be stuck with using a batch file until there is TNEF support too. I feel much more comfortable with my multi-scanner batch file than I do with my TNEF hacks. Jerry - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [Declude.Virus] errors in log file

2001-10-03 Thread Jerry Murdock
- Original Message - From: Dan Spangenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:16 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] errors in log file Scott and/or Jerry; I could use some help from you or possibly Jerry on getting the batch file right. I am

Re: [Declude.Virus] f-secure / f-prot ?

2001-09-24 Thread Jerry Murdock
No. The F-Secure product licenses the f-prot engine from Frisk, the result is the command line scanner in both is the same. F-Secure actually uses both the F-Prot and Kaspersky engines in the Windows version. Jerry - Original Message - From: Jim Jones, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [Declude.Virus] OT: Alert: New IIS Worm

2001-09-18 Thread Jerry Murdock
FYI: F-Prot has already been updated for this today. Get the new fp-def. Jerry - Original Message - From: Terrence Koeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:42 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] OT: Alert: New IIS Worm Offtopic From NTBUGTRAQ:

Re: [Declude.Virus] new virus FPROT not stopping

2001-09-18 Thread Jerry Murdock
It's new. F-Prot has already updated the defs. Get them. - Original Message - From: J Porter To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:04 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] new virus FPROT not stopping I received an email this AM containing a new

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Stuff

2001-08-31 Thread Jerry Murdock
Hmm... I think that is too broad an interpretation of emulation. I would suspect it does nothing more than what McAfee does by default, and that you can turn off with the /NOCOMP switch. Seeing as it apparently works with the Windows and Linux versions as well, they would have to have a lot of

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Stuff

2001-08-30 Thread Jerry Murdock
What's your command line? - Original Message - From: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:01 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Stuff F-Prot support finally got back to me on that virus I submitted on the 13th. We will add this virus to

[Declude.Virus] Problems with new ONLYSENDIFREMOTESENDER directives?

2001-08-22 Thread Jerry Murdock
Can someone post a working recip.eml that uses the ONLYSENDIFREMOTESENDER option? I can't seem to get it working as expected. The recip.eml always goes out. Also, what is determining local/remote status? Thanks, Jerry This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To

Re: [Declude.Virus] Problems with new ONLYSENDIFREMOTESENDER directives?

2001-08-22 Thread Jerry Murdock
Scott: Can you take a look at the attached files? The zip contains the queue files of the test message, my recip.eml, debug log output for the message, and the generated recipient notification. I went through the queue file and 0'd out the test virus, so it no longer contains a virus, but the

[Declude.Virus] Console window pops up using 1.25

2001-08-22 Thread Jerry Murdock
One more new thing I just noticed. I get a console screen of the virus scanning popping up whenever I am logged into the server. I added CONSOLE OFF to the virus .cfg and get 08/22/2001 16:37:39 Console turned OFF in the log file. It did not do this before. Please help again. Jerry

[Declude.Virus] Pro upgrade pricing for existing users

2001-08-15 Thread Jerry Murdock
Has this been announced yet? Didn't see it on the site. Are the per domian/user settings the only addition, or are more planned? Jerry This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.Virus. You

Re: REVDNS:RE: [Declude.Virus] Virus Issue

2001-08-14 Thread Jerry Murdock
I think it's just a link to Trend's browser based scanner. http://housecall.antivirus.com Jerry - Original Message - From: Dan Spangenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:53 AM Subject: RE: REVDNS:RE: [Declude.Virus] Virus Issue I never did

Re: REVDNS:Re: [Declude.Virus] Can declude use two scanners?

2001-08-14 Thread Jerry Murdock
: (Leave alone) Found a virus 'TROJ_W95NUKER' in C:\TEMP\WINNUKE.EXE (Non-Cleanable) Action taken on virus file C:\TEMP\WINNUKE.EXE : (Leave alone) --- -Bill Doyle [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] - Original Message - From: Jerry Murdock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

Re: REVDNS:RE: [Declude.Virus] Virus Issue

2001-08-14 Thread Jerry Murdock
Expected since mcafee and solomon share the same engine. FWIW: Norman does not catch it either. Kaspersky identifies it as i-worm/magistr.corrupted. I found the corrupted interesting, don't know what it really means though. Jerry - Original Message - From: Dan Spangenberg [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.Virus] Can declude use two scanners?

2001-08-13 Thread Jerry Murdock
Yes. My simplified batch file is attached, along with one support utility that sets the errorlevel to EE hex. Rename the ErrEE.co_ to ErrEE.com. Use VIRUSCODE 238 in virus.cfg. This is completely unsupported, use at your own risk, your mileage may vary, etc. Jerry - Original Message

[Declude.Virus] TNEF Support

2001-03-05 Thread Jerry Murdock
Any word on when TNEF support will be rolled in? I haven't updated my rigged TNEF support to work with 1.14 yet. If Declude's is in the near term, I may wait - but my client has WAY too many folks using RTFs in Outlook for me to look the other way for long. Thanks, Jerry [ This E-mail came