On the devlist but not to be expected soon
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 7:43 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
Any update or information on this?
John T
Any update or information on this?John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent 6/23/2008 11:36:40 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\
me
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: Colbeck, Andrew
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 6:56 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
For what it&
t;
*To:* declude.virus@declude.com <mailto:declude.virus@declude.com>
*Sent:* Friday, June 13, 2008 5:25 PM
*Subject:* RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
Be careful with this setting. If a message gets held as spam it will
not be
virus scanned. Make sure you scan any messag
On Monday, June 23, 2008, 2:16:47 PM, Kevin wrote:
>
I have complained about this for a while now.
This process of fix the configuration the place in the proc folder only works if you are constantly pouring through your hold folders. We do not do that. We send an email to our users with
I will see what we can do for a new directive for the HOLD to be excluded or
included by the admin.
David
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 2:17 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs
VIRUSSCANONHOLD. This would make everyone happy.
Kevin Bilbee
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 9:57 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
For what it's wor
ssages for viruses saves me a lot of processing power.
Andrew.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Barker
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 9:00 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
bject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
Hi David,
Could you explain this:
We have chosen not to do this otherwise your users will end up with viruses
in their junkmail folders
By NOT scanning held junkmail the virus WILL end up in a users mailbox if I
have to reque the
virus@declude.com
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
Dear Bonno,
It is not that we can't do this. We have chosen not to do this otherwise your
users will end up with viruses in their junkmail folders.
AVAFTERJM will skip m
lf Of Bonno
Bloksma
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 4:20 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
Hi,
(Open mail request)
Dear Declude people.
I have asked this before and with the current spam levels kan we PLEASE have
this feature now ASAP? W
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Bilbee
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
Be careful with this setting. If a message gets held as spam it will not be
virus scanned. Make sure you scan any
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
Ahh... so the solution is to use Declude Junkmail instead of IMail's poor
anti-spam. Then you could use the AVAFTERJM to work effectively with AV
scanning.
Darin.
- Original Message --
8 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
I have bought declude anti-virus, not declude anti-spam.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 12:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
I have bought declude anti-virus, not declude anti-spam.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 12:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
The reason for it not working is that the scanner d
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
> AVAFTERJM has been around a long time. I don't remember what version, but
> it was a 1.x version.
>
> Are you familiar with the setting? It tells Declu
Of
Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:10 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
AVAFTERJM has been around a long time. I don't remember what version,
but
it was a 1.x version.
Are you familiar with the setting? It tells Declude to run
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Darin Cox
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:10 AM
> To: declude.virus@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
>
> AVAFTERJM has been around a long time. I don't remember what version,
> but
> it was a 1.x
0 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
AVAFTERJM has been around a long time. I don't remember what version, but
it was a 1.x version.
Are you familiar with the setting? It tells Declude to run Anti-Virus
after
Junkmail. It then only runs AV after checking to see i
From: "Brian Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
No, I am still using antique version declude and
imail.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No, I am still using antique version declude and
imail.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
Interesting that you are also seeing the 70-100% CPU with
Interesting that you are also seeing the 70-100% CPU with F-Prot 6, where we
are not.
Are you running AVAFTERJM?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamA
need to remove --mbox, if this is there, it will
not function.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6
I think VIRUSCODE 1 need to be added too?
http://www.f-pro
essage -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6
Assuming the default location for program installation, here you go.
SCANFILE C:\PROGRA~1\FRISKS~1\F-PROT~1\fpscan.exe /VERBOSE=0 /ARCHIVE=5
/scanlevel
: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6
Excellent response thanks Darin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Darin
Cox
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 2:39 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6
Yes. It's expensive, but is still a
If there's a command line scanner, it shouldn't be too difficult, but I
don't know offhand if Trend Micro has one.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "SJ Stanaitis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 3:24 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus]
Excellent response thanks Darin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 2:39 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6
Yes. It's expensive, but is still a good and effi
ox and it again is phenomenal.
--SJ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 2:39 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6
Yes. It's expensive, but is still a good a
naitis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 1:09 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6
You've got to buy the server product now. I don't think the cheap
version works anymore with Declude.
--SJ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
62
VIRUSCODE 63
for completeness.
Hope this helps,
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:46 AM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6
Can anyone provide a SCANFILE line that they know works with F-PROT 6 ?
om
Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6
Can anyone provide a SCANFILE line that they know works with F-PROT 6 ?
Thanks
David B
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The a
Can anyone provide a SCANFILE line that they know works with F-PROT 6 ?
Thanks
David B
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
(lists)
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 1:49 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
As Andrew pointed out, you did not read the fine print.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PRO
As Andrew pointed out, you did not read the fine print.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Douglas Cohn
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:50 PM
> To: declude.virus@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus
al Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:50 PM
> To: declude.virus@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
>
> F-prot is $50 for 10 licenses per year. $5 per machine
@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
Changed when they released the new version. About 3 months back. Check the
archives of this list. We were complaining about it. We dumped using their
product and just use the AVG built into Declude.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Mess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:33 PM
> To: declude.virus@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
>
> When did their licensing change? F-Prot used to be extremely
> reasonable.
>
> Don
>
>
When did their licensing change? F-Prot used to be extremely reasonable.
Don
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 11:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
Read the license. It may be co
ct: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
>
> Been using F-Prot version 3 for years ... and now getting notices to
> upgrade to version 6.
>
> Anyone done this yet, and is it still compatible with Declude/Imail,
> etc?
>
> David
>
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from t
Been using F-Prot version 3 for years ... and now getting notices to
upgrade to version 6.
Anyone done this yet, and is it still compatible with Declude/Imail,
etc?
David
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], a
18, 2006 11:37 PM - MGMT
> To: declude.virus@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot down?
>
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:27 PM, Ncl Admin wrote:
>
> > Down here as well on two different circuits. Tracert times out in
> > Germany somewhere or other.
&
On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:27 PM, Ncl Admin wrote:
Down here as well on two different circuits. Tracert times out in
Germany somewhere or other.
Obviously a good reason to be running multiple scanners.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-m
Down here as well on two different circuits. Tracert times out in Germany
somewhere or other.
---
Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Original Message --
From: David Dodell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: declude.virus@declude.com
Date: Mon, 18 Dec
I haven't seen a good connection from F-Prot for about 24 hours ...
just checked for their website, can't connect there.
This is on our primary Sprint connection.
Tried our backup DSL from Qwest that is totally separate (we use for
testing etc) and can't connect there either ...
Anyone els
Of MattSent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 2:45
PMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re:
[Declude.Virus] F-Prot SwitchesI think that in the
context of scanning E-mail, where executables are normally banned, this switch
has far less risk of a false positive. Generally, virus scanners in
"Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:53 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Switches
#Dec-10-2004 AC Note that I've added 'ai' and 'packed' to the switches
suggested in the manual. The noboot
g of files.
>/AI - Uses Neural network heuristic scanning of files.
>/NOAI - Doesn't use Neural network heuristic scanning of files.
>
>
>
> Original Message
>> From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March
M
> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Switches
>
> #Dec-10-2004 AC Note that I've added 'ai' and 'packed' to the switches
> suggested in the manual. The noboot and nomem options
> # are not listed when you
If you take a look at the DOS version of F-Prot
ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/dos/fp-316b.zip
you will find that it contains a file called COMMAND.TXT that seems to explain
everything. I've attached it below:
The command-line options
F-PROT.EXE is usually run without any p
SCANFILE C:\f-prot_windows\fpcmd.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM /ARCHIVE=5
/PACKED /NOBOOT /DUMB /REPORT=report.txt
Regards
Mario Antonio
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:46 AM
Subject: [Declude.Virus]
SCANFILE C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe /TYPE /SILENT /PACKED /NOMEM
/ARCHIVE=5 /NOBOOT /DUMB /REPORT=report.txt
marc
At 18:46 28.03.2006, you wrote:
>After seeing Matt's response I'm curious what other users are using for
>their F-prot switches. Some of the switches Matt uses seem like the
Hi Mark,
Mark Reimer wrote:
After seeing Matt's response I'm curious what other users are using for
their F-prot switches.
here are mine:
SCANFILE1e:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe /ARCHIVE=5 /DUMB /NOBOOT
/NOMEM /PACKED /SERVER /SILENT /TYPE /REPORT=report.txt
VIRUSCODE13
VIRUSCODE1
server /archive=5 /packed /dumb
/noboot /nomem /silent /report=report.txt
Andrew 8)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Reimer
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:46 AM
> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
> Subject:
After seeing Matt's response I'm curious what other users are using for
their F-prot switches. Some of the switches Matt uses seem like they should
be used but Declude does not include them in the config shown in their EVA
manual. What do the majority of you all use?
Mark Reimer
IT Project Manager
declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot exit code 8 and body content
>
> Matt, John,
>
> F-Prot is not catching simple e-zips. I supposed it was the "password"
> string in the mailbody. Now after an additional test it turned out that
> F-Prot is exiting w
nt: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 7:17 PM
> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot exit code 8 and body content
>
> I am using viruscode 8 and it is not blocking password
> protected zips. I think like Markus said it is looking for a
> combination of a passwo
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:02 AM
> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-prot exit code 8 and body content
>
Markus,
I believe that this is something that several of us railed against and
tried to get F-Prot to change. Formerly no known viruses would be
tagged with an exit code of 8, but then they suddenly started tagging
some known viruses this way, essentially requiring us to add that code
in for
Today I've had a message hold as false positive ("unknown virus" exit code
8)
F-Prot seems ending with this exit code if there is attached a password
protected zip file and in the body is something like
"password: ."
This message was definitively no false positive and so I requeued it.
I've
Another buffer overflow has been found in ClamAV and ClamWin, this time
in decompressing UPX packed executables, which is fairly common for
virus and spyware variants. See:
http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/01/clam_antivirus_.html
The current ClamWin version is 0.88 here:
http://
For those of you using F-prot
Version 3.16f windows (f-prot) is ready for dowloading.
This newest version of F-Prot Antivirus for Windows includes a bugfix for an
endless loop encountered in a corrupted Windows Metafile (WMF) sample.
-
Regards
Luis Arango
__
[Email scanned for viru
the
same.
Andrew 8)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 11:48 AM
> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot 3.16e
>
> I found this blurb on the
I found this blurb on their site saying what is new for version 3.16e
http://www.f-prot.com/news/gen_news/060104_release_win316e_exchange123.h
tml
FRISK Software has released versions 3.16e of F-Prot Antivirus for
Windows and version 1.2.3 of F-Prot Antivirus for Exchange.
These newest versions
Ouch. F-Prot is very popular on this group. This vulnerability may
never turn into an exploit, but it's better that we keep abreast of
issues like this.
"F-Prot Antivirus Lets Remote Users Bypass the Scanning Engine with
Specially Crafted ZIP Files"
http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=820
T
Yes. There are a couple of ways. One is to just run a scheduled task
that calls the Updater. Something like:
"C:\Program Files\FSI\F-Prot\FP-Updater\Updater.exe" /INTERNET /QUIT /HIDDEN
Chris Anton wrote:
Hi all,
We are running F-Prot and are wondering if there is a way to configure
the
ions" is a registered trademark of Global Web
Solutions, Inc., Glen Allen, VA
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
AntonSent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 9:32 AMTo:
Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot...
autoupdates??
Hi all,We are running F-Prot and are
wondering if there is a way to configure the updates such that we don't have to
login everytime a new update is released. What are your thoughts?
Thanks!-Chris
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot
update
Ah, I didn't check the internals of the
*.def files. I simply ran fpcmd manually against the viral files I had
stashed and noted how long it took and what the errorlevel was afterwards.
I'll re-subscribe to the announc
comSubject: RE:
[Declude.Virus] F-Prot update
Andrew,
I looked at the sign
and sign2.def files and they are binary “junk” to me. What did you use to
check the def files?
I resubscribed to the
announcements and maybe now I will get 1 announcement J
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 9:54
PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus]
F-Prot update
According to their website, this is a
stability update; comparing a new install on my test box
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J PorterSent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 11:14
AMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: [Declude.Virus]
F-Prot update
I
received a notice for 3.16c update from Frisk.I don't recall it being
normal for them to recommend updating ASAP.Anyone tried it
yet?~Joe
Cohn
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 2:52
PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus]
F-Prot update
They always said it!!
Here's the previous update notice
We
recommend that users of F-Prot Antivirus for Windows update their programs to
version 3.16b as soon as pos
D] On Behalf Of J
PorterSent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 2:14 PMTo:
Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot
update
I received
a notice for 3.16c update from Frisk.I don't recall it being normal for
them to recommend updating ASAP.Anyone tried it yet?~Joe
I received
a notice for 3.16c update from Frisk.I don't recall it being normal for
them to recommend updating ASAP.Anyone tried it yet?~Joe
Same here. Wget rocks.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:27 AM
> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] f-prot update script
>
Yep. We do the same thing for scheduling
updates.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] f-prot update script
FYI, my experience with the command line updater in F-Prot has
been
comment was just that it works fine, and has for years.
I'll choose FTP over HTTP anyday if given the choice...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 12:50 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] f-prot updat
: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 12:50 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] f-prot update script
Darin you're depending on legacy support. I'd suggest that if you want
to stick to this method, you work on your backup plan. See th
aq/30.html
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 9:43 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] f-prot update script
Huh? What about FTP is not working?
We're still F
crdef2.zip
close
quit
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 12:19 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] f-prot update script
Hmmm. Well, I went to the F-Prot website and picked out their link to
download the l
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 8:27 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] f-prot update script
My wget script for updating F-Prot has been working just fine for a few
years now, and still contin
My wget script for updating F-Prot has been working just fine for a few
years now, and still continues to function properly.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas Cohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 8:13 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] f-pr
Johnson
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:21 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] f-prot update script
Daniel,
Give this a try:
http://www.f-prot.com/support/windows/fpwin_faq/88.html
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
f Colbeck, Andrew
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 9:13 AM
> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot and HTML object exploit
>
> Agreed, the current *.def files no longer trigger on my sample
> false-positive files.
>
> Also, I had exactly the same me
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wind
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:04 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot and HTML object exploit
I tested it the last hours and had no FP since the new update.
Uwe
- Original Message -
Fr
I tested it the last hours and had no FP since the new update.
Uwe
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Fitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:44 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot and HTML object exploit
I have these installed and appears t
: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot and HTML object exploit
Hello,
in the moment I got this email from F-prot support:
Unfortunately, virus signature files released at 17:00 on 2 May 2005
included a false positive detection identified as: "Infection:
HTML/[EMAIL PROT
Mcafee command line.
If you can find a license it should run about $25 a year.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Schick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 4:02 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Alternative
> We have been running F-prot as the
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 2:03 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot and HTML object exploit
F-Prot may have pulled the latest defs do to the number of complaints
received, whi
I did contact f-prot now the second time. I did not get an answer till now.
Uwe
- Original Message -
From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 3:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot and HTML object exploit
The sign*.def files have
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 2:03 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot and HTML object exploit
F-Prot may have pulled the latest defs do to the number of complaints
received, which could explain why the app reports that you have
> We have been running F-prot as the virus scanner with Declude for
> over a year but lately it seems to have more and more bugs in it.
> What do others recommend as low-cost scanners to work with declude?
I've been finding BitDefender to have a very reliable auto-updater,
which is obvi
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 2:03 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Alternative
We have been running F-prot as the virus scanner with Declude for over a
year but lately it seems to have more and more bugs in it. What d
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 2:03 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Alternative
We have been running F-prot as the virus scanner with Declude for over a
year but lately it seems to hav
Behalf Of Chuck Schick
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 2:03 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Alternative
We have been running F-prot as the virus scanner with Declude for over a
year but lately it seems to have more and more bugs in it. What do
others recommend as low-cost
On 2 May 2005 at 15:02, Chuck Schick wrote:
> We have been running F-prot as the virus scanner with Declude for over
> a year but lately it seems to have more and more bugs in it. What do
> others recommend as low-cost scanners to work with declude?
Hi Chuck -
Well Mcafee is hard to beat for t
10 or Office 11 headers
> >or were replies to messages created with Office 10 or Office 11.
> >
> >Andrew 8)
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
> >Sent: Monday, May
We have been running F-prot as the virus scanner with Declude for over a
year but lately it seems to have more and more bugs in it. What do others
recommend as low-cost scanners to work with declude?
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Vir
ay, May 02, 2005 1:54 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot and HTML object exploit
I also filled out the form at FProt's site. Thanks for the defs. When
I open up FProt, though, it says that my defs are up-to-date, even
though I replaced the newest ones wit
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 7:47 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot and HTML object exploit
It appears that something has updated on F-Prot in the last
hour. Now, a lot of
1 - 100 of 509 matches
Mail list logo
