would order a renewal. But he left.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 5:59 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Who is minding the store
Douglas Cohn wrote:
Using
If Scott would chime in here and say DON'T worry Doug these people know
their stuff, you are in good hands. I would order a renewal. But he left.
I'm not completely gone. :)
Everyone does things differently, and I knew when I sold that company that
the new owners wouldn't do everything
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 5:59 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Who is minding the store
Douglas Cohn wrote:
Using this forum for support is certainly less expensive to the
company
Scott,
While you have first hand knowledge of the inner-workings at Declude
under the new management, many around here have no clue as to whether or
not this list is even being monitored, and I think that's what is really
at issue. Free and open communication is the best way to go. I think
, 2005 7:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Who is minding the store
On 2 May 2005 at 9:51, Douglas Cohn wrote:
Douglas -
I agree with what you are saying. And I miss Scott for his slant on
techsupport and philosphy [ Remember Len Scott dialogs? :) ]
That said we need to give the new Declude
What I find very odd is where is declude technical participation on this
list? Since Scott left I see no SOLID ANSWERS to many questions. Answers
that often came from Scott. I surely understand that there are many very
skilled programmers, technicians and network managers that are all
Douglas Cohn wrote:
Using this forum for support is certainly less expensive to the
company
... unless you're charging for support, then it could be viewed as a
losing proposition to assist in free support. I fear this may be the
mindset. This view, is, of course, entirely wrong; as you
