Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-04-11 Thread Thomas Andraschko
: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 2:28 PM Subject: Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release T he last time I asked about it the responses seemed lukewarm, so I figured it wasn't something people really cared about. We could certainly add it in post 0.4 if there really is a desire

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-27 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 4:03 PM Subject: Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release I doubt it. I've responded (I

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-27 Thread Gerhard Petracek
is free to just add a feature branch for a new feature which is outside those areas. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 2:28 PM Subject: Re: Heading towards

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-27 Thread John D. Ament
. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 2:28 PM Subject: Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release T he last time I asked about it the responses

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-26 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@ romain: imo it doesn't make sense to remove something (and add it later on again), if it's just a matter of few hours (to do it immediately). anybody is welcome to work on DS-333. @ DS-288 it's almost done and as i mentioned earlier i'll finish it once DS-289 is done. (yes we need it for 0.4)

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-26 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
@Gerhard: the point about proxy was i thought it was not straight forward since some people will not want to bring any additional lib for it (because they use only interfaces and proxy libs can conflcts). Wonder if handling it with a dep optional couldn't do the trick too. *Romain Manni-Bucau*

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-26 Thread Jason Porter
Wrt xml-config, I'll be working on configuring cdi via osgi blueprint, over in the Aries project. If we want to port over the seam config stuff, we can certainly do that too.  — Sent from Mailbox for iPhone On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-26 Thread John D. Ament
Jason, Does that mean we are no longer bringing XML config to DeltaSpike, even though it was already voted in? On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.comwrote: Wrt xml-config, I'll be working on configuring cdi via osgi blueprint, over in the Aries project. If we

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-26 Thread Jason Porter
The last time I asked about it the responses seemed lukewarm, so I figured it wasn't something people really cared about. We could certainly add it in post 0.4 if there really is a desire for it.  — Sent from Mailbox for iPhone On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:23 AM, John D. Ament

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-26 Thread John D. Ament
Ok. How about the open catch issues? Do you feel any of those are needed for 0.4? On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.comwrote: The last time I asked about it the responses seemed lukewarm, so I figured it wasn't something people really cared about. We could

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-26 Thread John D. Ament
I moved the XML config to 0.5 I resolver DS-105 since no additional comments on it and general consensus was that it was needed for backwards compatibility. On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:40 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.comwrote: Ok. How about the open catch issues? Do you feel any of

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-26 Thread Jason Porter
I doubt it. I've responded (I believe) to all of them and the original reporters have not given feedback either way. I interpret that as * Thanks, that works, or * I no longer care People can always open more tickets if they feel it's still an issue and we can dig further. On Tue, Mar 26, 2013

Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-25 Thread John D. Ament
All, Based on the flurry of threads, I wanted to help get things started to move towards a 0.4 release. I created the filter at [1] to show our current progress. We currently have 50 issues fixed in 0.4, with 27 unresolved for the release. Some of these issues stick out, with me thinking that

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-25 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi john, @ examples: we haven't discussed what our goal is here @ DS-60 imo we should do it for 0.5 (and release 0.5 short after 0.4) @ DS-113 we have to change the proxy-lib and move it to an own module (i'll create the module today) @ DS-263 not needed, but nice to have - +1 (you can have a

Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release

2013-03-25 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi DS-60: we are a bunch o wait after it DS-113: think we can push partial bean to another release and keep interface handling for this iteration (well if you import asm part right now it can work but then the question will be which shade version? a proxy as in cxf?) other are not blocker