Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-16 Thread Kathey Marsden
Satheesh Bandaram wrote: >One of the issues I see is that 'In progress' doesn't indicate when the >feature/bug might be addressed. This makes it hard to plan and drive to >a release, especially with partial checkin model being followed. Just my >concerns. > > Jira also has a "Due Date" field wh

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-16 Thread Satheesh Bandaram
One of the issues I see is that 'In progress' doesn't indicate when the feature/bug might be addressed. This makes it hard to plan and drive to a release, especially with partial checkin model being followed. Just my concerns. Satheesh Bernt M. Johnsen wrote: >Well, first of all. Jira has a nice

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-16 Thread Bernt M. Johnsen
Daniel John Debrunner wrote (2006-01-12 09:06:20): > Bernt M. Johnsen wrote: > > > BUT: I think its equally (or more) important that we take full > > advantage of Jira too. The most important one is to set Jira issues > > being worked on to "In progress". > > In an open source proje

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-12 Thread Satheesh Bandaram
I applied all suggestions. Let me know if any more changes are required. http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyDevActivities It would be great if everyone can take a minute to update the page. Satheesh Daniel John Debrunner wrote: >Derby should be able to run on 1.6 without any JDBC 4.0 sup

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-12 Thread Satheesh Bandaram
Daniel John Debrunner wrote: I'm curious how do you think it would be useful? For status updates... If I look at the list after long time, I know which items I need to update more easily. Guess feature name might be enough to remind me. :-) I have changed the page to have three tables now.

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-12 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Satheesh Bandaram wrote: > > Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > > >>Do we need the contributor column? I think we found from the similar >>column in the old to-do list that it encouraged direct e-mails to the >>contact listed. >> >>Dan. >> >> > > I can remove it, but I thought since this list is

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-12 Thread Satheesh Bandaram
Daniel John Debrunner wrote: >Do we need the contributor column? I think we found from the similar >column in the old to-do list that it encouraged direct e-mails to the >contact listed. > >Dan. > > I can remove it, but I thought since this list is for short-term use, to help plan for immediat

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-12 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Satheesh Bandaram wrote: > I already did that... You are seeing my intermediate results... I kept > saving in the middle, old habit. > > Here is my first version of active developments as I have noticed. I > know there are some more that I have missed. Before I continue further, > any comments on

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-12 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Satheesh Bandaram wrote: > I already did that... You are seeing my intermediate results... I kept > saving in the middle, old habit. > > Here is my first version of active developments as I have noticed. I > know there are some more that I have missed. Before I continue further, > any comments on

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-12 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Bernt M. Johnsen wrote: >Satheesh Bandaram wrote (2006-01-11 13:28:30): >> >>I already did that... You are seeing my intermediate results... I kept saving >>in the middle, old habit. >> >>Here is my first version of active developments as I have noticed. I know >>there >>are some more

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-12 Thread Satheesh Bandaram
Hi Bernt, Bernt M. Johnsen wrote: >A very nice overview. Especially as an addition to Jira and as a >gateway into Jira. > >BUT: I think its equally (or more) important that we take full >advantage of Jira too. The most important one is to set Jira issues >being worked on to "In progress". > >

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-12 Thread Dag H. Wanvik
> "Bernt" == Bernt M Johnsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bernt> > Here is my first version of active developments as I have noticed. I know there Bernt> > are some more that I have missed. Before I continue further, any comments on Bernt> > the format? Bernt> > Bernt> > http://wiki.apache.o

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-12 Thread Bernt M. Johnsen
Satheesh Bandaram wrote (2006-01-11 13:28:30): > I already did that... You are seeing my intermediate results... I kept saving > in the middle, old habit. > > Here is my first version of active developments as I have noticed. I know > there > are some more that I have missed. Before

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-11 Thread Satheesh Bandaram
I already did that... You are seeing my intermediate results... I kept saving in the middle, old habit. Here is my first version of active developments as I have noticed. I know there are some more that I have missed. Before I continue further, any comments on the format? http://wiki.apache.o

Re: [Db-derby Wiki] Update of "DerbyDevActivities" by SatheeshBandaram

2006-01-11 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
If you want the Jira links to be actual links, here is what I do. [http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-573 DERBY-573] Apache Wiki wrote: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Db-derby Wiki" for > change notification. > > The following page has