Thanks for your feedback on this, Astron. I'll try to address the
issues that you pointed out.
Em -10-01--28163 16:59, Astron escreveu:
Additionally, global undo/redo should work. Adding a dedicated
[Revert] button to the dialog also wouldn't make much sense (at least
to me -- if you anyone c
On 2011-04-27 09:34, Andy Brown wrote:
> Steve Edmonds wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 27/04/11 8:25 AM, Christoph Noack wrote:
>>> Still the point is - why do people need to add more styles? I think the
>>> number of styles is quite sufficient, but maybe the defaults are
>>> unwanted ... don't know.
>> Since
Hi everyone,
@Bernhard:
> 1. [Apply] button as standard:
> Every change is visible immediately (or after a short time as Christoph
> suggests) in the document.
>
> a. The user wants to keep the changes and leave the dialog:
> -> Just press [Close]
> b. The user wants to revert the change
Christoph, All,
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 23:17 +0200, Christoph Noack wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> and it really helps to add some links, or? Sorry! ;-)
>
> Here is the link to the current WWN list:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Kick-Off/WhatWeNeed#What_We_Might_Need
>
> This is the link t
2011/4/26 Cyril Arnaud :
> Personally I don't mind really.
> OK it's nice to be consistent with the desktop but you can't please every
> single desktop standard right ?
> I would rather see a Libreoffice look than a KDE or Gnome one, as long as
> the UI is fresh and efficient :)
All FOSS desktops
Scott
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 14:51 -0600, Scott Pledger wrote:
> Purely out of curiosity, how many people here prefer that the user's default
> environment theme (GTK, Qt, etc.) be applied to LibreOffice versus how many
> would rather see LibreOffice get its own look independent of the desktop
>
Personally I don't mind really.
OK it's nice to be consistent with the desktop but you can't please every
single desktop standard right ?
I would rather see a Libreoffice look than a KDE or Gnome one, as long as
the UI is fresh and efficient :)
-- Cyril Arnaud
On Apr 26, 2011 4:51 PM, "Scott Pledg
Hi Christoph, all,
Christoph Noack schrieb:
Hi all,
and it really helps to add some links, or? Sorry! ;-)
Here is the link to the current WWN list:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Kick-Off/WhatWeNeed#What_We_Might_Need
Great work - and quite a number of topics! Thanks a lot.
I tri
Hi Christoph, all
I just want to add an idea - not even thought to the end, but perhaps
some valuable input to reduce the numbers of buttons...
It's not too different to Heinzs/Astron's proposal when he started the
thread, but avoids name changes on the buttons.:
[Help] needs quite a lot of
Steve Edmonds wrote:
On 27/04/11 8:25 AM, Christoph Noack wrote:
Still the point is - why do people need to add more styles? I think the
number of styles is quite sufficient, but maybe the defaults are
unwanted ... don't know.
Since discovering styles I use them all the time. I have styles fo
2011/4/26 Steve Edmonds :
>
>
> On 27/04/11 8:25 AM, Christoph Noack wrote:
>>
>> Still the point is - why do people need to add more styles? I think the
>> number of styles is quite sufficient, but maybe the defaults are
>> unwanted ... don't know.
>
> Since discovering styles I use them all the t
2011/4/26 Scott Pledger :
> Purely out of curiosity, how many people here prefer that the user's default
> environment theme (GTK, Qt, etc.) be applied to LibreOffice versus how many
> would rather see LibreOffice get its own look independent of the desktop
> environment?
For my part, I prefer con
Hi all,
and it really helps to add some links, or? Sorry! ;-)
Here is the link to the current WWN list:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Kick-Off/WhatWeNeed#What_We_Might_Need
This is the link to the previous version of the page containing the
individual thoughts:
http://wiki.documentfo
Hi all,
a few weeks ago we talked about "What We Need" - everything that eases
discussions, helps us to keeps the focus, and helps to provide what
others expect (both users and developers *g*).
Many people added their thoughts - and I'd like to say a big "thank you"
for that. I tried to cluster t
On 27/04/11 8:25 AM, Christoph Noack wrote:
Still the point is - why do people need to add more styles? I think the
number of styles is quite sufficient, but maybe the defaults are
unwanted ... don't know.
Since discovering styles I use them all the time. I have styles for
various manuals and
Purely out of curiosity, how many people here prefer that the user's default
environment theme (GTK, Qt, etc.) be applied to LibreOffice versus how many
would rather see LibreOffice get its own look independent of the desktop
environment?
Yours Truly,
Scott R. Pledger
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:
Hi Octavio, all!
Thanks for joining this discussion :-)
Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2011, 11:28 -0700 schrieb Octavio Alvarez:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 05:56:40 -0700, Sparkling Specks
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > In the upcoming 3.4 release there will be an additional button in
> > dialogs, "Apply," to ap
2011/4/26 Christoph Noack :
> Hi,
>
> please allow me to quickly add my thoughts ...
>
> Am Montag, den 25.04.2011, 13:18 +0200 schrieb RGB ES:
>> 2011/4/25 Michel RENON :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Few days ago, there was a discussion about the "style" name :
>> > http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/d
Hi Rafael,
thanks for your mail ... I try to quickly add some comments.
Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2011, 02:50 -0300 schrieb Rafael Rocha Daud:
> Hi all,
>
> I propose a first easy modification to the Styles and Format issue,
> regarding their window, which I find much unfriendly (not opposed to
>
Hi,
please allow me to quickly add my thoughts ...
Am Montag, den 25.04.2011, 13:18 +0200 schrieb RGB ES:
> 2011/4/25 Michel RENON :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Few days ago, there was a discussion about the "style" name :
> > http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/msg01436.html
> >
> > As I've been
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 05:56:40 -0700, Sparkling Specks
wrote:
Hi,
In the upcoming 3.4 release there will be an additional button in
dialogs, "Apply," to apply changes made in dialogues without closing
the dialogue. This new button means that now there are five or six
buttons on the bottom of ma
Thanks! One additional notion that I've had for it is to have any
extraneous popup windows be displayed as part of the menu hierarchy. For
instance, the current Insert > Frame dialog box would be shown such that it
is a part of the menu itself. I haven't sketched this out yet as I haven't
had ti
I depends if you want to save vertical space or horizontal space.
Since most of the screen nowadays are wide screens, we have extra
horizontal space, so we should save as much vertical space as possible.
Therefore I think the menu on the right is indeed a good idea.
-Cyril
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 1
Scott,
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 09:19 -0600, Scott Pledger wrote:
> This is actually very close to the design I'm currently working on for
> LibreOffice and, indeed, partly its inspiration. Much of the difference
> between the implementation of Lotus Symphony and my design is that Lotus
> Symphony
That's really a nice design indeed.
How can we promote this design ? I would love to see an implementation
of these ideas in real life :)
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 09:19 -0600, Scott Pledger wrote:
> This is actually very close to the design I'm currently working on for
> LibreOffice and, indeed, pa
I think a Tabs-Function for all
open documents would be especially nice!The right
column for special functions seems to be a good Idea too.Personally I
don't like the Menu panel on the right side in that
example. I think menus should stay horizontally on top of the
This is actually very close to the design I'm currently working on for
LibreOffice and, indeed, partly its inspiration. Much of the difference
between the implementation of Lotus Symphony and my design is that Lotus
Symphony's side bar does not constitute of panels which change based on what
the u
> I didn't understand the Version 1 and Version 2
> thing, though. Version 1 seems very sane and usable, but is it in
> substitution to the 'Revert' function?
Me, I must admit I didn't really understand version 2, either. Take
another look at the wiki page: I killed it yesterday.
Basically, my prop
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 03:58:04 -0700, Michel RENON
wrote:
what if we completely replace the name "style" (used for style sheet)
with "template" ?
LibreOffice already uses the name "Template" for documents.
It would be "document template".
For writer :
"page style" --> "page template",
"frame
Hi Ricardo,
Le 25/04/11 13:18, RGB ES a écrit :
2011/4/25 Michel RENON:
Hi,
Few days ago, there was a discussion about the "style" name :
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/msg01436.html
As I've been teaching the basic of OpenOffice 2 or 3 years ago, I can
confirm that the idea of
Hi Marc,
Le 25/04/11 13:15, Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 2011-04-25 06:58, Michel RENON a écrit :
Hi,
Few days ago, there was a discussion about the "style" name :
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/msg01436.html
As I've been teaching the basic of OpenOffice 2 or 3 years ago, I can
conf
31 matches
Mail list logo
