Toby Smithe wrote:
I did not see these evil things you wrote, but I am sure everyone
forgives you. Don't be so down on yourself; everything isn't awful.
First of all, thanks to everybody for warm replies (I received private
emails also). People were worried about me and I must say that it
that I bring light, but it was almost all just crazy
rhetoric and fantasies of an ill and self-loving person.
/Maxim Udushlivy
P.S. I renamed designer project (http://crow-designer.sf.net; a crow,
because they are tool makers) and will leave it... If somebody is
interested to take over, please
Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
There is no conspiracy. Really.
[...]
You may feel indignant at the current wording of the FAQ, but it was not
written that way to annoy you. You are just sensitive to wording. It's
like when Arnold Schoenberg got sensitive that some poor musical chords
were
Murray Cumming wrote:
[snip]
A fight because bullsh*t is a cancer. For another example check this
review that puts gtkmm not only above other wrappers but almost on one
level with GTK+ itself:
http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/928
This article is a direct result of gtkmm presentation
Murray Cumming wrote:
You'll have to be more clear.
Enough was said, this is not a trial and we have no a judge.
1. State openly that gtkmm website contains subtle (unintentional?)
lies. (This was the most important for me personally.)
Enough. This is completely unhinged and I won't
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Maxim Udushlivy
Why not to admit mistakes and do the renaming yourself or at least fix
controversial things in gtkmm presentation and documentation?
There's nothing controversial there, and nothing to fix. There is no war,
and we have no idea what
The International Space Station (ISS) is a manned research space
facility that is being assembled in orbit around the Earth. It is a
joint project between five space agencies: the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA, United States), the Russian Federal Space
Agency (RKA, Russian
Maxim Udushlivy wrote:
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Maxim Udushlivy
The International Space Station (ISS) is a manned research space
facility that is being assembled in orbit around the Earth.
Maxim,
This is not on topic for this list.
Thanks,
- Jeff
That was done
Elijah Newren wrote:
On 9/19/06, Maxim Udushlivy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was done on purpose due to a strange list inactivity. I am still
So you intentionally wasted everyone's time? You're right[1], we do
need stronger list moderation. Please don't do that again.
hoping to get your
Richard Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 21:38 +0400, Maxim Udushlivy wrote:
Thanks, Elijah for the reply: it is a bit harsh
Nope, I think Elijah was 100% correct.
Richard.
That was a compliment, no need to protect Elijah
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
So, the attitude we can expect from a person whom wants to contribute
something to GNOME in terms of organisation and policies is to try and
understand the current organisation, policies and goals; and only after
that, proposing to change something (complete with a nice
Elijah Newren wrote:
Scroll down to Near future - the 2.16 platform and try to find GTK+ on
the diagram. There is something called UI Library Project Ridely under
Gnome Platform section. At the same time Gnome Bindings lists GTK+
wrappers using their full names.
It seems to me that Gnome is
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
I think you are 100% right and that it is important for GNOME to
narrow its focus. For example, if GNOME limited its focus to computers
with 256 MB of RAM, then...
I was proposing to narrow Gnome by ideology (implementation style),
Havok - by desktop tasks
Maxim Udushlivy wrote:
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
I think you are 100% right and that it is important for GNOME to
narrow its focus. For example, if GNOME limited its focus to computers
with 256 MB of RAM, then...
I was proposing to narrow Gnome by ideology (implementation style),
Havok
Shaun McCance wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 00:33 +0400, Maxim Udushlivy wrote:
Havoc Pennington wrote:
I think the best shot at this would be to gather a small group that
agrees on some audience they want to try and do stuff for, and just
start doing it; I'm not sure how
Zaheer Merali wrote:
On 9/11/06, Maxim Udushlivy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was once lurking around planet.gnome.org and there was an interesting
accident. One guy said about Israel that it is evil and another (Jeff
Waugh?) was trying to moderate him.
I blogged about the Israel issue
Ed Mack wrote:
Gnome Sheriff must be elected by some formal procedure (better by
democratic voting). His main responsibility - moderate mailing lists
from bullshit, destroy crazy ideas before they infect people, protect
project ideology, etc.
A democracy arises because allowing
Travis Watkins wrote:
On 9/12/06, Ed Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A democracy arises because allowing everyone a say in running the
country is not feasible. We already have structures where everybody can
voice opinion, and if you think you can do something better you are free
to
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Maxim Udushlivy wrote:
I remember somebody compared Gnome with a car. But the desktop is an
environment, so it is not a car, it is a parking. The same goes about
a hammer: desktop environment is a collection of tools. Different
tasks require different collections
*The Lower Desktop, Upper Desktops*
(a letter to the Gnome community, in a poor English)
It was about two years while I was more or less in touch with Gnome,
and I must say that no other large free software project delivers so
much confusion to an outsider. And since Gnome has
Calum Benson wrote:
On 30 Aug 2006, at 13:30, Maxim Udushlivy wrote:
.
That is the problem: those checklists become constraints that hinder UI
innovation. As a programmer (artist to some extent) I want to learn
common sense principles that possibly would allow me to implement
interface
Alan Horkan wrote:
And about that HIG: guidelines have a tendency slowly but steadily to
transform into constraints. It's much better to have principles instead
of constraints.
Guideline and checklists are easier to follow.
That is the problem: those checklists become constraints that
Maxim Udushlivy wrote:
Random thought: opposition to a commercial software project is a
capitalism while opposition to a community-based foss project is
sometimes like a revolt. :)
Yet another thought: I think you certainly need to reorient Gnome from
politics towards technology
Maxim Udushlivy wrote:
Greetings :)
Noticed news about spreadgnome.org, was frightened for some reason and
suddenly realized that Gideon Designer is not neutral to Gnome, but is
in a conflict.
And since I am not an animal and trying to be a Christian, I (usually
;) seek peace and like
to change GuiLoader license to LGPL and contribute Gideon and
GuiLoader to Gnome.
Interested?
/Maxim Udushlivy
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Johan Dahlin wrote:
I'm not sure I see the point of one more ui designer and one more ui loader...
Johan
I dare to say that I am offering a Porsche 911 while you are talking
about broken bicycles ;)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
Tommi Komulainen wrote:
Where we're going, we don't need roads.
Sorry, it had to be said ;)
Sorries are not needed, I am not an English lord ;)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
Maxim, is there a public source code repository somewhere? I can only
find tarballs.
Hi,
public repository was not set up yet; current tarballs represent the
latest code.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
28 matches
Mail list logo
