Hello again. The problem remains unsolved several years later. I am with Ubuntu
Eoan (19.10).
The solution I used before to get the SPDIF digital optical output to work no
longer works. Can someone please try to fix this problem?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The same mistake in gorilla.
** Attachment added: "4.jpeg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1303316/+attachment/5437227/+files/4.jpeg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
htt
Missing option is
SPDIF Digital 5.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303316
Title:
Digital S/PDIF output is not present in 5.1 mode
Status in pulseaudio package in
Nothing new?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303316
Title:
Digital S/PDIF output is not present in 5.1 mode
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug desc
Ubuntu hirsute hippo too
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1697373
Title:
[screensaver] Screen blanks during video playback in Chrome and
Firefox under Xwayland
St
Latest Ubuntu version.
Same bug, ten years ago...
Spdif Digital 5.1 not appears. Only HDMI 5.1.
El jue, 29 jul 2021 a las 22:13, Daniel van Vugt (<
1303...@bugs.launchpad.net>) escribió:
> Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
> Ubuntu 20.10 (groovy) reached end-of-life on July 22, 2021.
21.04
El 4 ago. 2021 4:16 +0200, Daniel van Vugt <1303...@bugs.launchpad.net>,
escribió:
> Thanks. Which Ubuntu version is that?
>
> ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
> Status: Won't Fix => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> ht
El 30/08/11 21:03, Pedro Villavicencio escribió:
> We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need
> to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments.
> Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't
> hesitate to submit bug reports i
Do you need another more information about?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303316
Title:
Digital S/PDIF output is not present in 5.1 mode
Status in “pulseaudio” p
Running the script with working audio:
http://www.alsa-project.org/db/?f=eef498b2f6679df3535aadc3635913df8e6f8cc4
Running the script selecting not working 5.1 audio:
http://www.alsa-project.org/db/?f=27ba2138e87f78fc6eafbcbaad51a5f5b48c4d96
Please, confirm that all is ok and do not need more inf
Public bug reported:
The scanner recognizes 2 printers Brother DCPJ-315W, does not scan any of them.
I uninstalled simply scan purging. When reinstalling, still recognizes two
printers and still not working.
I deleted the printer of the system, purging again single-scan. I installed
the print
This bug also affects to Ubuntu 14.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303316
Title:
Digital S/PDIF output is not present in 5.1 mode
Status in “pulseaudio” package
Hi again. Now appears only one scanner, but there is another issue. I have to
press two times the scan button. The first one click in the scan button, it
gives me scanner error... The second one click, scans fine.
I have to click alwais one time, wait a few seconds and press again the scan
butt
Can this be incorporated into the Ubuntu 18.04 version? I manually
patched 3.30.2-1~ubuntu18.10.3, but was overwritten by an update to
3.30.2-1~ubuntu18.10.4.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Correction, I am running Ubuntu 18.10, not 18.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814169
Title:
Mutter upsteam bug: cannot overwrite workspaces layout
Status in mutter
** Changed in: gnome-software
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776069
Title:
"Don't know how to handle
'file:///home/
Public bug reported:
The Gnome lock screen has caused me a lot of frustration over time,
since I've often found that is unresponsive to the keyboard when I come
back to the system and try to get back in after the screen lock has
activated. I finally realized that this is usually due to the "Softwa
Public bug reported:
Whilst working normally, I was unable to interact with gnome-shell. The
clock at the top of the screen continued to increment, and I could ssh
in to the machine, but clicking anywhere on the screen resulted in
nothing. Changing to another VTY and back again had no effect.
I
We're considering disabling CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY_FALLBACK in
preparation for 20.04 LTS so getting this fixed soon would be necessary
to keep the driver working.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-3
Thanks for pointing that out! I'm marking this bug as fixed for nvidia-
graphics-drivers-340.
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nv
Public bug reported:
On my Ubuntu 17.10 system, Epiphany Browser 3.26.1 has trouble playing
YouTube videos. I can play a video from the start point without trouble,
but if I pause the video the screen will freeze and stay that way after
restarting the video, if I leave the page and go back later i
@rbalint can you please open a new bug to track re-enabling the guest
session with proper confinement rather than piggy back on this bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723178
Title:
package libreoffice-common 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 failed to ins
Hi Jan - congrats on creating your first bug report. We appreciate all
feedback and look forward to receiving more from you in the future.
As for this specific bug report, I suspect that it is an issue with the
package in the specific PPA that you're trying to install from. Since
PPAs are maintain
Updates have been released:
https://usn.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-3455-1/
** Changed in: wpa (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1723909 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723909
Please see https://usn.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-3455-1/
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1723909
[security] WPA2: Many vulnerabilities
@ogra it isn't obvious how the fix for this bug could have caused bug
1733557. Can you elaborate?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677924
Title:
Local privilege escalat
@lahtis deb packaging doesn't provide us the granularity to have the
kernel packages specifically depend on intel-microcode packages on Intel
x86 systems and amd64-microcde on AMD x86 systems. Instead, we have to
depend on both packages. If you have an Intel processor, the AMD
microcode is not used
@amribrahim1987 you've probably noticed but we have released an
amd64-microcode update recently:
https://usn.ubuntu.com/3690-1/
Updates for AMD microcode will be provided in the amd64-microcode
package and not in linux-firmware.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Public bug reported:
I'm using Ubuntu 12.10 32bit (clean install) with totem 3.4.3-0ubuntu5.
I have all appropriate codecs installed. When I put in a dvd the menu
comes up fine but when I click on play, on the dvd menu, it immediately
locks up. I don't think it's a hardware issue because everythin
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064584
Title:
Locked gnome session unlocks without password authentication
Stat
** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** No longer affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
** Project changed: gdm => gnome-shell
Public bug reported:
This bug affects rapid release firefox versions and unity-2d in Natty.
Directions:
1) I'm not sure if it matters, but I don't have a ~/.thunderbird
2) Start thunderbird (I started it from the unity launcher)
3) Don't create a new account
- hit "cancel" in 12.0.1
- hit
Public bug reported:
When testing firefox 14.0~b9+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1~mfn1, I found that
the totem plugin crashes when attempting to play an ogv. I did not
experience this crash when testing ff 14.0 on Natty.
The only way I've been able to trigger the crash is running test-
browser.py from qa
Public bug reported:
While testing 14.0~b9+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1~mfn1 on Precise amd64 with
the IcedTea plugin, I noticed that
http://www.java.com/de/download/help/testvm.xml fails to properly reload
the java applet after refreshing the page. The applet works fine during
the initial page load.
Note that totem itself has no problem playing the ogv. The file can be
found here:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/qa-regression-
testing/master/view/head:/data/rfbproxy-jaunty.ogv
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscri
Public bug reported:
After updating to Firefox 13.0.1 (13.0.1+build1-0ubuntu0.11.10.1), the
browser immediately starts using large amounts of CPU time (50 to 100%),
even if I start the browser in "safe mode" with plugins and other
features disabled. CPU usage remains consistently high as I browse
Thanks. I was beginning to feel a bit silly after a reboot fixed my
issue as well. I had first tried restarting my X environment, thinking
that some Gnome libraries or protocols might have gotten out of sync
somehow. I rarely reboot my machine since issues can normally be
resolved through other
Just since I'm not sure I want to file another bug against something
that may be in a library function or system call, I'll note here that
mythfrontend and mythbackend processes (from MythTV) were also running
hot on a machine I use as a DVR. Those processes are more heavily
multi-threaded, so the
This bad behavior seems to have been caused by issues with futex system
calls. Here's the most detailed description I've seen so far, including
a small test program that can be used to replicate the behavior (I
haven't tried it since it modifies the system time):
https://lwn.net/Articles/504658/
** Also affects: enigmail (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: lightning-extension (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubunt
** Summary changed:
- Placeholder bug
+ Stable update to Firefox 14.0.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024562
Title:
Stable update to Firefox 14.0.1
Status in “fire
** Summary changed:
- Placeholder bug
+ Stable update to Thunderbird 14.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024564
Title:
Stable update to Thunderbird 14.0
Status
Sebastien, the issue does happen with firefox 13. Also not that Micah
mentioned it has been happening at least since firefox 12 in comment #1.
As for the stack trace, is the trace at the bottom of the Mozilla crash
report not sufficient? I've submitted a new crash report based off of
firefox 14.0.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Description changed:
+ USN information: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1510-1/
+
This is a workflow bug, please don't touch this
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
** Description changed:
+ USN information: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1509-1/
+
This is a workflow bug, please don't touch this
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024
** Also affects: ubufox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024562
Title:
Stable update to Firefox 14.0.1
Status in “
Hi Gary - I've been unable to reproduce the crash that you reported.
To rule out one of your add-ons (such as LastPass) causing the problem,
can you please see if the crash happens in Firefox's safe mode?
Instructions can be found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/#Try_running_in_saf
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not directly cause loss of data/privacy.
You can use 'ad
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Here's a new crash report sent from firefox
15.0.1+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1:
http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/bp-6a166a97-813a-
4de3-bc32-e47062120911
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
https://bug
On 2012-05-26 14:01:21, Srivatsa wrote:
> here is detailed step by step description. i think, we have a
> minefield of bugs here!
Thanks for providing more information!
> Initial setting:
> You are logged in to an admin account.
>
> 1. Gear menu -> System Settings -> User Accounts -> create a us
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1004948 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004948
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a
This is expected behavior from Firefox.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subsc
Thanks for using Ubuntu and reporting a bug! Unfortunately, this bug
report does not contain enough information for a developer to act upon.
Please try to provide more concise details about the specific problem
that you're facing.
Additionally, this does not sound like a security bug, so I'm makin
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for using Ubuntu and reporting this bug! I've confirmed it in
Precise.
I disagree that it is a security bug, as invalid passwords are only
accepted if the valid password has previously been saved. I see it as a
UI bug around a feature that happens to relate to security (remote
login). As a
Same problem now in 13.10. The last release that I had no dvd problems
in was 12.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171578
Title:
Unable to Play DVD's in Ubuntu
On 2013-10-22 18:46:37, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> We'll probably need to also add the following to
> data/apparmor/abstractions/lightdm:
>
> # Allow all DBus communications
> dbus,
After giving this some more thought, it is best to include the dbus
abstractions:
# Allow all DBus communicat
nce: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Tyler Hicks (tyhicks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1231778
Title:
** Also affects: apparmor
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apparmor
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: apparmor
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: apparmor
Assignee: (unassigned) => Tyler Hicks (tyhicks)
--
You received
The AppArmor abstraction needs some updates due to AppArmor mediation
changes that happened in Saucy. I need to do a little more testing with
the policy changes and then I'll push an updated branch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subsc
I pushed my branch with the AppArmor changes to lp:~tyhicks/lightdm
/guest-wrapper-with-apparmor-changes and proposed a merge into Robert's
branch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
I manually tested the guest session by viewing pages in firefox and
chromium-browser, opening libreoffice, printing to a PDF, and viewing
the PDF with evince.
I'm not sure how to test the remote sessions. Is that something you
could do, Robert?
--
You received this bug notification because you a
Hello Guy - a fix is currently in progress and should make it into the
Saucy release.
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Saucy)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Saucy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Tyler Hicks (tyhicks)
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu T-series)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed
Updated debdiff containing an audio abstraction change for bug #1211380
** Patch added: "apparmor_2.8.0-0ubuntu30.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1208988/+attachment/3860413/+files/apparmor_2.8.0-0ubuntu30.debdiff
** Patch removed: "apparmor_2.8.0-0ubuntu30.debdiff"
http
Here's the debdiff containing fixes for this bug and for bug #1235216.
It has received the following testing:
- Manual verification of this both fixes
+ Viewing PDFs and printing PDFs
- Passed QRT's test-evince.py
** Patch added: "evince_3.10.0-0ubuntu2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub
I should have mentioned that jdstrand will be sponsoring this debdiff.
It depends on a change in the apparmor package, which he will also be
sponsoring in a different upload.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubunt
ethod_call"
bus="session" path="/org/freedesktop/DBus"
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus" member="Hello" mask="send"
name="org.freedesktop.DBus" pid=30726 profile="/usr/bin/evince-
thumbnailer" peer_profile="uncon
Updated debdiff containing a fix for bug #1236082. jdstrand will sponsor
this debdiff, as it requires a pending apparmor update.
** Patch added: "evince_3.10.0-0ubuntu2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1226141/+attachment/3863259/+files/evince_3.10.0-0ubuntu2.debd
This bug is very finicky to reproduce. I've been testing with completely
up to date and pristine Saucy virtual machines on both amd64 and i386,
*without* the AppArmor mediation dbus package (so I'm testing dbus
1.6.12.0ubuntu2).
These are throw away VMs that I create and trash as needed. I'll crea
Here's another data point from another VM:
* dbus 1.6.12-0ubuntu2
* at-spi2-core 2.9.90-0ubuntu1
* ~/.xsession-errors is clean
* at-spi2-core is running:
$ ps aux | grep at-spi2
tyhicks 1444 0.0 0.3 337552 3384 ?Ssl 15:14 0:00
/usr/lib/at-spi2-core/at-spi-bus-launcher --launch
** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Tyler Hicks (tyhicks) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to at-spi2-core in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217757
Title:
Error retrieving accessibil
AppArmor denial from the accessibility dbus-daemon:
dbus[2835]: apparmor="DENIED" operation="dbus_method_call"
bus="accessibility" name="org.freedesktop.DBus"
path="/org/freedesktop/DBus" interface="org.freedesktop.DBus"
member="Hello" mask="send" pid=14848 profile="/usr/bin/evince"
peer_profile="
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226141
Title
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ On older kernels that are missing certain AppArmor patches related to
+ AppArmor D-Bus mediation, the presence of dbus rules in the binary
+ AppArmor policy will result in policy load failures and, as a result,
+ applications may run unconfined. On newer ker
** Description changed:
[Impact]
On older kernels that are missing certain AppArmor patches related to
AppArmor D-Bus mediation, the presence of dbus rules in the binary
AppArmor policy will result in policy load failures and, as a result,
applications may run unconfined. On newer ker
Here's a Saucy debdiff for apparmor to fix this bug and bug 1243932.
I've tested it using the manual tests mentioned in the description of
both bugs, as well as with QRT's test-apparmor.py test script.
** Patch added: "apparmor_2.8.0-0ubuntu31.1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bu
Here's a Trusty debdiff for apparmor to fix this bug, bug 1243932, and
bug 1247269. I've tested it using the manual tests mentioned in the
description of the first two bugs, as well as with QRT's test-
apparmor.py test script.
I've smoke tested the chromium-browser profile changes and manually
ver
I've added tests for this bug and bug 1243932 to QRT's test-apparmor.py.
I've successfully ran the new tests on Trusty and Saucy. I ran the tests
under a Trusty/Saucy, Raring, and Lucid kernels to test all potential
policy load scenarios. All scenarios pass.
** Description changed:
[Impact]
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Saucy)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: apparmor
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Deskto
I've verified that the test added to QRT's test-apparmor.py succeeds
under Ubuntu Saucy kernel 3.11.0-13.20-generic, using the
2.8.0-0ubuntu31.1 package from -proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ub
Public bug reported:
I am using Ubuntu 13.10 64bit fresh install with all appropriate codecs
installed. Whenever I try to play any DVD I get this message "Internal
Data Flow Error." "libdvdread4" has also been installed. Totem will play
video files but not DVD's, the last time Totem worked properl
Hi min-soo-cho - this fix has not yet been released in the upstream
apparmor project so I'm changing this back to 'fix committed'
** Changed in: apparmor
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subs
I have libdvdread4 and all pertinent codecs installed on my fully
updated 13.04 64bit system, but I still have the problem described in
comment #'s 8 & 9.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in Ubuntu.
https://bu
Public bug reported:
Network manager applet crashes and disappears after connecting to
internet. The only way I can log off is to restart computer.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: network-manager-gnome 0.9.8.0-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-19.29-generic 3.8.8
U
This functionality is typically available via a firefox addon. Please
browse the available addons to find one that will let you locally save
flash videos, games, etc.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Invalid
** Package changed: ubuntu => firefox (Ubuntu)
** Visibility changed to: Publ
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
I've confirmed this in oneiric (0.9.1.90-0ubuntu6) and precise
(0.9.1.90-0ubuntu7).
I glanced at the network-manager-applet code and believe that wpa-none
should be supported for ad-hoc networks. I don't see any obvious fixes
in the upstream git repo, nor any related upstream bugs. However, I did
** Bug watch removed: GNOME Bug Tracker #654772
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=654772
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905748
Title:
Create WPA2 a
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
1 - 100 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
