Having followed the discussion about usability and/or freedom of
choice and myself being rather one of those idiot users, who
thus often likes to make a "minority's choice", I wonder if there
wouldn't be a way to make *everybody* (independent of their needs)
happy.
If one looks at vlc (in GTK-inte
Linus,
I think there may be other things going on here.
X behavior is, at the moment, in its current incarnation, completely,
totally braindead. It doesn't have to be this way.
X is busywaiting on registers in *user* space; so the kernel thinks it
is a hoggish process, so its priority gets dump
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 14:02 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday 15 December 2005 10:34, John Cherry wrote:
> > So again, if you are not a desktop architect committed to addressing
> > these common focus areas, please remove yourself from this list.
>
> i propose that we check back on this i
On Thursday 15 December 2005 10:07, Timothy D. Witham wrote:
>As one who contributed to the noise - I think just a simple play nice
> take this off the list to folks who do this is the right place to start.
exactly that was done, actually. it seems to have had limited effect given
today's ema
On Thursday 15 December 2005 10:34, John Cherry wrote:
> So again, if you are not a desktop architect committed to addressing
> these common focus areas, please remove yourself from this list.
i propose that we check back on this in a week's time.
if the voluntary actions you've requested here h
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:00 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On 12/15/05, George Staikos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can we make this list invite-only for subscription and member-only posting?
> > Signal:noise ratio is dropping faster than I can keep up with the messages.
>
> Yes, please.
> (I'd even
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:00 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On 12/15/05, George Staikos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can we make this list invite-only for subscription and member-only posting?
> > Signal:noise ratio is dropping faster than I can keep up with the messages.
>
> Yes, please.
> (I'd even
On 12/15/05, George Staikos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we make this list invite-only for subscription and member-only posting?
> Signal:noise ratio is dropping faster than I can keep up with the messages.
Yes, please.
(I'd even like to see it at least partly moderated, but that might be
aski
Can we make this list invite-only for subscription and member-only posting?
Signal:noise ratio is dropping faster than I can keep up with the messages.
--
George Staikos
KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:33:20 +0100
> From: Lubos Lunak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: desktop_architects@lists.osdl.org
> Cc: usability@gnome.org, Ryan Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Usability] Re: [Desktop_architects] Good Job
>
>
> Gee, won't t
Gee, won't this stop :( ?
Dne Ätvrtek 15 prosinec 2005 06:27 Ryan Richards napsal(a):
> Mr. Waugh:
>
> Having recently read about Mr. Torvalds's comments on the KDE vs. Gnome
> matter, I found the thread and drilled down into it a bit. It seems to me
> that the features that Torvalds and others
On Thursday 15 December 2005 00:27, Ryan Richards wrote:
> Having recently read about Mr. Torvalds's comments on the KDE vs. Gnome
> matter, I found the thread and drilled down into it a bit. It seems to me
> that the features that Torvalds and others are complaining about are
> trivial at best, wh
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 16:36 +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > The gnome-print list might be a better place to discuss this:
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-print-list/
> >
>
> Thanks for the link, I will have a look there.
>
> > Also, there seems to be consensus th
13 matches
Mail list logo
