I received a mail from someone who said that the klik slides (as
PDF) are no longer retrievable from the OSDL website. So I'll now
provide an ASCII copy of these (only 4 pages) of slides, for the
sake of this discussion.
Sli
> A few suggested applications to test klik with:
> ---
> (I'll post some more extended descriptions in one of my next mails)
In my last mail I suggested a mix of klik-ified applications to
play with, in order to gain an overview about klik's current s
On Sunday 27 November 2005 16:58, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 01:09:54PM +0100, Martin Konold wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 25. November 2005 08:29 schrieb Bryce Harrington:
> > > another have some trouble getting a given rpm installed on their
> > > system, due to dependency, glibc
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
...
note that such a customization effort would almost certainly move ahead
quickest if driven by ISVs with custom data formats as we in the open source
desktop world don't have a lot of motivation here. in other words, this wold
be a great open source project for ISVs to
On 12/31/05, Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> note that this doesn't replace X/Qt/Gtk+/whatever APIs, but rather wraps them
> in a common IPC layer for those who can't, don't want to or simply won't
> write directly to those APIs but who also wish for their app to integrate
> nicely with
On Saturday 31 December 2005 10:24, Michael Sweet wrote:
> Sigh. Nothing should prevent a custom dialog from using the base
> services to grab the preview image, etc. for a file. I.e. there should
> be a common set of APIs, not specific to a particular toolkit, which
> provide access to this stuf
On Saturday 31 December 2005 10:51, Dan Kegel wrote:
> My impression is that he wants to replace all of the
> current set of X / gnome / qt APIs with a new one based
> on web services.
i'm not involved with RUDI myself, but i have listened to what has been said
by those who are and the goal and p
On 12/31/05, Michael Sweet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The goal, I thought, was for RUDI to provide access to a common set of
> >> dialogs (file and print have been suggested so far) and not to suddenly
> >> become a system-level library providing all common services and UIs.
> >
> > Actually t
Martin Konold wrote:
Am Montag, 19. Dezember 2005 14:00 schrieb Michael Sweet:
Hi Michael,
The goal, I thought, was for RUDI to provide access to a common set of
dialogs (file and print have been suggested so far) and not to suddenly
become a system-level library providing all common services
Martin Konold wrote:
Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2005 20:25 schrieben Sie:
Hi Michael,
E.g. KDE offers a file open dialog with preview capabilities. This
capability is build into the dialog without a call back to the
application calling the dialog.
I should be more careful with my wording. Wit
10 matches
Mail list logo
