On 12/31/05, Michael Sweet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The goal, I thought, was for RUDI to provide access to a common set of > >> dialogs (file and print have been suggested so far) and not to suddenly > >> become a system-level library providing all common services and UIs. > > > > Actually to the contrary is true as hinted on > > http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/1396?size=_original the concept of RUDI is > > to provide common services including but _not_ limited to dialogs and other > > aspects of the UIs. > > I find your diagram unreadable - what are you actually trying to say > with this? What does your new architecture really look like, or are > you just putting down your ideas and joining them with lines to make > them look pretty?
I also find Martin has not clearly articulated RUDI. My impression is that he wants to replace all of the current set of X / gnome / qt APIs with a new one based on web services. Martin, did you say you had a prototype implementation? I can't recall... - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv _______________________________________________ Desktop_architects mailing list Desktop_architects@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
