initial startup if the
> monitor starts faster than the manager, but refreshing the page should
> make it work eventually if the manager is actually running. If that
> doesn't happen eventually, I'm not sure what could be happening
> without further troubleshooting.
>
&g
ng to run more than one (I could see an argument for both). It
> would be weird if one incorrectly reported "Master[now Manager] is
> down" because another monitor was running, though. I would expect the
> 2.1 behavior you described over that 2.0 behavior.
>
> On Mon, Sep
to start.
>
> To troubleshoot, I would compare your log4j config with what we ship
> in the 2.1 tarball and also check to see if you've done any log4j
> config overrides in the system properties or environment variables
> that control log4j.
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 8:10 PM
test instance first, just to practice.
> If you run into a specific problem doing that, we could probably offer
> more specific insight, having probably seen it before.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 4:50 PM Vincent Russell
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Christopher.
> >
same code.
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 11:04 AM Vincent Russell
> wrote:
> >
> > Also the link to:
> >
> > https://accumulo.apache.org/docs/2.x/troubleshooting/ZooKeeper#ACLs
> >
> > is not resolving.
> >
> > What needs to be done at this st
Also the link to:
https://accumulo.apache.org/docs/2.x/troubleshooting/ZooKeeper#ACLs
is not resolving.
What needs to be done at this step?
Thanks,
Vincent
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:36 AM Vincent Russell
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm practicing going to the upgrade instructions
Hello,
I'm practicing going to the upgrade instructions from 2.0.1 to 2.1.1 and I
wanted to confirm that the zoo-dump command is run via the accumulo-util
command and not via accumulo.
The instructions say:
$ACCUMULO_HOME/bin/accumulo dump-zoo --xml --root /accumulo | tee
PATH_TO_SNAPSHOT
Thank
Christopher,
I was able to verify that tests that previously failed related to this
issue now pass.Other tests are failing due to api changes, but I think
that's another issue.
Thanks,
Vincent
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:27 AM Vincent Russell
wrote:
> Thank you for the response Chr
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/3134 actually fixes your
> issue. Have you tried a recent snapshot version to see if the problem
> is fixed for you? I looked for, but didn't see, any comment from you
> about that.
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 7:07 AM Vincent Russell
>
Hello,
Just checking in on if there is a timeframe for 2.1.1.
This has been delaying our upgrade to jdk 17 for almost 5 month now.
Thanks,
Vincent
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022, 12:57 PM Vincent Russell
wrote:
> Ok.. Thank you for the update.
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 11:55 AM Christoph
I just noticed that swappiness is set to 60 at the slow site and 1 at the
other site. I am going to work with the system administrators to change
this as soon as possible.
Thanks,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 9:34 AM Vincent Russell
wrote:
> Thank you Dave. I didn't take look at the s
re collocated instead of spread out?
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:01 PM Vincent Russell >
> wrote:
>
> > I stopped the two data nodes and it had no effect.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:53 PM Vincent Russell <
> vincent.ru
I stopped the two data nodes and it had no effect.
Thanks,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:53 PM Vincent Russell
wrote:
> Yes. We have the hdfs rack-aware set up to divide the blocks equally.
> And according to the name node http page it doesn't look like those nodes
> have a much hi
across the hosts?
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 5:52 PM Vincent Russell >
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am using accumulo 2.0.1 with hadoop 3.3.1.
> >
> > I have two identical clusters with 28 tservers.
> >
> > I have writers on both cluster
Hello,
I am using accumulo 2.0.1 with hadoop 3.3.1.
I have two identical clusters with 28 tservers.
I have writers on both clusters which are set with 10 batch writers with a
max memory of 50m.
However, one server is ingesting 10x faster than the other.
Is there anything I should check for?
I
> > Version 2.1.1 will be released with bug fixes and this fix (when finished
> > and merged) is planned to be included as part of that release. I don't
> know
> > the exact time frame yet though.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 11:04 AM Vincent Russell <
>
Hello,
Are there any plans to release an accumulo 2.1 patch to fix this issue?
Thanks,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 7:36 PM Vincent Russell
wrote:
> No worries. I'm glad I was able to help in some small way.
>
> Thank you for fixing the issue.
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at
opher wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think it's intentional. This might be the source of the problem.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 3:39 PM Vincent Russell
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Also in TserverUtils:270, when the TNonblo
Also in TserverUtils:270, when the TNonblockingServerSocket is created it
looks like it ends up using the default frame size. I am not sure if this
is intentional or not.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 3:26 PM Vincent Russell
wrote:
> Christopher,
>
> I am not sure if this issue is related t
should be using 1G:
2022-09-01 16:59:41 INFO [org.apache.accumulo.tserver.TabletServer]
ServerUtil:124 - general.server.message.size.max = 1G
Thanks,
Vincent
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 12:26 PM Vincent Russell
wrote:
>
>
> I had to make a stack trace with hacking together a remote debug
mostly in
> libthrift itself, that does that. It's a bit tricky to track down the
> one causing this particular issue. If you have a full stack trace, it
> could help.
>
> Also, this might be the same issue seen reported in
> https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/3042
>
appear to work fine.
Any idea what the issue might be?
Thank you,
Vincent
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 4:43 PM Vincent Russell
wrote:
> Thank you both for your responses.
>
> We are using an event store library from a sister project that was written
> for accumulo 1.10., which I have alre
in the future
> (except
> > during major versions). We can try and find where things might have
> moved,
> > but a class may have been split into multiple pieces. If you could
> provide
> > class and method, that would be easier.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 a
others.
Thanks,
Vincent
On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 9:02 AM Vincent Russell
wrote:
> I mean Christopher.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 9:01 AM Vincent Russell
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Chris.
>>
>> Will will upgrade to Accumulo 2.1 and ZooKeeper 3.
I mean Christopher.
Thanks again.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 9:01 AM Vincent Russell
wrote:
> Thank you Chris.
>
> Will will upgrade to Accumulo 2.1 and ZooKeeper 3.7 or later as soon as
> possible.
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:44 PM Christopher wrote:
>
>> Hi Vincent,
d JDK 17 support yet. So,
> MiniAccumuloCluster seems to work with JDK 17, as does Accumulo and ZK
> 3.8, but I don't think a full Hadoop cluster would (yet).
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:28 PM Vincent Russell
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are curr
Hello,
We are currently using accumulo 2.0.1.
We are in the process of upgrading our source code to use jdk 17 however we
are running into some problems with our tests and the MiniAccumuloCluster.
One of our developer encountered the following issues:
1. The MiniAccumumluoClusterImpl._exec i
Hello,
We are running accumulo 2.0.1 with high availability? Is there a way to
force failover of the accumulo master to the standby node?
Thanks,
Vincent
> <
> https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.6.3/api/src-html/org/apache/hadoop/mapreduce/lib/output/MultipleOutputs.html#line.175
> >
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 9:46 AM Vincent Russell
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the reply mike.
> >
> > These are the counters t
ing in the Job?
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:44 PM Vincent Russell
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am using map reduce with accumulo 2.0.1 and hadoop 3.3.1. After our
> map
> > reduce jobs complete we take a look at the counters and the
> Data-local-ma
Hello,
I am using map reduce with accumulo 2.0.1 and hadoop 3.3.1. After our map
reduce jobs complete we take a look at the counters and the Data-local-map
tasks and rack-local map tasks are both equal to 0. Do we probably have
something misconfigured or is this expected? Or can this count not
> but otherwise, I wouldn't expect them to.
>
> Are you seeing any error messages anywhere?
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022, 15:23 Vincent Russell
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > Yes we are using the new MapReduce API, but we are not setting any
> > settings
lit
> could. Are you using the new MapReduce API introduced in 2.0? Are you
> setting it to use an isolated scan?
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 3:01 PM Vincent Russell >
> wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Could major compactions that occur while a map reduce job is runn
Hello All,
Could major compactions that occur while a map reduce job is running cause
the map reduce job to miss records because rows have been moved to a
different tablet?
How does this work?
I'm using accumulo 2.0.1
Thank you,
Vincent
; you should ensure that whatever name service you use (typically DNS/rDNS)
> is configured so that any address resolved locally is consistent with how
> that server's address resolves elsewhere on the same cluster.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:09 AM Vincent Russell <
> v
Hello,
Is there any way to specify what hostname an accumulo server should bind to
when it starts up?
For instance with hadoop you can specify: dfs.namenode.rpc-address
or dfs.datanode.http.address?
We have some servers with multiple interfaces and this is causing issues.
Thank you,
Vincent
figuration properly passed to it. That interface is not in the
> public API and should avoid being used.
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:45 AM Dave Marion wrote:
>
> > Is that datanode configured correctly? I wonder why it's excluded.
> >
> > On Wed, De
eatly appreciated.
Thanks,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 2:23 PM Vincent Russell
wrote:
> Thanks Chris.
>
> Yes I do get an error (I can't remember now because it's on a separate
> computer) during the init and I get a MagicNumber exception on the datanode
> during this pro
n the class path. So, it looks like it should work.
> Have you tried it? Did you get an error?
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 1:54 PM Vincent Russell
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Mike,
> >
> > but it appears that accumulo uses those settings to connect acc
efix.
> https://accumulo.apache.org/docs/2.x/configuration/client-properties
> This blog post from a few years ago may help:
>
> https://accumulo.apache.org/blog/2014/09/02/generating-keystores-for-configuring-accumulo-with-ssl.html
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:58 AM Vincent Russell >
> wr
Hello,
I am trying to init a test accumulo instance with an hdfs running with
SSL.Is this possible? I am looking at the code and it doesn't look
like this is possible.
The Initialize class just instantiates a Hadoop config and passes that into
the VolumeManager without sending over any hadoo
Hello,
I'm interested in setting up an accumulo cluster with ssl set up with
zookeeper, hadoop and accumulo.
It looks like accumulo 2.0.1 is set up to work with zookeeper 3.4.14, but
it looks like I would need zookeeper 3.5+ in order to get this to work with
zookeeper at least. Is that so or am
Hello,
I am interested in using an accumulo query and storage library that was
written against accumulo version 1.10 and I am interested in using it with
accumulo 2.0.
Is there a shim that exists that would allow the library to be used for
both versions that could be activated at compile time via
Most projects, that I've seen anyway, keep their Dockerfile in the same
repository as their source code so that it's versioned with the software
that its loading.
Please consider doing this for accumulo.
Thanks,
Vincent
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 8:05 AM karthick rn
wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
>
;
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Vincent Russell >
> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have any suggestions or maybe a solution for getting
> MapReduce
> > to work with the MiniMRCluster and MockAccumulo (Maybe some type of
> > client/server solution with thrift and zooke
Does anyone have any suggestions or maybe a solution for getting MapReduce
to work with the MiniMRCluster and MockAccumulo (Maybe some type of
client/server solution with thrift and zookeeper?). I am already using the
MiniDFSCluster and MiniMRCluster and I just don't want to add the
MiniAccumuloCl
Corey,
You should try git-svn. That should give you an interface that you are used to.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Corey Nolet wrote:
> Ill revert this and redo. Still getting used to svn.
> Corey,
>
> It seems these move were not done is such a way that history was preserved.
> 'svn mo
Corey has been an accumulo user for several years now. He's a great
addition to the committer team. Congrats Corey!
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:57 AM, John Vines wrote:
> Welcome aboard good sir!
>
> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
> On May 12, 2013 8:52 AM, "Drew Farris
You can also write an expect script to achieve this.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> AFAIK, there are no CLI options for this currently. You might be able to
> pipe in your instance name and passwd (two times) to get around it.
>
> e.g. `echo accumulo secret secret | accumul
49 matches
Mail list logo
