ki. If we need to store documents in a version controlled
> way, we can store them on the website, or in our project's SVN dev
> space. The wiki is just another place people would have to follow if
> they want to participate, and I don't think that serves us. Therefore,
> I think we shouldn
space. The wiki is just
another place people would have to follow if they want to participate, and I
don't think that serves us. Therefore, I think we shouldn't use it.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 15:59 wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> dlmari
I couldn't make the call today, but am curious if anyone has previously
brought up creating a FileSystem API for Accumulo so that we could use
implementations other than Hadoop. I realize that Hadoop provides
implementations for things other than HDFS but that doesn't necessarily mean
that
Re #2: Does your Accumulo processes run as the hdfs user on the O/S, or as the
accumulo user? Make sure you are checking the correct users trash folder. Also,
check the Accumulo garbage collector log to see if the GC process deleted the
WAL files. Take a look at [1] to see if you are hitting
portion of it worked
to some degree. I have not touched it in two years, but it could be a starting
point or someone could use the ideas behind it to do something on their own.
https://github.com/dlmarion/raccovery
-Original Message-
From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org]
Sent
Congrats Ivan!
-Original Message-
From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 3:02 PM
To: Accumulo Dev List
Subject: New committer/PMC: Ivan Bella
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Accumulo has invited Ivan
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/272
Latest commit causing build to fail with test failure at:
HostRegexTableLoadBalancerReconfigurationTest.testConfigurationChanges:83
expected:<5> but was:<0>
---
If your pr
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/272#discussion_r124015943
--- Diff:
server/base/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/master/balancer/HostRegexTableLoadBalancer.java
---
@@ -66,6 +71,9 @@
* It's
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/272
Agreed that the default should be the old behavior in the 1.x releases. We
can change the behavior in the 2.x release line and it should be noted in the
2.0 release notes.
---
If your project
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/272#discussion_r123022077
--- Diff:
server/base/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/master/balancer/HostRegexTableLoadBalancer.java
---
@@ -81,15 +86,24
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/272#discussion_r123021060
--- Diff:
server/base/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/master/balancer/HostRegexTableLoadBalancer.java
---
@@ -81,15 +86,24
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/270#discussion_r123020151
--- Diff:
server/base/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/util/MetadataTableUtil.java
---
@@ -894,12 +895,19 @@ public static void
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/270#discussion_r122974876
--- Diff:
server/base/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/util/MetadataTableUtil.java
---
@@ -894,12 +895,19 @@ public static void
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/270#discussion_r122793218
--- Diff:
server/base/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/util/MetadataTableUtil.java
---
@@ -894,12 +894,19 @@ public static void
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/269
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/265
Merged manually
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/265#discussion_r120398028
--- Diff: CONTRIBUTING.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+
+
+# Contributors Guide
+
+ If you believe that you have found a bug, please search
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/265#discussion_r120391771
--- Diff: CONTRIBUTING.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+
+
+# Contributors Guide
+
+ If you believe that you have found a bug, please search
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/265
Made modifications based on comments from @mikewalch and @joshelser.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user dlmarion opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/265
ACCUMULO-4647 - start of contributor guide
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/apache/accumulo ACCUMULO-4647
Alternatively you
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/260#discussion_r120024937
--- Diff:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/tablet/Tablet.java ---
@@ -746,16 +774,29 @@ Batch nextBatch(SortedKeyValueIterator
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/260
@joshelser Is there an example of creating a new metric, or is it still all
JMX based?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/260#discussion_r119692389
--- Diff:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/tablet/Tablet.java ---
@@ -586,6 +591,11 @@ private LookupResult
lookup
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/260
LGTM, might need more tests for the edge cases. May also want to look at
the iterator test harness to see if it needs to be modified.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/260#discussion_r119597285
--- Diff:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/tablet/Tablet.java ---
@@ -746,16 +764,22 @@ Batch nextBatch(SortedKeyValueIterator
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/260#discussion_r119597061
--- Diff:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/tablet/Tablet.java ---
@@ -586,6 +591,11 @@ private LookupResult
lookup
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/260#discussion_r119457446
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/iterators/SortedKeyValueIterator.java
---
@@ -147,4 +147,35
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/260#discussion_r119457222
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/iterators/SortedKeyValueIterator.java
---
@@ -147,4 +147,35
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/261
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256
Merged manually
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dlmarion closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256
yes please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256
@keith-turner looks good. Is the Builder just for tests? I'm assuming you
don't need it in TabletServerResourceManager, RFileScanner, etc because you
already have the configuration. Feel free
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r116310180
--- Diff:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/TabletServerResourceManager.java
---
@@ -169,25 +170,23 @@ public
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r116305691
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/blockfile/cache/BlockCacheManager.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r116305578
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/blockfile/cache/BlockCacheManager.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r116305410
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/rfile/RFileScanner.java ---
@@ -135,15 +139,34 @@ public long requestCount
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256
@keith-turner @mjwall - I added a new commit that takes into account your
comments and changes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r116251656
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/rfile/RFileScanner.java ---
@@ -135,16 +142,41 @@ public long requestCount
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r116232168
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/blockfile/cache/BlockCacheManager.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r116231739
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/blockfile/cache/BlockCacheManager.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r115597102
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/blockfile/cache/BlockCacheConfiguration.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256
I made some significant changes in this latest commit. @joshelser ,
@keith-turner - I believe I addressed most, if not all, of your previous
comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r115355361
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/blockfile/cache/BlockCacheFactory.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r115331908
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/Property.java ---
@@ -245,7 +245,8 @@
TSERV_PREFIX("tserver.", null, PropertyT
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256
Ok, let me see if I can rework this given the comments up to this point.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r115288967
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/blockfile/cache/BlockCache.java
---
@@ -17,10 +17,30 @@
*/
package
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256#discussion_r115287907
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/Property.java ---
@@ -245,7 +245,8 @@
TSERV_PREFIX("tserver.", null, PropertyT
GitHub user dlmarion opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/256
ACCUMULO-4463: Make block cache implentation configurable
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/apache/accumulo ACCUMULO-4463
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/199
@phrocker - Just thinking about multi-tenancy and competition for
resources, allowing an administrator to define upper limits, and making sure
that user operations don't trump an administrator
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/199
I see in Property.java the definition of queues / pools. Are the high water
marks for the requested resources set there also? I could not tell from the PR,
but I think an admin should be able
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/193
Thanks @joshelser . I have not had time yet to do it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/193
I was hoping that someone else would look at this and +1 it before merging
it. What's your timeline on needing this done?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/193
+1 - that was easy
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/176
ACCUMULO-4000 has some information too. It's not always seen during
decommissioning though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/176
> I'm not sure I understand the reasoning behind that logic (admittedly,
it's "early"). Specifically, how would a failure of the local node be any
different than a failure of a
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/176
May want to point out https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3702 as an
option starting with Hadoop 2.8, so that if the node goes down and can't be
brought back up, you can still recover
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/173
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
For those interested, we released the third version of Timely today which
includes several feature changes and performance improvements. Release notes
are at: https://nationalsecurityagency.github.io/timely/docs/#release-notes
So, to get the set of visibilities used in a table, we would have to open all
of the rfiles?
> -Original Message-
> From: Dylan Hutchison [mailto:dhutc...@cs.washington.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 3:43 PM
> To: Accumulo Dev List
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Would a visibility
Christopher re-opened 3948 and said he was testing a patch.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Wall"
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 9:05:34 AM
Subject: 1.8.0 RC3
I was going to make another RC for 1.8.0, but we have open 4 tickets.
Agreed - this thread should be left to votes only. Let it pass or fail.
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Elser"
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 8:15:01 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Plan for next release
If we really need to keep arguing
I share your concerns and have proposed releasing a 1.8.0 as-is, followed by a
2.0 with much the same artifacts plus Java 8 source. In talking with
Christopher about this though, that means that the community would be
supporting 1.6 (until 1.6.6 is released), 1.7.x, 1.8.x, and 2.0.x. Being on
+1
Additionally, I'm also +1 for removing deprecated items. Leaving them in will
cause more code to be modified as bugs are fixed and features added. Let's rip
the band-aid off and move forward.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday,
+0 (because I had issues running mvn verify. I kept running out of memory at
the tests module even with Xmx of 2560M)
I did:
verify the sha1 and md5 values
verified semver compliance with Josh using the semver compliance plugin
(ACCUMULO-4307)
- Original Message -
From: "Michael
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/139
Yeah, no worries, go for it. Related, are you finding any issues with
running multiple tservers?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/139
Changes LGTM. I should be able to check them out more thoroughly tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/138
No, not what I expected.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/138
Please do.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/138#discussion_r74800933
--- Diff: assemble/bin/start-daemon.sh ---
@@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ if [[ "$SERVICE" != "tserver" || $NUM_TSERVERS -eq 1
]]; then
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/138#discussion_r74798567
--- Diff: assemble/bin/start-daemon.sh ---
@@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ if [[ "$SERVICE" != "tserver" || $NUM_TSERVERS -eq 1
]]; then
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/138#discussion_r74797105
--- Diff: assemble/bin/start-daemon.sh ---
@@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ if [[ "$SERVICE" != "tserver" || $NUM_TSERVERS -eq 1
]]; then
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/138#discussion_r74796945
--- Diff: assemble/bin/start-daemon.sh ---
@@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ if [[ "$SERVICE" != "tserver" || $NUM_TSERVERS -eq 1
]]; then
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/138
Cool, thanks @joshelser
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/137
Closed as target branch was incorrect.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user dlmarion opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/138
ACCUMULO-4406: Add instance number to .out and .err files
@mjwall @joshelser
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/apache/accumulo
Github user dlmarion closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/137
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user dlmarion opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/137
ACCUMULO-4406: Add instance number to .out and .err files
@mjwall @joshelser
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/apache/accumulo
The change to add the instance number to the .out and .err files should be
pretty simple. I'll take a look at it. Regarding the change if there is only
one tserver, I'm not sure how you would specify the conditional in the logging
configuration file.
- Original Message -
From: "Josh
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/134
+1 LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Can't you use JDK8 and keep the source and target at 1.7?
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher"
To: "Accumulo Dev List"
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:22:58 PM
Subject: [OT] Can no longer obtain JDK6/JDK7 tarballs
I know we've
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/125
LGTM. @mjwall - can we get this into the 1.8 release?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/124
You might want to rebase this onto the 1.8 branch. If we have consensus,
then we might be able to pull this into the 1.8 release.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
+1 LGTM.
- Original Message -
From: "Billie Rinaldi"
To: "Accumulo Dev List"
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 12:48:51 PM
Subject: Board report draft July 2016
Hello Apache Accumulo community,
The Apache Accumulo PMC has decided to start
Never heard of Warp 10. Do you have a link?
- Original Message -
From: "Mathias Herberts"
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:23:36 PM
Subject: Re: Publicity/blog on Timely
Have you considered starting with Warp 10 instead of
In the Grafana U/I you can specify a set of tags for the metric query. We take
the first tag and seek to it, then take the remaining tags in the query and
filter on them. Specifying the tags in the metric query in order of more
specific to less specific will give better performance. I thought
We have discussed giving a presentation at the Accumulo Summit, nothing beyond
that at the moment though.
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Elser"
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 3:28:48 PM
Subject: Publicity/blog on Timely
My
Timely is a time series database application that provides secure access to
time series data. It is designed to be used with Apache Accumulo for
persistence and Grafana for visualization. Timely is located at
https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/timely .
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/111#discussion_r67013512
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/PropertyType.java ---
@@ -262,4 +267,46 @@ public boolean apply(final String input
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/111#discussion_r67011320
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/PropertyType.java ---
@@ -262,4 +267,46 @@ public boolean apply(final String input
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/111#discussion_r67008218
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/AccumuloConfigurationTest.java
---
@@ -72,4 +72,79 @@ public void testGetPropertyByString
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/111#discussion_r67004086
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/AccumuloConfigurationTest.java
---
@@ -72,4 +72,79 @@ public void testGetPropertyByString
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/111#discussion_r67003317
--- Diff:
server/base/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/util/Admin.java ---
@@ -374,15 +374,17 @@ private static void stopTabletServer(final
Github user dlmarion commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/111#discussion_r67002968
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/AccumuloConfigurationTest.java
---
@@ -72,4 +72,79 @@ public void testGetPropertyByString
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/111
Will apply manually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user dlmarion closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/111
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user dlmarion closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/113
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/113
Will apply this manually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user dlmarion opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/113
ACCUMULO-4341: Preload classes
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/dlmarion/accumulo ACCUMULO-4341
Alternatively you can review
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/111
FWIW, with this latest change I was able to start Accumulo to include two
tablet servers with setting all of the *.port.client properties to the range of
11000-11006.
---
If your project is set
1 - 100 of 288 matches
Mail list logo