Thanks for the explanation. That helps.
So, I guess we could discuss the merits of keeping the Board Reports on our
wiki, as it does seem somewhat redundant. As long as they exist on the
wiki, it would be helpful to have a better indexing system.
Perhaps Hiram can offer background as to the
Your proposal sounds good to me.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Tim. That is a clear and compelling reason to keep them there.
With that clarified, does anyone have any comments on the renaming of the
pages to improve the indexing?
Best,
Jim
Thanks, Tim. That is a clear and compelling reason to keep them there.
With that clarified, does anyone have any comments on the renaming of the
pages to improve the indexing?
Best,
Jim
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/09/2015 02:13 PM, Jim Gomes
No “objection”, but why don’t we just delete the page and point at the official
records:
https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/ActiveMQ.html
Dan
On Apr 9, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Jim Gomes jgo...@apache.org wrote:
I recently went out to look at previous Board Reports (
renaming makes sense to me.
On 9 Apr 2015 19:44, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Tim. That is a clear and compelling reason to keep them there.
With that clarified, does anyone have any comments on the renaming of the
pages to improve the indexing?
Best,
Jim
On Thu, Apr 9,
I recently went out to look at previous Board Reports (
http://activemq.apache.org/apache-activemq-board-reports.html) and found
the current sorting method difficult to deal with. Unless we are required
to use the page naming format, I would like to change it to the following
format:
Apache
Thanks for the feedback, everyone. It looks like there's no technical
reason for the current naming scheme. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't
breaking some kind of formatting requirement from the Board.
I'll get them fixed up shortly.
Best,
Jim
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Gary Tully
On Apr 9, 2015, at 1:02 PM, Jim Gomes jgo...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the link, Dan. I didn't know those were there. I think the main
difference here is that link is to the Board Minutes, whereas the ActiveMQ
wiki has the Board Report. They seem to be identical, but will they always
Thanks for the link, Dan. I didn't know those were there. I think the main
difference here is that link is to the Board Minutes, whereas the ActiveMQ
wiki has the Board Report. They seem to be identical, but will they always
be? And even if they are identical, do we still need to have the
On 04/09/2015 02:13 PM, Jim Gomes wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. That helps.
So, I guess we could discuss the merits of keeping the Board Reports on our
wiki, as it does seem somewhat redundant. As long as they exist on the
wiki, it would be helpful to have a better indexing system.
10 matches
Mail list logo
