Out of two issues, I am able to resolve first one (Queue taking considerable
time on persistent messages). Topic was fast because by default,
concurrentStoreAndDispatchTopics is false for Topic. For Queue, it's
enabled. But main difference was enableJournalDiskSyncs on each message.
>From SAR comma
Hello Matt,
Thanks for your message. I will do these settings and see what happens. I
have attached links to code and results.
My test show these two problems:
- ActiveMQ Queue takes more time in Persistent Mode (Q28,Q31 rows in excel
sheet) as compared to Sonic.
- ActiveMQ Non Persistent Per Me
Hi-
How big are the messages? Can you post a link to the C++ code. There may
be some gotchas in how its sent or recv'd.
It sounds like you have confirmed that you do not have any network or
disk performance issues, since SonicMQ is getting reasonable numbers on
the same server.
Out-of-the-
Artemis is an initiative to make a new broker with similar features to
ActiveMQ5 which is getting closer and closer each day.
I would say It's worth giving it a try. 1.3.0 just passed the voting,
you should see the announcement soon for the release.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:56 AM, ActiveMQ Inv
Hello Celebert,
I am using apache-activemq-5.12.1.
I found out the issue. My subscribers were on same machine as ActiveMQ
install. While 5 subscribers, consuming messages on same machine as install,
it was quite intensive. I moved subscribers to a separate machine than
install and it took 9 seco
What version ?
Can you try Artemis ?
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016, ActiveMQ Investigation <
ajay.ku...@winterflood.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am doing some raw performance tests on ActiveMQ to replace SonicMQ (JMS
> based) on C++ side. We have CMS using OpenWire.
> My test has got five Non Durable
