Re: [VOTE] Add Multiple PR's of the Month to the Airflow Newsletter

Just to clarify, I didn't mean we should highlight multiple PRs every month. In that month none of @eumiro's PRs were individually enough to be highlighted but in bulk they were. That was an unusual situation though. I think we should be flexible with it. I'm not opposed to having multiple per mon

Re: [VOTE] Add providers for Pinecone, OpenAI & Cohere to enable first-class LLMOps

+1 (binding) for: - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35094 (Pinecone) - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34921 (Cohere) -0 (binding) for: - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35023 (OpenAI) -> One month ago, openai-python announced its v1.0.0 Beta version ( https://github.co

Re: [VOTE] Add Multiple PR's of the Month to the Airflow Newsletter

Hey All, Thank you so much for your feedback on this. It sounds like we are good to move forward with our current script that features the Top 5 PRs of the Month, and then voting for our top 3 from those. On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:51 PM Aritra Basu wrote: > I'm not sure on the exact heuristics

Re: [VOTE] Add Multiple PR's of the Month to the Airflow Newsletter

I'm not sure on the exact heuristics used by the script but how about all PRs with atleast 1 (or 2 or a specific number) votes from the ones picked by the script gets featured. -- Regards, Aritra Basu On Sat, Oct 28, 2023, 1:04 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Yeah. Top PRs of the month sound good. > >

Re: [VOTE] Add Multiple PR's of the Month to the Airflow Newsletter

Yeah. Top PRs of the month sound good. On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 6:16 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > Hi, > > I also think having multiple PRs under PR of the month would be really > nice. > > One way to approach this is: > > What we can do is, collect votes for all the stakeholders for their top 3 > PRs

Re: [VOTE] Add providers for Pinecone, OpenAI & Cohere to enable first-class LLMOps

+1 (non binding) On Sat, 28 Oct, 2023, 00:47 Ryan Hatter, wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:32 AM Oliveira, Niko > > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > looking forward to having more native LLM capabilities in Airflow! > > > > > > From: Arit

Re: [VOTE] Add providers for Pinecone, OpenAI & Cohere to enable first-class LLMOps

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:32 AM Oliveira, Niko wrote: > +1 (binding) > > looking forward to having more native LLM capabilities in Airflow! > > > From: Aritra Basu > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 12:10:00 PM > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > Su

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing Qubole provider (and adding removal process)

Sounds like a good time to set the process up. +1 from me as well. -- Regards, Aritra Basu On Fri, Oct 27, 2023, 6:42 PM Vincent Beck wrote: > I like that. I also think it is important to have a process to remove > provider if needed. +1 > > On 2023/10/27 09:00:25 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > I th

Re: AIP-49 OpenTelemetry call for action/help

Hi, I can try helping out, though I haven't much experience working with otel, so I guess I might be more helpful if there's some implementations already done to work off of. -- Regards, Aritra Basu On Fri, Oct 27, 2023, 9:35 PM Ferruzzi, Dennis wrote: > Hello friends! OTel support for metrics

Re: [VOTE] Add Multiple PR's of the Month to the Airflow Newsletter

Hi, I also think having multiple PRs under PR of the month would be really nice. One way to approach this is: What we can do is, collect votes for all the stakeholders for their top 3 PRs in the list as Pierre mentioned and then create score for each PR. The top X PRs from this list goes in the

Re: [VOTE] Add Multiple PR's of the Month to the Airflow Newsletter

Hello all, I like the idea of highlighting more than just 1 PR in the "PR of the month section", especially when we have a hard time deciding between a few good candidates. IMHO the script does not always select good candidates or sometimes miss some good candidates, (because of the heuristic we

AIP-49 OpenTelemetry call for action/help

Hello friends! OTel support for metrics reporting has been live for a bit now and I am looking forward to the next stage which will be to get Traces and Spans implemented. Howard Yoo has a working proof-of-concept for the Traces in the AIP, and I have set up a Project board on GitHub with a b

[VOTE] Add Multiple PR's of the Month to the Airflow Newsletter

Hey All, A couple months back, Jed Cunningham proposed that we batch our PRs, instead of including just one in the PR of the Month section of the Airflow Newsletter. Thread below: I'd like to put this up to a vote. Do you prefer

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing Qubole provider (and adding removal process)

I like that. I also think it is important to have a process to remove provider if needed. +1 On 2023/10/27 09:00:25 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > I think in the case of Qubole it is pretty easy to remove it from the > provider codebase. I'm pretty sure that almost no one even noticed this > removal. >

Re: Airflow Docs Development Issues

Yeah, excellent team! Utkarsh note that I will be on vacation from today till Nov 6. I should be able to help after that :) Even during this period i will have slack on mobile, so I can help asynchronously if needed. Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Fri, Oct 27, 2023, 14:22 Jarek Potiuk wrote

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing Qubole provider (and adding removal process)

> I think in the case of Qubole it is pretty easy to remove it from the provider codebase. I'm pretty sure that almost no one even noticed this removal. Yeah. Agree. This one is pretty "obvious" that's why I would like to create a process for doing it along the way so that in the future if we have

Re: Airflow Docs Development Issues

Whoa. Dream team :) . And of course - if you need any of my input of how it works or get stuck with something - feel absolutely free to ping me on slack. While I have not developed the build process I probably tinkered and touched it in the past in many places and reverse engineered some parts of